Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Is it legal to tap the ball in the cup using the toe of your putter?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by mtsalmela80

Is it legal to tap the ball in the cup using the toe of your putter?

Yep. Just watch where you're standing when you do it. You can use the back of the putter, too. Or the heel.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I am pretty certain that is fine.  On occasion, I will hit a shot with the toe of the putter when there is a fairly high fringe and the ball nestles right up against it.  I wouldn't be able to get the face of the putter through the grass, but the toe slices right through.

As far as I know, there is nothing wrong with either of those shots.  Similar to flipping a short iron upside down to play it opposite-handed, I would say.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

The point that Iacas is making is that it can leave you open to an illegal stance because you're going to be approaching the ball from an odd angle.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by Shorty

The point that Iacas is making is that it can leave you open to an illegal stance because you're going to be approaching the ball from an odd angle.


Yes. I think some people thought Tiger might have been standing astride the line of his putt when he tapped in at Augusta or something six years ago or so.

You can hit a ball with the back of an iron, too. You don't have to turn it over. Clubs can't be designed with multiple striking faces, though (putters can, but that's it - that's what makes some of those old-fashioned chippers illegal).

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by iacas

Yes. I think some people thought Tiger might have been standing astride the line of his putt when he tapped in at Augusta or something six years ago or so.

You can hit a ball with the back of an iron, too. You don't have to turn it over. Clubs can't be designed with multi


In 2007, John Daly straddled a putt in a silly season cashfest and Nick faldo, who was commentating, wasn't impressed.

In the race of life, always back self-interest. At least you know it's trying.

 

 


Posted

So you can design a putter with a flat surface on the toe designed to strike the ball?

I'm just curious because we have all probably heard about the Dr. feelgood putter, and that it is illegal. Its illegal supposedly because its longer front to back than it is side to side.

Then why not just redesign the thing and have a impact surface running along the side of it, along with the hammer-style tip at the end.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Originally Posted by mtsalmela80

Then why not just redesign the thing and have a impact surface running along the side of it, along with the hammer-style tip at the end.


Because the shaft would be inserted at the wrong angle for the long flat side to be considered the "face" of the putter.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by mtsalmela80

So you can design a putter with a flat surface on the toe designed to strike the ball?

I'm just curious because we have all probably heard about the Dr. feelgood putter, and that it is illegal. Its illegal supposedly because its longer front to back than it is side to side.

Then why not just redesign the thing and have a impact surface running along the side of it, along with the hammer-style tip at the end.



Appendix ll in the Rules of Golf covers design of clubs.  As far as your suggestion, clubs may only have one striking face, however putters may have two striking faces only if their characteristics are the same and they are opposite of each other.

As far as striking the ball, as long as you use the head of the club, you are ok.  Doesn't matter if it's front, back, or toe.

As far as the rule that prohibits standing astride or on the line of putt or on an extension of that line behind the ball, (Rule 16-1d) it's the Sam Snead rule.  The rule was put in specifically to prohibit croquet style putting.  An exception to the rule allows you to inadvertently stand on or across the line as well as purposely doing it for reasons of etiquette.  In other words to avoid standing on someones line.

So as long as you are not purposely doing it, or are doing it to avoid standing on someone elses line there is no penalty.

Regards,

John

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Let's say you just miss a putt a couple of inches long, so when you walk up to the hole its directly opposite the hole from you.  If you tap it in from that point, is that illegal?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Quote:
Originally Posted by Golfingdad View Post

Let's say you just miss a putt a couple of inches long, so when you walk up to the hole its directly opposite the hole from you.  If you tap it in from that point, is that illegal?

Nope. Not only is it inadvertent but the line of the putt doesn't extend beyond the hole:

Quote:
The “ line of putt ’’ is the line that the player wishes his ball to take after a stroke on the putting green . Except with respect to Rule 16-1e , the line of putt includes a reasonable distance on either side of the intended line. The line of putt does not extend beyond the hole .

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Erik covered that very well.  The only possible infraction I've seen with that type of put is a tendency to "drag" the putt toward you.  You have to make sure it's still a momentary strike.

Regards,

John

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Great thanks.  It's one of the many little things that I just don't really pay attention to or care about in a casual round, but are going to come up and bite me when I start playing competitively.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Great thanks.  It's one of the many little things that I just don't really pay attention to or care about in a casual round, but are going to come up and bite me when I start playing competitively.



I could do a short list of some of the most common myths regarding golf rules if anyone's insterested.  I'm new, so it may have been done already.

Regards,

John

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


Originally Posted by mtsalmela80

So you can design a putter with a flat surface on the toe designed to strike the ball?

I'm just curious because we have all probably heard about the Dr. feelgood putter, and that it is illegal. Its illegal supposedly because its longer front to back than it is side to side.

Then why not just redesign the thing and have a impact surface running along the side of it, along with the hammer-style tip at the end.



The short answer is no, you can't design a putter in that fashion, and for the reason that you mention about the Feelgood putter.  If it is designed to be used with the toe (meaning that there is a purposely made striking face set at 90 degrees from the conventional face), then it would be nonconforming.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted


so who is to say that a flat toe side is a "striking face" vs just a design feature. i mean if i took a typical anser putter and grinded a small flat toe, is it then nonconforming?

Originally Posted by Fourputt

The short answer is no, you can't design a putter in that fashion, and for the reason that you mention about the Feelgood putter.  If it is designed to be used with the toe (meaning that there is a purposely made striking face set at 90 degrees from the conventional face), then it would be nonconforming.



Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I imagine it'd be up to the committee and perhaps eventually the USGA (or appropriate local agency).  The rules on this are necessarily a bit vague, but if you can't point out a plausible reason why you ground off that toe other than to use it as a striking face, you might have a problem.

Note one other concern when using the toe (or anywhere other than the face) of the putter is that many designs open up the possibility of hitting with two parts of the club and incurring a double-hit penalty.

I'd just use the face of the putter, I can't imagine any reason to do otherwise.

In the bag:
FT-iQ 10° driver, FT 21° neutral 3H
T-Zoid Forged 15° 3W, MX-23 4-PW
Harmonized 52° GW, Tom Watson 56° SW, X-Forged Vintage 60° LW
White Hot XG #1 Putter, 33"


Posted


Originally Posted by mtsalmela80

so who is to say that a flat toe side is a "striking face" vs just a design feature. i mean if i took a typical anser putter and grinded a small flat toe, is it then nonconforming?


Hey mtsalmela80,

With your example I would say you would be in breach of Rule 4-1b.  A club that conforms to the rules when new must not be altered, other than in the normal course of play, where the club in it's altered state would not confirm with the Rules.  As mentioned before, striking surfaces must be opposing on a putter.  I wouldn't think that you could create a new striking face on the toe, and at the same time declare the front of the Anser to be a non striking face when that's how it was originally designed.  Also, you now have a putter that has a much longer body front to back than it's striking surface, which is illegal.

Having said that, if a company designed a putter that just so happended to have a flat toe, I think, as long as the toe isn't identified as a striking surface, the club would probably be legal.

You're making my head hurt.

Do you really want to make a club like this?

Regards,

John

Regards,

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 1: 2025.12.26 Worked on LH position on grip, trying to keep fingers closer to perpendicular to the club. Feels awkward but change is meant to.
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • Please see this topic for updated information:
    • When you've been teaching golf as long as I have, you're going to find that you can teach some things better than you previously had, and you're probably going to find some things that you taught incorrectly. I don't see that as a bad thing — what would be worse is refusing to adapt and grow given new information. I've always said that my goal with my instruction isn't to be right, but it's to get things right. To that end, I'm about five years late in issuing a public proclamation on something… When I first got my GEARS system, I immediately looked at the golf swings of the dozens and dozens of Tour players for which I suddenly had full 3D data. I created a huge spreadsheet showing how their bodies moved, how the club moved, at various points in the swing. I mapped knee and elbow angles, hand speeds, shoulder turns and pelvis turns… etc. I re-considered what I thought I knew about the golf swing as performed by the best players. One of those things dated back to the earliest days: that you extend (I never taught "straighten" and would avoid using that word unless in the context of saying "don't fully straighten") the trail knee/leg in the backswing. I was mislead by 2D photos from less-than-ideal camera angles — the trail leg rotates a bit during the backswing, and so when observing trail knee flex should also use a camera that moves to stay perpendicular to the plane of the ankle/knee/hip joint. We have at least two topics here on this (here and here; both of which I'll be updating after publishing this) where @mvmac and I advise golfers to extend the trail knee. Learning that this was not right is one of the reasons I'm glad to have a 3D system, as most golfers generally preserve the trail knee flex throughout the backswing. Data Here's a video showing an iron and a driver of someone who has won the career slam: Here's what the graph of his right knee flex looks like. The solid lines I've positioned at the top of the backswing (GEARS aligns both swings at impact, the dashed line). Address is to the right, of course, and the graph shows knee flex from the two swings above. The data (17.56° and 23.20°) shows where this player is in both swings (orange being the yellow iron swing, pink the blue driver swing). You can see that this golfer extends his trail knee 2-3°… before bending it even more than that through the late backswing and early downswing. Months ago I created a quick Instagram video showing the trail knee flex in the backswing of several players (see the top for the larger number): Erik J. Barzeski (@iacas) • Instagram reel GEARS shares expert advice on golf swing technique, focusing on the critical backswing phase. Tour winners and major champions reveal the key to a precise and powerful swing, highlighting the importance of... Here are a few more graphs. Two LIV players and major champions: Two PGA Tour winners: Two women's #1 ranked players: Two more PGA Tour winners (one a major champ): Two former #1s, the left one being a woman, the right a man, with a driver: Two more PGA Tour players: You'll notice a trend: they almost all maintain roughly the same flex throughout their backswing and downswing. The Issues with Extending the Trail Knee You can play good golf extending (again, not "straightening") the trail knee. Some Tour players do. But, as with many things, if 95 out of 100 Tour players do it, you're most likely better off doing similarly to what they do. So, what are the issues with extending the trail knee in the backswing? To list a few: Pelvic Depth and Rotation Quality Suffers When the trail knee extends, the trail leg often acts like an axle on the backswing, with the pelvis rotating around the leg and the trail hip joint. This prevents the trail side from gaining depth, as is needed to keep the pelvis center from thrusting toward the ball. Most of the "early extension" (thrust) that I see occurs during the backswing. Encourages Early Extension (Thrust) Patterns When you've thrust and turned around the trail hip joint in the backswing, you often thrust a bit more in the downswing as the direction your pelvis is oriented is forward and "out" (to the right for a righty). Your trail leg can abduct to push you forward, but "forward" when your pelvis is turned like that is in the "thrust" direction. Additionally, the trail knee "breaking" again at the start of the downswing often jumps the trail hip out toward the ball a bit too much or too quickly. While the trail hip does move in that direction, if it's too fast or too much, it can prevent the lead side hip from getting "back" at the right rate, or at a rate commensurate with the trail hip to keep the pelvis center from thrusting. Disrupts the Pressure Shift/Transition When the trail leg extends too much, it often can't "push" forward normally. The forward push begins much earlier than forward motion begins — pushing forward begins as early as about P1.5 to P2 in the swings of most good golfers. It can push forward by abducting, again, but that's a weaker movement that shoves the pelvis forward (toward the target) and turns it more than it generally should (see the next point). Limits Internal Rotation of the Trail Hip Internal rotation of the trail hip is a sort of "limiter" on the backswing. I have seen many golfers on GEARS whose trail knee extends, whose pelvis shifts forward (toward the target), and who turn over 50°, 60°, and rarely but not never, over 70° in the backswing. If you turn 60° in the backswing, it's going to be almost impossible to get "open enough" in the downswing to arrive at a good impact position. Swaying/Lateral Motion Occasionally a golfer who extends the trail knee too much will shift back too far, but more often the issue is that the golfer will shift forward too early in the backswing (sometimes even immediately to begin the backswing), leaving them "stuck forward" to begin the downswing. They'll push forward, stop, and have to restart around P4, disrupting the smooth sequence often seen in the game's best players. Other Bits… Reduces ground reaction force potential, compromises spine inclination and posture, makes transition sequencing harder, increases stress on the trail knee and lower back… In short… It's not athletic. We don't do many athletic things with "straight" or very extended legs (unless it's the end of the action, like a jump or a big push off like a step in a running motion).
    • Day 135 12-25 Wide backswing to wide downswing drill. Recorder and used mirror. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.