Jump to content
IGNORED

Augusta National admits two female members


LSU_justin
Note: This thread is 3455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Originally Posted by Subaroo

...and a Republican

Can of worms just opened....however is it really a surprise? Personally though I don't care and am real happy to see this finally happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by bamagrad03

Hopefully this sparks a change in all those small-minded, hate-spawning, bigoted women's only health clubs. I'm sure that Martha Burk will be out in front of them protesting with a mega-phone.

Wait...It's only small-minded if it is Augusta. If women want a women only club, then it's a-OK.

If you can name a women's club with comparable money, prestige, and influence that Augusta has and you express a genuine desire to become a member, I guarantee people like Martha Burke would be happy to protest on your behalf.  It's not about taking things away from men, it's about granting equal opportunities to women.

nike.gif  VR-S Covert 10.5*

nike.gif  SQ2 15*

  Idea Black Hybrid, 19*

mizuno.gif  MP54, 4-PW

vokey.gif SM 50*, 54*, 58*

nike.gif  Method 001

nike.gif  RZN One

Link to comment
Share on other sites


People need to stop turning everything into a cause. Men aren't allowed to feel self-conscious? Why are only women granted that concession? For the record, I see NO problem with all-women health clubs. But I think it is absolutely ludicrous that the thought of men wanting a club just for men is in any way backed by hate or discrimination.

Why is it the end of the world if guys just want a place they can escape to (in the same manner women are rightfully afforded)? Tired of double standards.

This is the perfect example of a straw man argument.  Create a position that no one has taken and argue against that.  No one is trying to outlaw all men's clubs.  There are all-male cigar, poker, health, and social clubs all over the country.  There are also the same sorts of race-exclusive clubs.  The difference (which I believe you understand but can't argue) is that those clubs don't benefit from millions of dollars in endorsements from companies that recieve federal money and they aren't featured on national TV with limited commercials every year.

nike.gif  VR-S Covert 10.5*

nike.gif  SQ2 15*

  Idea Black Hybrid, 19*

mizuno.gif  MP54, 4-PW

vokey.gif SM 50*, 54*, 58*

nike.gif  Method 001

nike.gif  RZN One

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:
Originally Posted by ClayHbg View Post

If you can name a women's club with comparable money, prestige, and influence that Augusta has and you express a genuine desire to become a member, I guarantee people like Martha Burke would be happy to protest on your behalf.  It's not about taking things away from men, it's about granting equal opportunities to women.

This makes absolutely no sense. If it's SUUUUCH a horrible example of discrimination, then it doesn't matter on what scale it's done. Face it, you think it is OK to discriminate against men in this case, but not against women (because it's not a PC issue to make sure men are included).

By the way, from Curves website: " Curves has nearly 10,000 locations in over 85 countries."

Quote:
This is the perfect example of a straw man argument.  Create a position that no one has taken and argue against that.  No one is trying to outlaw all men's clubs.  There are all-male cigar, poker, health, and social clubs all over the country.  There are also the same sorts of race-exclusive clubs.  The difference (which I believe you understand but can't argue) is that those clubs don't benefit from millions of dollars in endorsements from companies that recieve federal money and they aren't featured on national TV with limited commercials every year.

I didn't create a straw man. I articulated a simple premise that it's OK for women to have a club where only women are allowed, but for some reason it's some bastion of bigotry and discrimination for men to have the same. The size or revenue generation of the club is immaterial as it relates to the concept of discrimination. If Augusta was so wrong to not allow women, than ANY club that disallows men, should be equally wrong, shouldn't it?

You can't say: "Augusta is highly discriminatory by not allowing women, but it is only discriminatory because they make more money than the all women's health club across the street."

Talk about a straw man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I don't really hold an opinion on the matter, because I'm not a member and never will be a member - much like 99.9% of the readers/members of TST. I "know of" the prestige and the legendary history, however it is not a part of me and has no effect on me whatsoever.

I really could care less who they let in to their tree house. I enjoy watching The Masters and that's all I really care about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Spyder

I really could care less who they let in to their tree house. I enjoy watching The Masters and that's all I really care about.

This is sort of where I stand on the matter as well. I couldn't care less who the let in or out of their treehouse. I just find it off putting that they're being pressured by others to cave to a politically correct agenda. While others aren't being held to the same standard.

There's nothing wrong with men wanting a place of their own to go and get away from women from time to time. Just like there's nothing wrong with women wanting their own club as well.

But as to whom they allow in their club under their own volition: I couldn't care less.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by bamagrad03

This is sort of where I stand on the matter as well. I couldn't care less who the let in or out of their treehouse. I just find it off putting that they're being pressured by others to cave to a politically correct agenda. While others aren't being held to the same standard.

There's nothing wrong with men wanting a place of their own to go and get away from women from time to time. Just like there's nothing wrong with women wanting their own club as well.

But as to whom they allow in their club under their own volition: I couldn't care less.

Except that they made it very clear that thay wouldn't be pressured ... and they weren't.  Has anything regarding Augusta been in the news since after the Masters ended BEFORE they (on their own) made this announcement?  The Martha Burk issue of 10 years ago is dead.  The stories from last spring regarding the IBM CEO are long dead as well.  They did WHAT they wanted to do, and they did it WHEN they wanted to do it.  Plain and simple.

And I heard this morning that this time of year (while the club is closed for the summer, and just prior to it opening in the fall) is when they always admit their new members.  The only thing that is different here from a normal year is that they felt obligated to make the admission of the two female members public.  And, even that, I would suspect was not because of "pressure" but rather their own reasons (maybe goodwill, or growing the sport, who knows).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by bamagrad03

Quote:

Originally Posted by ClayHbg

If you can name a women's club with comparable money, prestige, and influence that Augusta has and you express a genuine desire to become a member, I guarantee people like Martha Burke would be happy to protest on your behalf.  It's not about taking things away from men, it's about granting equal opportunities to women.

This makes absolutely no sense. If it's SUUUUCH a horrible example of discrimination, then it doesn't matter on what scale it's done. Face it, you think it is OK to discriminate against men in this case, but not against women (because it's not a PC issue to make sure men are included).

By the way, from Curves website: "Curves has nearly 10,000 locations in over 85 countries."

I didn't create a straw man...I articulated a simple premise that it's OK for women to have a club where only women are allowed, but for some reason it's some bastion of bigotry and discrimination for men to have the same. The size or revenue generation of the club is immaterial as it relates to the concept of discrimination. If Augusta was so wrong to not allow women, than ANY club that disallows men, should be equally wrong, shouldn't it?

You want to be a Curves member?  That's cool.  I suggest you form a group and start protesting.  There are plenty of equality groups that would be happy to take up your cause.  But I'm guessing you merely want to argue, which is also fine.

Yes....that is a straw man argument because (in regards to Martha Burk/Augusta) no one was arguing the premise that all exclusive clubs should be banned because they are discriminatory.  If your club is TRULY private then you actually have a right to discriminate and Martha Burk herself stated that those clubs should be viewed differently than places such as Augusta.  The same applies to your private residence.  If you don't want white people in your house you have a right to disallow them from entering your home.   Like I said previously, if men, women, Whites, Blacks, Asians or Latinos want to have their own exclusive/private clubs it's fine by me.  That's their prerogative and no one is trying to prevent that.  If you want to sit in a room with a bunch of other men that's totally cool with me as well.  But when your club receives government money, tax benefits, or it is endorsed by companies that are funded by everyone's tax dollars then you have a different situation on your hands.

If that applies to Curves or any other establishment then I agree with you 100 percent.

nike.gif  VR-S Covert 10.5*

nike.gif  SQ2 15*

  Idea Black Hybrid, 19*

mizuno.gif  MP54, 4-PW

vokey.gif SM 50*, 54*, 58*

nike.gif  Method 001

nike.gif  RZN One

Link to comment
Share on other sites


It's about time.

On another note related to this story:

I heard on NPR yesterday that the initiation fee there is only $30 grand.  That sure seems cheap considering the facility it is.

Comparable country clubs in our area have a $100k to $150K initiation fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by vo-man

It's about time.

On another note related to this story:

I heard on NPR yesterday that the initiation fee there is only $30 grand.  That sure seems cheap considering the facility it is.

Comparable country clubs in our area have a $100k to $150K initiation fee.

The thing is though, is that in the case of Augusta.. it's not all about money. The "prestige cannot be bought". Most other country clubs around the country will accept you if your bank roll is large enough. According to Augusta and history, they don't care about your income. They claim you cannot buy an invitation.

However, being the realist that I am, I highly doubt that if someone were to say: "Here's $1,000,000... consider it a donation to the club. May I have a jacket and membership?", that the answer would be a firm "No.".

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Quote:

Originally Posted by bamagrad03

This is sort of where I stand on the matter as well. I couldn't care less who the let in or out of their treehouse. I just find it off putting that they're being pressured by others to cave to a politically correct agenda. While others aren't being held to the same standard.

There's nothing wrong with men wanting a place of their own to go and get away from women from time to time. Just like there's nothing wrong with women wanting their own club as well.

But as to whom they allow in their club under their own volition: I couldn't care less.

Except that they made it very clear that thay wouldn't be pressured ... and they weren't.  Has anything regarding Augusta been in the news since after the Masters ended BEFORE they (on their own) made this announcement?  The Martha Burk issue of 10 years ago is dead.  The stories from last spring regarding the IBM CEO are long dead as well.  They did WHAT they wanted to do, and they did it WHEN they wanted to do it.  Plain and simple.

And I heard this morning that this time of year (while the club is closed for the summer, and just prior to it opening in the fall) is when they always admit their new members.  The only thing that is different here from a normal year is that they felt obligated to make the admission of the two female members public.  And, even that, I would suspect was not because of "pressure" but rather their own reasons (maybe goodwill, or growing the sport, who knows).

Come on man.  You don't think the fact that IBM now has a female CEO had anything to do with this decision?  Really?  If you honestly think that Augusta hasn't been under constant and continued pressure from CBS and  the boards of their former and current advertisers like Coca-Cola, AT&T;, and IBM (all of which have female board members) then you obviously don't understand how Fortune 500s work.

nike.gif  VR-S Covert 10.5*

nike.gif  SQ2 15*

  Idea Black Hybrid, 19*

mizuno.gif  MP54, 4-PW

vokey.gif SM 50*, 54*, 58*

nike.gif  Method 001

nike.gif  RZN One

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by Shorty

There's a big difference between discrimination and providing a place for women to work out without being leered at or feeling self-conscious when there are a million places men can work out.

That would be discrimination - the motive for a discriminatory policy is irrelevant.

What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander.

Driver: Cobra 460SZ 9.0, med.
3 Wood: Taylor stiff
3-hybrid: Nike 18 deg stiff
4-hybrid:
Taylor RBZ 22 deg regular
Irons:5-9, Mizuno MP30, steel
Wedges: PW, 52, 56, 60 Mizuno MP30
Putter: Odyssey 2-ball

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by ClayHbg

Come on man.  You don't think the fact that IBM now has a female CEO had anything to do with this decision?  Really?  If you honestly think that Augusta hasn't been under constant and continued pressure from CBS and  the boards of their former and current advertisers like Coca-Cola, AT&T;, and IBM (all of which have female board members) then you obviously don't understand how Fortune 500s work.

I admittedly know very little about how Fortune 500 companies work, so you could be right.  But from what I understand about how Augusta and the Masters works, no amount of pressure from CBS or their advertisers is going to matter to them - they are the ones with the upper hand.  Augusta are the ones who keep CBS and the advertisers on their toes (with 1 year contracts), not the other way around.

Besides, if it was about IBM and their female CEO, wouldn't she have been one of the new members as well?

(This is getting confusing ... I feel like the two identical threads should be combined into one, no?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I'm sure it was just to shut up hags like Martha Burk who wouldn't relent until Augusta admitted a female to their club.  Condi was a good choice, hopefully they did it because they wanted to and not because of the external pressures.

Quote:

I admittedly know very little about how Fortune 500 companies work, so you could be right.  But from what I understand about how Augusta and the Masters works, no amount of pressure from CBS or their advertisers is going to matter to them - they are the ones with the upper hand.  Augusta are the ones who keep CBS and the advertisers on their toes (with 1 year contracts), not the other way around.

Besides, if it was about IBM and their female CEO, wouldn't she have been one of the new members as well?

(This is getting confusing ... I feel like the two identical threads should be combined into one, no?)

Joe Paradiso

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

...if it was about IBM and their female CEO, wouldn't she have been one of the new members as well?

Not if she (Ginni Rometty) declined Augusta's invitation to become a member...Augusta has not and never will reveal how many actual invitations go out every year.  They only reveal those that accept.  Part of the Augusta lure is the notion that no one in their right mind would ever decline an invitation so it's unlikely they'll ever reveal how many declined invites the get every year.

nike.gif  VR-S Covert 10.5*

nike.gif  SQ2 15*

  Idea Black Hybrid, 19*

mizuno.gif  MP54, 4-PW

vokey.gif SM 50*, 54*, 58*

nike.gif  Method 001

nike.gif  RZN One

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Originally Posted by vo-man

On another note related to this story:

I heard on NPR yesterday that the initiation fee there is only $30 grand.  That sure seems cheap considering the facility it is.

Comparable country clubs in our area have a $100k to $150K initiation fee.

They don't need to have high initiation fees when they make millions on the exclusive TV partnership with CBS, as well as the sponsorship money received for the 4 minutes of advertising per hour (IBM, etc.).  Plus, they have some of the worlds elite members (Warren Buffet, Bill Gates, etc.)... I'm sure the club receives plenty of money via donors (members wanting to give back) and endowment funds that by far exceed any need to raise dues/fee's?

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

They did WHAT they wanted to do, and they did it WHEN they wanted to do it.  Plain and simple.

I am, admittedly, speculating here.

Originally Posted by ClayHbg

Come on man.  You don't think the fact that IBM now has a female CEO had anything to do with this decision?  Really?  If you honestly think that Augusta hasn't been under constant and continued pressure from CBS and  the boards of their former and current advertisers like Coca-Cola, AT&T;, and IBM (all of which have female board members) then you obviously don't understand how Fortune 500s work.

But you are guessing as well.

Originally Posted by Golfingdad

Besides, if it was about IBM and their female CEO, wouldn't she have been one of the new members as well?

Me speculating again.

Originally Posted by ClayHbg

Not if she (Ginni Rometty) declined Augusta's invitation to become a member...Augusta has not and never will reveal how many actual invitations go out every year.  They only reveal those that accept.  Part of the Augusta lure is the notion that no one in their right mind would ever decline an invitation so it's unlikely they'll ever reveal how many declined invites the get every year.

And, you as well.

Neither of us is a member at Augusta (I am speculating again, but I feel this is a safe assumption??) so we really have no clue which of us is "right" here, nor will we ever.  Both situations are equally plausible.  The end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3455 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I had to think about this topic for a while. I don't tend to remember specific details about my putts, but a few do stand out in my mind so I guess they're worth noting. I don't know that I'd call them my favorite but it's close enough. #18 at Spooky Brook Might be the hardest 4' putt I've ever had. Pin was back right and I hit my third shot just to the right of it. The green slopes fairly severely back to front. I read the green but I knew the putt anyway as I've seen it before. I told the guys I was playing with that the putt was it was going to break almost 3' and if it doesn't go in I'd have a longer coming back up for par than I was looking at. It went in. #12 at Quail Brook I'm not even sure how to describe this green properly. It's not quite a two-tiered green, but the back and front are separated by a ridge that goes across the middle of it, with the green sloping harder off the front than the back. You can generally putt from the front to a back hole location but good luck keeping the ball on the green if you putt from back to front. On this particular day, I was looking at the latter. I had to putt up into the apron due to how the ball was going to break and that helped slow the ball down enough to hit the hole at the perfect speed. One of the rare birdies I've seen on that hole. #2 at Hyatt Hills Short par 5. This makes the list because it's the first eagle putt I've ever made, which funny enough happened the day after the first eagle I've ever made. I've made two eagles in all my life and they came on back to back days. I wasn't even planning on playing golf - it was a Monday - but I was doing some work at the place I used to work at when I was younger and catching up with some of the guys I've known for years. They were going out to play in the afternoon and had a spot available. I used to see these guys every day for years but we've never played together, so I said I'm in. I hit a really good approach shot into slope that separated the two tiers on the green and spun the ball closer to the hole. Had roughly 8' left to the hole, a downhill right to left breaker. One of the guys said, "You've got to make this, I've never seen an eagle before," and I said, "I've never made an eagle putt before." And then I made it. #17 at Stoneleigh @GolfLug's post reminded me of my own heroics on #17 a couple of years ago. The hole was back left, in the bottom tier. I hit my approach short of the green and flubbed my chip so it stayed on the top tier. I read how the putt was going to break after the ramp (is that what you call it?), then read my putt up to that point. It needed to basically die at that point because if it hit the slope with any kind of speed, it would long past the hole and possibly off the green. I hit the putt perfectly and holed the 40-footer center cup. #6 at Meadow at Neshanic Valley, #15 in the Round This was during the stroke play qualifier of my tournament. It might be a little bit of recency bias and I hit some really good long putts in the four rounds I played, but this 7-footer was my favorite putt of the entire tournament. The hole was cut on the top of a ridge. I hit my tee shot short right but hit a pretty good chip just long and below the hole. Play had backed up at this point, with the ladies waiting on the tee while we were finishing up. I hit the putt just a hair on the high side and it curled around the hole, fell back a couple of inches and stopped on lip. We all looked at it incredulously, "How does that not fall in?" Before I took my first step towards the hole, the ball must have thought the same thing and decided to drop.
    • I don't remember a ton of putts, but I've thought about this a bit and came up with 2 good ones. #5 at Mid-South: 2017 Newport Cup I remember the putt pretty well, but the surrounding details are a little hazy. I believe this was in my singles match against @cipher, and it was a hole he was stroking on. I had hit a mediocre approach to the front of the green and had what must have been a 50 foot putt to a back pin. If I remember correctly, @cipher was pretty close for an easy par at worst. I had @mvmac help me out with a read, which ended up being a great read by him. Hit the putt and jarred it for birdie. It was perfect speed, too, would have been an easy 2 putt if it hadn't gone in. I think we ended up tying for the hole. But I rarely make putts that long, and doing it to steal half a hole was really nice. #3 Fox Hollow (Links): 2023 Match Play This was on the third extra hole of a scratch match against a legitimate 0 handicapper. We had tied after 18 holes and traded pars on the first two extra holes. On the third extra hole, he had about 30 feet for birdie; I had about 25. We were on pretty much the exact same line. He missed his putt just on the low side, and I conceded the par. I felt good over this putt - I knew the break well and just needed good speed. I hit a great (not perfect) putt, and BAM, back of the cup for the victory on the 21st hole. I will say that the speed wasn't great, as it would have been a few feet past if it didn't hit the cup. But I wanted to give the ball a chance and take a bit of break out of it. I went on to win the match play tournament, which is my only tournament victory in a scratch event.
    • there will be lots of changes.  i mean, look at newey past, each team fell off a cliff when he moved on i think max is the magic bullet   if red bull loses him then whee are they going for drivers?   lots of young talent but he is a proven winner and i’m sure top engineers love to work with him  
    • I too, like @GolfLug, remember great wedge, iron shots, or my missed putts, more than my made putts. My most memorable recently, would be: #17 Old Course St. Andrews (last year) I had been putting awful all day (I started 3 putt, 4 putt, 3 putt, 3 putt), but found a putting stroke on the back 9 and was 1 under on the back going into 16 and of course I 3-putted it for a bogey. Got to 17 and my playing partner just hit it into the hotel, so I went a little more left and decided to not try and hit it over the hotel.  And as soon as my ball was in the air, I heard one of the other caddies do the chicken noise.  LOL My shot was a little more left than I wanted, about 185 yards, I hit a 6-iron and it was drawing right at the flag.  The pin was just to the right of he bunker and towards the front of the green. My ball hit short (and just missed going into said bunker) and stopped about 15 feet left of the hole. Had a little left to right break and as soon as I hit it, I knew it was in.  Birdie on the road hole, looked at the caddie and said not bad for a Chicken.  Parred 18 (missed 10 foot birdie putt) for a 35 on the back 9 at the Old Course. #18 Springfield G&CC Last year while playing in our season long match play event, my partner and I get the 18th hole needing to win the match to move on into the knockout round.  We are tied going into 18.  A tie and we lose on overall points by .5.  Our teaching pro is on the other team (very good golfer), so we were pretty sure we needed a birdie to have a chance to win the match, I hit on of the best drives I hit all day and had about 135 yards to the pin, but it was in a place where you didn't really want to be long.  So I hit a PW and it landed just short of the flag but released about 12 feet past the hole, so have a devilish putt coming back down the hill.  Our competitors were away and the pro missed his birdie putt by inches, I thought it was in when he hit it.  So after reading the putt, which probably had a 2 cup left to right break, I made the putt to win the match.   #15 Springfield G&CC A few years back, was playing in the first round of the Club Championship (against the previous years runner-up) and my putter was balky all day.  Got to the 15 hole, 2nd Par 5 on back, and was 3-down with 4 to play.  We both hit good drives, both hit good second shots and we both hit decent 3rd shots.  I was about 15 feet and he was just a hair longer.  He missed his putt, I had another slider putt down the hill, with about a foot of right to left break and made the putt.  I birded the next hole, to go 1 down, but not a memorable putt as I only needed a bogey to beat him on that hole, he had all kinds of issues going on.  Lost on 17, as he birdied it, right after I missed mine to lose 2&1.
    • Wordle 1,049 3/6* ⬜⬜⬜🟩🟨 ⬜⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...