Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Backswing or Impact - Delusional Thoughts on Why its a No-Brainer


Note: This thread is 4468 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah it is but you're are the one talking about establishing impact conditions at address.  That's how different address is from impact.

Establishing impact conditions at address doesn't mean adopting exact impact positions at address. I think I have already established this point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mvmac

So if good address = good impact, why aren't you a low single digit handicap?

Ouch! But I could be and I have left a point out of my stated handicap or a plus sign.

However, that's not an argument I've known golfers with excellent ball striking ability who fail to get to single digits because of other ghosts that this game can throw at you.

If the backswing is causing issues on the downswing then working on the backswing is working on improving impact

I couldn't have put that any better myself. That's why I allocate 5% of my time to such things.


Posted

Depends on what causes the issue, they are both intertwined to a certain degree. If you take the club way to the inside, which is not a set up related issue, but its a backswing issue that requires a compensation to get the correct impact conditions you want.

I didn't say you don't need to work on other parts of the swing, I just think golfers shouldn't be getting too bogged down by them.

As someone already said on this thread, "I could rest the club on my right shoulder and probably hit the ball better than a 1.2 handicapper."

That's because he has confidence in his ability to attain good impact positions with any old back swing.


Posted
Originally Posted by Everthing Golf

We're going round in circles a bit here.

Establishing impact conditions at address doesn't mean adopting exact impact positions at address. I think I have already established this point.

Ouch! But I could be and I have left a point out of my stated handicap or a plus sign.

However, that's not an argument I've known golfers with excellent ball striking ability who fail to get to single digits because of other ghosts that this game can throw at you.

I couldn't have put that any better myself. That's why I allocate 5% of my time to such things.

Actually we weren't till your last two posts.

That was not what you were saying for the whole thread up till now.

You might put 5% to such things, but if that is the primary fault of somebody's swing, then that must be worked on at a higher percentage. Like for me, I take the club head way behind me in the back swing. This causes me to come over the top. I do get into the slot, but it makes it near impossible for me to change that momentum of that such movement to one coming that should come the inside. This causes me to hit a slight pull fade. Which I can play, but I want to be able to hit a proper push draw. So to fix this, I MUST fix the back swing. Which means I must prioritize it, especially above 5%.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm being a bit random here, I know, but it relates to the topic at hand ...

Yesterday at the range I was hitting it quite poorly so I spent the last 10-15 balls doing the "preset drill."  (For those unfamiliar ... http://thesandtrap.com/t/35686/eriks-hips-forward-pre-set-drill-video/0_30#post_458570) I was immediately hitting the ball crisp and solid again, and with a nice draw.  I was hitting a 9-iron at the 150 yard target.  With my normal swing, when I strike it really well, it's probably going about 160 (this range is typically downwind), and with the preset drill, I was hitting it about 145.  So about a 10% dropoff.

If somebody is not really hurting for distance - and, of course, doesn't mind being laughed at - why would he not just play from that position?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Ouch! But I could be and I have left a point out of my stated handicap or a plus sign.

However, that's not an argument I've known golfers with excellent ball striking ability who fail to get to single digits because of other ghosts that this game can throw at you.

Yes sorry it was a little harsh but just trying to make a point.  I would strongly disagree that you can be an excellent ball striker and not be a low single digit handicap.  We probably just have different definitions of what an excellent ball striker is.

I'm being a bit random here, I know, but it relates to the topic at hand ...

Yesterday at the range I was hitting it quite poorly so I spent the last 10-15 balls doing the "preset drill."  (For those unfamiliar ... http://thesandtrap.com/t/35686/eriks-hips-forward-pre-set-drill-video/0_30#post_458570)  I was immediately hitting the ball crisp and solid again, and with a nice draw.  I was hitting a 9-iron at the 150 yard target.  With my normal swing, when I strike it really well, it's probably going about 160 (this range is typically downwind), and with the preset drill, I was hitting it about 145.  So about a 10% dropoff.

If somebody is not really hurting for distance - and, of course, doesn't mind being laughed at - why would he not just play from that position?

I've seen a few high handicap players/beginners really change their games by adopting this kind of set-up.  Can work very well for the right player.  Troy Matteson played for a couple seasons with a similar address position.  A player would have to watch out for rotating their Key #4 too far to the right for a couple reasons.  The backswing will tend to have the arms more inward with slightly flatter hips/shoulders.  Then on the downswing the hips and shoulders might be aimed too far to the right.  Basically the player could end up hitting hooks and big pushes.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yes sorry it was a little harsh but just trying to make a point.  I would strongly disagree that you can be an excellent ball striker and not be a low single digit handicap.  We probably just have different definitions of what an excellent ball striker is. I've seen a few high handicap players/beginners really change their games by adopting this kind of set-up.  Can work very well for the right player.  Troy Matteson played for a couple seasons with a similar address position.  A player would have to watch out for rotating their Key #4 too far to the right for a couple reasons.  The backswing will tend to have the arms more inward with slightly flatter hips/shoulders.  Then on the downswing the hips and shoulders might be aimed too far to the right.  Basically the player could end up hitting hooks and big pushes.

Thanks mike, that makes sense. Seeing as how I was hitting 5 yard draws with a 9 iron, they probably would turn into some big hooks with longer clubs. :)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How can you even control the impact position directly?  What you can do is control how you get to that impact position, which is via your whole swing.  I've always understood that you don't really want to have the feel of hitting the ball, ie, impact, but rather making a good swing that the ball just happens to get in the way of.  Impact takes what?  A thousandth of a second?  A ten thousandth?  How can the human body control that?  It can't - what it can control is how you get to that point and what you do after that point.  In other words, the swing.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Actually we weren't till your last two posts.

That was not what you were saying for the whole thread up till now.

You might put 5% to such things, but if that is the primary fault of somebody's swing, then that must be worked on at a higher percentage. Like for me, I take the club head way behind me in the back swing. This causes me to come over the top. I do get into the slot, but it makes it near impossible for me to change that momentum of that such movement to one coming that should come the inside. This causes me to hit a slight pull fade. Which I can play, but I want to be able to hit a proper push draw. So to fix this, I MUST fix the back swing. Which means I must prioritize it, especially above 5%.

I don't disagree with what you are saying and working on other parts of the swing should not be ignored.

From my experience, golfers and teaching pros allocate far too much time on parts of the swing that IMO don't accredit such importance.

It only stands to reason that your main intention during a swing will automatically be what you were working on during your last practice session. And again, IMO, if that's not an impact intention then you will be directing your focus somewhere other than the most important moment in the swing.

Like I said earlier, one intention - 100% focus, two intentions - 50% focus (at most) etc. Get your swing down before you go onto the course and trust what you have on the day. If you are going to have a swing intention/thought, then make sure you are focussing on impact.

Focussing on other parts of the swing is just wrong. A guy with a big axe has only one intention, hit the tree; an archer, the moment to let go; a baseball/tennis player, hit the ball; IOW they focus on the moment of truth. I know I'm in for an attack about how golf is a much more intricate move than these examples but its the same ball park. Bottom line its all about impact.

If you're casting or coming OTT at the start of the downswing then returning to the desired impact position is probably impossible. A little work on this fault would be advisable but as for the backswing, you can recover from most of those errors prior to impact but that's another topic.


Posted

Yes sorry it was a little harsh but just trying to make a point.  I would strongly disagree that you can be an excellent ball striker and not be a low single digit handicap.  We probably just have different definitions of what an excellent ball striker is.

Thanks, and I agree that most excellent ball strikers will have low single digit handicaps but things like the yips (I hate even using the word) can ruin careers - Baker-Finch, Ballesteros, Me - not to mention how mental/psychological issues can hold an excellent player back from his true potential.


  • Administrator
Posted

Patrick,

First, you know well enough to multiquote, so please start doing so.

And again, IMO, if that's not an impact intention then you will be directing your focus somewhere other than the most important moment in the swing.

Focussing on other parts of the swing is just wrong.

No, it's not "just wrong." As I have said a few times now, focusing on the backswing often improves "the most important moment in the swing." EVERY good instructor is focusing on "impact."

If you're casting or coming OTT at the start of the downswing then returning to the desired impact position is probably impossible. A little work on this fault would be advisable but as for the backswing, you can recover from most of those errors prior to impact but that's another topic.

"Can recover" and "are likely to recover" are two very different things.

At this point, I'll ask that you do as requested above: show us pictures of your setup, or a video of your swing. You have no valid reasons that I can conceive not to do so, especially given that you're wealthy enough to be in Australia and the UK within hours on the same day. I'm sure you have at least a three-year-old cell phone camera lying about.

So let's see it. Let's see something. You're all talk at this point - talk that's bordering on nonsensical and ignoring the many, many valid responses posted by myself and others.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hi Patrick @EverythingGolf

LOL, oops, I mentioned the wrong Everything Golf guy, that'll be confusing.

Didn't notice that Patrick can't spell either...

Anywho...I meant to mention @Everthing Golf not the other, spell capable, guy.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How can you even control the impact position directly?

Yes, that's the million dollar question. I'm sure if you asked any of the golfing greats they would have a stab at answering that question and be gunned down a little for their explanations. I have been having a stab at answering that question here on this thread and continue to do so.

Having a strong understanding of the most important impact conditions and an awareness or feeling for them is where its all at.

My setup/address focuses on preparing my body for impact and that's what I refer to as good impact conditions at address.

What you can do is control how you get to that impact position, which is via your whole swing.

Debatable. Where's your focus? Is it centered on a particular aspect of the swing?

I've always understood that you don't really want to have the feel of hitting the ball, ie, impact, but rather making a good swing that the ball just happens to get in the way of.

Yeah, I always thought that sounded really good too but again there's no real centered focus on that one.

Impact takes what?  A thousandth of a second?  A ten thousandth?  How can the human body control that?  It can't - what it can control is how you get to that point and what you do after that point.  In other words, the swing.

Again debatable. I personally think the thousandth of a second is easier to control than the thousands of things that are happening during the two second swing.


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

At this point, I'll ask that you do as requested above: show us pictures of your setup, or a video of your swing. You have no valid reasons that I can conceive not to do so

So let's see it. Let's see something. You're all talk at this point - talk that's bordering on nonsensical and ignoring the many, many valid responses posted by myself and others.

OK


Posted

I have established all of these things and more during my setup but I commit to only one...

At the moment that's my awareness of forward lean.

Forward lean is your single point of focus at this point?  Is that your swing you've posted?  That almost looks like a reverse weight shift at impact.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
OK [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/85035/] [/URL]

I'm on an iPhone so the image is a little small but it looks pretty flippity-do-da-day to me.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Forward lean is your single point of focus at this point?  Is that your swing you've posted?  That almost looks like a reverse weight shift at impact.


Sorry, this ones much better...


Posted
Are you a lefty or a righty?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sorry, this ones much better...

Yeah, your swing looks much better left handed.  I'm done with this thread.  You're either a troll or illiterate.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4468 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 470 - 2026-01-13 Got some work in while some players were using the sim, so I had to stick around. 🙂 Good thing too, since… I hadn't yet practiced today until about 6:45 tonight. 😛 
    • That's not quite the same thing as what some people messaged me today.
    • Day 152 1-12 More reps bowing wrists in downswing. Still pausing at the top. Making sure to get to lead side and getting the ball to go left. Slow progress is better than no progress.  
    • Yea, if I were to make a post arguing against the heat map concept, citing some recent robot testing would be my first point. The heat map concept is what I find interesting, more on that below. The robot testing I have looked at, including the one you linked, do discreet point testing then provide that discrete data in various forms. Which as you said is old as the hills, if you know of any other heat map concept type testing, I would be interested in links to that though! No, and I did say in my first post "if this heat map data is valid and reliable" meaning I have my reservations as well. Heck beyond reservations. I have some fairly strong suspicions there are flaws. But all I have are hunches and guesses, if anyone has data to share, I would be interested to see it.  My background is I quit golfing about 9 years ago and have been toying with the idea of returning. So far that has been limited to a dozen range sessions in late Summer through Fall when the range closed. Then primarily hitting foam balls indoors using a swing speed monitor as feedback. Between the range closing and the snow flying I did buy an R10 and hit a few balls into a backyard net. The heat map concept is a graphical representation of efficiency (smash factor) loss mapped onto the face of the club. As I understand it to make the representation agnostic to swing speed or other golfer specific swing characteristics. It is more a graphical tool not a data tool. The areas are labeled numerically in discrete 1% increments while the raw data is changing at ~0.0017%/mm and these changes are represented as subtle changes in color across those discrete areas. The only data we care about in terms of the heat map is the 1.3 to 1.24 SF loss and where was the strike location on the face - 16mm heal and 5mm low. From the video the SF loss is 4.6% looking up 16mm heal and 5mm low on the heat map it is on the edge of where the map changes from 3% loss to 4%. For that data point in the video, 16mm heal, 5mm low, 71.3 mph swing speed (reference was 71.4 mph), the distance loss was 7.2% or 9 yards, 125 reference distance down to 116. However, distance loss is not part of a heat map discussion. Distance loss will be specific to the golfers swing characteristics not the club. What I was trying to convey was that I do not have enough information to determine good or bad. Are the two systems referencing strike location the same? How accurate are the two systems in measuring even if they are referencing from the same location? What variation might have been introduced by the club delivery on the shot I picked vs the reference set of shots? However, based on the data I do have and making some assumptions and guesses the results seem ok, within reason, a good place to start from and possibly refine. I do not see what is wrong with 70mph 7 iron, although that is one of my other areas of questioning. The title of the video has slow swing speed in all caps, and it seems like the videos I watch define 7i slow, medium, and fast as 70, 80, and 90. The whole question of mid iron swing speed and the implications for a players game and equipment choices is of interest to me as (according to my swing speed meter) over my ~decade break I lost 30mph swing speed on mine.
    • Maxfli, Maltby, Golfworks, all under the Dicks/Golf Galaxy umbrella... it's all a bit confounding. Looking at the pictures, they all look very, very similar in their design. I suspect they're the same club, manufactured in the same factory in China, just with different badging.  The whacky pricing structure has soured me, so I'll just cool my heels a bit. The new Mizuno's will be available to test very soon. I'm in no rush.  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.