Jump to content
Subscribe to the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5239 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Longest par 3 you have played.

    • 200 and under
      3
    • 200-210
      10
    • 210-220
      12
    • 220-230
      21
    • 230-240
      17
    • 240-250
      23


Recommended Posts

  allin said:
It is mostly the newer, resort and high end courses that I have seen this on. Thats why I placed emphasis on average golfers and which sets of tees are being played. The differences between back tees and forward tees on many courses are very minimal on some of these newer courses. It may be because of maintanence, safety, golfers ego or just design laziness, I really don't know. It seems like some of the courses adjust for the tee shot only. On a par 5 for women in they hit a driver 165, a 3wood 150, and they still have 125 left maybe a five iron, that can't be much fun.

That's how a lot of our fellow sandtrappers play a par 5. A lot of flag waving short knockers in these parts.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


  sean_miller said:
There are plenty of birdie holes out there, why not have a couple bogey holes to balance them out? A par 3 that requires a really crisp long iron (or a great pitch), just to have a chance at a par, makes that par so much more satisfying.

I see it differently. A "Birdie hole" is a hole where birdie is possible only if you hit a few good shots. I mean, you don't see courses with 400yd par 5s just so they can have a birdie hole. On the other hand, a par 3 should be a "Fair distance from the tee. Obviously based on your HC compared to mine, those distances are going to vary. I just don't see the purpose of having a par 3 where I need to crush a 3 wood just to get there.

my get up and go musta got up and went..
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Mine was #17 at Le Maitre in Tremblant , QC, Canada. Really tough hole as there is a large mound covering the right hand side of the green which can completely hide the flag if tucked far enough right. Thankfully the wind isn't predominately in your face.

|Callaway I-MIX FT-9  - Driver | Callaway Diablo Octane - 3 Wood | Callaway Diablo Edge Tour [3H & 4H] - Hybrids | Callaway X-forged 2009 - Irons | Callaway JAWS [52, 56, 60] - Wedges | SC Studio Style Newport 2 / Laguna 1.5 / Kombi-S - Putter |
 


  jetsknicks1 said:
I see it differently. A "Birdie hole" is a hole where birdie is possible only if you hit a few good shots. I mean, you don't see courses with 400yd par 5s just so they can have a birdie hole. On the other hand, a par 3 should be a "Fair distance from the tee. Obviously based on your HC compared to mine, those distances are going to vary. I just don't see the purpose of having a par 3 where I need to crush a 3 wood just to get there.

You brought up the issue and dealt with it in your post. You don't see the point of a hole that means you need to "crush a 3-wood". For me, that would be a 275 yard plus straightaway hole. Yeah, that would probably end up as a bogey for me.

I'm personally not a huge fan of 250 yard par 3s, even though I can get there no problem. I still treat them as bogey holes. If I get a par, it's a bonus. A birdie would feel like an eagle. That's the point. Golf courses very rarely have 18 difficult holes. If they do, they suck. You gotta pick your spots. I play one course where there are two par 3s over 220 yards, but they're both followed by par 5s that can be reached in two with a mid-iron. If I play those 4 holes 1 over par, I'm okay with that. Play them even par, and it's gonna be a good day.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Number 17 at Riverwood Golf Course plays 228 down a narrow fairway with forest on both sides and a river guarding the green in the back. Too long for my 3 hybrid - to short for my 3 wood - it kicks me in the teeth. The good news - I rarely play there.

Titleist 910D2 10.5* Stiff / Taylormade 3 Wood - Superfast 2.0 15*  3 Superfast 2.0 Rescue 18* Stiff Shafts


253 on the 15th at Maderas in San Diego (actually Poway). Johnny Miller is the course designer, and he can be as tough in architecture as he is with a microphone. Fortunately the hole plays significantly downhill, but in the afternoon a prevailing wind is often right in your face negating much of the elevation advantage. I par it about once in every 10 rounds, and usually feel lucky to walk away with a bogie.

Not crazy long, but demands some precision. The 16th at Leopard Creek. 190 meters (210 yards odd) with water on three sides and limited bailout left. Crocs in the water, leave the ball retriever at home!



Also, when I die, I want to be reincarnated here please. View of clubhouse with ninth (right) and 18th (left) greens.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Hole 5 at Grande Oaks in Fort Lauderdale. 250+ yards, flat, with bunkers. Played it during a Div 1 college tourney into the wind and many players took driver. I put 3-wood short and got my par. Website says they can stretch it to 275 from the champ tees. Interestingly, the course isn't that long (6700), it is just that hole really.

"I'm not going left or right of those trees, okay. I'm going over those trees...with a little draw." ~ Tin Cup


Haven't played it, but just thought about the 19th Hole at Legends Golf and Safari Resort in South Africa. 630 yard par 3, 1400 ft elevation drop, and you need to take a helicopter to get up there. Tee shot hangtime is like 30 seconds.

http://sports.yahoo.com/golf/blog/de...rn=golf-152314

"I'm not going left or right of those trees, okay. I'm going over those trees...with a little draw." ~ Tin Cup


Note: This thread is 5239 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • While on vacation in Punta Cana a few weeks ago I played with rental clubs, Mizuno Pro 245's with KBS Tour Lite steel shafts. Surprisingly, I was blown away, not only by the distance, trajectory and dispersion I was getting but also about how soft and buttery they felt. It got me thinking.... IT'S TIME FOR NEW IRONS! Just yesterday, at my local Golf Galaxy, I tested them again side by side with the JPX Forged (recommended by the Mizuno rep who happened to be there) which also felt pretty good. Not as buttery soft as the 245's but they did produce slightly better numbers on off-center hits. Also, I haven't played with forged clubs with steel shafts in 10 years thinking I was getting too old and that I needed the lighter weight but these clubs with that shaft felt really, really good. So that's my long and drawn-out intro to my question: Does anyone here at TST play with either of these clubs and if so, what's your opinion?  
    • Current attendee list (10 confirmed, 1 tentative): @Hardspoon @iacas @bkuehn1952 @billchao @ChetlovesMer @Carl3 @StuM @vasaribm @DaveP043 @dennyjones @klineka (Tentative) I assume we'll have (3) total foursomes for planning purposes...maybe 4.  I'll start to send out some preliminary thoughts on location and courses this week.  
    • By today’s standards that’s certainly true, but they weren’t having any trouble hitting golf balls in 2005 so I’ve equipped myself with what was among the very best equipment around that time for a very reasonable investment. If I get to the point where I feel like I’ve outgrown that stuff, I’ll reward myself with something more current. But for now I don’t need adjustable loft and lie and modern head shape, just a good quality, proven club with a clean club face. For now I’m going to concentrate on the basics. I know you can get more yardage with newer woods, but I don’t care about distance nearly as much as consistency, and you can’t buy that for any price. 
    • Wordle 1,386 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Trying to feel bit more external rotation of the trail elbow at A4. I think better than what have ever been able to position it.  Forward lunge at impact still a work in progress. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...