Jump to content
Note: This thread is 4980 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. From which distance you still make 50% of your putts ( and don't lie !!!) ?

    • 0-2 ft.
      1
    • 2-3 ft.
      2
    • 3-4 ft.
      7
    • 4-5 ft.
      13
    • 5-6 ft.
      9
    • 6-7 ft.
      3
    • 7-8 ft.
      5
    • 8-10 ft.
      5
    • 10+ ft. (you must be kiddin' or thinking from any distance .... it goes in or it doesn't 50/50 .......)
      0


Recommended Posts

  • Administrator

Originally Posted by Gerald

Maybe not ........ but most don't need to "plug" an  putter to get one for free


Not sure what you mean. I'm an Edel putter fitter now, and when I get my Edel putter (I've yet to be fit for mine), I'm going to pay for it.

It's kind of OT, though. My point was simply that with Edel and AimPoint I feel like my 50% range will extend to 10 feet or so now.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by iacas

It's kind of OT, though. My point was simply that with Edel and AimPoint I feel like my 50% range will extend to 10 feet or so now.

Which would put you tied for 23rd on the Tour, with folks like Hunter Mahan and Brent Snedecker.  Nice!!


  • Administrator

Originally Posted by Harmonious

Which would put you tied for 23rd on the Tour, with folks like Hunter Mahan and Brent Snedecker.  Nice!!

They'll probably drop, and perhaps I'm understating how well I think I can putt this year and in future years. I'm excited about it... really excited.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Maybe I am just naive .......

Originally Posted by iacas

Not sure what you mean. I'm an Edel putter fitter now, and when I get my Edel putter (I've yet to be fit for mine), I'm going to pay for it.

It's kind of OT, though. My point was simply that with Edel and AimPoint I feel like my 50% range will extend to 10 feet or so now.

Well posting a somewhat "coloured" advertisement on how good Edel putters are, while being a certified Edel fitter, has a certain smell ........... excuse my French.........

  • Upvote 1

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter




Originally Posted by Gerald

Maybe I am just naive .......

Well posting a somewhat "coloured" advertisement on how good Edel putters are, while being a certified Edel fitter, has a certain smell ........... excuse my French.........



You're not alone, but c'est la vie.

  • Upvote 1

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


  • Administrator

Originally Posted by Gerald

Maybe I am just naive .......

Well posting a somewhat "coloured" advertisement on how good Edel putters are, while being a certified Edel fitter, has a certain smell ........... excuse my French.........


Gee, I'm promoting something I believe in on a forum I created. What an ass I am.

Angel Cabrera and Mike Weir aimed over six inches outside the hole from six feet. That might play a role in why some pros miss putts, no?

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by iacas

Gee, I'm promoting something I believe in on a forum I created. What an ass I am.

Angel Cabrera and Mike Weir aimed over six inches outside the hole from six feet. That might play a role in why some pros miss putts, no?



I think the OP was probably suggesting it was a "What putter do you use?" type of comment. Considering all the trouble I went through the past couple years relearning how to aim, I can see why you're excited. I would be too - making putts is very rewarding.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


If I would have been interested in which putter would bring 50% from 10 ft. plus, I would have posted the poll in "clubs, grips, shafts, fitting" ...... I fully understand Iacas's enthusiasm, but it also smells commercially involvement, nothing against that, but have some mixed feelings.........

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter


  • Administrator

Originally Posted by Gerald

If I would have been interested in which putter would bring 50% from 10 ft. plus, I would have posted the poll in "clubs, grips, shafts, fitting" ...... I fully understand Iacas's enthusiasm, but it also smells commercially involvement, nothing against that, but have some mixed feelings.........


That's fine. But at the same time, it would have been one post if nobody had mentioned it again...

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by iacas

Gee, I'm promoting something I believe in on a forum I created. What an ass I am.

Angel Cabrera and Mike Weir aimed over six inches outside the hole from six feet. That might play a role in why some pros miss putts, no?


FIRST of all get off the pipe, you're a hack compared to Mike Weir and Cabrera. You were a 3 handicap a couple years ago and you think you're going to be making 50 % of your putts inside 10 feet...WHAT A JOKE.  Instead of starting a forum, you should have gone to Q school...


  • Administrator

Originally Posted by jcard71

FIRST of all get off the pipe, you're a hack compared to Mike Weir and Cabrera. You were a 3 handicap a couple years ago and you think you're going to be making 50 % of your putts inside 10 feet...WHAT A JOKE.  Instead of starting a forum, you should have gone to Q school...


I can aim my putter better than them, but besides that, I never said I was better than them at anything. Probably a better software developer, though, if asked...

Yep, I was a 3 index four years ago. I got some good information, some good help, and now I'm below scratch and a pro, making a good living helping people play better golf, both in person and here. You, you're still some guy who makes rude comments (which were removed from your post). Look around - a few forum members were helped just last week in San Antonio and Las Vegas.

And if you must know, I already make way, way above 50% of my putts "inside 10 feet." Since I've been keeping track of stats, I'm 1204 of 1614. That's almost exactly 75%.

Heck, here's a stat for you: I make more than 50% of all of my putts. Think about it...

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades



Originally Posted by jcard71

FIRST of all get off the pipe, you're a hack compared to Mike Weir and Cabrera. You were a 3 handicap a couple years ago and you think you're going to be making 50 % of your putts inside 10 feet...WHAT A JOKE.  Instead of starting a forum, you should have gone to Q school...

Making 50% of all putts inside 10 feet is no big deal.  In fact, if you only made 50% of all putts inside 10', you would be a really poor putter. #100 on the PGA Tour last year (Jeff Overton) made 87%. #1 (Paul Casey) made 90.67%. You have to remember that it includes all putts under 10', including tap-ins.

Making 50% of 10' putts is entirely different, however.  That would place you 22nd on tour last year, tying you with Aaron Baddeley, among others.  In other words, you would be one of the best putters in the world.


Hahahahahaaaaa

Originally Posted by iacas

Heck, here's a stat for you: I make more than 50% of all of my putts. Think about it...


I don't think even the worlds best putter is making more than 50% of all putts .......

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter




Originally Posted by iacas

Heck, here's a stat for you: I make more than 50% of all of my putts. Think about it...


Fun with math!  If you average fewer than 2 putts per hole, this statement is true for you, too! :-)  (Maybe it's kind of an obvious identity, but I hadn't thought about it in those terms.)  I average 36.93 putts per 18 holes, so I make 18 / 36.93 on average, or just shy of 49%.  I should just flip a coin!

Originally Posted by Harmonious

Making 50% of 10' putts is entirely different, however.  That would place you 22nd on tour last year, tying you with Aaron Baddeley, among others.  In other words, you would be one of the best putters in the world.

While matching stats with the top couple dozen pros in anything is astounding, my gut feeling is that this is an area where a non-pro (or, in Erik's case, a non-tour pro) could plausibly be competitive.  It's very different from the endless 15-handicappers with 300 yard average drives.  Putting doesn't require the ungodly hand-eye coordination, whole-body muscle control, timing, etc, that it takes to hit every full shot as near-perfect as those guys do it.  Not to say it's easy, but a lot of the athletic requirements are relaxed so I think someone who's simply got a very good eye for putting and puts in a lot of time could excel in this area without being tour caliber otherwise.  Factor in that the pros are seeing a wider variety of greens than someone who doesn't travel to a new course every week, their pin placements are consistently chosen to be downright evil, and the greens are tuned to be faster than what most of us see, and the 10 foot putts for the pros are generally harder than the 10 footers for the rest of us.  In that sense, it's not apples to apples, so the stats could be equal even if the skills aren't.

Anyway, the point is, at 10-foot putts, I think it's unlikey but not absurd that a scratch or slightly better handicapper who spends a lot of time working on putting could be competitive with the big guys in terms of percentages.  Many of the best putters in the world are on tour, but I'd wager a fair sum that there is a fair number of better putters who aren't.  Just like the long drive champs are pretty much a separate group from PGA Tour members, the very best in one area are specialists who can't necessarily compete overall.

And even if you disagree, being a jerk about it is just unnecessary.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


  • Moderator

I definitely believe I can make at least 50% of my putts within 10 feet.  The trick is getting your approach shot within 10 feet.  Thats the real difference. There could be a 20 handicapper putting at greater than 50% within 10 feet, but if he can't hit the green in regulation, then it doesn't really matter.  Playing pros are pros because they put their approach shots within 15 feet a good chunk of the time, and with good putting stats at those distances, they become great golfers.

Philip Kohnken, PGA
Director of Instruction, Lake Padden GC, Bellingham, WA

Srixon/Cleveland Club Fitter; PGA Modern Coach; Certified in Dr Kwon’s Golf Biomechanics Levels 1 & 2; Certified in SAM Putting; Certified in TPI
 
Team :srixon:!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by zeg

Fun with math!  If you average fewer than 2 putts per hole, this statement is true for you, too! :-)  (Maybe it's kind of an obvious identity, but I hadn't thought about it in those terms.)  I average 36.93 putts per 18 holes, so I make 18 / 36.93 on average, or just shy of 49%.  I should just flip a coin!

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter


Believe is nice, it is also possitive thinking (I like that), but what if you really keep stats of within 10 ft.

Watching PGA Tour golf on television we see many shots ending at least 20-30 ft from the hole, it is hard to expect even a 1.5 hc. to get inside 10 ft with the approach (unless you also include scrambling for par)

Originally Posted by phillyk

I definitely believe I can make at least 50% of my putts within 10 feet.  The trick is getting your approach shot within 10 feet.  Thats the real difference. There could be a 20 handicapper putting at greater than 50% within 10 feet, but if he can't hit the green in regulation, then it doesn't really matter.  Playing pros are pros because they put their approach shots within 15 feet a good chunk of the time, and with good putting stats at those distances, they become great golfers.



Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter




Originally Posted by Gerald

Well math isn't mine ....... I would say you needed 1.5 putts per hole to state your average to be at 50% and even below 1.5 to state you are over 50% on all putts ......


Nope,  since you always make one putt on each hole, if you 2-putt, that means you also missed one. So you made one out of two, or 50%.  If you average N putts per hole, then you make 1/N of your putts, multiply by 100 to get the percentage.  Here are a few numbers to give an idea of how it works.

Average putts per hole Success rate
Percentage of putts made for given average number of putts per hole.
1.5 67%
1.75 57%
2.0 50%
2.25 44%
2.5 40%

Edit:

Actually, I just realized this isn't exactly true since you may escape a hole with zero putts.  For this to be exact you need to throw those holes out when you compute your average putts per hole. But really, if you no-putt often enough to affect the statistics, you don't belong here.  :-)

  • Upvote 1

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Note: This thread is 4980 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 307 - Mirror swings, focusing on rotation. That seems to take pressure off my lead hip. 
    • With a lot of help from @iacas, I was able to take a great trip down to Pinehurst this past week. Took advantage of having a day off because of Veteran's Day and spent 4 days in the Pinehurst area. @iacas, @Hardspoon, @GolfLug, and @NCGolfer joined me for at least 1 round on the trip. I got in 2 courses in Pinehurst proper - Southern Pines and Pine Needles - and then the Duke golf course in Durham and Tobacco Road. All of the courses were new to me, and I really liked all of them. I am going to add more to this later when I have some time, but I wanted to post a quick recap/thoughts for each course. Duke Golf Club I really enjoyed this course. It's a big ballpark that goes up and down a couple of hills. The front 9 starts off going straight downhill, with 1 and 2 being similar dogleg left, downhill par 4s. You make your way to the bottom of the hill with a par 3 that plays over a lake, and then you creep up slowly. The best hole on the front is the 7, the first par 5. It's a dogleg right goes downhill to a small green protected by a creek and bunkers. If you can get your ball to the fairway, you should have a chance at going for the green in 2. That shot was probably the most memorable one I had on this course. You then crest the hill again with the tee shot on 9, which is a par 5 that goes down the hill and then the green is back on top of the hill by the clubhouse.  The back only goes up and down the hill once, so it's slightly more tame than the front. I really liked 11, which is another par 5. The tee shot plays down the hill, and if you hit a good one, you could have a mid iron into your hand with your second shot. The green is huge, but protected by a creek that runs in front of it. The closing stretch of holes are pretty good. 16 is a short par 4 playing straight up hill. Distance control with a wedge is really important. 17 is slightly uphill, but the trick is navigating the uneven lies in the fairway. 18 is fairly straightforward but a stout par 4 to end the round. The only negative is that there were a lot of holes with forced carries to the green. 4, 7, 11, 12, and 13 all had ponds or creeks fronting the green. Most of those required hefty carries.  Bottom line, I liked the course and the setting. I would be happy to play here regularly. Pine Needles I loved this course. The setting reminded me a lot of #2, and it feels like a mini #2 with a lot of small, turtleback-type greens. The opening 5 holes were outstanding. 1 was a really cool par 5 that was no gimme. The green was pretty wild. 2 was a long, downhill par 4. 3 was one of my favorite par 3s that we played - over a lake with bunkers framing the green. 4 was a short uphill par 4 that I really liked. 5 was an excellent but tough par 3, sitting on a shelf well above the tee. It's a great opening stretch. And again, the feel and look of the place is unique to the Pinehurst area. It feels like something you wouldn't find anywhere else. Other highlights - the green site on 9 was really cool. There is a big run off area to the right of the green that you want to avoid. It reminded me a bit of the second hole at Sand Valley - you don't want to be right of that green either. 12 was a great hole. You can't see the green from the tee, as the tee shot plays over a hill. When you see the green, it looks tiny, with a huge runoff and bunkers to the left of the green. The fairway is pretty wide, so the trick is accuracy with your approach shot. 18 was an extremely cool finishing hole. You can't really see the fairway off the tee, but it turns out to be fairly generous when you get there. And then the green site is fantastic - sitting at the bottom of the hill, but still requiring precision to be on it. I really want to get back and play this course again. There are a few shots that I want to try again (the drive on 10, the approach on 12, the drive on 18). And I just really loved the look and feel of the place. A great course and a fun day of golf. Southern Pines I thought this was the best course of the 4 I played. It's wider than Pine Needles, and the greens are bigger. But the greens are much more undulating. The land here is truly excellent. There is a ton of land movement, and seemingly every hole has elevation changes you have to navigate. I really like both par 5s on the front. If you hit good drives on both, you will get a big kick down the fairway. If you don't, you're going to be faced with a long 2nd shot just to have a wedge in. 2 plays down the hill with the tee shot and then back up the hill with the approach. You have to be careful about club selection and distance control there. 7 was a good, fairly long par 3 with a green perched on a ledge. 11 was a driveable par 4 with a wild green. 15 was really cool as well - the tee shot is downhill, but then the green is back uphill. This is a course I would love to play everyday. It's a thinking man's course, because you have to be really careful with all the elevations changes there. You constantly have to play and commit to a club longer or shorter than the distance. And I don't really think there are any bad holes. Only negative is that a few holes are a bit repetitive - 4, 16, and 18 are all shorter par 4s where you're hitting an uphill approach wedge or short iron. This is a very minor nit, though. One of the best courses I've played. I'd have to think about where exactly to rank it, but easily within the top 10. Possibly cracking the top 5. I will play this again next time I'm in Pinehurst. Tobacco Road I had a blast at this course. It is unique and pretty wild. You start out with these massive dune-like hills pinching in on your tee shot on 1. And then the entire round feels like you're going around these massive dunes. There are a lot of interesting shots here. You have long carries over bunkers, blind tee shots, shots into tiny greens, shots into huge greens, carries over deep bunkers, downhill shots, uphill shots, you name it. The setting is incredible. It is a huge course, and the fairways and greens tend to be very generous. I want to write more about individual holes later. But I really liked 7, 9, 10, and 16. I want to play a couple of the par 3s again with different hole locations and/or different tee boxes. 6 and 17, in particular, could play like wildly different holes with a different hole location (for 17) or coming from a different tee box (for 6).  While I had a lot of fun seeing this course, I do feel like a smart golfer could get bored here. To me, it was fairly obvious that Strantz was trying to bait you into trying a bunch of hard shots. On 11, for example, if you hit a good drive to the right side of the fairway, you could have a shot at the green in 2. But the green is over a massive bunker that has to be 40 feet below the green. And the green is narrow, essentially facing perpendicular to you. The only chance you really have is to hit a perfect shot. The alternative is an easy lay up to a wide fairway, leaving you with a wedge at the perfect angle. Maybe I try going for it with a 7 iron or something shorter, but that's about it. I felt similar on 5 - the direct line to the green is not that far and the green is driveable, But if you miss, you're going to have a 40ish yard bunker shot or a lost ball. Meanwhile, if you play to the right, you have a massive fairway and you'll likely be left with a wedge in your hand. I think it would be fun to play with 2 balls on some of these holes and try the shots. If you are a LSW disciple, though, you are not going to try the crazy risky shots Strantz is trying to bait you into. In the end, I really enjoyed this course. But I think it's below PN or SP. It's still awesome, and it was fun to see and play. I would come back here, but it's a lower priority than other Pinehurst courses. Well, that ended up being longer than I was anticipating. I may add some more thoughts about specific holes later, but this is a good starting point. I do want to think more about course ratings out of 10 for these, too. More to come...
    • Day 123: did a stack session.
    • Day 48 - 2024-11-17 A little work before Junior Elite. Left thumb and the compensating left wrist are better; still not great.
    • I watched a re-release of The Fifth Element.  I am going to give this movie a tap in Eagle. It's a wells shot movie. The actors are great. The story is interesting, and the setting is fascinating. For it being just over 2 hours, the pacing is phenomenal. I really enjoyed watching this sci-fi classic. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...