Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5270 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would say putting should be your main focus. Just looking at your GIR, you had 3 3putts, and I know as well as anybody how frustrating that is. Nice round for sure!

In my Bag (work in progress):

Driver: TaylorMade 10.5* R11, Regular Shaft
3W: TaylorMade Burner 15*

3Hy: Nike SQ Sumo Hybrid
Irons: 2005 TaylorMade Rac OS, 4-AW

Wedge: Cleveland CG14 56*, old dingy 64* wedge that I have no business using

Putter: Odyssey White Hot Tour Putter or a Cleveland Classic Anser-Style

Kicks: Footjoy E-Comforts

Ball: Used Titleist DT Solos.


Posted

Yeah my putting is certainly killing me.  I have my lesson today so I am going to try and divide it between putting and the 3 wood.  Then maybe some chipping next time.  I feel like after watching Phils DVD my chipping technique is okay, I just need more practice.


Posted

did the 52* wedge really make a difference with your chipping? When i chip, i use my 60*, and i'm a horrible chipper. :(

Maybe i'll give my 52* a chance next time.

Driver:  R9 SuperTri 10.5*

Fairway:  R7 3wood 13*

Hybrid:  Super Hybrid 17*

Irons: CG Reds

Wedges: Vr 52* 56* 

Putter: Studio Select Newport 2.5 midslant

Ball: e6


Posted

did the 52* wedge really make a difference with your chipping? When i chip, i use my 60*, and i'm a horrible chipper. :(

Maybe i'll give my 52* a chance next time.

I also used to use a 60* and then switched to a 52*. It made a big difference. The 60* simply had too much loft to reliably made solid contact, and as a result sometimes I'd carry too much or too little depending on how I struck the ball. With the 52*, that's a lot harder. Also, the 60* required that I carry most chips a long way, and the more carry the harder it is to control. The 52* keeps things down lower and more controlled. I could see myself chipping with something even lower loft, but in general I don't like using my irons to chip, they're too bulky.

"Golf is an entire game built around making something that is naturally easy - putting a ball into a hole - as difficult as possible." - Scott Adams

Mid-priced ball reviews: Top Flight Gamer v2 | Bridgestone e5 ('10) | Titleist NXT Tour ('10) | Taylormade Burner TP LDP | Taylormade TP Black | Taylormade Burner Tour | Srixon Q-Star ('12)


Posted


Originally Posted by B-Con

I also used to use a 60* and then switched to a 52*. It made a big difference. The 60* simply had too much loft to reliably made solid contact, and as a result sometimes I'd carry too much or too little depending on how I struck the ball. With the 52*, that's a lot harder. Also, the 60* required that I carry most chips a long way, and the more carry the harder it is to control. The 52* keeps things down lower and more controlled.

I could see myself chipping with something even lower loft, but in general I don't like using my irons to chip, they're too bulky.

This. The 52* is a lot easier to control and I don't miss hit it near as much.  Even when I do it does not end up near as badly as miss hitting a 60* shot.


Posted

Nice job! I remember the first time I broke 90 last year, awesome feeling! Keep it up.


Posted


Originally Posted by darkhunter139

Sorry I was too excited not to post this, everything finally came together at the same time and I finally got a score I knew I had potential to get for a while now.

It was raining lightly the whole time which felt really good.  Got paired up with a foursome of pretty good people so I was a bit nervous...turns out I didnt need to be.

I decided to not hit the driver the entire day (Still hit it 3 times but they went okay) and decided to use my 52* wedge instead of my 60* to chip.  I also just got my putter shortened because it was way to long.

Chipping is by far the worst part of the game, it would not be an exaggeration to say I give up 8-10 shots per round just from chipping.  Well I finally decided to give up on my 60* wedge and used my 52.  It changed everything, I was chipping better then I ever have,  did not shank any, and even chipped one in for par.

My iron play was also great today, hit 5 GIR's and came close a bunch of other times.

Combine all that with my putter being on fire (for me at least) and I shot my best round ever of an 88! I think I will be able to consistently stay in the 90's now as long as I keep using my 52* wedge and working a lot on chipping/putting.

Here is my scorecard.  So pumped!  Did not have anything over a 6 and only one triple bogey.

http://golfshot.com/Rounds/Detail/209-6191233-6191455


Congratulations!  That's great you were able to do it a little under pressure as well, with the strangers around you.  Sometimes I find that brings out the best in your game, because in a way you're turning into a competitor.  Anyway, great job, and keep it up!

Garrett


Posted


Originally Posted by darkhunter139

Sorry I was too excited not to post this



Absolutely no reason to apologize for this -- that is fantastic and I enjoyed the post and looking over your card -- I have sniffed an under par round a handful of times coming down the stretch, but I can say with certainty that the times I first came down the stretch with a legitimate chance at the first time breaking 90, I was the most alive I have ever felt on a course -- the butterflies and andrenalin were higher than I ever felt -- I think it took me three or four times to actually break through (finally shot an 89 at Lake Padden in Bellingham, WA)......remember like it was yesterday...Congrats.

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


Posted

That's awesome man and for me I felt like breaking 90 was more difficult than breaking 80 because you go from having no clue to having sort of a clue...where by the time you break 80 you will have just become much better at the important things: chipping, putting, getting out of a bunker in one shot, and keeping the ball in play off of the teebox.   Don't be surprised if you break 80 soon.   Keep working at it.


Note: This thread is 5270 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.