Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
misterjohn

Battle Srixon: q star versus AD333

18 posts in this topic

There seems to be a lot of love for the q star here and in other forums, but if you look at the specs on the q star box, they seem almost exactly the same as the AD333 which, I understand, the q star is replacing. My question is: what are the differences between these two ball? Has anyone done a side by side test? Is this just a brand refresh on Srixon's part, or are there really substantive differences between the q star and the AD333?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

See my comment on this site by Peartree. I love AD333s. However, they are going to be replaced

by Q stars with a higher price. I wouldn't mind if they presented some proof that they were superior , but as you stated, all they give a golfer is marketing fluff on the box.

My wife and I did our own playing test this weekend. See my review.

You, and rightly so, asked the obvious question. And Srixon doesn't have an answer.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Peeartree thanks for the link to your review. O think there is a tendiceny to want to believe that whatever is new is better, but it's not always the case. You would think that with all the cheerleading for the q star, there would be more response to a simple request for a comparison to the ball it is replacing---the obvious closets substitute. That deafening silence on the issue says a lot, I think. While I'm a Srixon fan, I'm not spending an additional $5 per dozen until I see some evidence of value for my additional cash. What is a little weird are all the folks out there willing to suggest that others try the q star apparently without any evidence that it works better than the (cheaper) ball that it is replacing. I suppose the Srixon marketing guys can be happy about a successful campaign though.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Originally Posted by misterjohn

What is a little weird are all the folks out there willing to suggest that others try the q star apparently without any evidence that it works better than the (cheaper) ball that it is replacing. I suppose the Srixon marketing guys can be happy about a successful campaign though.


I think you answered your own thought.  Why would someone suggest using the AD333 when they will not be produced anymore?

At 42 cents more per ball they are def worth the money for extra spin and softness.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

They definately feel more soft and I personally got them to stop quicker than the ad333

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I played both and I honestly did not tell much of any difference at all. The resident professional at our local course also tried both and said for the difference in cost, it is not worth it other than to pull out the shiny new box and show off the Q-Star in the club house. His personal review was that he also would not be able to distinguish the difference between the balls if blindly handed one at a time.

Think of that scenario when you're comparing these balls in such a way. If I blind-folded you and handed you one, I really doubt that you're going to hit it and then say "Oh, that was a Q-Star!". Or with a chip shot say, "Yeah that one didn't check up at all, definitely the AD-333.". (For the smart-asses that will say you can't hit blind-folded, how about instead... removing the label from the ball lol)

I'm by no means cheap but with this almost unnoticeable difference, I will definitely take the AD-333 at the current cost of 2 dozen for $25.00 at Golf Galaxy. "Generally" the same quality, twice the quantity - why not?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Spyder

why not?



because eventually you will not have a choice - it will be Q-star or find another ball. Since you cant tell the difference, I am sure the extra $5 will be worth it.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

My overall point is that people who choose to play this particular ball can utilize the sales that are currently going on to stock up on it. Obviously, you will eventually need to move onto the Q-Star in the future if you enjoy playing the AD-333 and want the next comparable model in Srixon's line. To the argument being made that the "Q-Star is obviously superior" though, I commented to offer my advice on the contrary. This would be the same concept as someone actually trying to tell you that they can easily and quickly tell the difference between a prior generation Pro V1x and a 2011 Pro V1x by performance/feel.

Personally, I'm going to stock up on the Callaway HX-Hot Plus because 2 for $35.00 is a pretty damn good deal at the moment. I've already got several dozen of the AD-333 stocked up from the 2 for $25.00 sale.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As part of my little experiment, I picked up some q stars to run head to head versus the ad333s. I found no significant differences between the two balls. They went about the same distance, spun about the same, felt about the same, sounded about the same. I'm quite sure I could not tell the two apart in a blind taste test. I think q star is a marketing strategy on Srixon's part rather than a true technological advance. Several others seem to confirm this. Thus, for all those posts where the q star is recommended, I would instead recommend trying the ad333. It's cheaper for the moment and if you end up liking it, you can transition to the q star once ad333 is no more and still enjoy the same level of happiness (albeit at a higher price point).
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is one, but only one, difference between the back of the box descriptions of the two balls: the number of dimples. I don't have the balls in front of me to check for sure, but I believe the ad333 has 333 dimples. The Q-Star has about 344, if I'm remembering correctly. I don't know if this would meaningfully affect the performance.

By the way, the descriptions of these two balls is pretty close to how Bridgestone describes the e5, their soft, two-piece spin ball. It's about 26.95 and is described as having a urethane, rather than rabalon, cover. To me the two covers are very similar--they are similarly soft and scuff rather easily (don't hit any cart paths on the fly!). I like all three balls, but, as you say, the ad333 is the best deal.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My spring golf buddies and I made our annual trip to NC the End of February and prior to leaving I picked up some Z-Stars.   Granted they were last years model but I was able to get them at $24 a dozen and purchased several dozen.  I really like them and then the Q=Star came out decided I'd try them and like the rest of you I feel there is a big drop of between the Z and Q-Star.  I get lots of spin with the Q-Star but not wuite the distance and will be going back to the HX-Hot+ basically due to pricing.

As for the mention of the Titleist Prov1 and x, I've never liked them.  Won 2 dozen last fall and gave them to my son, he likes titleists.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

i must be crazy but i tried the ad333's a handful of times and hated them. i recently have played the srixon yellow trispeed tours and they seem nice.  maybe its all just in my head

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've played a couple dozen of each, they are both great balls for the money. I agree with a few others, if you like the Qstars, try the AD333 as long as you can still find them.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

the ad333 felt too light and clicky off my putter. I wonder are the q-stars the same

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Read your review ,with all due respect none of you have the swing speed to get the spin to stop the ball. I can stop any dstance ball within a foot or 2 or less but my swing speed is around 100. That said the q-star performs well for me and I carry it 278 a lot of that is due to my new CG Black driver get one you will be amazed Im 30 yards longer just carry Im 53 .

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

For A$1.20 per ball around Xmas 2013, I can't fault these balls.

Spin, long drives, money in my pocket, yippy.

Kind regards, Ken :)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • It sounds like you may just be overcompensating for the draw in your set-up. You know your stock shot is a draw, so you aim right; instead of making your normal swing, you intentionally play for a draw, and it curves even further to the left than normal.
    • You are a tad close. I would say the ball is about a ball width too close. When you move the ball away don't adjust to that by bending over at the waist more.  Even still, the ball looks to be in the middle of your stance. That is not a good ball placement for a 6 iron. I would say it's two ball widths to far back. Hover your mouse icon over the text A4 . 
    • Sorry we'll miss you, @Big C.  If this one is remotely successful, I'll try to see to it that one happens in winter (organizing it myself if I need to), and hopefully you can join us then. 
    • I do not like hot temperatures... at all.  Being from the northeast, if it got above 90 degrees, you'd find me stationed in front of the nearest window air conditioner.  Then I moved south and I quickly realized that if I took that mentality, I wouldn't do anything for 2/3 of the year.  

      Last September, I played a round during a weekday at a local course in 98 degree temperatures.  As I usually do, I packed 2 frozen waters, 2 unfrozen waters and 2 sports drinks.  I had learned earlier in the year that I need 128 ounces of fluids, at a minimum, during rounds in warm weather.  I almost never walk (puts too much strain on my knees throughout a round and I can't move the next day), and that day was no different.  I took a cart and found shade as much as possible.  

      I had been drinking more water than normal that day.  All 4 waters and the sports drinks were gone by the 14th hole.  No cart girl on the course that day.  I started looking for a water cooler on the 16th hole because I was starting to feel a little weak.  The only place I had seen to get water was at the comfort station between the 11th and 12th holes, but it was from a water fountain that had brown tinted water, so I figured I'd be find to make it the last 3 holes with no problems.  15 minutes later, after I hit my approach shot on the 17th hole, I told my cart partner that I'd walk up the path in the shade.  Truth was, I was felling really sick at that point and I didn't want to vomit from the cart.

      I sat on a rock off the edge of the path and things got REALLY dark REALLY quick.  Sounds were muffled.  I was dizzy.  

      The guys in the other cart stopped to see if I was okay.  I told them I wasn't and that I felt off.  I knew I needed water.  Luckily, one of them had a bottle of water in his bag and offered it to me.  I slowly sipped it and the other guy went to my cart and grabbed an ice pack out of my cooler so I could put it on my neck.  It took about 5 minutes before I could stand up.  

      After putting out on the 17th, I considered just packing it up and sitting in the cart for the last hole, but I managed to play out the 18th hole.  Got to the clubhouse and drank a few cups of ice water and a Gatorade while trying to cool down.  

      I was out of it for 2-3 days before I started to feel normal again.  I learned my lesson that day and now I will fill up my water bottles even if I feel like I 'have plenty' for the rest of the round.  It was easily one of the scariest moments, health-wise, in my life.  I was extremely lucky to have been playing with others that day otherwise, things could have been real bad.

      Stay hydrated... stay in shade... and if you feel even a LITTLE off, make sure to get yourself somewhere safe and around people in a hurry.  As others have said... it will overtake you in a hurry.

      ETA - By the way... I'm not in 'good shape' by any means, but I'm only mid 30s and not easily 'gassed' or anything.  It just hit me quickly and I wasn't at all prepared for it.  Also, the course I played that day is now closed.  I suppose that's why they didn't have water in the coolers or anything that day.  

      CY
    • I won't walk above 95 deg. and only 9 holes max if above 85 deg. (I carry). Don't get too hung up on being in shape.   Dehydration recovery is also a mini race that your replenishment effort could lose. The 'water-ade' you are drinking may not make it fast enough to all of your body to make up for the sweat loss. So you can actually drink more than you sweat and still dehydrate (and have a bloated belly). Happens to people all the time - "but, but, I drank so much water..!!"  If the de-hy % exceeds certain amount then you could be in trouble. Sometimes you don't feel/recognize till a few hours later. Also, core temps take longer to cool down once heated up.   +1 to the umbrella recommendation. Priceless. Scores? IDK, don't think much difference but haven't paid attention to heat vs. scores before.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. chriswuk
      chriswuk
      (25 years old)
    2. Gero
      Gero
      (73 years old)
    3. SUPGolfer
      SUPGolfer
      (46 years old)
  • Blog Entries