Jump to content
IGNORED

What Ruling Would You Have Made?


Meltdwhiskey
Note: This thread is 3843 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

No the only time I can remeber going into yellow there was a drop zone. But what do you get from yellow?

Let me get this straight.

You have been playing golf for a number of years and only once hit your ball into a water hazard (that is, a WH marked with yellow stakes)? Where have you been playing, in a desert??

Link to comment
Share on other sites


No the only time I can remeber going into yellow there was a drop zone. But what do you get from yellow?

When I asked if you had ever opened a rule book did you not think there may be a hint there?

But to save you the effort

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Definitions/

Look for Water Hazard and Lateral Water Hazard

http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Rule-26/#26-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites


When I asked if you had ever opened a rule book did you not think there may be a hint there? But to save you the effort [URL=http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Definitions/]http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Definitions/[/URL] Look for Water Hazard and Lateral Water Hazard [URL=http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Rule-26/#26-1]http://www.usga.org/Rule-Books/Rules-of-Golf/Rule-26/#26-1[/URL]

I think I was doing it right just had the names backwards

Link to comment
Share on other sites


What course is this? I always like to check distances on Google Earth on these types of posts...just for fun.

River Pines in John's Creek, GA.

A little update on this post, I played again on Saturday and oddly hit in this area again - although a much weaker shot that first hit the fairway and then kicked left and for sure landed in that rough area short of the creek and pretty close to the path.  We had talked about the 'virtual certainty' clause. With my ball in there this time, it was very obvious.  I took a look around and decided that I should not have had a hard time finding it in that rough.  I'd say now that for it to have not gone in the creek, it would have had to go in a little ditch-type thing short of the rough area.  You might be able to make out on the graphic - it is a little darker green rectangle that extends from the path to the tree line to the lower left. I'm closer to virtual certainty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


There's the question.  How can you play the game to a 5.8 handicap without knowing that very fundamental difference?

This was kind of my original thought when responding to Nick.  On the one hand, how does one get that low without knowing the rules.  On the other, did ignorance of the rules help contribute to the lowering of the cap?  I have no doubt that he hits the ball great or he wouldn't be near a 5.  But that is a really low cap to be not understanding some of the more basic rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This was kind of my original thought when responding to Nick.  On the one hand, how does one get that low without knowing the rules.  On the other, did ignorance of the rules help contribute to the lowering of the cap?  I have no doubt that he hits the ball great or he wouldn't be near a 5.  But that is a really low cap to be not understanding some of the more basic rules.

I just had the words backward. An I asked the kid who I learned the rules from and he thought it was backwards too

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Meltdwhiskey

This was kind of my original thought when responding to Nick.  On the one hand, how does one get that low without knowing the rules.  On the other, did ignorance of the rules help contribute to the lowering of the cap?  I have no doubt that he hits the ball great or he wouldn't be near a 5.  But that is a really low cap to be not understanding some of the more basic rules.

I just had the words backward. An I asked the kid who I learned the rules from and he thought it was backwards too

If that's how you learned the rules, then you haven't learned the rules.  90% of rules learned by word of mouth are incorrect in some way.  If he had something that simple wrong, then how likely is it that he was even worse on anything more complicated?

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

If that's how you learned the rules, then you haven't learned the rules.  90% of rules learned by word of mouth are incorrect in some way.  If he had something that simple wrong, then how likely is it that he was even worse on anything more complicated?

well on my team we reviewed the rules and I knew it all(we referred to hazards by their color) and also usually one of your playing partners knows the rules and they can help. Also if there is still a dispute I call rule 3-3 where you can play a ball for the 2 rules and afterwards get help to decide the correct ruling. We use that a lot at the junior level

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Note: This thread is 3843 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • First off please forgive me if this is not a proper post or not in the proper location, still learning the ropes around here. Second, it's important that I mention I am very new to the game with only about 10 rounds of golf under my belt, most being 9 holes. Only this year have I started playing 18. That being said, I am hooked, love the game and am very eager to learn and improve. To give you an idea of my skill, the last 2 18 rounds I played were 110 and 105. Not great at all, however I am slowly improving as I learn. Had been having bad slicing issues with the driver and hybrids but after playing some more and hitting the range, I've been able to improve on that quite a bit and have been hitting more straight on average. Irons have always come easier to me as far as hitting straight for some reason. Wedges have needed a lot of improvement, but I practice chipping about 20-30 mins about 3-5 times a week and that's helped a lot. Today I went to the range and started to note down some distance data, mind you I am averaging the distances based off my best guess compared to the distance markers on the range. I do not currently own a range finder or tracker. From reading some similar posts I do understand that filling gaps is ideal, but I am having a some issues figuring out those gaps and understanding which clubs to keep and remove as some gaps are minimal between clubs. Below is an image of the chart I put together showing the clubs and average distances I've been hitting and power applied. For some reason I am hitting my hybrids around the same distances and I am not sure why. Wondering if one of them should be removed. I didn't notice a huge loft difference either. The irons I have are hand me downs from my grandfather and after playing with them a bit, I feel like they're just not giving me what could potentially be there. The feel is a bit hard/harsh and underwhelming if that makes sense and I can't seem to get decent distances from them. Wondering if I should be looking to invest in some more updated irons and if those should be muscle backs or cavity backs? My knowledge here is minimal. I have never played with modern fairway woods, only the classic clubs that are actually wood and much smaller than modern clubs. I recently removed the 4 and 5 woods from my bag as I was never using them and I don't hit them very well or very far. Wondering if I should look into some more modern fairway wood options? I appreciate any feedback or advice anyone is willing to give, please forgive my lack of knowledge. I am eager to learn! Thank you.  
    • I would think that 3 in a row with the same players might get some behind the scenes examination from the SCGA if they were suspect.  Are there any clubs questioning the results?
    • What simple fact? A golf match is not a coin flip — there is a fact for you. I'm trying to help you, and you're throwing out what could easily be called sour grapes. Come with FACTS, not weak analogies. Then you've got nothing. Hopefully they've done a better job of making their case. 😛 
    • It's pretty close. The odds of a 50/50 shot going your way 21 times are greater than 1 in a million!  I guess your point is, that simple fact is not enough to declare these guys dirty rotten sandbaggers. I disagree, but fair enough. I posted it here on the message board to get different perspectives, after all.  I probably won't be digging further into specific scores. I have no dog in this fight beyond a generalized contempt for sandbagging. With that said, it would not surprise if a lot of clubs shared my concern and were grousing about it to the SCGA.
    • I had an article on Cam Smith pop up along with this..... Current major eligibility list for all LIV Golf players Here's a look at which majors, if any, all LIV Golf players are eligible.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...