Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5536 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I want to get a new 52-54 degree wedge and I am trying to decide what kind to get.  The Cleveland CG 15 series ones look pretty nice, do you guys think they are worth the price? Its about $120 per wedge at dicks.


Posted


Originally Posted by darkhunter139

I want to get a new 52-54 degree wedge and I am trying to decide what kind to get.  The Cleveland CG 15 series ones look pretty nice, do you guys think they are worth the price? Its about $120 per wedge at dicks.



One thing you may want to do is order one (no matter which brand you go with).  I wish I had done this with my wedges:  I have no idea why I thought it would be OK to just pick up the wedges I wanted off the shelf, with S400 shafts of standard length, when my irons are a lighter shaft (both in weight and flex) and shorter.

I've heard great things about Cleveland's wedges.  One of my best friends has 12 TaylorMade clubs in his bag;  they are above and beyond his favorite manufacturer of golf clubs.  I say this to add that only his sand wedge (Cleveland) and putter (Yes!) vary.   That was the key thing for me to know they're quality -- if my friend was willing to not get a TaylorMade sand wedge to go with his Driver through AW.

One thing I really like about Cleveland's wedges is the huge variety of bounce and lofts available.  It's seriously up there with the Vokey wedges for selection, whereas the two brands whose wedges I prefer (Nike and Mizuno) can be criticized - properly - for not having a big enough selection in these factors.  And this reminds me -- when you get your club (seems somewhere between a GW and SW for you), be sure to consider bounce instead of just picking whichever.

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Tour Edge Exotics C723 21 degree hybrid.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is question #786 on which wedges to choose, what brand, value, etc.....

Brands don't matter much, grooves don't matter much, lofts don't matter much, forged vs. cast doesn't matter much ...... it is all about shape/bounce/prefs/faith !

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter


Posted

Yeah I know I probably should have just done a search but there is a lot of threads to go through so I just posted.

How do you guys determine what bounce you choose? Is it basically just a preference based on feel or do you choose it based on the situations you will be using the club in.  I really have to go try swinging some of these soon.


Posted

Excellent point it depends on what type of courses you generally play on a higher bounce is good for sand or elevated grass. A lower bounce is ideal for links courses where the ground is firmer. I would highly recommend the Cleveland CG15 wedges , I know Cleveland did their huge marketing campaign for year of the wedge but it really is that good. At a great price I saw them for $120 at golfclubs.com but I know you can usually find 10 or 15% discounts for that store online as well that would get that price down. Good Luck.


Posted

Bounce is a big deal depending on the conditions you play in. Here in WA, we encounter lots of soft, muddy ground, so you want all the bounce you can get to help you from chunking shots. Once the weather dries up a bit in the summer I swap out the 56/14 for a 56/10.


Posted

For details on bounce and wedges, check out Ralph Maltby's site: http://www.ralphmaltby.com/50

As for CG15, here's a quick look at recent Cleveland CG series wedges.

  • CG12 and CG15 very similar: slightly smaller heads with musleback look.
  • CG14 and CG16 very similar: both are slightly larger clubheads and have slight perimeter weighting. (Between the two, CG14 has golf gel insert in clubhead - something I like - whereas CG16 does not).

I carry three CG14s - and, I have CG15 fitting data in case I want to upgrade.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Depends on what I'm most likely to be using the club for-although anything from about 7*-13* is useable in nearly all situations.  If I really want a jack of all trades wedge/bounce I'll go with 10* (which is what I have on my 54* and 58*).  If it's strictly a tight lies/firm fairways club then you could go as low as 5* or 6* bounce, and if it's strictly for bunker play, fluffy grass, etc. then 14*, 15* or 16* would work great.  Also depends on how the sole is designed/how the club opens up.  My JAWS 60* has 13* bounce, more than I usually want in a LW-but it opens up nicely and rewards an aggressive motion.

Originally Posted by darkhunter139

Yeah I know I probably should have just done a search but there is a lot of threads to go through so I just posted.

How do you guys determine what bounce you choose? Is it basically just a preference based on feel or do you choose it based on the situations you will be using the club in.  I really have to go try swinging some of these soon.




Posted


Originally Posted by darkhunter139

How do you guys determine what bounce you choose? Is it basically just a preference based on feel or do you choose it based on the situations you will be using the club in.  I really have to go try swinging some of these soon.


I personally feel that most Cleveland wedges have a bit too much bounce to be allround.

8*-10* bounce I would call to be allround, good turf interaction, but a bit too less if the sand in bunkers is soft or the rough being fluffy.

4* bounce ...... better to stay away from these, even if the fairways are hardpan, because they are so easy to dig in deep.

14* (PLUS) bounce is only for bunkers with very soft white pearly sand ........ so when I see a two dot (average bounce) 14* bounce sandwedge ..... I wonder.

I our region most of the bunkers have heavy sand, sometimes wet, sometimes hard, about never soft ....... So I carry 8* bounce wedges (52 and 58), but I also have a 58/12 for courses with deep rough and/or soft sanded bunkers.

Besides that there are many styles of hitting the wedges, for instance if you are swinging steep and agressive attacking the ball, you are better off with some more bounce to prevent digging deep and If you prefer to pick up balls very neatly, you might well be using wedges with lesser bounce.

Cal Razr Hawk 10.5 | TM Superfast 3W | Adams Idea Pro Black 20 | MP-68 3-PW | TW9 50/06 + 58/12 | Ram Zebra Putter


Posted

I would think about which courses you will play at. Maybe even ask the club pros at a couple courses what kind of wedge setup they are using for their courses and why. This drove me nuts when I was wedge shopping for the first time.


Posted

Quote:

... I personally feel that most Cleveland wedges have a bit too much bounce to be allround.

8*-10* bounce I would call to be allround, good turf interaction, but a bit too less if the sand in bunkers is soft or the rough being fluffy. ...

Some versions of Cleveland CG12 and CG15 wedges feature Dynamic Sole Grind (DSG). These DSG wedges have 8* bounce for lofts 52-56*, and 6* bounce for lofts 58* and above. Plus, they have sole relief - metal is removed from the heel you can open up the clubface a lot for significant working of the wedge shot. Ralph Maltby cautions that the DSGs are hard to hit for players short on practice time.

Also, several pros and clubfitters suggest having some variety in the bounce of your wedges, for different shots you might face.

I play the standard CG14 - at most I close down or open up a couple of degrees, and hit pretty much plain vanilla wedge shots.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha B16 OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:  image.png.0d90925b4c768ce7c125b16f98313e0d.png Inertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  :srixon: QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5536 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • StuM,  I have, in the past, added a left handed club. (Ususally a 7 iron) However, I usually take a stroke penalty and move the ball to where I want it.  I play for fun and in a pinch can use theback side if my club if I don't want the penalty stroke.    RetiredOldMan,  Terry 
    • So, Brendan Sorsby, Texas Tech transfer QB, was found guilty of sports betting by the NCAA. He admitted to it. He placed thousands of bets over multiple years while at Indiana and Cincinnati. This included betting on his own teams.  The NCAA rules ban athletes from betting on any sport (college or pro).  A retired visiting judge from Tarrant County, Texas has put an injunction on the NCAA ruling. He is a visiting judge because the first judge was a graduate and big fan of Texas Tech, and he recused himself. The judged ruled the following... "Under Curry's order, Sorsby is permitted to play for Texas Tech's 2026 season on the condition that he continues his treatment for a gambling and anxiety disorder and serves a two-game suspension (missing games against Abilene Christian and Oregon State)."  Don't get me wrong, I don't particularly care for the NCAA. That still doesn't mean that a college can choose when or where to say, "Yea we agree to these rules for all our sports, well except in this case." Here is a breakdown from S&W. The Hidden Weapon in Sorsby’s Injunction: How a Lubbock County Court Order Quietly Neutralized the NCAA’s Most Powerful Enforcement Tool - Law Offices of Snell & Wilmer By Ryan J. Regula On June 8, 2026, Lubbock County District Court Judge Ken Curry issued a temporary injunction in Brendan Sorsby v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, Cause No. DC-2026-CV-0791 (99th Judicial District... The main judgement made sense. Sorsby, I am going to have all this harm done to me if I don't get to play. The Judge, I agree. The penalty for gambling is too harsh, so here are all these things you must do, and I will grant this injunction against the NCAA. Basically, an analogy would be when a person goes into court for a DUI and they agree to all these other things to not end up in jail.  What sucks for the NCAA is the NCAA has appealed to Texas’ Seventh Court of Appeals, based in Amarillo. All four justices that preside over the court are graduates of Texas Tech University School of Law. It would be hilarious if all four of them had to recuse themselves 🤣. For those who like to read legal rulings...  
    • The chatter in my brain is when the distance is between clubs since I am pretty weak at shortened backswings, etc. I try to simply decide if being long or short is the better outcome and choose my club based on that and simply not even try for the “real” distance.  For me a full normal swing is what I strive for.
    • I saw this comment made in a golf article... "Most golfers stand over a 4- or 5-iron still negotiating with themselves. They think about how hard to swing, whether they have the right club, if they have the aim correct and more. It’s a lot to deal with and long irons punish the “half-in” golf swing." I am not sure the "most golfers" is correct regarding the bolded part. I can understand if there is a bunker, water, and/or OB that a lot of golfers would be fixated on that. I am not sure that leads to ending up more times there. Pending your level in golf, the variance is so large in outcomes, it could be just with in the expected outcomes. I can understand if have a big lake on the right side of the hole being one of the most terrifying shots for right-handed amateur golfers.  I am not sure many golfers are standing over the ball talking to themselves, "Ok, maybe I should step back and pull the 4-iron. Am I lined up right? Oh, the wind came up, should I swing harder? What am I going to have for dinner tonight, maybe steak. (Joking, somewhat 😛)" A question is that how much chatter do you get while standing over the ball. Are you questioning the everything about your golf shot?   
    • Wordle 1,816 5/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.