Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 5022 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
The 'In to in' path involves an approach to impact from inside, then straight for 4/10 of a millisecond, and returning immediately to the inside after that. Giving, let's say a + or - 0.5° cushion, this would still be a difficult path to follow for the best of golfers. Adding to this, the factor of difficulty involved for hitting a straight shot from this path would require a square club face. For example, presuming we allowed a 0.5° cushion for both parameters could we identify why a ball is fading slightly using this shot choice. Is it because the path was + or was it the club face or was it both? Or or or. I believe we can mechanise a robotic machine to cover this path proficiently but even with the above cushions in place these perfect parameters are almost impossible for golfers to achieve or repeat.

Posted

Patrick, I'm your biggest fan!  I just can't get enough of you and your vast sea of knowledge. Can I have your autograph please?  Make it out to:  My dearest friend, HoganWoods.

Keep up these great threads!

In my bag

Driver:      SLDR 10.5*

Hybrids:   Taylormade RBZ Stage 2

Irons:       NikeVR PRO 4-PW

Wedges:   Nike VR Pro 50* 54* 58*

Putter:      2014 Newport 2

Ball:          E6


Posted
Patrick, I'm your biggest fan!  I just can't get enough of you and your vast sea of knowledge. Can I have your autograph please?  Make it out to:  My dearest friend, HoganWoods. Keep up these great threads!:dance:

Thanks for your fellowship.


Posted

You are an idiot if you think he was being serious.

This thread has no point. Apparently it's impossible to play good golf. Which explains the golfers in Patrick's videos.

Originally Posted by Patrick57

Thanks for your fellowship.



"The expert golfer has maximum time to make minimal compensations. The poorer player has minimal time to make maximum compensations." - And no, I'm not Mac. Please do not PM me about it. I just think he is a crazy MFer and we could all use a little more crazy sometimes.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Does this mean pro golfers are robotic machines?

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

FellowShip!!! LOL  You can be Frodo and I'll be Gandalf... Lets head for the crack of doom and bond our friendship to new heights!

In my bag

Driver:      SLDR 10.5*

Hybrids:   Taylormade RBZ Stage 2

Irons:       NikeVR PRO 4-PW

Wedges:   Nike VR Pro 50* 54* 58*

Putter:      2014 Newport 2

Ball:          E6


Posted
Does this mean pro golfers are robotic machines?

No most pro golfers use the 'in to out' path. They are not stupid enough to create shots using the less controllable parameters. [quote name="Hoganwoods" url="/t/57111/an-in-to-in-dtl-swingpath-is-asking-a-lot-opinions#post_699912"] FellowShip!!! LOL  You can be Frodo and I'll be Gandalf... Lets head for the crack of doom and bond our friendship to new heights! [/quote] OK Hw, Do you actually have anything to say about the topic of this thread or are you going to act like a Bilbo Baggins for the rest of your life?


Posted

Alright, Patrick.  I'm done.  Carry on...

In my bag

Driver:      SLDR 10.5*

Hybrids:   Taylormade RBZ Stage 2

Irons:       NikeVR PRO 4-PW

Wedges:   Nike VR Pro 50* 54* 58*

Putter:      2014 Newport 2

Ball:          E6


Posted

Whats this 4/10 if a millisecond?

Robots only play for the girls,  the beer, and Cuban cigars.

"Quick Dorthy....the oil can!"


Posted

Wrong, the golf swing no matter what goes in to in swing path. At the moment of impact it might be angled outward, but the clubhead will go back inward no matter what.

Also having more outward swing path will give leeway for hitting a draw, if its closer to square then you have no clue if its going to be left or right, it could be significant in that tolerance you specified. But, if you have an outward swing path, then you can draw it with hedging your right to left ball flight. You might hit it lets say 3 yard draw to 6 yard draw, but at least you know your going to draw the ball.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Whats this 4/10 if a millisecond?  We robots only play for the girls and the beer.

I think 'The Tin Head' would suit you better! LoL [quote name="saevel25" url="/t/57111/an-in-to-in-dtl-swingpath-is-asking-a-lot-opinions#post_699933"] Wrong, the golf swing no matter what goes in to in swing path. At the moment of impact it might be angled outward, but the clubhead will go back inward no matter what. [/quote] On that logic, lets rename all of the paths 'in to in' and discard the O and NBFL. [quote name="saevel25" url="/t/57111/an-in-to-in-dtl-swingpath-is-asking-a-lot-opinions#post_699933"] Also having more outward swing path will give leeway for hitting a draw, if its closer to square then you have no clue if its going to be left or right, it could be significant in that tolerance you specified. But, if you have an outward swing path, then you can draw it with hedging your right to left ball flight. You might hit it lets say 3 yard draw to 6 yard draw, but at least you know your going to draw the ball. [/quote] That's what I'm saying, a DTL path has parameters that require exactness which drift into unreliability. Except for robots. I have never hit a perfectly straight golf shot, putting aside, intentionally. I shape every shot to a certain degree. Sometimes it comes off darn close to what I planned and other times to a lesser extent or even differently.


Posted


Originally Posted by The Tin Man

Whats this 4/10 if a millisecond?

Robots only play for the girls,  the beer, and Cuban cigars.



Don't you mean "Zuban" cigars?  I'll have a BenderBrau while you're at it, ha ha....

Benderbrau_label_by_sircle.png


  • Moderator
Posted

I love Bender!  He has an in-to out swing path!

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 5022 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 47: simulator day! Played St. Andrew’s and shot a +1. Not bad, especially with having to putt at this simulator set up. Had about 5 minutes at the end to work on some feels as well. 
    • I think you're saying it's preposterous to think that the areas on this club are anything like what's shown here: 30mm toward the toe or heel loses only 5% distance? Highly, highly doubtful. So a guy who hits the ball there and normally hits the ball about 250… will hit it instead about 238. By missing the sweet spot by about 1.2 inches? Highly, highly doubtful. Heck, the high heel barely gets into the red, and orange is only "up to" 10%! @M2R, I've never heard of "Ask Golf Nut" but I'm dubious of his claims in the video and really, really dubious of what's on his site: "Why AskGolfNut Is the Most Trusted Data-Driven Golf Resource". Hmmmmmm.
    • Day 151 1-11 flow work today. I've been doing all pause work, so Inwanted to get some rhythm going. Recorded.
    • a) No b) This MLR says: I doubt the MLR is going to affect their weekly league games, in other words.
    • So the question was posed today by some of my friends.  Is a pitch mark the same as a divot?  I thought NO, but they argued if your ball lands in another player's divot (made by club during a swing) this was the same as a pitch mark, i.e. the ball mark made when the ball lands  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.