Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3186 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

These are the ugliest putters ever made.

We don't use a revealer on course so the balance is a gimmick.

The best putter is a simple blade.

Why have one club that has no torque?  IMO the basic sense of the club should be same through the bag.  I couldn't imagine trying to learn a new technique for putter alone since it spins like a balanced prop.

I agree the physics of it are diff from other putters and golf clubs.  I view that as a negative that would hurt feel.

 


Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

 

The best putter is a simple blade.

 

I believe Karsten Solheim would disagree with that statement. 

Edited by JPitts

Posted

@JPitts

so?  Is he God?

The entire putter industry is based on marketing alone.

PGA pros have pulled used putters out of some Podunk shop discount rack and won majors.

Putter design is a fugazi


Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

Putter design is a fugazi

An ethical rock band inspired by the Clash?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugazi

Edited by Lihu

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

@JPitts

so?  Is he God?

The entire putter industry is based on marketing alone.

PGA pros have pulled used putters out of some Podunk shop discount rack and won majors.

Putter design is a fugazi

Nope,  only 1 God. But he is/ was kind of relevent in the putter industry. 


Posted
3 minutes ago, JPitts said:

Nope,  only 1 God. But he is/ was kind of relevent in the putter industry. 

You were more entertaining when you were on topic....

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Here is the study I read that led me to Directed Force. Sorry,  it's long.  

Mississippi State study on Directed Force Lie Angle Balancing (LAB) vs Odyssey V Line


 HOW DOES A PUTTER’S CENTER OF MASS AFFECT MUSCLE ACTIVATION OF THE FOREARMS DURING THE PUTTING STROKE.
 

 
 
The Neuromechanics Lab at Mississippi State University in the Department of Kinesiology took a different approach to analyzing putters. Our mission was to see how putters affected the golfer during the putting stroke.   Two different putters were selected, Odyssey V-Line and the Reno from Directed Force Putters. We measured EEG (electroencephalography, brain activity) and EMG (electromyography, muscle activity) of a PGA Professional and researcher using both putters, with the Odyssey being his current putter.  Five practice putts from each putter was used during the warm up to familiarize the speed of the putting surface.  Static baselines were established for both EEG and EMG.  EMG electrodes were placed on the pronators and supinators of both arms, to establish how much work was being placed on the muscular system to control the putter.
 
Here are the results:  EEG alpha waves showed more activity in the Reno putter compared to the current player’s putter (Odyssey).  Generally, the higher the alpha waves indicate the more conscious thinking is occurring which may impact performance.  Due to the player’s familiarity with his putter, the alpha waves were more synchronized and the player wasn’t thinking about the putter, which is good if you want to make putts.  A reason why the player was thinking more may be due to the lack of familiarity to a “new” putter.  It looks and feels different than his current putter and with only 5 practice attempts, there is more conscious awareness prior to the stroke.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Odyssey Putter

Directed Force Putter
However, the EMG showed a surprising result, even though the player was not familiar with the putter to establish a repeatable motor pattern (habit), EMG showed less muscle activation during the stroke compared to the player’s personal putter.  This means that the player using a Directed Force putter is using less muscular effort to keep the putter square to the intended target at impact.  This may allow the player to develop a better sense of distance control through an increase in proprioception.  The higher muscle activation with the face-balanced putter is required to apply torque to the putter to keep it from rotating open during the swing.  This additional muscular effort now must be applied to each stroke throughout the round and may not be dependable during stressful situations.  The player may over relax and lighten their grip pressure in attempt to calm down which may result in a change in their muscle activation pattern allowing the putter to rotate slightly due to its center of mass position right before impact resulting in a missed putt.  Or the player may over rotate the putter in attempt not miss it right 
Sample of a single putt made with both an Odyssey compared to the Directed Force Putter.
(right handed golfer).  In both situations, the player is working harder to maintain control of the face without regards to distance control.  Generally, this additional muscle activation could lead to an increase in missed putts.  
 
 
Future studies will need to dig deeper into the variables involved with putting that may affect outcome and changes in motor control and learning.
(Tony Luczak was the subject during the test)
 
2016, Tony Luczak, Research Elevated Performance Systems, LLC, All Rights Reserved.

  • Upvote 2

Posted

The point is, it's a putter. Some will like, some won't. I was trying to relax the growing tension and hostility in this thread. By the way, the Reno 2.1 DF Putter is now laser sighted and uses stainless steel screws - major changes ... lol. Maybe it's more like mine.

DF Sightline.jpg

  • Like 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, JPitts said:

Generally, the higher the alpha waves indicate the more conscious thinking is occurring which may impact performance.

It's been quite some time since I studied brain waves (regarding EEG studies), I'm a physician. However, I do believe IIRC that Alpha waves are more a measure of a relaxed state and tend to be higher in pattern with a relaxed subject with eyes closed. Once the subject is brought to attention, eyes opened..the Alpha waves diminish. So, I'm not seeing how measuring alpha waves during putting has any usefulness at all.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
30 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

These are the ugliest putters ever made.

We don't use a revealer on course so the balance is a gimmick.

The best putter is a simple blade.

Why have one club that has no torque?  IMO the basic sense of the club should be same through the bag.  I couldn't imagine trying to learn a new technique for putter alone since it spins like a balanced prop.

I agree the physics of it are diff from other putters and golf clubs.  I view that as a negative that would hurt feel.

 

Regardless of the science, a putter has to look good to me. Not sure I could use a DF putter. I like the looks of the Edel putters. If I ever try a custom putter it would probably be an Edel, but the closest fitter is about two hours away.


Posted
8 minutes ago, caniac6 said:

Regardless of the science, a putter has to look good to me. Not sure I could use a DF putter. I like the looks of the Edel putters. If I ever try a custom putter it would probably be an Edel, but the closest fitter is about two hours away.

I can agree with you there.  I love the science,  the looks,  well I got past them.  Thats why i stared I'd love to see this Tec in a smaller stainless steel head. 


Posted

That thing looks like an overweight goldfish trying to swim away from the ball!

But,  science wise I am sure that all those radii and conflicting lines are counterproductive to good aiming.

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.


Posted
2 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

 

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.

That's why its easier to aim left.  (J/K)


  • Administrator
Posted
Just now, Jack Watson said:

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.

In my experience, aim isn't really a scientific thing, more of a personal thing. Some people aim mallets with a number of lines on them well, some aim a simple Bullseye best.

What's missing in this whole discussion is that if you can't aim this putter - and ample experience says the majority won't be able to, regardless of the few changes you can make to the lines, colors, etc. - then the putter is a complete non-starter. Never mind the junk science and lousy one-person, horribly written un-Google-able studies.

People overlooked @Phil McGleno's post earlier about putting with a wedge. That'll give you some clue about how minimal the torques are in a putter (even an 8802-style putter) given the speed with which we move our putters in the initial takeaway and the change of direction.

  • Thumbs Up 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, Jack Watson said:

That thing looks like an overweight goldfish trying to swim away from the ball!

But,  science wise I am sure that all those radii and conflicting lines are counterproductive to good aiming.

There are at least two studies I have seen that showed results indicating that these strange putter heads make it more difficult for people to aim right.

Wrong, Jack, it looks like a garden hoe. People see it and say "WTF?" I just spin the head like Linda Blair in "The Exorcist" and they say "Ooooh, it spins without hanging up? What does that mean?" I say, "I have no effin' idea, but it's cool to have all that aluminum spin like a SeeMore FGP in your hands."

And Jack, you are wrong again as to aim, at least my aim. You are 2 for 2! Congrats as to your wrongness.

I would not have purchased it if I was not able to aim it where I thought I was aiming. I've used Edels for 9 years, so I know the importance of aim and design, and that it is unique to everyone. I made an adjustment to the T Line to make it shorter, and the more I use it, the easier it is to aim for me.

And when I use the DF, my eyes don't go all over the putter, they stay at the ball. I don't notice the garden hoe aspect. in fact, the back of the putter is a built-in training aid and the carved portion in back is where you can pick up the ball from the green.

Everyone's mileage will vary. But there are enough rave reviews elsewhere to know that some small portion of the golfing public has success with these putters.

Admittedly, it's not for most people, it may not be for me. I need time on the course with it. My instructor wanted to see it, especially after being on a forum where several instructors had discussions with the inventor, and the instructors were not impressed. I told my guy that Presse is not the most personable marketer - lol. My instructor did not care for it, but that doesn't matter. I just want it to help me make putts in less strokes.

Edited by Mr. Desmond
  • Upvote 1

Ping G400 Max 9/TPT Shaft, TEE EX10 Beta 4, 5 wd, PXG 22 HY, Mizuno JPX919F 5-GW, TItleist SM7 Raw 55-09, 59-11, Bettinardi BB39

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Fairway wood, driver, iron, wedge, lots of clubs you can putt with.

1 hour ago, Jack Watson said:

The best putter is a simple blade.

The best putter is the one you can aim true and is the right weight for you to control distance easily. Whether that's a blade, a mallet, or some other configuration is up to the individual.

  • Thumbs Up 2

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, billchao said:

Fairway wood, driver, iron, wedge, lots of clubs you can putt with.

The best putter is the one you can aim true and is the right weight for you to control distance easily. Whether that's a blade, a mallet, or some other configuration is up to the individual.

Well, interesting enough it's not entirely up to the individual. It also must be conforming to USGA standards. So I guess they're kinda saying, 'Look...putt with whatever you want, but stay in these regulations or...well...you just suck at putting.' lol.

:ping: G25 Driver Stiff :ping: G20 3W, 5W :ping: S55 4-W (aerotech steel fiber 110g shafts) :ping: Tour Wedges 50*, 54*, 58* :nike: Method Putter Floating clubs: :edel: 54* trapper wedge

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
22 minutes ago, Vinsk said:

Well, interesting enough it's not entirely up to the individual. It also must be conforming to USGA standards. So I guess they're kinda saying, 'Look...putt with whatever you want, but stay in these regulations or...well...you just suck at putting.' lol.

I wasn't referring to non-conforming clubs. What I was trying to say is, what shape the putter happens to be depends on how each individual aims. Not everyone is suited to a blade so a generalization like the one @Jack Watson made is inaccurate.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3186 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I have been debating getting a launch monitor of some sort, if only so I can re-figure my shot zones (I haven't actually mapped them in years) and also to practice distance wedges at home.  I have to see if this works with either my current setup, or what my setup would be if I move it to the garage.  
    • Day 48, June 23.  After work today, I took 25 minutes in my practice room;  6-iron, same everything as yesterday except the time and count. 
    • Well, this is interesting.  I think we discovered a few months ago that I haven't been following professional golf in a while (my confusion about Scotty's footwork confirmed that), so at least as I aim to follow a bit more I'll get something new to learn with all of you.  My very quick read of Erik's summary makes me think this new Challenger series fits somewhere between Korn Ferry and the Championship (not Champions, but I know I'm going to make that mistake a few times if I'm not careful!).   My recollection is that there were already second-tier events among the PGA Tour;  the Bob Hope didn't have the same quality of field as the event at Riviera (whose current name I forget, although now that I say that, I realize the Palm Springs event hasn't been called the Bob Hope in a few years either).   With the absence of the FedEx (if I'm reading that correctly), does that mean no more FedEx Cup at all? Hopefully I'll have time later in 2026 to sit down and see what we're in for in 2027, where one of my goals already is to follow more professional golf.
    • The highlights as I see them: Championship and Challenger Series The creation of the PGA Tour and the PGB Tour, in the words of Joel Dahmen a few years ago. They're calling them the Championship Series (23-24 events) and the Challenger Series (20+ events). Both run February to August. They feel this will achieve three things: increasing the consistency and quality of fields across the season creating a clear system for players to earn and retain status and delivering a more structured and competitive experience for fans and partners—all in an effort to strengthen meritocracy. Championship Series Structure and Eligibility The 23-24 events includes the Players, majors, season-ending events, and the Presidents Cup and Ryder Cup. These will be 72-hole events with a 36-hole cut to the top 65 and ties and purses of $20M+. 120 players without an alternate list. 90 players (roughly) from the previous year and 20 players promoted from the Challenger Series. Full eligibility will be finalized later this year. Sites (cities) to be finalized soon, but 10 of the 15 courses have already been determined. Postseason: includes retention and relegation and concludes with match play. The Tour Championship will also be played across a rotation of prestigious courses. Challenger Series Structure and Eligibility 20+ events. Running concurrently. Will feature players fighting their way back to the Championship Series or players graduating and on the upswing from the Korn Ferry Tour. Many of these events will be current PGA Tour courses. About 7 of the Challenger Series events will be during off weeks for the Championship Series with elevated purses and visibility. Purses of at least $4M, with cuts similar to the Champ series. 144 player fields. Competitive Fields for Both Series Players will be eligible for only one series at a time: Championship Series Players are not eligible for Challenger Series events. Championship Series members will have a known schedule with all events having the same eligibility. Players and Majors will have their own eligibility criteria. Championship Series players don't have to play all events. This begs the question about, say, the Canadian Open, and other "home-town" events that players might want to play, even if they're Challenger Series events. Will releases be granted? Promotion and Relegation At least 90 players will be retained in the Championship Series, and 20 players will be promoted from the Challenger Series each year. Battlefield promotion for two-time winners from the Challenger Series. Players relegated from the Championship Series will have a "last chance" opportunity to retain status, or will go to the Challenger Series. Criteria will be finalized before the start of the 2027 season. Points System New points system (not FedExCup points). Separate points systems for the Championship and Challenger Series. Elevated points in the Challenger Series for off-weeks on the Championship Series. More details tk. Elevated International Events in the Fall The fall schedule will include a limited series of elevated international events with top players from the Championship Series, with the intent to deliver in partnership with the DP World Tour as part of the Strategic Alliance. Last Chance Series The Tour will develop a “last chance” series of 4-6 events in the fall, with a limited number of spots on the Championship Series available for top finishers. Eligibility will include players relegated from the Championship Series, Challenger Series players, and other categories to be determined. Q-School continues, as do the Korn Ferry Tour and PGA Tour Latinoamerica. Also, Brian Rolapp is the new commissioner as of January 1, 2027.
    • You can download the PDF at this link or see the first page of it above.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.