Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Beau Hossler gets Congressional invite


Note: This thread is 4905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Golf isn't the "get rich" sport like the contract sports.....you make millions in golf with longevity, not hype.....michelle wie the exception.

He ought to go to college and sharpen his game....keep working....turn pro when HE feels its the right time....and I don't think he feels its the right time now

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


Posted

He could go to college and have his game fall apart.  Cash in now and you can go to any college you want if things don't pan out.  If things do pan out and his career is that of a PGA golfer then I can think of no better place to learn your trade then practice on the PGA tour.

And to whoever said he isn't marketable because he looks like a doofus, I would say he is one of the most talked about stories on the tour this year despite the merits of it and can make some money for someone.

What's in my Micro Lite Bag:

Driver: RocketBallz Tour 9
3 Wood: V Steel 15 degree
3-PW: 762 DCIGW: CG 12 52 degree

SW/LW: spin milled 56/11, 60/7

Putter: 2 Ball 35"


Posted
Originally Posted by BMac0223

He could go to college and have his game fall apart.  Cash in now

The point is that if his game is going to fall apart in college, it is going to fall apart as a pro........so he turns pro now, signs a couple of deals and makes a good run for 6-12 months getting sponsors exemptions....if his game then falls apart, he'll spend what he has made chasing the dream....if you are actually considering the possibility that his game isn't really as good as showing now (and I think it is), you can make an argument that college is a MUCH better financial choice......just sayin..

"Getting paired with you is the equivalent to a two-stroke penalty to your playing competitors"  -- Sean O'Hair to Rory Sabbatini (Zurich Classic, 2011)


Posted
Originally Posted by BMac0223

He could go to college and have his game fall apart.  Cash in now and you can go to any college you want if things don't pan out.  If things do pan out and his career is that of a PGA golfer then I can think of no better place to learn your trade then practice on the PGA tour.

Coming from more of a background studying (in some cases knowing) hockey players and up and coming prospects I would say it is better to wait and mature in college instead of jumping into the big dance right away.  here are my reasons:

1) In all honesty what harm could come from tearing up the college circuit? If he finds it too easy then he gets some much needed confidence

2) Lets say he jumps into pro right away first 3 months he never makes a cut, that is tough for even a pro to take yet alone a kid who can't even buy beer yet?

Pro may be a good idea but young players (in all sports) put under too much pressure can collapse quite easily and ruin their careers.

Driver: RBZ 9.5° Stiff

Woods: :nike:VR_S Tour 2.0 15° Stiff

Hybrids:  910H 21° Stiff

Irons: 4-GW Pro Black CB1 with Project X rifle 6.0

Wedges:CC Jaws 56°.14° 60°.08°

Putter: Classic 1

Ball:  Z-Star XV Pure White


Posted
Originally Posted by BallStriker

Golf isn't the "get rich" sport like the contract sports.....you make millions in golf with longevity, not hype.....michelle wie the exception.

He ought to go to college and sharpen his game....keep working....turn pro when HE feels its the right time....and I don't think he feels its the right time now

Agreed.

Let's keep this in context - a 17-year old had a T29 in the US Open.

The potential is certainly there to be a successful pro, but not yet. That banana is still pretty green.


Posted

Has anyone mentioned Justin Rose yet?

T4 at the Open in 1998 at roughly the same age. Turned pro immediately. Missed 21 consecutive cuts. Got his card. Lost his card. Got his card again. Grew up, acquired some seasoning and turned into a very, very good player.

Faster is not always better.

Stretch.

"In the process of trial and error, our failed attempts are meant to destroy arrogance and provoke humility." -- Master Jin Kwon

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Faster is not always better.

That's what my wife keeps trying to tell me...

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by zipazoid

Agreed.

Let's keep this in context - a 17-year old had a T29 in the US Open.

The potential is certainly there to be a successful pro, but not yet. That banana is still pretty green.

That's a plausible argument to make. If he's not ready, then getting ready is important, of course.


Posted

Slower also isn't always better. And in an alternative world, Rose goes to college for 4 years, turns pro, misses 21 cuts. Got card. Lost card, Learned how to play as a pro and turns into a very good player. What is the difference? In this world his pro career is 4 years shorter. Amateur golf is not  pro golf. Maybe you can learn the lessons you need during it but maybe you just have to go pro and figure it out.

I am not saying anyone should go pro at 17.   But doing it also isn't crazy if you can find someone to fund your golf game for the next 4 years.   There is nothing magical about college. Now if you plan on going pro in anyway counts on winning Big Break, your insane...

Originally Posted by Stretch

Has anyone mentioned Justin Rose yet?

T4 at the Open in 1998 at roughly the same age. Turned pro immediately. Missed 21 consecutive cuts. Got his card. Lost his card. Got his card again. Grew up, acquired some seasoning and turned into a very, very good player.

Faster is not always better.


Posted
Originally Posted by x129

Slower also isn't always better. And in an alternative world, Rose goes to college for 4 years, turns pro, misses 21 cuts. Got card. Lost card, Learned how to play as a pro and turns into a very good player. What is the difference? In this world his pro career is 4 years shorter. Amateur golf is not  pro golf. Maybe you can learn the lessons you need during it but maybe you just have to go pro and figure it out.

I am not saying anyone should go pro at 17.   But doing it also isn't crazy if you can find someone to fund your golf game for the next 4 years.   There is nothing magical about college. Now if you plan on going pro in anyway counts on winning Big Break, your insane...

I always feel jumping in to something to fast may be damaging but being slow can not in many pro sports lot's of players have been ruined because of jumping up too early.  A lot of it is just confidence issues which can really increase exponentially with a teenager or 20 year old turning professional.  Not saying college is the be all end all I just think it is a good way to accurately assess where you stand opposed to a few odd professional tournaments.

  • Upvote 1

Driver: RBZ 9.5° Stiff

Woods: :nike:VR_S Tour 2.0 15° Stiff

Hybrids:  910H 21° Stiff

Irons: 4-GW Pro Black CB1 with Project X rifle 6.0

Wedges:CC Jaws 56°.14° 60°.08°

Putter: Classic 1

Ball:  Z-Star XV Pure White


Posted
What happened? Did he have to withdraw?

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

He got MDF'd.  Made cut did not finish.  When too many people are tied at the bottom and make the first cut on Friday, they have a second cut after the third round on Saturday.  He got cut after Saturday's round.


Posted
Oh wow, I didn't know they did that...

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by gwlee7

He got MDF'd.  Made cut did not finish.

The initialism sounds so much dirtier than that.

Brandon a.k.a. Tony Stark

-------------------------

The Fastest Flip in the West


Note: This thread is 4905 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.