Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4910 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

The title sums it up.

Shot 72-74 at the Country Club of Lexington (SC) to pass it on my first attempt. I'm happy with myself, but I have to admit that I think some people need to reevaluate what they are doing with golf. Played with a guy that shot 108 in the morning round and didn't come back to play the afternoon. I understand people have bad rounds, but that was tough to watch. Anyways, it was fun and now I can't play amateur tournaments anymore :(

Driver: R11s 9 with a Fubuki Tour 63 X-Stiff
Fairway Wood: R11s 15.5 with Miyazaki Kusala Black 83 X-Stiff

Hybrid: taylormade.gif 4 with Fubuki 515 X-Stiff
Irons: titleist.gif Forged 660 3-PW with Dynamic Gold X-100

Wedges: callaway.gif CC Jaws 52 and 58 Degree
Putter: ping.gif In Anser 2


Posted

What is a PAT? Are you able to be a pro now?

What's In My  Stand Bag

 

Driver:  FT-iZ 9*

Hybrids: C3 3,4,5

Irons: C3 6-GW

Wedges: C3 58*/8 and 54*/12

Putter:  blade

Ball: Gamer V2

 

http://cdn.thesandtrap.com/0/0d/150x50px-LL-0d81d772_tst_award_kickstarter_otm.png


Posted

Congrats.

Sounds similar to what the guy in Paper Tiger said of some of the competitors.

Dan

:tmade: R11s 10.5*, Adila RIP Phenom 60g Stiff
:ping: G20 3W
:callaway: Diablo 3H
:ping:
i20 4-U, KBS Tour Stiff
:vokey: Vokey SM4 54.14 
:vokey: Vokey :) 58.11

:scotty_cameron: Newport 2
:sunmountain: Four 5

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Welcome to the 2%. :)

I still remember a LOT of my PAT from over two years ago: http://thesandtrap.com/t/42384/ive-passed-the-pat . Good stuff. Are you apprenticing under someone? Where are you and what do you eventually want to do?

Congratulations.

P.S. I played with a guy who didn't break 90 average for two rounds (I think it was 93/88 or something like that). Unfortunately he had to play the second round because they make you sit out six months or something like that if you don't play your second round or otherwise WD except for a medical reason.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
The title sums it up. Shot 72-74 at the Country Club of Lexington (SC) to pass it on my first attempt. I'm happy with myself, but I have to admit that I think some people need to reevaluate what they are doing with golf. Played with a guy that shot 108 in the morning round and didn't come back to play the afternoon. I understand people have bad rounds, but that was tough to watch. Anyways, it was fun and now I can't play amateur tournaments anymore :(

Congrats, the most impressive part is that you could make it through while watching a guy shoot 108!

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted
Congratulations. You didn't just pass it, you crushed it! Well done!

In David's bag....

Driver: Titleist 910 D-3;  9.5* Diamana Kai'li
3-Wood: Titleist 910F;  15* Diamana Kai'li
Hybrids: Titleist 910H 19* and 21* Diamana Kai'li
Irons: Titleist 695cb 5-Pw

Wedges: Scratch 51-11 TNC grind, Vokey SM-5's;  56-14 F grind and 60-11 K grind
Putter: Scotty Cameron Kombi S
Ball: ProV1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

yea I live here next to campbell and play with guys in the PGM program all the time.  They take the PAT here from the white tees and some of the guys I've played with couldn't break 90 on their best day.  Not sure what these guys are doing but, it makes alot of since why the PGA is full of bad teaching pros.

Congrats btw

Driver: Titleist 915 D3
3 wood: 15 Callaway X Hot pro
Hybrids:  18 Callaway X Hot Pro
Irons: 4-GW Callaway Apex
project x 6.0
Wedges: 54 , 58 Callaway
Putter: 2 ball
Ball: Callaway Chrome

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

Welcome to the 2%. :)

I still remember a LOT of my PAT from over two years ago: http://thesandtrap.com/t/42384/ive-passed-the-pat . Good stuff. Are you apprenticing under someone? Where are you and what do you eventually want to do?

Congratulations.

P.S. I played with a guy who didn't break 90 average for two rounds (I think it was 93/88 or something like that). Unfortunately he had to play the second round because they make you sit out six months or something like that if you don't play your second round or otherwise WD except for a medical reason.


I had no idea that only 2% of people pass it in their first attempt, that's giving me a certain bit of pride (along with some extra ego). I moved from Chicago to Greenville, SC at the beginning of the summer to pursue the PGM program offered at Clemson. As for what I want to do, I'm going to see how I do in the program and who knows where golf will take me in the future. I'm going to start playing in a lot of the mini-tour tournaments in a few months. Being able to play year round was imperative to my ascending to the next level of professional golf.

I hope I didn't come off as a jerk when I made those comments about that other player. What was most upsetting to me was that his inability to play affected the play of the other people in the group. It is very, very difficult to remain focused for 18 holes when someone in your group is hitting two balls off the tee, blading shots over the greens, duffing chips, and then five putting every single green. I understand that people have bad days on the golf course and if you're not used to tournament pressure, those bad days are going to be worse than normal. But a bad day for a player that is aspiring to be a pro should fall in the mid 80s, not in the 100s. A decent player that is fighting their swing for the day should still be able to get the ball in the hole and not be 36 over par for one round.

Maybe the guy will try again in the future. But if I saw him I'd recommend that the try a few things differently. I'd tell him at least make it to the tee before your scheduled tee time. Poor guy was just having a hard time from the get go.

Driver: R11s 9 with a Fubuki Tour 63 X-Stiff
Fairway Wood: R11s 15.5 with Miyazaki Kusala Black 83 X-Stiff

Hybrid: taylormade.gif 4 with Fubuki 515 X-Stiff
Irons: titleist.gif Forged 660 3-PW with Dynamic Gold X-100

Wedges: callaway.gif CC Jaws 52 and 58 Degree
Putter: ping.gif In Anser 2


Posted

You didn't come off in bad form because the guy shooting 108 had no business being out there. This is not a US Open set-up by any means with the course being set-up as fair as possible. His w/ding was the best thing for him to do as it showed compassion for the rest of the group especially those guys who are grinding to just make the target score of 15 over course rating in 36 holes. With your plus rating, I think it would take a lot to get you unglued, but to some of those guys that are on the bubble, it can mean a lot. Besides, the guy only has to wait 90 days to try again, but I doubt that 90 days would be enough to have a game good enough to make the grade.

The set-up comment was not to take away anything from the people that passed it because while it may not be crazy hard, it is still a tough mental test playing 36 in one day knowing that a job or career path is what is at stake. Playing any golf under those conditions and passing easily shows that you are ready to tackle some of the mini-tour events and sectionals that are offered. Good luck and enjoy!

  • Upvote 1

Callaway AI Smoke TD Max 10.5* | Cobra Big Tour 15.5* | Rad Tour 18.5* | Titleist U500 4i | T100 5-P | Vokey 50/8* F, 54/10* S,  58/10* S | Scotty Cameron Squareback 1


Posted

Congrats........you blew away the PAT requirement by a mile

My old home course hosted the PAT's in the 1990s.  Based on the CR, all they had to do was average 78's to pass and I was shocked by the terrible scores.  IMO.....that guy who shot 108 definitely had no business being on the course, but I suppose if he was willing to pay the fee, it's his own business.  I would have been p!ssed if I got stuck either with or behind his group!!

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Posted
Originally Posted by dsc123

Sounds similar to what the guy in Paper Tiger said of some of the competitors.

That guy didn't pass his PAT either. He had a really bad day. Anyway, his head was in writing the book.

Getting back on topic ... Congrats to OP Bastid. Always great to see hard work pay off.


Posted
Congrats on passing - another item checked off the list. Good luck at Clemson. [quote name="poser" url="/t/61033/passed-my-p-a-t#post_752430"]yea I live here next to campbell and play with guys in the PGM program all the time.  They take the PAT here from the white tees and some of the guys I've played with couldn't break 90 on their best day.  Not sure what these guys are doing but, it makes alot of since why the PGA is full of bad teaching pros.   Congrats btw [/quote] I don't understand what you're saying. If the guys can't break 90, they can't pass the PAT. If they can't pass the PAT, they can't become PGA teaching pros. How does not being able to become a PGA teaching pro make the PGA full of bad teaching pros? Besides, according to many folks here, you don't actually have to be able to break 90 (or 100, for that matter) to teach golf.

In The Bag: - Patience - Persistence - Perseverance - Platitudes


Posted
Originally Posted by LovinItAll

according to many folks here, you don't actually have to be able to break 90 (or 100, for that matter) to teach golf.

I don't buy into that at all....

What's in Paul's Bag:
- Callaway Big Bertha Alpha Driver
- Big Bertha Alpha 815 3-wood
- Callaway Razr Fit 5-wood
- Callaway Big Bertha 4-5 Rescue Clubs
-- Mizuno Mx-25 six iron-gap wedge
- Mizuno Mp-T4 56degree SW
- Mizuno Mp-T11 60degree SW
- Putter- Ping Cadence Ketsch


Note: This thread is 4910 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.