Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4213 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
I had some recent golf lessons where my instructor mentioned that my swing plane was too flat. He suggested that I lift my arms higher at the top of the back swing so that the plane of my arms is steeper than my shoulder plane. I believe that this is commonly referred to as the two plane swing and most modern golf teachers prefer this method.

Since my lessons I have researched the swing plane and there seems to be two schools of the thought. The majority of modern advice seems to concur with my instructor. However, I have come across numerous articles referencing flatter swing planes; in particular those referencing Hogan and Sam Snead both of whom had relatively flat swings and who were giants of the game.

I have a few questions for you technicians out there:-

Why has the flat swing become so unfashionable? If it worked for Hogan and Snead what's wrong with it nowadays? What are the advantages and disadvantages of a flat swing?

Taylormade r7 460
Callaway X 3 Wood
Callaway X 5 Wood
Callaway X 7 Wood
Callaway X Hybrid (24*)TaylorMade r7 Irons (5-PW)Mizuno MP-R Series Wedges (52,58 degrees)Ping G2 Anser Putter


Posted
hmmm...it's hard to say without seeing your swing, but one fact about golf that nobody can change is that you have to hit down on the ball to make it go up. if your pro was messing with your swing plane it was probably in an effort to make this happen. if you get too shallow then the only two moves you can reasonably make are two sweep the ball very low and from the inside resulting in a lack of power and spin on your short irons or more likely, it will force you to throw the club out over the top in an effort to clear some space for your arms on the downswing. both of these things are not good. even the guys nowadays that are using a so called one-plane swing do not have overly flat swings...tiger, scott, etc. they also have a great spine angle from bending at the waste. chances are your pro was not lying to you. check and see about getting your swing on tape and then comparing it to some vids on the internet. you might be surprised. good luck with the swing though!

My (current) Sticks:

Callaway X Hot 3 Wood
MacTech NVG2 Mids 4-GW
Cleveland DSG RTG+ 56*/60*Ping G5i Craz-E PutterK. I. S. S.


Posted
Advantages of flat:
- better distance control
- good especially when you have good 'core strength'
- easier on the body since the upper body remains stacked on top of the lower body

Disadvantages of flat:
- worse directional control
- bad for players who are tall and have slight stature who have bad 'core strength'
- ball flight may be too low to be controllable

Posted
I will offer this on the subject.

If we agree that there is a swing plane that is too flat, and a plane that would be too upright, then there also has to be an optimum somewhere in between those two.

Something to think about.

Posted
I had some recent golf lessons where my instructor mentioned that my swing plane was too flat. He suggested that I lift my arms higher at the top of the back swing so that the plane of my arms is steeper than my shoulder plane. I believe that this is commonly referred to as the two plane swing and most modern golf teachers prefer this method.

I feel lift your arms is not a good way to describe this change. If you take the club back so that the club initially stays outside of your hands and you maintain good width (extension) and wrist position is not flat then you can turn your shoulders to get the right position. Trying to lift the arms leads to tempo and posture problems and a lot of pulls and slices. If you are to flat then posture, take away or wrist cock is probably be addressed.

1W Cleveland LauncherComp 10.5, 3W Touredge Exotics 15 deg.,FY Wilson 19.5 degree
4 and 5H, 6I-GW Callaway Razr, SW, LW Cleveland Cg-14, Putter Taylor Made Suzuka, Ball, Srixon XV Yellow


Posted
The ball doesn't care how you got the club to the ball and what the club does after its hit.

With that said there are some common sense or conventional thoughts when it comes to pretty much anything. In golf the angle the shaft makes in relation to the ground and club face is visable from the behind/down the line view. Common sense tells me that if you kept the club on that plane the whole time during the swing then it would make it easier to get the club face back to where it started, which is the key part of making good contact on the ball.

Personally I can't see how not being on plane with your swing could have any advantage over being on plane. Can everyone do it, no, is it a requirement, no but again there is something be said for starting and maintaining the path that you want the club to end up in at impact.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
The ball doesn't care how you got the club to the ball and what the club does after its hit.

Bear in mind here I'm not talking about a ridiculously flat swing. My arms and shoulders were basically swinging on the same plane. However, my instructor prefers to see the arms on a steeper plane than the shoulder plane.

I believe that some instructors just don't like 1-plane swings.

Taylormade r7 460
Callaway X 3 Wood
Callaway X 5 Wood
Callaway X 7 Wood
Callaway X Hybrid (24*)TaylorMade r7 Irons (5-PW)Mizuno MP-R Series Wedges (52,58 degrees)Ping G2 Anser Putter


Posted
Personally I can't see how not being on plane with your swing could have any advantage over being on plane.

Very easy to explain that.

Think of it this way. If I am not swinging "on plane", that can either be over the top or underneath plane... as I approach the ball, I have to not only time the face of the club but Also the path of the club. If I am approaching the ball from underneath plane (from the inside) and my club face is square to plane, it is WIDE open at the golf ball, so at the instant it reaches the ball I have to snap the face shut to get it square to target, which would be closed to plane. If I approach the ball directly down the target line and "on plane" I now ONLY have to worry about that club face. As far as "one plane" "two plane"... One plane doesnt even really exist, there are "flatter" and "more upright" but a TRUE one plane swing would have you swinging the club around your waist, ie- ON shaft plane. But because of the design of a golf club (the fact the shaft comes out on an angle) we are required to make plane shifts throughout the swing. But that goes back to my original note... if we agree that there is a plane that is too flat, and one that is too upright, then somewhere between those two has to be optimum, for you.

Posted
I believe if your swing plane is too flat you will have trouble consistently getting the ball up. I am not sure if your instructor was suggesting a two plane or one plane swing, but maybe what he was suggesting is that you need to get more consistent height on your ball flight and was encouraging you to hit down on the ball more.
In my bag:

Driver: R7 SuperQuad
Woods: RPM LP 3W & 5W
Irons: MX-25 4-SWPutter: Detour

Posted
I believe if your swing plane is too flat you will have trouble consistently getting the ball up.

No not really. The main problem I had was occasionally hitting towards the heel of the club.

Taylormade r7 460
Callaway X 3 Wood
Callaway X 5 Wood
Callaway X 7 Wood
Callaway X Hybrid (24*)TaylorMade r7 Irons (5-PW)Mizuno MP-R Series Wedges (52,58 degrees)Ping G2 Anser Putter


Posted
No not really. The main problem I had was occasionally hitting towards the heel of the club.

Sounds like he wanted you to change your swing plane to prevent you from hitting hozzel rockets. If you do not want to change your swing plane maybe you are set up too close to the ball or you are reaching for the ball?

In my bag:

Driver: R7 SuperQuad
Woods: RPM LP 3W & 5W
Irons: MX-25 4-SWPutter: Detour

Posted
I think I know what Big Don is talking about with the instructor changing the plane to a more upright plane. My guess is that the instructor is more comfortable teaching the plane he wants you on so he can diagnose problems. Most likely that is what his instructor uses for his swing. It appears to me that golfers who play a lot, tour pros and high end amateurs can do quite well with a 2 plane style swing. It's well grooved and these types of players have great hand eye coordination. Hackers like me don't possess that type of awesome Hand Eye required to square up the face consistently that is required for a two plane swing. For me, my natural plane was closer to the "one plane" style, arm along shoulder plane. With the help of my instructor we moved it to a more upright plane. I think what happened for me is that I started to blend a one plane / two plane. Short story is that I had good times and bad with my 2 plane swing but in the end I've gone back to a full one plane swing, Stack and Tilt, and things are much more consistent. I do have good leg and core strength and would agree that the one plane takes more activity from the legs and core to produce a solid swing. Sometimes when I'm tired I can't swing as well, but with two plane there wasn't a noticeable drop off in performance when I was tired. I also think that if your strength is less than average distance may suffer with the one plane swing. Again it goes to the type of movement required to generate club head speed. I think of 2 plane as having an extra lever of power but that extra lever is also a moving part. That extra moving part for me was hard to control all the time. The one plane uses more big body muscles to square up the club and the two plane utilizes more fine motor control muscles. I was a bit longer with my 2 plane swing but not much.

Bottom line is that you need to find a swing that fits for your body and is comfortable. Also don't blend the styles. If it's a one plane swing you like, make sure your instructor is familiar with all the parts of that swing. They do act a little different.

Swing = Stacked and On Plane when possible.
In My Bag:
Driver: Ping G5 9° Alidila NV 75g Stiff
3-Wood: Nike SQ 15° Diamana Stiff (Stock)
Irons: NIKE FORGED SPLIT CAVIY (S300)Wedges: Taylormade RAC Fe2O3 (Rust) 52°/56°/60°Putter: Titleist/Cameron Newport 1.5Ball: Looking for a new...


  • 6 years later...
Posted

Your left hand position on the top of the backswing has NOTHING to do with your swing plane. The club only moves on plane below your hips, on the top, it deviates from the plane, the difference between Woods and Kuchar (or Hogan) is how much the deviation is.

Your plane angle should be determined by the club lie angle, so with the same club you cannot change the steepness of your plane randomly. What you can change is how the club wraps around your body (higher left arm makes it easier to wrap around for more power), thus giving people the impression of "steep" or "flat" planes.  A book titled Decoding the Golf Swing Plane explains these things very well.


  • Administrator
Posted

Your plane angle should be determined by the club lie angle, so with the same club you cannot change the steepness of your plane randomly.

TaylorMade lists the lie angle of the SLDR as 59-62°. Can you share with us how that relates to what you just said?

And congratulations on bumping a thread that was seven years old…

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

An instructor in Texas of some stature Shawn Humphries shared some information about swing plane that made really good sense to me. Plus I had heard it before from really good local golfer. When asked about keeping on plane, his answer was something like "just keep your elbows level in the back swing". His idea of the importance of being on the correct plane was to not have a club face that was either open or closed at impact.  Level elbows in the back swing would help prevent these two impact flaws. As far as I can remember, he made no mention of a single, or dual plane swing.  Just being on your own plane.  Here is pretty much what he said about level elbows in the back swing.

"If the rear elbow is higher than the front elbow, you might tend to hit a fat shot, a slice, or a weak pop up to the slice side. If the front elbow is higher than the rear elbow you might tend to have too flat of a swing, which could cause topped shots, low line drives, or not taking a proper divot."

You can take Humphrie's level elbow info with a grain of salt if you wish, but it does work. Watch the pros, and almost all of them have level elbows during their back swings. The one's who don't usually don't make the cut. Myself, I don't worry about what plane I am using. I just keep my elbows level in my back swing.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

I dunno about that @Patch . Seems you can do quite a bit… and that the backswing has only some effect on the downswing…


Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I can't deny what the pictures are showing. I just wonder if those guys

have to make some compensations in their down swing to get to their

correct impact position. Let's not forget that these guys hit 1000s of

balls in practice, and play. Usually with a swing coach standing nearby

to assign any needed swing adjustments. However, I still maintain that

keeping level elbows in the back swing is not a bad thing. Maybe not all the way to the top, as much as possible. It maintains the triangle of the arms and hands. Too much good can come from it, especially for the amateur golfer. Stuff like the one piece take away,

maintaining a wide swing arc, an easier hip turn, no arm separation, no

flying elbow, and getting to the top in a more correct position that

helps with a better down swing. Maintaining the triangle formed at

address, with level elbows helps to keep all the moving pieces in your backswing working together to help set up a better start to the downswing. Also there is a well known drill where the golfer places a basketball, or some other object between their elbows and practices their back swing. Out of sync elbows would make that drill kind of tough to accomplish. No malice intended. Just my own opinion.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I can't deny what the pictures are showing. I just wonder if those guys

have to make some compensations in their down swing to get to their

correct impact position. Let's not forget that these guys hit 1000s of

balls in practice, and play. Usually with a swing coach standing nearby

to assign any needed swing adjustments. However, I still maintain that

keeping level elbows in the back swing is not a bad thing. Maybe not all the way to the top, as much as possible. It maintains the triangle of the arms and hands. Too much good can come from it, especially for the amateur golfer. Stuff like the one piece take away,

maintaining a wide swing arc, an easier hip turn, no arm separation, no

flying elbow, and getting to the top in a more correct position that

helps with a better down swing. Maintaining the triangle formed at

address, with level elbows helps to keep all the moving pieces in your backswing working together to help set up a better start to the downswing. Also there is a well known drill where the golfer places a basketball, or some other object between their elbows and practices their back swing. Out of sync elbows would make that drill kind of tough to accomplish. No malice intended. Just my own opinion.

I don't get why golfers talk about this triangle thing. It's basically impossible for the arm position not the change during the backswing. On the backswing the right elbow folds, this helps the hands work "up" and loads the left arm up and across the bend. A few feet into your takeaway your triangle is already "disrupted".

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4213 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.