Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5225 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am a beginner.  I was hitting my Cleveland CG16 56* two dot (14 bounce) at the range today.  And I was getting the expected steep trajectory from a grassy lie.  However, from hard bare dirt I was getting a much lower trajectory and had to power down to get the same distance.  I understand that I am not getting under the ball as well on hard dirt.  What is the solution?  Less bounce?  More loft?  Better technique?  14 degrees seems like a lot of bounce, but Cleveland calls it "standard" so I'm not sure what my expectations should be.


Posted
14 degrees of bounce is hard to hit off of that lie. my mizuno 56 has 14 degrees of loft and I use it almost exclusively for the sand or a fluffy chip

:callaway: BB Alpha 815 DBD 10.5* Rogue Silver 60 :callaway: x2hot 3deep 14.5* (TBD) :tmade: RSI UDI 20* RIP Tour 90 :bridgestone: J40CB 4-PW Steelfiber i95 :vokey: SM4 50* KBS Tour V :vokey: SM5 54* KBS 610 :vokey: SM5 58* KBS HI-REV 2.0 MannKrafted Handmade Custom


Posted

As a "beginner", might I suggest a wedge similar to a Maltby M-Series 1.25 UC Wedge?  The 56* wedge has 8* of bounce, and I've found it to be easier to hit than any wedge I've tried.  That includes from fluffy sand and the rough as well as from the fairway.

http://www.golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_MA0103_A_cn_E_667

Driver - Cobra Amp Cell/Maltby KE4 V 10.5

FW - Maltby KE4 ST-F 3W

Hybrids - Cobra T-Rail+ 3H and 4H

Irons - Maltby KE4 SS1 4-GW

SW - Cleveland CG16 56*

Putter - Nike Method Core MC02W/Bobby Grace AMG Triumph


Posted


Originally Posted by jpalermo

14 degrees of bounce is hard to hit off of that lie. my mizuno 56 has 14 degrees of loft and I use it almost exclusively for the sand or a fluffy chip



Are you saying for a partial swing on the fairway (25 yards +) you don't like the 56-14?  I have pretty good luck with it, I take a divot though and flight it down a bit so the bounce is not a big factor, I am pretty sure (when done right) I am hands in front of the head at impact.

I only ask because I am wondering if I should play those shots with my 51-6?  I had not considered using the 51 because I feel confident with the 56?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I used a Callaway XForged 56.14 last summer. On days I was swinging well, I could hit it from almost anywhere (except on actual hardpan).

On other days, I would use a 50.08 wedges for partial shots from less fluffy lies.

With 14° bounce, on tighter (less grassy) lies you run the risk of the clubhead bouncing off the turf - rather than digging in - and partially skulling the ball. Also, if you bounce it into impact you will lose some clubhead speed.

If you put your hands forward and ball back, you can reduce the effective bounce, but this can be trickly to do consistently.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

It's not all about the stated bounce, guys. A narrow sole or sole relief/grind decreases the effect of, and/or the stated bounce.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


I have been eye-balling that wedge for a while but haven't pulled the trigger.  I don't like my 56-14* SW off tight lies either and was interested in trying the Maltby wedge's combination of wider sole and lower bounce.

Originally Posted by bassplayer7770

As a "beginner", might I suggest a wedge similar to a Maltby M-Series 1.25 UC Wedge?  The 56* wedge has 8* of bounce, and I've found it to be easier to hit than any wedge I've tried.  That includes from fluffy sand and the rough as well as from the fairway.

http://www.golfworks.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_MA0103_A_cn_E_667


To the OP, you may be flipping which will make this problem worse.  Flipping in grass can give you a high trajectory assuming you don't flip really bad and scull it. Flipping on hardpan will cause the wedge to ricochet off the ground and hit the ball thin with a much lower trajectory.

Driver:  Callaway Diablo Octane iMix 11.5*
Fairway: Cobra Baffler Rail F 3W & 7W
Irons:  Wilson Ci
Wedges:  Acer XB (52* & 56*)
Putter:  Cleveland Classic #10 with Winn Jumbo Pistol Grip


Posted


Originally Posted by Mr. Desmond

It's not all about the stated bounce, guys. A narrow sole or sole relief/grind decreases the effect of, and/or the stated bounce.



^^^ This.


Posted


Originally Posted by Axolotl

I am a beginner.  I was hitting my Cleveland CG16 56* two dot (14 bounce) at the range today.  And I was getting the expected steep trajectory from a grassy lie.  However, from hard bare dirt I was getting a much lower trajectory and had to power down to get the same distance.  I understand that I am not getting under the ball as well on hard dirt.  What is the solution?  Less bounce?  More loft?  Better technique?  14 degrees seems like a lot of bounce, but Cleveland calls it "standard" so I'm not sure what my expectations should be.



14 degrees is standard for an average sand wedge, not for a utility type of wedge.  You don't need that much bounce when hitting from a tight lie... in fact it can be a severe liability, as you have discovered.  My 56° CG15 has 10° bounce and I use that mostly as a utility wedge.  My 54° Vokey has 11°, and it is almost exclusively used as a sand wedge.  Neither one is really low bounce - both are more or less mid range.   Good sand technique can go a long way to reducing the need for excess bounce, making the wedge more useful for other shots.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted




Are you saying for a partial swing on the fairway (25 yards +) you don't like the 56-14?  I have pretty good luck with it, I take a divot though and flight it down a bit so the bounce is not a big factor, I am pretty sure (when done right) I am hands in front of the head at impact.

I only ask because I am wondering if I should play those shots with my 51-6?  I had not considered using the 51 because I feel confident with the 56?





I love my 56, for those 2 shots only.... I use my 53 for pretty much everything 100 yards and in. same reason you use your 56. it's my money club. chips, pitches, 1/4, 1/2, 3/4... I use my 60 for down hill chips from off the backside that run straight down, I use my 50 for full shot at 130 or if I need a runner up over a ridge in the green. each one has a purpose and multiple shots... I love them all actually.

:callaway: BB Alpha 815 DBD 10.5* Rogue Silver 60 :callaway: x2hot 3deep 14.5* (TBD) :tmade: RSI UDI 20* RIP Tour 90 :bridgestone: J40CB 4-PW Steelfiber i95 :vokey: SM4 50* KBS Tour V :vokey: SM5 54* KBS 610 :vokey: SM5 58* KBS HI-REV 2.0 MannKrafted Handmade Custom


Posted


Originally Posted by Topper

I have been eye-balling that wedge for a while but haven't pulled the trigger.  I don't like my 56-14* SW off tight lies either and was interested in trying the Maltby wedge's combination of wider sole and lower bounce.


A wider sole adds to effective bounce. How about a medium sole with 11-12 of bounce, and maybe with some trailing edge relief.

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5225 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.