Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
bluecollar01

Scoring Consistency

7 posts in this topic

I play in a golf league and I noticed that a lot of the folks that play at my level (bogey) seem to get to their score very differently.  What I mean is you have a few whom basically bogey every hole where as others mix in several birdies with several doubles or triples to shoot roughly the same score.

What I'm curious about from the community here is:

a) which type of scorer are you (steady or erratic)?

b) do you think one scoring type (steady or erratic) is better than the other and why?

c) is one's "scoring type" indicative of potential / skill / etc.

Obviously, lots of factors (course length, course type, type of player, etc.) could effect scores and someone may not always play to their "archetype".  I was just curious of the communities thoughts on the subject... or lack thereof.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

If I shoot 4 over, I'll probably have a couple of bogeys a side, maybe 5 total, and I birdie. I typically have more pars than anything else. I shot 73 a couple of weeks ago (+2) at the course I grew up on. Snap hooked the first drive OB and made double. 17 pars later, it was a 73.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by geauxforbroke

If I shoot 4 over, I'll probably have a couple of bogeys a side, maybe 5 total, and I birdie. I typically have more pars than anything else. I shot 73 a couple of weeks ago (+2) at the course I grew up on. Snap hooked the first drive OB and made double. 17 pars later, it was a 73.


To me, that seems pretty steady and I'm sure the deviation for lower handicap players is much less.  That being said though, even on the touring level you have guys like Phil who IMHO seem to be erratic but still shoot great golf vs someone like, I don't know... maybe, Webb Simpson who is more of a consistent scorer type.

Maybe, all it indicates is how aggressive a style they play vs their ability to scramble?

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm an erratic scorer for sure. I recently shot an 84 that included 4 birdies and 3 triples (still pissed about that round, ha ha ha).

I'm not sure if one way is better. I feel like, as an erratic scorer, I have the potential to go out and break 80 or break 90 (in a bad way) with every round. I think a lot of the people who have a similar handicap to mine don't have the potential to break 80 on a round. On the other hand, it's a constant struggle with me to get more consistentcy from hole to hole. If I eliminated anything over a double bogey, for example, I'd be consistently in the low 80s instead of sporadically in the 90s and mostly in the high 80s.

Erratic scoring, though, is fun for match play. It means one bad hole won't put my round in the toilet like it does with stroke play. It's also great to bounce back from a triple bogey with a par or birdie because of how it messes with your opponent.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by DeadMan

I'm an erratic scorer for sure. I recently shot an 84 that included 4 birdies and 3 triples (still pissed about that round, ha ha ha).

I'm not sure if one way is better. I feel like, as an erratic scorer, I have the potential to go out and break 80 or break 90 (in a bad way) with every round. I think a lot of the people who have a similar handicap to mine don't have the potential to break 80 on a round. On the other hand, it's a constant struggle with me to get more consistentcy from hole to hole. If I eliminated anything over a double bogey, for example, I'd be consistently in the low 80s instead of sporadically in the 90s and mostly in the high 80s.

Erratic scoring, though, is fun for match play. It means one bad hole won't put my round in the toilet like it does with stroke play. It's also great to bounce back from a triple bogey with a par or birdie because of how it messes with your opponent.


I see lots of people in league that shoot scores in a manner similar to yours.  I'm fairly consistent in that I'll make mostly bogies with a few pars sprinkled in and a few doubles but I don't often have the big number.

And, I agree that as a steady player I don't feel like I have that ability to go out and score way under my average but I usually don't shoot much over it.  I didn't know if that meant I'd never get much better or that I'd just improve slowly. Thought it might point to potential but maybe it just has to do with aggressive vs conservative play.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm definitely steady, if I shoot poorly it's because I'm carding too many bogeys but I hardly ever make doubles or worse.

Steady IMO, a steady player usually will have just as much potential to make birdies as an erratic player but without wasting them to make up for big scores.  To answer your third question I think both would have equal potential if they are shooting similar scores, they may just play the course differently or one could be a better decision maker.  Some of that is natural.

I'm not including steady scorers who are short knocking grinders in this comparison, these guys may shoot in the mid 70's to low 80's but they hardly ever have the game to make birdies which is what's needed to shoot even or better.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though it feels erratic it's probably not as bad as it seems. I track stats so I can pull up what my average scores are from one round to everything I have logged in 5 round increments. I look more at the trends of GIR and FIR but I do look at scores from time to time it doesn't vary more than 5%.

I just looked at my stats, everything I have in there dates back to late 2012. Using just the highest scoring percentages from day one par 26% bogey 46%. Last 20 rounds par 31% bogey 42%. Everything else is significantly lower.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thank you! Got out for a few holes so it was a good day in spite of work!
    • 2/25: Played two rounds today with dad at a different course than usual. Shot 96 and 93. A few nice strings of pars and made several amazing putts (). Mostly bogeys other than that but managed a couple of absolute blow-up holes in each round that helped to guarantee 90+ scores from an otherwise very nice day of golf. I could complain about "sand-traps" sans-a-single-spec-of-sand with 10-foot wide puddles in them, or mushy fairways, or waiting 5-minutes for the 4-some in front of you on every shot, but there wasn't a notes field on the scorecard.  Practice is paying off, though. Hit my drives farther than ever, draws when I wanted them, and the fade didn't let me down when I needed it. 3/4 "flighted" shots are the new go-to approach of choice all the way out to 160+ with my 3-iron, and (n)GIRs have jumped up considerably. I've rambled on about my short-game improvements before, but it continues. Holed a pitch shot from about 10 yards and stopped 2 others 6 inches from the pin. Gotta play some more rounds from the front so I get used to stringing pars together. Realized today that I don't just get nervous about it, I also get cocky. Weird combination. 
    • I really like the travel of the sweetspot on the backswing. Kinda Nicklaus-esque.   They just stall a bit and it happens after impact. Can see how the belt loops are rotating all the way to impact.
    • At the top level the men may still be much better than the women at putting. Paige McKenzie once talked about how she played against some college guys who destroyed her on putting and she thought she was pretty good relative to her peers. I expect the best pro women ballstrikers have to work even less on putting to compete successfully than the guys where every edge is crucial just to get a card and make cuts. I love to watch Rory and DJ crank it out there. But I also get a kick out of Jim Furyk and Mo Martin's precision oriented play. It's all good. If they want to make accuracy more important for PGA players, all they have to do is grow the average event rough up a bit more so there's more of a penalty on every errant shot on the loss of spin and swing/ball speed reduction. Those are real issues for the sport...at least for facilities that don't cater to higher income golfers.
    • I have the Zepp 2 Golf (the round sensor).    Ive read the manual multiple times, and have approximately 500 ball strikes.    As I'm new to golf I can't seriously vouch for its accuracy, but I will say this: it's helping me improve my golf swing.    The 3D swing analysis is a great tool as is the swing comparison capability. In my opinion once you learn about what the tool measures and how it can be quite effective it    However, I do have a question: In the daily swings window, what does the red "P" next to the specific swing data mean?   Please and Thanks for any input.    V/R,  Chris
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Catcher20
      Catcher20
      (27 years old)
    2. JD15
      JD15
      (52 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon