Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Backswing or Impact - Delusional Thoughts on Why its a No-Brainer


Note: This thread is 4630 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yeah it is but you're are the one talking about establishing impact conditions at address.  That's how different address is from impact.

Establishing impact conditions at address doesn't mean adopting exact impact positions at address. I think I have already established this point.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mvmac

So if good address = good impact, why aren't you a low single digit handicap?

Ouch! But I could be and I have left a point out of my stated handicap or a plus sign.

However, that's not an argument I've known golfers with excellent ball striking ability who fail to get to single digits because of other ghosts that this game can throw at you.

If the backswing is causing issues on the downswing then working on the backswing is working on improving impact

I couldn't have put that any better myself. That's why I allocate 5% of my time to such things.


Posted

Depends on what causes the issue, they are both intertwined to a certain degree. If you take the club way to the inside, which is not a set up related issue, but its a backswing issue that requires a compensation to get the correct impact conditions you want.

I didn't say you don't need to work on other parts of the swing, I just think golfers shouldn't be getting too bogged down by them.

As someone already said on this thread, "I could rest the club on my right shoulder and probably hit the ball better than a 1.2 handicapper."

That's because he has confidence in his ability to attain good impact positions with any old back swing.


Posted
Originally Posted by Everthing Golf

We're going round in circles a bit here.

Establishing impact conditions at address doesn't mean adopting exact impact positions at address. I think I have already established this point.

Ouch! But I could be and I have left a point out of my stated handicap or a plus sign.

However, that's not an argument I've known golfers with excellent ball striking ability who fail to get to single digits because of other ghosts that this game can throw at you.

I couldn't have put that any better myself. That's why I allocate 5% of my time to such things.

Actually we weren't till your last two posts.

That was not what you were saying for the whole thread up till now.

You might put 5% to such things, but if that is the primary fault of somebody's swing, then that must be worked on at a higher percentage. Like for me, I take the club head way behind me in the back swing. This causes me to come over the top. I do get into the slot, but it makes it near impossible for me to change that momentum of that such movement to one coming that should come the inside. This causes me to hit a slight pull fade. Which I can play, but I want to be able to hit a proper push draw. So to fix this, I MUST fix the back swing. Which means I must prioritize it, especially above 5%.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm being a bit random here, I know, but it relates to the topic at hand ...

Yesterday at the range I was hitting it quite poorly so I spent the last 10-15 balls doing the "preset drill."  (For those unfamiliar ... http://thesandtrap.com/t/35686/eriks-hips-forward-pre-set-drill-video/0_30#post_458570) I was immediately hitting the ball crisp and solid again, and with a nice draw.  I was hitting a 9-iron at the 150 yard target.  With my normal swing, when I strike it really well, it's probably going about 160 (this range is typically downwind), and with the preset drill, I was hitting it about 145.  So about a 10% dropoff.

If somebody is not really hurting for distance - and, of course, doesn't mind being laughed at - why would he not just play from that position?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Ouch! But I could be and I have left a point out of my stated handicap or a plus sign.

However, that's not an argument I've known golfers with excellent ball striking ability who fail to get to single digits because of other ghosts that this game can throw at you.

Yes sorry it was a little harsh but just trying to make a point.  I would strongly disagree that you can be an excellent ball striker and not be a low single digit handicap.  We probably just have different definitions of what an excellent ball striker is.

I'm being a bit random here, I know, but it relates to the topic at hand ...

Yesterday at the range I was hitting it quite poorly so I spent the last 10-15 balls doing the "preset drill."  (For those unfamiliar ... http://thesandtrap.com/t/35686/eriks-hips-forward-pre-set-drill-video/0_30#post_458570)  I was immediately hitting the ball crisp and solid again, and with a nice draw.  I was hitting a 9-iron at the 150 yard target.  With my normal swing, when I strike it really well, it's probably going about 160 (this range is typically downwind), and with the preset drill, I was hitting it about 145.  So about a 10% dropoff.

If somebody is not really hurting for distance - and, of course, doesn't mind being laughed at - why would he not just play from that position?

I've seen a few high handicap players/beginners really change their games by adopting this kind of set-up.  Can work very well for the right player.  Troy Matteson played for a couple seasons with a similar address position.  A player would have to watch out for rotating their Key #4 too far to the right for a couple reasons.  The backswing will tend to have the arms more inward with slightly flatter hips/shoulders.  Then on the downswing the hips and shoulders might be aimed too far to the right.  Basically the player could end up hitting hooks and big pushes.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yes sorry it was a little harsh but just trying to make a point.  I would strongly disagree that you can be an excellent ball striker and not be a low single digit handicap.  We probably just have different definitions of what an excellent ball striker is. I've seen a few high handicap players/beginners really change their games by adopting this kind of set-up.  Can work very well for the right player.  Troy Matteson played for a couple seasons with a similar address position.  A player would have to watch out for rotating their Key #4 too far to the right for a couple reasons.  The backswing will tend to have the arms more inward with slightly flatter hips/shoulders.  Then on the downswing the hips and shoulders might be aimed too far to the right.  Basically the player could end up hitting hooks and big pushes.

Thanks mike, that makes sense. Seeing as how I was hitting 5 yard draws with a 9 iron, they probably would turn into some big hooks with longer clubs. :)

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How can you even control the impact position directly?  What you can do is control how you get to that impact position, which is via your whole swing.  I've always understood that you don't really want to have the feel of hitting the ball, ie, impact, but rather making a good swing that the ball just happens to get in the way of.  Impact takes what?  A thousandth of a second?  A ten thousandth?  How can the human body control that?  It can't - what it can control is how you get to that point and what you do after that point.  In other words, the swing.

But then again, what the hell do I know?

Rich - in name only

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Actually we weren't till your last two posts.

That was not what you were saying for the whole thread up till now.

You might put 5% to such things, but if that is the primary fault of somebody's swing, then that must be worked on at a higher percentage. Like for me, I take the club head way behind me in the back swing. This causes me to come over the top. I do get into the slot, but it makes it near impossible for me to change that momentum of that such movement to one coming that should come the inside. This causes me to hit a slight pull fade. Which I can play, but I want to be able to hit a proper push draw. So to fix this, I MUST fix the back swing. Which means I must prioritize it, especially above 5%.

I don't disagree with what you are saying and working on other parts of the swing should not be ignored.

From my experience, golfers and teaching pros allocate far too much time on parts of the swing that IMO don't accredit such importance.

It only stands to reason that your main intention during a swing will automatically be what you were working on during your last practice session. And again, IMO, if that's not an impact intention then you will be directing your focus somewhere other than the most important moment in the swing.

Like I said earlier, one intention - 100% focus, two intentions - 50% focus (at most) etc. Get your swing down before you go onto the course and trust what you have on the day. If you are going to have a swing intention/thought, then make sure you are focussing on impact.

Focussing on other parts of the swing is just wrong. A guy with a big axe has only one intention, hit the tree; an archer, the moment to let go; a baseball/tennis player, hit the ball; IOW they focus on the moment of truth. I know I'm in for an attack about how golf is a much more intricate move than these examples but its the same ball park. Bottom line its all about impact.

If you're casting or coming OTT at the start of the downswing then returning to the desired impact position is probably impossible. A little work on this fault would be advisable but as for the backswing, you can recover from most of those errors prior to impact but that's another topic.


Posted

Yes sorry it was a little harsh but just trying to make a point.  I would strongly disagree that you can be an excellent ball striker and not be a low single digit handicap.  We probably just have different definitions of what an excellent ball striker is.

Thanks, and I agree that most excellent ball strikers will have low single digit handicaps but things like the yips (I hate even using the word) can ruin careers - Baker-Finch, Ballesteros, Me - not to mention how mental/psychological issues can hold an excellent player back from his true potential.


  • Administrator
Posted

Patrick,

First, you know well enough to multiquote, so please start doing so.

And again, IMO, if that's not an impact intention then you will be directing your focus somewhere other than the most important moment in the swing.

Focussing on other parts of the swing is just wrong.

No, it's not "just wrong." As I have said a few times now, focusing on the backswing often improves "the most important moment in the swing." EVERY good instructor is focusing on "impact."

If you're casting or coming OTT at the start of the downswing then returning to the desired impact position is probably impossible. A little work on this fault would be advisable but as for the backswing, you can recover from most of those errors prior to impact but that's another topic.

"Can recover" and "are likely to recover" are two very different things.

At this point, I'll ask that you do as requested above: show us pictures of your setup, or a video of your swing. You have no valid reasons that I can conceive not to do so, especially given that you're wealthy enough to be in Australia and the UK within hours on the same day. I'm sure you have at least a three-year-old cell phone camera lying about.

So let's see it. Let's see something. You're all talk at this point - talk that's bordering on nonsensical and ignoring the many, many valid responses posted by myself and others.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Hi Patrick @EverythingGolf

LOL, oops, I mentioned the wrong Everything Golf guy, that'll be confusing.

Didn't notice that Patrick can't spell either...

Anywho...I meant to mention @Everthing Golf not the other, spell capable, guy.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

How can you even control the impact position directly?

Yes, that's the million dollar question. I'm sure if you asked any of the golfing greats they would have a stab at answering that question and be gunned down a little for their explanations. I have been having a stab at answering that question here on this thread and continue to do so.

Having a strong understanding of the most important impact conditions and an awareness or feeling for them is where its all at.

My setup/address focuses on preparing my body for impact and that's what I refer to as good impact conditions at address.

What you can do is control how you get to that impact position, which is via your whole swing.

Debatable. Where's your focus? Is it centered on a particular aspect of the swing?

I've always understood that you don't really want to have the feel of hitting the ball, ie, impact, but rather making a good swing that the ball just happens to get in the way of.

Yeah, I always thought that sounded really good too but again there's no real centered focus on that one.

Impact takes what?  A thousandth of a second?  A ten thousandth?  How can the human body control that?  It can't - what it can control is how you get to that point and what you do after that point.  In other words, the swing.

Again debatable. I personally think the thousandth of a second is easier to control than the thousands of things that are happening during the two second swing.


Posted
Originally Posted by iacas

At this point, I'll ask that you do as requested above: show us pictures of your setup, or a video of your swing. You have no valid reasons that I can conceive not to do so

So let's see it. Let's see something. You're all talk at this point - talk that's bordering on nonsensical and ignoring the many, many valid responses posted by myself and others.

OK


Posted

I have established all of these things and more during my setup but I commit to only one...

At the moment that's my awareness of forward lean.

Forward lean is your single point of focus at this point?  Is that your swing you've posted?  That almost looks like a reverse weight shift at impact.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
OK [URL=http://thesandtrap.com/content/type/61/id/85035/] [/URL]

I'm on an iPhone so the image is a little small but it looks pretty flippity-do-da-day to me.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Forward lean is your single point of focus at this point?  Is that your swing you've posted?  That almost looks like a reverse weight shift at impact.


Sorry, this ones much better...


Posted
Are you a lefty or a righty?

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Sorry, this ones much better...

Yeah, your swing looks much better left handed.  I'm done with this thread.  You're either a troll or illiterate.

Kevin

Titleist 910 D3 9.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Titleist 910F 13.5* with ahina 72 X flex
Adams Idea A12 Pro hybrid 18*; 23* with RIP S flex
Titleist 712 AP2 4-9 iron with KBS C-Taper, S+ flex
Titleist Vokey SM wedges 48*, 52*, 58*
Odyssey White Hot 2-ball mallet, center shaft, 34"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4630 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.