• Announcements

    • iacas

      GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Contest   09/22/2016

      Join our GAME GOLF Ryder Cup Challenge to win an autographed GAME GOLF, a Pebble Steel watch, and many more great prizes!
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
marklemcd

Forum noob from Northern California

4 posts in this topic

I first played golf as a teen and then through college (not competitively).  I gave it up after college because I couldn't afford it once I had to pay for it for a bit while I established myself in my career.  Started playing again 17 months ago and have completely fallen in love with the sport but found it completely different picking it up at 34 years old after a 12 year hiatus (and 55 pounds lighter than in college).  I've worked my way from 28 handicap on January 1 this year to as low as a 19.2 though it's currently at 22.  I struggled for a bit when I got new irons to replace the used set gifted to me by a friend.

Here's my gear if you're interested:

DR:  Nike VRS

3 Wood:  Nike SQ Dyno

3H: Taylormade  Burner Rescue

5H: Taylormade Burner Rescue

Irons 4-PW:  Mizuno HP-M4

SW:  An old Calloway X

GW:  No brand, just a crappy 52 degree that I bought for 20 bucks

PT:  Odyssey dual force 2

The main thing I'm working on right now is a Steady Head.  It's the key to me hitting what is decent for me.  When it's steady, solid contact with a 7 iron going 155-160.  When I don't it's chunk city.  I'm making progress, played 18 this morning without a single chunk and shot 88.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Want to get rid of this advertisement? Sign up (or log in) today! It's free!

San Rafael isn't that far from Sac.  You and I have similar experiences with golf.  I golfed a bit when I was young, then didn't golf or even swing a club for like 15 years.  However, I gave it up even before college (right around high school), and picked it up about 5-6 years ago.  When I started again, I couldn't hit a driver or 3w to save my life.  I played shorter, easier courses and hit 3i off almost every tee.

Anyway, where do you usually play?  And welcome to the board!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I play most often at Peacock Gap here in San Rafael, mostly out of convenience since it's about 2 miles away.  It's not a memorable 18, but it's decent enough.  I play a lot on Ocean at Olympic since I have a friend who is a member (it kills me) and I play Presidio often with friends who live in the city.

I'd really like to find more people to play with in all though.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome. Great to see another Northern Californian. I am in the South Bay.
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2016 TST Partners

    GAME Golf
    PING Golf
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • No offense, but in my opinion this makes you unprepared to discuss it.
    • Every year, something is changed in a club design.  The real differences are minimal, assuming your current clubs are from within the last 10 or so years (just throwing out a random number).

      However, I just got upgraded to the Ping G driver from the Ping G30, and the big change I noticed is the face of the driver has a bit more friction on the G (at least as I understand it).  What it seems to do is reduce side spin, while retaining normal-ish back spin (I use the low-spin tec version).  When I miss-hit a drive with my old driver vs the newer one, I see noticeably less slice or hook with the newer version.
        When I go through those articles, I mostly read through the reviews of them.  It gives a better idea of what might be better.
    • Right, but then you're just getting into however different people value different things (including money, the performance of their golf clubs, the looks of the golf clubs, the value of a name brand, etc.). People have different values. For something like this, there's rarely any agreement on those, nor is there any "right" or "wrong" answers. I use a set of muscle backs that could just as easily be from the 1950s as now. The tech on those isn't really improving much (though the shafts are undoubtedly much better).
    • We went round and round a bit on this last year, but I don't remember seeing decision 15-3b/1 mentioned.  The difference between this decision and 27/6 seems to be that B's ball is found in a timely manner.  The finding of the "other" ball makes it virtually certain that A's ball was moved by an outside agency (Player B).  In the other thread, B's ball is never found.  27/6 allows the same kind of relief as long as the "other" ball is found within the 5-minute search limit.  As I read the rules and decisions, this is a timing issue,  the rules require a decision to be made within 5 minutes of beginning the search for A's ball.  If the "other ball" isn't found, its presumed lost.   In a way this is somewhat similar to another discussion we had, where a player's ball apparently hit a cart path and went much further than anticipated.  He searched and didn't find it at the expected distance, went back and played another tee shot for the lost ball, and eventually found the original much closer to the green.  He couldn't then put the original into play and "negate" the second tee ball, as he'd already searched for 5 minutes. I don't know if the difference in the timing of the discovery is adequate justification for the different outcomes, but that seems to me to be the defining factor.  It would be interesting to get the take of some of the USGA rules experts on this, not on what the rules say, but on why they draw the distinction.
    • I'd have thought there would be a sliding scale, akin to a volume discount. Not just $x/18 = per-hole cost. Or if there are obvious points where it's not terrible to get back to the clubhouse, make 3-hole, 7-hole, 11-hole, 15-hole, and 18-hole rates. Then you could even consider the par of the holes. Heck, if the course started par 5, 4, 5 I'd be tempted to just play the first three holes three times.  I'd get more for my money than playing holes 4, 5, and 6 which are pars 3, 4, 3.
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Images

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. bandstan
      bandstan
      (46 years old)
    2. boobiemiles
      boobiemiles
      (25 years old)
    3. ElsieOlson
      ElsieOlson
      (77 years old)
    4. Matt66
      Matt66
      (26 years old)
  • Blog Entries