Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Rangefinders, and Distance


Note: This thread is 5103 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I played the game a very long time before rangefinders came into use and in fact even before yardage markers were used.

I am just wondering.

How many out there use rangefinders and how has it affected your game?

A long time ago we had no markers at all on the course.

Not even markers on sprinkler heads.

You just estimated distance and the club to use.

Mostly just the club to use.  The distance didn't seem to matter.  You just knew how far you could hit a club.

I didn't think rangefinders had a chance of becoming part of the game.

I thought they would be banned.


  • Administrator
Posted

It's sped up my game.

I came into the game when courses were pretty well marked so I see it as no advantage at all except for being able to be a) more precise b) more quickly.

I can understand a little that the golfer's skill is reduced but my argument to that is two-fold:

a) there are a lot of other variables which affect distance which are not accounted for in a distance measurement (wind speed and direction, temperature, the lie, how you're swinging that day, what kind of shot you intend to play, the humidity, etc.).

b) is "being able to accurately estimate a distance" really a core skill in golf? I would say that it's not.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Back when courses had caddies, they would tell you the distance because they had stepped it off.  Now we don't have caddies and use rangefinders and GPS instead.

I got a lot more consistent knowing the distance and it saves strokes and time.  I don't always use it either.  Maybe on one shot per hole, usually the approach for par 4 and 5 holes and the tee on par 3.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Don't quote me on this but I don't think caddies stepped off the distances and recorded the distances till Jack Nicklaus came along.


Posted
I have had mine for a season and a half and love it. It speeds things up and knowing exact distances has helped a lot. I also know my distances for hard/dry summer as well as cold/soggy fall/winter.

In my Bagboy cart bag:
Driver: TM R11s 10.5 R-flex 3W: TM 09 Burner 3H: TM 09 Burner Irons: TM Tour Burner 4-PW r-flex
Wedges: Wilson TW9 GW, Ping Eye 2+ SW, Vokey SM 58.08      Putter:TM Rossa Spider Ball: TM TP/Red LDP, TF Gamer v2   Range Finder: GX-I


Posted

Also, I feel like an underrated aspect of the range finder is being able to shot distances to hazards, bunkers, doglegs, etc. I like knowing that the fairway ends at about 240 because the tree right behind it is about 250. I also like knowing that the front of the green where the water hazard is is at 176 exactly, even though I'm just past the 200 marker on the course. I really think that the benefit of the rangefinder is being able to get those abstract yardages that you wouldn't have without a caddie (Also with the use of the rangefinder I've found that par-3 yardage can sometimes vary GREATLY than what's on the card/yardage plate).

l Bag l TaylorMade Stand Bag

l Driver l TaylorMade '07 Burner 9.5* l 3-Wood l Titleist 910F 15* (D1 shaft setting)

l Hybrids l TaylorMade '07 Burner 19* : TaylorMade '10 Rescue 22*

l Irons l TaylorMade r7 5-PW l Wedges l Titleist Bob Vokey 52* 56* 60*

l Putter l Scotty Cameron California Del Mar 34" l Balls l TaylorMade Penta TP


Posted


Originally Posted by camper6

Don't quote me on this but I don't think caddies stepped off the distances and recorded the distances till Jack Nicklaus came along.



You are correct.  Nicklaus is credited with "inventing" the caddy book.

I started play also before you could count on a course even having 150 yard markers.  Then they added the 200, 150 and 200 yard markers.  Then they started marking sprinklers.  The more stuff they marked the slower the game became.  Now with GPS, the game is actually faster than when half the players were pacing off distances from sprinklers and yardage plaques.  I find that not only does it help with distances to the hole, but the right types of GPS or laser is a huge help with distances to layup points.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by camper6

Don't quote me on this but I don't think caddies stepped off the distances and recorded the distances till Jack Nicklaus came along.



This sounds like an internet myth.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

This sounds like an internet myth.



Can't be, the internet wasn't invented until after Jack came along.


Posted


Originally Posted by sean_miller

This sounds like an internet myth.



No it isn't.  Do some research and you'll find that it's fact.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

How about this for research.  My father in law was a scratch golfer and caddie in the 1930s.  He always knew the distances because the caddies, himself included, had paced the distances from items on the course to the front of the green and middle of the green.  They paced tee to hazards, etc.  It was their job to know.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Nicklaus may have invented (or, imo more likely, been the first prominent golfer to use one) the yardage book, but I'd be surprised if caddies hadn't been memorizing distances for their home courses.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted

Golf is hard enough to stick it close with the correct yardage, let alone being off by possibly a couple of clubs at a time.....

Driver: Taylormade R11 set to 8*
3 Wood: R9 15* Motore Stiff
Hybrid: 19° 909 H Voodoo
Irons: 4-PW AP2 Project X 5.5
52*, 60* Vokey SM Chrome

Putter: Odyssey XG #7

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x


Posted


Originally Posted by Fourputt

Quote:

Originally Posted by sean_miller

This sounds like an internet myth.

No it isn't.  Do some research and you'll find that it's fact.


Should be easy to find, so how about link?!?

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Posted

Oh ye of little faith.

Excerpt:

Nicklaus then popularized the books on Tour when he left the amateur ranks in 1962. Although it took awhile.

"Jack led the way, but players were slow to adopt the practice," Beman says. "It took about five years before more players and caddies were using some sort of yardage notes than those who weren't. Part of the skill of golf was figuring out how far it was and then hitting the proper shot. A lot of players felt that the books took away from the skills.

"That changed, because there's no question in my mind that the yardage books had a major impact on scoring, a major, major impact."

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/golf/2010-05-31-golf-yardage-books_N.htm


Posted


Originally Posted by boogielicious

How about this for research.  My father in law was a scratch golfer and caddie in the 1930s.  He always knew the distances because the caddies, himself included, had paced the distances from items on the course to the front of the green and middle of the green.  They paced tee to hazards, etc.  It was their job to know.



They knew the distances at their home course and memorized them.

But.  They couldn't tell you what club to use until they were familiar with your game.

That's what caddies did.  They handed you the club they thought you could reach with and sometimes argued with you when you refused to listen.


Posted


Originally Posted by camper6

Oh ye of little faith.

Excerpt:

Nicklaus then popularized the books on Tour when he left the amateur ranks in 1962. Although it took awhile.

"Jack led the way, but players were slow to adopt the practice," Beman says. "It took about five years before more players and caddies were using some sort of yardage notes than those who weren't. Part of the skill of golf was figuring out how far it was and then hitting the proper shot. A lot of players felt that the books took away from the skills.

"That changed, because there's no question in my mind that the yardage books had a major impact on scoring, a major, major impact."

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/golf/2010-05-31-golf-yardage-books_N.htm



I'm not disputing that Nicklaus was one of the pioneers in using yardage books on the PGA Tour. That's not exactly what you said though.

Mizuno MP600 driver, Cleveland '09 Launcher 3-wood, Callaway FTiz 18 degree hybrid, Cleveland TA1 3-9, Scratch SS8620 47, 53, 58, Cleveland Classic 2 mid-mallet, Bridgestone B330S, Sun Mountain four5.


Note: This thread is 5103 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Never practiced golf when I was young and the only lesson ever taken was a driver lesson. I feel like I'm improving every year. However, the numbers don't support my feeling about improving. I usually drop to 12-13 during the summer while playing the familiar courses around home and then go on golf trips in the fall to new courses and increase to end the year between 15-17. Been a similar story for a number of years now but hey, it's the best thing there is in life so not too bothered but reaching 9.9 is the objective every year. Maybe a few lessons and practice could help me achieve it since I pretty much have no idea what I'm doing, just playing and never practice.
    • I am semi-loyal. Usually buy four dozen of one ball and only play that until out and then determine whether to continue or try another one. Since starting my semi-loyal path to success, I've been playing the below, not in order: ProV1 ProV1x ProV1x left dash AVX Bridgestone BXS Srixon Z-star XV I am not sure if it has helped anything, but it gives a bit of confidence knowing that it at least is not the ball (while using the same one) that gives different results so one thing less to mind about I guess. On the level that I am, not sure whether it makes much difference but will continue since I have to play something so might as well go with the same ball for a number of rounds. Edit: favorite is probably the BXS followed by ProV1/Srixon Z-star XV. Haven't got any numbers to back it up but just by feel.  
    • Will not do it by myself, going to the pro shop I usually use after Cristmas for input and actually doing the changes, if any, but wanted to get some thoughts on whether this was worthwhile out of curiosity. 
    • In terms of ball striking, not really. Ball striking being how good you are at hitting the center of the clubface with the swing path you want and the loft you want to present at impact.  In terms of getting better launch conditions for the current swing you have, it is debatable.  It depends on how you swing and what your current launch conditions are at. These are fine tuning mechanisms not significant changes. They might not even be the correct fine tuning you need. I would go spend the $100 to $150 dollars in getting a club fitting over potentially wasting money on changes that ChatGPT gave you.  New grips are important. Yes, it can affect swing weight, but it is personal preference. Swing weight is just one component.  Overall weight effects the feel. The type of golf shaft effects the feel of the club in the swing. Swing weight effects the feel. You can add so much extra weight to get the swing weight correct and it will feel completely different because the total weight went up. Imagine swinging a 5lb stick versus a 15lb stick. They could be balanced the same (swing weight), but one will take substantially more effort to move.  I would almost say swing weight is an old school way of fitting clubs. Now, with launch monitors, you could just fit the golfer. You could have two golfers with the same swing speed that want completely different swing weight. It is just personal preference. You can only tell that by swinging a golf club.     
    • Thanks for the comments. I fully understand that these changes won't make any big difference compared to getting a flawless swing but looking to give myself the best chance of success at where I am and hopefully lessons will improve the swing along the way. Can these changes make minor improvements to ball striking and misses then that's fine. From what I understood about changing the grips, which is to avoid them slipping in warm and humid conditions, is that it will affect the swing weight since midsize are heavier than regular and so therefore adding weight to the club head would be required to avoid a change of feel in the club compared to before? 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.