Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4906 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Originally Posted by brettski01

Out to in with a slightly closed face that matches your out to in path i believe

I could be wrong but I thought that would produce a pull (start left and continue on a straight line left).........   The shots I am talking about start left but about 5yds out, the ball curved back to parallel with the target line and continued to run parallel for the rest of the flight.

Razr Fit Xtreme 9.5* Matrix Black Tie shaft, Diablo Octane 3 wood 15*, Razr X Hybrid 21*, Razr X 4-SW, Forged Dark Chrome 60* lob wedge, Hex Chrome & Hex Black ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by teamroper60

The shots I am talking about start left but about 5yds out, the ball curved back to parallel with the target line and continued to run parallel for the rest of the flight.

Outside of wind or a badly scuffed or otherwise damaged golf ball, such a shot is not possible. Balls don't just stop curving.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Outside of wind or a badly scuffed or otherwise damaged golf ball, such a shot is not possible. Balls don't just stop curving.

That was exactly what I was gonna say that there was a gash on the ball because range balls sometimes give some crazy ballflights when they get old !!


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Outside of wind or a badly scuffed or otherwise damaged golf ball, such a shot is not possible. Balls don't just stop curving.

If I hadn't seen it multiple times, I would agree that balls don't stop curving but in this case they did..........   My wife was watching and thought it was odd too.........   I guess it would have to have been the balls, because there was virtually no wind.   But it happened more than once so if it was the ball, it was more than one........  I think I have a pretty good handle on what conditions (face angle, club path) cause the normal ball flights so if it hadn't looked so weird, I would not have posted about it.........  I was hoping there was an explanation for it but I guess not.  At this point, I will just chalk it up to bad balls...

Razr Fit Xtreme 9.5* Matrix Black Tie shaft, Diablo Octane 3 wood 15*, Razr X Hybrid 21*, Razr X 4-SW, Forged Dark Chrome 60* lob wedge, Hex Chrome & Hex Black ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Yep must have been bad balls. Its like tonight when i was at the range i was hitting some solid drives about 240m then 2 or 3 carried about 150m. Has to be the balls

909 D2 10.5* Aldila NVS Reg 65g

Baffler T-Rail 16*

R7 19*

Fli-Hi 21*

FP 5-PW

52* 56* 60* Vokey Spin Milled

Flat Stick


Posted
Originally Posted by teamroper60

If I hadn't seen it multiple times, I would agree that balls don't stop curving but in this case they did..........   My wife was watching and thought it was odd too.........   I guess it would have to have been the balls, because there was virtually no wind.   But it happened more than once so if it was the ball, it was more than one........  I think I have a pretty good handle on what conditions (face angle, club path) cause the normal ball flights so if it hadn't looked so weird, I would not have posted about it.........  I was hoping there was an explanation for it but I guess not.  At this point, I will just chalk it up to bad balls...

Range balls are range balls because they likely fail to meet the standards one of which likely is that it isn't perfectly round or the core is off center. If either of these happen then this will easily create some weird ballflight.  Range balls are not to be trusted !!


  • Moderator
Posted

Range balls, depending on the range, are usually dodgy - I don't put too much stock in the ball's flight and distance, especially if it has lost its luster or does something funky, like drop out of the sky like a rock.

As for names, how about

The real ball flight laws?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by Righty to Lefty

The  main problem with the old BFL's is point the clubhead to where you want he ball to end up because the shot will never stay on the target line.  Also the ball will in no way start where your stance is aligned.  That is the main rub why some will still say the old BFL's are correct because they will create the desired shot shape, but they will not stay on target.

Yep, that's the difference I'm reading.

Funny thing is, without knowing the science, when I actually had the temerity to start trying to shape shots deliberately, I noticed that (hooks in paricular - that I noticed, perhaps not true in practise) whenever I aimed "just enough" to get around the obstacle (read as : tree!) in front of me, I tended to hit it a lot.  I actually just assumed that the error was in my swing - which may well have been the case, but even with the perfect swing, chances are I was setting up to hit the tree!

Great, real-world applicable, data!


Posted

i was looking at the d plane video and noticed that the ball  flight angle on a straight drive was about 10 percent below the trajectory of the actual club face angle verticaly.now as we know the face is say 85 percent initial direction.If we open the face would  that mean that the flight would be just left of the open face due to the lower trajctory? you seem a bit clever erik what do you think?


Posted
Originally Posted by filco123

i was looking at the d plane video and noticed that the ball  flight angle on a straight drive was about 10 percent below the trajectory of the actual club face angle verticaly.now as we know the face is say 85 percent initial direction.If we open the face would  that mean that the flight would be just left of the open face due to the lower trajctory? you seem a bit clever erik what do you think?

It depends...

a.) Are you talking center contact?

b.) Path will still play a factor.

c.) Spin Loft will determine how much the ball spins - spin helps curve the ball.

Trackman - Club Speed - Attack Angle - Dynamic Loft.png

d.) Launch conditions will come into play.

.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

if the face is closed to the path it curves left, if the face is open to the path it curves right.  The only exception is when you use a lofted club, when the ball does not actually curve, because there is more backspin that sidespin on the ball.

Hope that helps,  Blessings,

Todd Howard


  • Moderator
Posted
Originally Posted by Todd777

if the face is closed to the path it curves left, if the face is open to the path it curves right.  The only exception is when you use a lofted club, when the ball does not actually curve, because there is more backspin that sidespin on the ball.

Hope that helps,  Blessings,

Todd Howard

So the ball spins in two directions?

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

As an inconsistent golfer constantly aspiring to improve, understanding the truth about ball flight has helped me greatly on the course. Understanding why the ball started right and kept going right has greatly increased my ability to self correct from shot to shot. I can't understand why anyone wouldn't find the knowledge beneficial as an aid, even if it's easier to think of shot shaping in the "old" way.


  • Administrator
Posted
Originally Posted by filco123

i was looking at the d plane video and noticed that the ball  flight angle on a straight drive was about 10 percent below the trajectory of the actual club face angle verticaly.now as we know the face is say 85 percent initial direction.If we open the face would  that mean that the flight would be just left of the open face due to the lower trajctory? you seem a bit clever erik what do you think?

Short answer (sorry, missed your question a few weeks ago): yes and no.

The ball will start left of the face by a little bit because the path is well left of the face. The path is what affects it, though, not the "lower trajectory." The "lower trajectory" is caused by the path as well.

Let's say it's 80% face and 20% path just to have more rounded numbers. Let's say 10° dynamic loft with an AoA of 0°. Let's say we open the face 5°.

The ball will launch vertically at about 8° (80% between 0° and 10°) and horizontally at 4°.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4906 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.