Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Beachcomber

Out of Bounds Fencing Question

28 posts in this topic

I had this occur during a recent round and would like to hear input on what you believe the ruling should have been. Par 3 - OB down the right hand side of the hole. The hole is 175 up hill - and plays more like 200. The white OB stakes run down the right side of the hole for about 30 to 40 yards. Then there is a chain link fence which starts and protects an area where the course stores equipment. Like a small barn. The fence that runs along this barn is OB if you fall on the right side of the fence. But if your shot comes to rest on the left side of the fence - you are in bounds. I hit a 5 iron and blocked it hard right of the green... My ball kicks hard off the side of the hill, which throws my ball down towards the chain link fence which protects the barn. From the tees, I couldn't tell if my ball was in bounds or not, so I hit a provisional ball from the tees onto the green. I found my first ball - literally a few inches away from the fence - but on the left side which is inbounds. I was green side, but couldn't take a swing due to the fence. The guy I was playing with said that due that the fence was an OB fencing... I had to: 1. Take an unplayable lie, and a penalty stroke with a drop to the nearest relief point, or 2. Play it as it lies Literally there was no way to play it as it lies because I couldn't make a swing. I told the guy since the OB fencing was man made, that I felt I shuld get a free drop, no closer to the hole. He and I went back and forth, and he finally told me to play it how I believed the rule to play. I took a free drop - two clubs lengths from the fencing, but no closer to the hole. I hit a great flop shot up the hill and onto the green, one putted for par. Did I play this hole correctly?
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Most OB fencing, stakes and other markers are man made.

Unless there is a local rule regarding the fence, your playing partner gets my vote,,ie unplayable lie with a stroke penalty.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Beachcomber

Did I play this hole correctly?


No you didn't.

An out of bounds fence is not an obstruction.

You are not entitled to a free drop.

You either play it as it lies or you declare the ball unplayable and take a penalty and drop the ball appropriately.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

As others have correctly stated, there is no relief from an OB fence. However I'll also point out:

Originally Posted by Beachcomber

...I took a free drop - two clubs lengths from the fencing, but no closer to the hole.

...that in cases where you do get relief from an immovable obstruction, it's *one* club length.  (In general, you get one club length for free drops, and two lengths when it consists of taking a penalty stroke.)

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Beachcomber

I had this occur during a recent round and would like to hear input on what you believe the ruling should have been.

Par 3 - OB down the right hand side of the hole. The hole is 175 up hill - and plays more like 200.

The white OB stakes run down the right side of the hole for about 30 to 40 yards. Then there is a chain link fence which starts and protects an area where the course stores equipment. Like a small barn.

The fence that runs along this barn is OB if you fall on the right side of the fence. But if your shot comes to rest on the left side of the fence - you are in bounds.

I hit a 5 iron and blocked it hard right of the green... My ball kicks hard off the side of the hill, which throws my ball down towards the chain link fence which protects the barn. From the tees, I couldn't tell if my ball was in bounds or not, so I hit a provisional ball from the tees onto the green.

I found my first ball - literally a few inches away from the fence - but on the left side which is inbounds. I was green side, but couldn't take a swing due to the fence. The guy I was playing with said that due that the fence was an OB fencing... I had to:

1. Take an unplayable lie, and a penalty stroke with a drop to the nearest relief point, or

2. Play it as it lies

Literally there was no way to play it as it lies because I couldn't make a swing.

I told the guy since the OB fencing was man made, that I felt I shuld get a free drop, no closer to the hole. He and I went back and forth, and he finally told me to play it how I believed the rule to play.

I took a free drop - two clubs lengths from the fencing, but no closer to the hole. I hit a great flop shot up the hill and onto the green, one putted for par.

Did I play this hole correctly?


No you didn't.  Any object marking out of bounds, whether stakes, fence, wall is not an obstruction and no relief is given.  You play the ball as it lies or you declare it unplayable and take the penalty under Rule 28.

24/3  Concrete Bases of Boundary Fence Posts

Q. Posts of a boundary fence have been set in concrete bases 14 inches in diameter. Are the parts of the bases within the boundary of the course obstructions?

A. No. Such a base is part of the fence and thus no part of it is an obstruction — see Definition of "Obstructions." If such bases are at or below ground level, the boundary line is the inside points of the fence posts at ground level. If they are above ground level, the Committee should clarify the location of the boundary line.

24/4  Part of Boundary Fence Within Boundary Line

Q. Part of a boundary fence is bowed towards the course so that it is inside the boundary line formed by the fence posts. A player's ball comes to rest against this part of the fence. Is the player entitled to relief under Rule 24-2b?

A. No. A fence defining out of bounds is not an obstruction even if part of it is inside the boundary line formed by the fence posts — see Definitions of "Obstructions" and "Out of Bounds."

Also note the definition of "obstruction":

Obstructions

An "obstruction" is anything artificial, including the artificial surfaces and sides of roads and paths and manufactured

ice, except:

a. Objects defining out of bounds, such as walls, fences, stakes and railings;

b. Any part of an immovable artificial object that is out of bounds; and

c. Any construction declared by the Committee to be an integral part of the course.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Just to beat this dead horse... if the thing interfering with your swing was an OB stake instead of the fence, and the stake was removable, you still cannot take free relief or move the stake. If the stake was marking a hazard, you can move it but not anything marking or defining OB. Fought this fight many times in an extended group that did a buddy trip every year.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by rustyredcab

Just to beat this dead horse... if the thing interfering with your swing was an OB stake instead of the fence, and the stake was removable, you still cannot take free relief or move the stake. If the stake was marking a hazard, you can move it but not anything marking or defining OB. Fought this fight many times in an extended group that did a buddy trip every year.


Isn't it peculiar? Even though these things are very clearly described in the Definitions ('Obstruction' and 'Out of Bounds') and even supported by some Decisions.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the responses guys. I obviously miss played the shot and screwed up.
1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

usually the club will have a rule specific to that type of OB issue.  If its a natural hazard such as young trees and plants which need to be protected then often there is a free drop.  If its gone OB though, then often ive found you are forced to take a drop, and count it too.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by awj888

If its gone OB though, then often ive found you are forced to take a drop, and count it too.



Stating "forced to take a drop" is too vague when talking about OB. You have to take a hike back also.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by awj888

usually the club will have a rule specific to that type of OB issue.  If its a natural hazard such as young trees and plants which need to be protected then often there is a free drop.  If its gone OB though, then often ive found you are forced to take a drop, and count it too.

Dear me.

You have confused the issue completely.

The original question was asked and immediately answered correctly.

Now, 2 weeks later........

There is only one kind of "OB issue". And that is OB. It has nothing to do with young trees and free drops.

There is ONE RESPONSE TO OB:

Re-play from where you played it (distance penalty) adding a stroke penalty. Stroke and distance.

Please don't chime in and sprout things that are not true!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Shorty rolls out the welcome mat once again. Hey Shorty... if someone has incorrect info, but they believe it to be true, how do you expect them to know it's not true when typing up their post? Does the editor now have the feature of adding red squiggly lines under any information that is false?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by awj888

usually the club will have a rule specific to that type of OB issue.  If its a natural hazard such as young trees and plants which need to be protected then often there is a free drop.  If its gone OB though, then often ive found you are forced to take a drop, and count it too.



I think you are confusing hazards with out of bounds.  There are allowances for young trees on the course - that's called ground under repair.  No such allowance is given for out of bounds markers, because by definition they are not on the course - they are out of bounds.  As such, they can't be given the same protection as objects on the course.  You can still take a drop for an unplayable lie if your ball is not out of bounds and you can't play a shot because of interference from such an object, but you must still add the penalty stroke and follow one of the procedures shown  in rule 28 .

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades


Originally Posted by Grumpter

Shorty rolls out the welcome mat once again. Hey Shorty... if someone has incorrect info, but they believe it to be true, how do you expect them to know it's not true when typing up their post? Does the editor now have the feature of adding red squiggly lines under any information that is false?


Shorty's reply was spot on, and perfectly reasonable. The post he responded to was confusing, and the question at hand had already been answered. Shorty merely pointed this out in a civil way.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure how all this OB talk got atarted, the original post stated he was in bounds but did not have a playable shot due to the fence. He does not have to take a stroke and distance just a one stroke penalty as stated correctly in earlier posts.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Originally Posted by Beachcomber

1. Take an unplayable lie, and a penalty stroke with a drop to the nearest relief point, or

2. Play it as it lies

Literally there was no way to play it as it lies because I couldn't make a swing.

I told the guy since the OB fencing was man made, that I felt I shuld get a free drop, no closer to the hole. He and I went back and forth, and he finally told me to play it how I believed the rule to play.

I took a free drop - two clubs lengths from the fencing, but no closer to the hole. I hit a great flop shot up the hill and onto the green, one putted for par.

Did I play this hole correctly?


Just to keep beating this one:

There are several misconceptions here.  The first one has been addressed about taking relief from any out of bound marker. but......

Let's assume that it had been an obstruction from which relief was allowed - he still proceeded incorrectly by taking a drop TWO clublengths from the point where the ball lay.  He was actually proceeding correctly under Rule 28 for an unplayable lie, only he didn't add the penalty stroke, but it was not the right procedure for taking relief without penalty from an obstruction.  He might have accidentally ended up dropping in a correct manner, but by not first determining the nearest point of complete relief and then measuring ONE clublength from that spot (not nearer to the hole), he may well have missed the correct drop area.  Since the rule only requires the player to drop in the correct spot, he doesn't have to follow the entire measuring process as long as he knows that he is in the right area.  In this case he may or he may not have found the right spot by his method - there is always some risk involved when taking a shortcut.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon