Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4701 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

At what point should someone consider going to a premium "tour" ball? I have used the penta, V1, and V1x just see what they were like and realized real quick that I have no business with such a responsive ball until I can get my game off the tee and on the fairway more consistent.

My Bag:

 

Burner 9.5

X 3&5 Woods

DCI Gold 3- PW(48*) + 52* Vokey wedge

56* sand wedge

Cushin Putter


  • 4 months later...
Posted
I know this is an old topic but I'm a little slow sometimes..lol. I am very reluctant to change anything in my golf game when I find something that works. With that said, I have played with the Pro Vx since it was introduced with more than acceptable results. It was only a few months ago that a friend suggested I give the Penta balls a chance. The first time I tried them, I played a Pro Vx and Penta 5 side by side. I noticed almost no differece off the driver but in the mid and long irons, the Penta was noticibly longer. Off the short irons, the Penta offered more of a one hop and stop or maybe spin back to the pitch mark whereas the X almost always spins back past the pitch mark. A lot of this is a result of my swing which puts a lot of spin on irons but the Penta simply spun less. Another area where it shines for example is a 175 yard par 3 that borders water and almost always plays into the wind on a home course. Normally a center pin location here is basically a stock 6 iron for me with the X. The same swing with the Penta always resulted in a 182-185 yard back pin location shot. I also recorded an all time best stableford score using the Penta of 43 points where usually around 36 is normal with the X. After playing with a dozen Pentas over a month and a half, I couldn't find them locally and played with the X last week. I found myself spinning my wedges back off the green again which is a call for adjustment again. The Penta seems to spin less and much more durable for my game. Comparing both balls off of my no insert putter, I still feel like the Pro v feels softer but both are great. My total opinion and review is BOTH are great balls and I wouldn't hesitate playing either. This is saying a lot for me because I'm a Titleist faithful player. My bag is filled with Titleist equipment with the exception of a TM hybrid and Bettinardi putter.

Posted

Like has been said, both are great balls.  I play the Penta because it seems to fit me better.  I have also found that the penta cover holds up better for me over the course of a round.

Taylormade 425 R7 Driver- Tour stiff Cobra AMP 3 wood- Stiff Titleist 704 CB irons 2-PW Cleveland 588 wedges- 56 and 60 Ping Pick Em Up- belly putter Taylormade Penta 5 balls


Posted

I found no difference in the proV1X or the Penta tp5 except around $16.00/doz less for new Pentas ( buy 2 get 1 free) I do agree that the penta has a more durable finish the the proV1X


Posted
I play the Penta 5 practice balls. $19.99 at Golf Galaxy. Same ball for the price of a TopFllte...

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There's a very interesting interview with Dean Snell, Director of R&D; at TM, on the Penta TP3 and 5 and the rbz ball on the hackers paradise site.  Its from early 2012 when the balls came out and he talks about the 3 balls, how they came into being, the market they are targeting with each and alot on just what these companies work on in developing new golfballs (the most interesting part).

Very much worth listening to.  Not all golfballs are created equal and, after listening to the interview, you might have one more clue as to why one ball fits you're game better than another.

Driver: R7 425,  3-wood: V-Steel
3H Burner,  4-pw: R9 TP
SW: Vokey, 56-10
Putter: Cameron

Posted

I switched to the Penta TP (and now the TP5) over the Pro-V1x a while back and don't have second thoughts.  I even received a dozen V1x as a gift a few months ago and gave them away to a buddy because I won't play them anymore.

For me, the Penta performs much better in the wind.  I can also control the spin around the greens better; with the V1x, I had a hard time getting the ball to roll out consistently on chips (it would spin unexpectedly at times).  The Penta gives me a much more consistent roll-out on chips and pitches.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have played the Penta since they came out.  I switched to the Prov1 at the end of last season.  The only reason I did so was I refuse to support Taylormade Golf in any fashion.  They are replacing the Penta with something called the killer or something like that (i saw pictures of it the other day).  The marketing department in Taylormade is on crack lately.  But the Penta and the Prov1 are both fantastic balls.


Posted
Originally Posted by SVTGolfer

Im going to go out on a limb and say they're almost identical and its "almost" impossible to tell the difference. Almost…

The one thing I personally noticed was that to me, the Penta really does feel like it has more pop off the club face. I just bought a dozen last week and I had a choice in the store; last years ProV1 or the Penta. I have now played them for a few rounds (only lost two so far) Used one today actually, and really liked it.

I think the guys that say they don't spin as much don't actually know. Line up 10 of each and hit the same shot into the green and see what happens. You still wont spin as many ProV1's as you think, just like you wont spin as many Penta's as you think. Not everyone that can spin a ball can spin it on every shot consistently to say one way or another. I think spin is relative to your game and because of that when someone plays a ball and doesn't play it well they think its the ball, when the truth is you wouldn't have made that shot with a ProV1 either.

The Penta is just as good as the ProV1 and cheaper too!!!

AGREED


Posted
Originally Posted by 853277

Thanks for the tip on Pentas for 19.99/doz

no prob, its a great deal as long as you dont mind the "PRACTICE" stamped on the side.  i love them.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I play a lot of golf (3 or 4 times a week) in the late afternoons during the summer and I find a lot of golf balls.  Besides TopFlites, probably the ball I find the most are Pro V1 or ProV1x.  Many are almost brand new.  So, I do play a lot of non-tournament golf with balls I find.  I went to a TaylorMade club fitting and of course the ball they recommend is the TM Penta5.  So happens that where I did the fitting, their range balls were ProV1.  So, once we moved to the grass range portion of the fitting where the guy was putting clubs together, he asked me about what balls I played.  Told him ProV1. He asked me if I had ever played the Penta balls and told him only if I find one.  He suggested if I was going to continue playing Titleist balls that I switch to the ProV1x.

So, the next time I went out to play in the afternoon, I played 3 balls off the tee on several holes and played the hole in with those balls.  One was ProV1, one was ProV1x and one was the Penta5.  He was right...for me, the ProV1x outperformed the ProV1.  And, the Penta5 and the ProV1x were very comparable.

I had a gift card for Golfsmith and I bought the Penta5 balls with the buy 2 dozen, get 1 dozen free.  I have been playing them in tournaments lately and have been very pleased.  I actually think they are a touch longer for me off my irons. Performance is good also.  I think someone else said it...they tend to hit, skip, stop.  The ProV1x does similar whereas the ProV1 would hit, skip, spin back.

Bag: Titleist
Driver: TM RBZ 9.5
Fairway metals: TM RBZ 3 wood
Hybrids: TM RBZ 3, 4 and 5
Irons: TM Burner 1.0 6 thru LW stiff steel shafts
Putter: Ping B60
Ball: TM Tour Preferred X or ProV1x
Check out littlejohngolfleague.com  A Greater Houston TX traveling golf league.


Posted
My school gives us pentas, but I personally dislike their short game characteristics. Therefore I used the pro v 1. The pants is fantastic in the wind, but the pro v1 doe sent have a seam, producing a more pure roll than the penta

In my  stand bag

 :titleist:910d2 8.5*

  speedline fast 12 3w 

 910h 17* 

:titleist: 712 cb/mb 3-p

 :mizuno: MP-T4 56* 60*

 :nike: method 001 

:srixon: tour yellow z star xv 


Posted
Pentas, not pants darn autocorrect

In my  stand bag

 :titleist:910d2 8.5*

  speedline fast 12 3w 

 910h 17* 

:titleist: 712 cb/mb 3-p

 :mizuno: MP-T4 56* 60*

 :nike: method 001 

:srixon: tour yellow z star xv 


Note: This thread is 4701 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.