Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Question to golfers for an application


Note: This thread is 5412 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

0  

  1. 1. Do you, as a golfer, use the value of Hole's Handicap ?

    • I use it
      0
    • I don't use it
      4


Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi everyones,

I would like to start a thread about an interesting question:

Do you use the Handicap value printed on scorecards for each holes ?

By example, for some golf courses, for each holes there is a Handicap value:

HOLE 1, PAR 3, HCP 4

HOLE 2, PAR 4, HCP 8

I'm creating an application for android devices, and I'm questionning pro and amateurs golfers to know what they really use on a scorecard.

Thanks!


Posted

I ignore the handicap posted on the scorecards normally..  They are too subjective and are often flawed int their reasoning..


Posted


Originally Posted by Dreller

Hi everyones,

I would like to start a thread about an interesting question:

Do you use the Handicap value printed on scorecards for each holes ?

By example, for some golf courses, for each holes there is a Handicap value:

HOLE 1, PAR 3, HCP 4

HOLE 2, PAR 4, HCP 8

I'm creating an application for android devices, and I'm questionning pro and amateurs golfers to know what they really use on a scorecard.

Thanks!

Any time one is playing a match type of competition (like a traditional match or a skins game), the hole handicaps are necessary to determine where strokes are to be given.  If I take my 15 handicap and play against a 22, I would expect to give him 7 strokes.  Those strokes should be received on the holes where he deserves to get them - that is, the number 1 thru 7 handicap holes.  Those who just automatically say that the hole handicaps are flawed probably don't have any real understanding of how the system works.  That or they don't ever play in match competitions.  The individual hole handicaps are irrelevant in stroke play unless something like a skins game is also involved.

  • Upvote 1

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Dreller

I'm creating an application for android devices

No offense, but perhaps if you don't golf or know much about golf, you shouldn't be developing an application for golfers? The best software is written by people who use the software.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
No offence of course ;) I personnally play golf since a couple of years and my friend (who help me) plays golf since 15 years. We never have used this "handicap per holes value" when we played together... We really love playing Golf :) That's why we want to build an app... Thanks for advice :)

Posted

It's valuable sometimes when you haven't played a course and the layout is odd, the green complexes are tough, the distances are poorly marked, or other factors where you don't know what you're necessarily in for when you step onto the tee box for a hole. Other than that, most good players don't care about it. On my home course, the #1 handicap hole isn't the toughest one for me. I'm sure many folks on this site could say the same of their home course.

Current Gear Setup: Driver: TM R9 460, 9.5, Stiff - 3W: TM R9, 15, stiff - Hybrid: Adams Idea Pro Black, 18, stiff - Irons: Callaway X Forged 09, 3-PW, PX 5.5 - SW: Callaway X Series Jaws, 54.14 - LW: Callaway X Series Jaws, 60.12 - Putter: PING Redwood Anser, 33in.


Posted

I usually look at it just to figure out which holes are supposed to be the hardest and which are supposed to be the easiest.  For anything about 4-15, I don't pay attention.


Posted

When playing an unfamiliar course, or when playing with someone who has not played a course I am familiar with, I may cite the top few handicap holes, or maybe the bottom few (easiest of the par 3's, easiest of the 5's, that sort of thing)... but beyond that, don't really use them much.

 :macgregor: V Foil 8.5*    :tmade: Mid Rescue 16*  -- :wilsonstaff: RM  2 thru Wedge -- :vokey: 56/10  -- :scotty_cameron: Studio Design 2  & a  :srixon: Z Star 


Posted

Are you talking about handicap index or matchplay indexes? Or both?

Both are becessary, but only if you are playing a par or stableford event (handicap index) and matchplay (matchplay index).

The OP should not be creating a golf application  if he doesn't know when these indexes are used.

The application would be useless without them at times.

For casual play, they have no value.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted


Originally Posted by Fourputt

Any time one is playing a match type of competition (like a traditional match or a skins game), the hole handicaps are necessary to determine where strokes are to be given.  If I take my 15 handicap and play against a 22, I would expect to give him 7 strokes.  Those strokes should be received on the holes where he deserves to get them - that is, the number 1 thru 7 handicap holes.  Those who just automatically say that the hole handicaps are flawed probably don't have any real understanding of how the system works.  That or they don't ever play in match competitions.  The individual hole handicaps are irrelevant in stroke play unless something like a skins game is also involved.

You will find that in matchplay it does not work that way, unless you have a different system in the U.S.

There are two indexes.

Nowadays, shots are divided up equally throughout each 9 for the matchplay index.

There’s a standard match play index that most courses have adopted. The idea is to spread strokes given evenly.

scanneddocumentq.jpg

There are still courses that use their Stableford index as the Match Play index, so this will be specific to the course.

In a match, if you were off 10 and your opponent was off 15, he would not get strokes on the 5 hardest holes. He would get shots on the matchplay index holes 1 to 5.

In a stableford event, if you were off 13, you would not get a shot on the 5 supposedly "easiest holes", indexes 13 to 18.


In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted


Originally Posted by ohiolefty

It's valuable sometimes when you haven't played a course and the layout is odd, the green complexes are tough, the distances are poorly marked, or other factors where you don't know what you're necessarily in for when you step onto the tee box for a hole. Other than that, most good players don't care about it. On my home course, the #1 handicap hole isn't the toughest one for me. I'm sure many folks on this site could say the same of their home course.


This is because that isn't how handicap rating works.  It doesn't rate the holes by difficulty.  It rates them by how likely it is that a bogey golfer will need a stroke to tie a scratch golfer.  On many difficult holes, the scratch golfer is almost as likely to make bogey as the bogey golfer, so that hole is not ranked as high as a hole where the bogey golfer would have a harder time staying with the scratch player.

For example, the 12th hole is long par 4 with no hazards except bunkers.  The bogey golfer knows he can't reach in regulation so he plays, 3W - hybrid - wedge - 2 putts, while the scratch player hits driver (maybe hits fairway bunker) - long iron (possibly in greenside bunker) - pitch or blast up and 2 putts.  Both make bogey, and both had almost the same chance to make par.  Thus this may be the most difficult hole on the course, but it may rank as the 6th or 8th handicap hole (back 9 should always have the even numbered handicap holes).


Originally Posted by Shorty

Are you talking about handicap index or matchplay indexes? Or both?

Both are becessary, but only if you are playing a par or stableford event (handicap index) and matchplay (matchplay index).

The OP should not be creating a golf application  if he doesn't know when these indexes are used.

The application would be useless without them at times.

For casual play, they have no value.



I've never even heard of a "match play index".  No such thing exists in the US as far as know.  We have handicap index which is plugged into the formula to arrive at course handicap .  For match play the lower course handicap is subtracted from the higher course handicap and the higher handicap player gets the difference in strokes on the matching handicap holes.

Stableford is a very rare bird in the US, and even when used it is usually played just as a tournament with modified point values, not the standard as put forth in the Rules of Golf.

My home Men's club is playing their Point Par tournament this weekend using modified Stableford scoring:

Double Bogey & over (-2 points)

Eagle (+6 points)

Bogey (-1 point)

Double Eagle (+10 points)

Par (+1 point)

Triple Eagle (+12 points)

Birdie (+3 points)

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5412 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I work with a lot of golfers who want more shaft lean at impact, who currently have AoAs that range from +2° to -2°, and who love to see the handle lower and more "in front of their trail thigh" from face-on at P6. And a lot of these golfers try to solve the issue by working on the downswing. They do something to drag the handle forward. Or they just leave their right thigh farther back so the same handle location "looks" farther forward. Or they move the ball back in their stance. Or they push themselves down into the ground to get the handle lower and increase (decrease?) their AoA (to be more negative). The real fix is often to get wider in the backswing. To do LESS in the backswing. To hinge less, fold the trail arm less, abduct the trail arm less. I had a case of this over the weekend. Before, the player had 110° of trail elbow bend, "lifted" his trail humerus only a few degrees, etc. The club traveled quite a bit around him, and he tended to "pick" the ball from the fairways. In the "after" swings below (which are mild exaggerations — this golfer does not need to end up at < 70° of elbow bend. These were slower backswings with "hit it as hard as you normally would" intent downswings), you can see that he bent his elbow about 70° instead of 110° and lifted his right arm an extra ~15° or more. You can't see how much less this moved his hands across his chest (right arm abduction), but it was also decreased. His hands stayed more "in front of" his right shoulder rather than traveling "beside" them so much. The two swings look like this: The change at P6, without talking about the downswing one little bit (outside of him telling me that he tends to pick the ball), is remarkable: Without 110° of elbow bend to get out (which he gets to 80°, a loss of 30°), the golfer actually loses slightly less elbow bend (70 - 50 = 20), but delivers 30° less elbow bend, lowering the handle and letting the elbow get "in front of" the rib cage… because it never got "behind" or "beside" the rib cage. If you look at this video showing the before/afters of P6, you'll note the handle location (both vertically and horizontally) and the shoulders (the ball is in the same place in these frames). This golfer's path was largely unaffected (still pretty straight into the ball, < 3° path and often < 1.5°), but his AoA jumped to -5° ± 2°. I've always said, and in talking with other instructors they agree and feel similarly, that we spend a lot of time working on the backswing. This is another example of why.
    • We had a member of our senior club who developed a mental block on pulling the trigger. I played with him to see what the membership was talking about. I timed him a few times when he would get over the ball. 45 seconds. He knew he had a mental block and would chide himself, “Just hit it!” Once on the green he was okay and chipping was a bit better. It was painful to watch him struggle. Our “bandaid” was to put him in the last tournament  tee time with two understanding players. We should have suggested to him to take a break from our tournaments. I agree with the idea that when a player realizes they have a problem, the answer is to go fix it and not return until they are able to play at an acceptable pace.
    • Day 56 (4 May 26) - Worked on some ball-then-ground drills - going from P3 thru impact - with a slowed tempo, working to keep all parts in sync.   
    • Wordle 1,780 3/6 🟩⬜🟨🟨🟨 ⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,780 4/6 🟨⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜🟨🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟨🟩🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.