Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
Crim

2014 Grand Slam of Golf

15 posts in this topic

It's still two months away and seems to go largely unnoticed since it's played during the week, but I for some reason love the grand slam of golf. It's usually the 4 major winners of the year playing for some great prize money on a course in Bermuda.

This year with Rory winning two of the majors...they've asked last years winner Adam Scott to come back.

Bubba Watson, Martin Kaymer, Rory McIlroy, and Adam Scott will tee it up on October 13th-15th.

Here's some more info including the purse. Guaranteed $200,000? Not too shabby.

With Rory McIlroy’s exciting win at the PGA Championship on Sunday, Adam Scott will earn the final invite to this year's PGA Grand Slam of Golf, to be held Oct. 13-15 at Port Royal Golf Course in Southampton, Bermuda .

Since McIlroy was already assured of a spot in the field with his win at the Open Championship, the invitation is extended to Scott, the defending champion at the Bermuda event.

RELATED: Complete coverage of the 2014 PGA Grand Slam of Golf | Past winners | Course tour

McIlroy defeated Phil Mickelson by one stroke to win the PGA Championship for his third win in a row.

Scott will make the trip back to Bermuda looking to become the first back-to-back winner since Tiger Woods did it in 2005 and 2006. Last year, Scott beat Justin Rose by two strokes in a field that also included Jason Dufner and Padraig Harrington.

The PGA Grand Slam of Golf features a $1.35 million purse, with the winner receiving $600,000, second place $300,000, third place $250,000 and fourth place $200,000.

TNT's prime-time broadcast of the event reaches a worldwide audience of 88.9 million U.S. homes and international viewers in more than 100 countries. The PGA Grand Slam of Golf is hosted by the Bermuda Department of Tourism, Port Royal Golf Course, and the Fairmont Southampton Hotel.

Established in 1979, the PGA Grand Slam of Golf has grown from an 18-hole, single-day charity event to a 36-hole annual showdown that matches professional golf's best against each other.

While the PGA Grand Slam of Golf extends its four invitations each year to the winners of the four majors, there is a contingency plan in place should a player not be able to make the trip. In the event of an injury or a dual winner in a major championship, the PGA of America has developed a formula to complete the PGA Grand Slam of Golf field.

The defending champion receives the initial invitation, then the Major Champions Points List is used to complete the field. This equation incorporates active past major winners and how they compete in this year's major events. The point system awards 150 points for a second-place finish in a major event, 125 for third, 110 for fourth, 100 for fifth, 90 for sixth, 85 for seventh, all the way through 70th place, which receives 6 points. In order to be eligible for the PGA Grand Slam of Golf, a player must be or must have been a major winner.

http://www.pga.com/grandslam/news/adam-scott-earns-final-invite-2014-pga-grand-slam-golf

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

Sign up (or log in) today! It's free (and you won't see this ad anymore)!

While I understand inviting the winner of the event from the prior year, and they also should be a major winner - I would have liked to see Rickie get a chance to play in this. His major finishes this year is amazing; the only player to finish in the top five in all the majors in a year without winning at least one.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While I understand inviting the winner of the event from the prior year, and they also should be a major winner - I would have liked to see Rickie get a chance to play in this. His major finishes this year is amazing; the only player to finish in the top five in all the majors in a year without winning at least one.

Although he doesn't fit the *hasn't won a major* criteria...I completely agree with you.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've played this course. Beautiful course!  I parred the 16th Cliff hole.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Wow, that course looks amazing.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

I too would like to see Fowler in the mix.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Adam Scott is out due to scheduling conflicts.


Jim Furyk is in.

"Furyk, the 2003 U.S. Open champion, was runner-up in this year's Major Champions Points List, which charts the performance throughout the year of active major champions."

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/jim-furyk-accepts-invite-complete-164452985--golf.html

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I almost forgot about this!!!!

This starts tomorrow at I believe 4pm ET.

Absolutely gorgeous course with 4 of golf's best players.

2 day event.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get to play Port Royal in about 3 weeks! Super pumped! The 16th hole has been giving me nightmares.  230 yd par 3 with ocean breeze!? Gonna be a tricky one...  Hopefully they don't keep the same pin placements! :beer:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get to play Port Royal in about 3 weeks! Super pumped! The 16th hole has been giving me nightmares.  230 yd par 3 with ocean breeze!? Gonna be a tricky one...  Hopefully they don't keep the same pin placements!

I'd have to "play it forward" for sure. Such a gorgeous course. You should take pics!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I get to play Port Royal in about 3 weeks! Super pumped! The 16th hole has been giving me nightmares.  230 yd par 3 with ocean breeze!? Gonna be a tricky one...  Hopefully they don't keep the same pin placements!


Played it and parred it.  I played from the 180 yard tees though.  You will love the course.  Enjoy!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Coverage is at 4pm ET on TNT. However they've already played through 9 holes. Here's the scores so far...

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched it yesterday and I am recording today.  This is the only course I have played that is on tour.  It is really cool watching how they play the course compared to what I can do.  Last year Rory hit a drive on 15 to within 30 yards of the green (400+ yard hole).  MK was about 60 out yesterday.  That same hole, I still had 180 to the hole!  I did par 16, but the flag was in the middle, which was an easier location.  I just aimed for the right side of the green.  I also played from the 180 tee as opposed to the 230.

Bermuda is beautiful.  I highly recommend visiting there.  You can stay at the resort that is next to Port Royal, Pompano Beach Club.  They have a free shuttle to and from the course for guests.  It is a nice resort and the food was fabulous.

My wife was watching with me yesterday and kept saying, "We have to go back." :dance:

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Although it will be on TNT in 40 minutes, here's the results if you can't watch it....sounds like it got pretty exciting at the end!

Rory was +4 on the day and ended up in 3rd place with 2 over. Jim Furyk shot +2 on the day and ended up in last at 3 over.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I watched the whole round.  Both Kaymer and Watson seemed to want to lose it more than win it! :-) In the end, Kaymer made a birdie putt from 8 feet and Watson missed his by a blade of Bermuda grass.  I just loved watching them play on this stunning course.  Rory played poorly.  He looks tired as does Furyk.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0



  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • 2017 TST Partners

    PING Golf
    Leupold Golf
    Snell Golf
    Talamore Golf Resort
    Lowest Score Wins
  • Posts

    • Thanks for your questions Swede. Regarding data for irons, if I understand what you are asking, the driver data can't really be correlated. Each iron would have it's own ideal launch conditions (launch angle, spin rate, ball speed) which would be based off of the player's swing speed.  The ball is designed to perform differently with longer clubs than shorter clubs, but if you can get dialed in with your driver, you'll be pretty close with the rest of the set also. The driver/shaft combo certainly affects the trajectory as well, and sometimes guys are playing the wrong ball and the wrong driver.  But what I see more often is a player who goes through the fitting process when purchasing a driver and irons, then they play whatever ball happens to be on sale.  It would be like using a different driver every time they played!  When trying to optimize trajectory, the ball is a good place to start.  Why buy a new driver when moving to a different ball can make the difference?  Sometimes the ball will help some, but to get where a player needs to be a different shaft or driver might be needed also. A lot of guys will go through a ball fitting whenever they get a new driver, which is not a bad idea.  Usually, if your previous driver fit properly and the new one fits properly, the ball will work just fine.  I usually suggest going through a ball fitting at least every-other-season just to make sure.  Sometimes our swings evolve...maybe your swing has improved or swing speed has increased, or it could be the other way, but it's good to make sure your stuff is correct.
    • To be clear, I have never talked about "the Titleist fitting." I don't know what they do to fit players. I'm simply talking about their recommendation to start at the green and work backward, but ultimately to consider all the shots you play in a round of golf, not just ones with the driver. I'm not talking about "here's two balls, try them out." I'm talking about the idea of "here are 30 kinds of golf ball. I eliminated a few because they felt horrible off my putter. I eliminated a few more for poor performance around the green. I eliminated some more for poor spin or flight with my irons. Of the six that I had left, these two performed well with my driver, so one of them is a good fit. If they have a super official "ball fitting" process, I wasn't talking about that, nor was I talking about a "here is a Pro V1 and a Pro V1x… hit some shots and pick one." So… I wish you hadn't devoted that much attention to the "Titleist method" in your post when that's not at all what I was asking. My point was… I'm skeptical that the Bridgestone method (only hitting a few balls, not doing much to account for consistent tee heights, ball position, players getting "warmed up" during the process, etc., only using the driver and disregarding the rest of the shots) is a great method, either.
    • 1. Golf is elitist. So far from true but I still get way too many people who chuckle at my interest in golf- as if I should be embarrassed that I enjoy such a snobby pastime.  2. Just swing your swing- and stop obsessing about getting a "pretty" swing. Sorry, but that's not sound advice - when I get rid of the key elements that are holding me back, yes, sure- then I'll make the most of what I've got. I'll swing that swing. Until then, not a chance, now that I have learned about the fundamentals . There's work to be done to make my future golf far more enjoyable and competitive.   3. Lessons are expensive. Nope- look hard enough and you can find quality swing guidance at a reasonable price.  I agree with lotsa others above but these resonate for me at my level of play right and interactions with people now. 
    • Let me address the things you mentioned and clarify a little bit, because I think there is some misconceptions on some of the aspects. There is perception that the Titleist fitting covers everything and the Bridgestone only addresses the driver.  One of the biggest issues I have with the Titleist method is it's not a real golf ball fitting.  They give you a Pro V1 2-ball pack and a Pro V1x 2-ball pack and basically tell you to hit some shots and see which one you like best. So regardless of swing speed, handicap, launch numbers or anything else, they are saying you can pick this ball or that ball.  The other models in Titleist's line are not included and competitor models are not included.  I know for a fact that there are many players who don't fit into either of those models, but Titleist doesn't offer other options or comparisons.  They claim the Pro V1 and Pro V1x have the best distance, best short game spin, best flight characteristics, softest feel and great durability.  I hate to tell everyone, but there is no such thing as a perfect golf ball.  The laws of physics and aerodynamics apply to Titleist just like everyone else.  A ball that is designed for high spin will not be as long as a lower spinning model and will tend to curve more, and a ball designed for distance will not have the same type of performance on approach shots and around the green. Titleist also doesn't offer any data that shows how those models stack-up for players, or how they perform compared to their ideal numbers.  Sure, people love the spin that they get around the green, but do they need that much spin?  Is all that spin hurting them in other areas?  High spin actually gets a lot of players in trouble and costs them more strokes than it saves them.  Similar to the Titleist method that has players go through the process on their own, after a Bridgestone tech works with a player and their driver and shows them the data, a 2-ball pack is given to the player to continue their testing on the course with irons and short game.  As far as the number of shots on the launch monitor is concerned, you are correct...typically 3 or 4 shots with each ball is recorded.  It's not a lot, but it's 6-8 more shots over a launch monitor than a Titleist fitting. Obviously it would be great to do more, but a fitting could easily stretch to an hour per player, so a typical 4-5 hour event we could only help a handful of players.  A normal fitting takes about 15 min, so that is 16-20 players per event.  At that number, the cost of each fitting was right around $40/player.  If an hour was spent with each player, it would cost almost $200/player which isn't cost effective. On the launch angle issue, what I said was there are many things that can affect the launch, including the ball.  I didn't say 2* wasn't possible and I didn't say in the example I posted that only 1/2* could be attributed to the ball.  Honestly, I can't say how much of that 2* is related to moving to a different model...even if other variables like tee height, ball position were removed, the difference in loft will vary from player-to-player due to different swing speeds, swing paths, angle of attack etc which is unique to everyone.  Plus depending on what model is used first and which model is recommended could have a smaller or larger affect than other combinations.  You could probably make the same case for every category if you wanted though, right?  You could say how much of the difference in spin was caused by the ball change and how much was the result of some other variable?  Spin is more important than the launch angle, so even if the l.a. stayed the same, the drop in spin would have made a nice difference by itself.  But we know the player was launching the ball too low with too much spin, a lower spinning/higher launching ball was recommended and the results were a more efficient trajectory and an increase in performance. I believe the key is to be able to show a player in black and white what their launch conditions are with their current ball and how it compares to their ideal numbers.  If you can't show a player the areas that need improvement, then how can you confidently recommend the best ball for them?  The truth is, most people are playing the wrong ball, so it's not that hard to make an improvement, and honestly there are probably a handful of different makes/models that would be better.    
    • 1-5. Putting matters most. Uh huh. What are the chances I gain 2 strokes because I (or just about any golfer) 4 putted? It's happened. Rarely. What are the chances I (or just about any golfer) hit an errant tee shot and blow 2 strokes? 40% every tee shot for me. 
  • TST Blog Entries

  • Blog Entries

  • Today's Birthdays

    1. Dragondrake
      Dragondrake
      (57 years old)
    2. Mistabigevil
      Mistabigevil
      (36 years old)
    3. Taylor56
      Taylor56
      (61 years old)
  • Get Great Gear with Amazon