Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5537 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Anyone on the board had a chance to try the new Mizuno MP63 irons? I hit them today against my current irons (same lie & shaft) and really liked the look at setup and feel at impact. However, the new Mizuno iron was consistently ~7-10 yard shorter than my ZMs, as well as a hair less forgiving on missed shots.

The 63 had a non-flighted PX 6.5 and the grip was a bit smaller than what I'm used to playing, however the 63 is 1 degree stronger in the 6 iron than my current set (30 vs 31).

I'm having a hard time understanding the distance loss, as a I've picked up a few yards with other similar clubs (TM R9TP, Tour Preferred, AP2, X Forged) over my current irons.

Anyone have any thoughts or experience here?

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


  • Administrator
Posted
I've noticed the same thing whenever I've tested Mizuno's on the course. Not sure why though.

Traditional lofts? Have you checked the lofts and length versus other clubs?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
In this particular case, the Mizunos were standard length and a degree stronger.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
I've noticed the same thing whenever I've tested Mizuno's on the course. Not sure why though.

Not so for the JPX line. The 800 Pro's line up pretty well with everything else I've hit and the regular JPX [non-Pro] are said to be about 10-15 yds longer than the 800 Pro's. Just my n=1 experience, though.


Posted
I've had many sets of irons and I hit my mizunos the same distance as any other iron I've had.

You're hitting some beefy MPs though. My old MPs go as far as any set I've used. Have you ever hit the 63s?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted
no I havent hit any of the cavity back mizuno irons. So I wouldnt know, my money would be that they are the same distance as any other forged cavity back though. Theres tons of guys on the board who use mizuno cavity backs on here that could comment though

Posted

Maybe the internal butter reservoirs weren't properly topped up during production? It happens.

I've hit the 800 Pros against the 53s and didn't see much difference in yardage between those. Will try the 53s against the 63s next time I'm at that range.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Not so for the JPX line. The 800 Pro's line up pretty well with everything else I've hit and the regular JPX [non-Pro] are said to be about 10-15 yds longer than the 800 Pro's. Just my n=1 experience, though.

The JPX 800 is also a degree stronger than the JPX Pro, too. Did you notice a difference in feel/playability for the two? My dad is using MP33's, but considering stepping down to the new JPX line.

Thanks.

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


Posted
The JPX 800 is also a degree stronger than the JPX Pro, too. Did you notice a difference in feel/playability for the two? My dad is using MP33's, but considering stepping down to the new JPX line.

I haven't hit the jpx line but they market that the jpx 800 iron has a hotter face by making the face thinner for more trampoline effect. They ouldnt forge the iron because of the thin face


Posted
The JPX 800 is also a degree stronger than the JPX Pro, too. Did you notice a difference in feel/playability for the two? My dad is using MP33's, but considering stepping down to the new JPX line.

The 800 is VERY hot! I hit them, as well as the Pro's and 57's. I hit the 800's 20+ yards further than the 57's and about 10 yards further than the Pro's. I also didn't produce much backspin with the 800's and there was more shot dispersion on them. The 57's had the tightest dispersion and the Pro's the best combination of distance and dispersion of the Mizuno's.

"The woods are full of long drivers."  Harvey Penick

Posted
The 800 is VERY hot! I hit them, as well as the Pro's and 57's. I hit the 800's 20+ yards further than the 57's and about 10 yards further than the Pro's. I also didn't produce much backspin with the 800's and there was more shot dispersion on them. The 57's had the tightest dispersion and the Pro's the best combination of distance and dispersion of the Mizuno's.

yea I saw Luke Donald hitting them on the trackman compared to his mp irons and his ball speed was way faster and it was like 10 yards farther. Hes a pro though so his results are going to be more accurate than what someone ont he sandtrap might claim. He was like and why dont I have these in my bag, lol. Honestly though, I highly doubt hes gonna bag the 800's over their mp line. I wouldnt mind have a set of the 800's though if I had unlimited amounts of money to throw out on equipment

I dont know though, does 1 degree stonger in loft increase ballspeed? That might play into Luke Donalds results too, at that level any tweaking of loft is going to have dramatic results

Posted
I dont know though, does 1 degree stonger in loft increase ballspeed? That might play into Luke Donalds results too, at that level any tweaking of loft is going to have dramatic results

I would say the clubface has more to do with it than the loft difference. It being cast vs. the forged of the Pro is part of the difference between them. The thing that bugged me though was I could see part of the cavity at address, of course picking up some extra distance gives you less club in your hand. That is assuming that you keep them in play...

"The woods are full of long drivers."  Harvey Penick

Posted

I went to a pro shop today and I hit some Mizuno irons, and to me the MP-58 was way shorter than the MP-62. The 62 had a longer shaft (with lines indicating the std length, which I tried to use), but even considering that the 58 were too short. I was hitting the 58 150 yds on a "good" shot, while the 62 was giving me 160 on a bad contact, almost 190 in a good one. I play MP-57, and I play the 6 iron for 170~175 yds.
The only explanation I can imagine is that for some reason I can't hit the 58s in the sweet spot, while with the 62s it was easier for me (isn't it supposed to be the other way? )

Clubs in my bag: TaylorMade R7 SuperDeep TP 9.5° Fujikura Speeder 757 S | Titleist 906F2 13° AccuFLEX ICON FH X| Adams Idea Pro Black 18° Aldila NV Pro 105-S| Mizuno MP-57 3-7; MP-32 8-P PX6.0 | Mizuno MP T-10 54.09, 60.05
My bags and cart: Titleist Carry Bag | Mizuno Omega V + Clicgear 2.0


  • Moderator
Posted
I've actually had the opposite experience with the MP63s. I find them equal to or a little longer, which I mostly attribute to the DSG shaft, when compared to my AP2s with PX. I've also been very pleasantly surprised by how forgiving they are for a player's cavity. I wonder if the distance loss the OP reported is due to the PX shaft not fitting his swing and ballooning the ball. 5-7 yards is lot between clubs of the same basic type.

For me, these have been great playing irons... Mizuno feel with a lot of forgiveness.

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
--Groucho Marx

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I've actually had the opposite experience with the MP63s. I find them equal to or a little longer, which I mostly attribute to the DSG shaft, when compared to my AP2s with PX. I've also been very pleasantly surprised by how forgiving they are for a player's cavity. I wonder if the distance loss the OP reported is due to the PX shaft not fitting his swing and ballooning the ball. 5-7 yards is lot between clubs of the same basic type.

Both irons had PX 6.5s, with my current set being flighted. With a 6 iron in hand, I'd imagine the flighted set may fly a bit higher than the non-flighted club, however neither should produce a ballooning ball flight. Spin rates were pretty high with both (~9500 rpms).

In the Bag: TaylorMade R11 TP - TaylorMade R7 TP TS - Cleveland Halo - TM TP 2009 3-PW - Vokey SM 52 - Vokey SM 60 - Rife Barbados CS - ProV1x 


On the Computer:  Analyzr Pro 
 


  • Moderator
Posted
I hit the MP63 and AP2 7-irons side by side yesterday. MP63 with TT DSG S was a few yards longer than AP2 with PX S, which you'd expect from the one-degree stronger loft.

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.
--Groucho Marx

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5537 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.