Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4141 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm gonna splurge this weekend and buy a set of Rocketbladez irons. I demoed them last week and loved them. One thing - the shafts on the demo clubs were one inch longer than normal stock RBz shafts, which are 1/4" longer than normal shafts already. The thing is, I really felt comfortable with the longer shafts, even though the 6 iron was about as long as my current 4 iron. They just felt natural. I'm 6'2 with about a 36 inch wrist-to-floor measurement. I've been fitted a couple of times, and they all say I should be using shafts that are 1/4 or 1/2 inch longer at most, but definitely not 1 1/4 inches longer.

Question - I'm thinking of getting the clubs and adding 3/4 inch to the shafts to make them slightly shorter than those that I demoed. Is it possible that my swing faults right now are what makes the longer clubs feel better? I don't want to buy any irons for a while, and I'm wondering if when I improve I'll be wishing that I had purchased the "proper" length for me because my swing will have actually changed. Question 2 - Is it wise to just choke up on the shafts if I find them to be too long in the future? Does it make a difference?

Any suggestions would be welcome. Thanks.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

When I saw the title of this thread, being in the "off-topic" section, I thought we were going really off-topic.  Whew.  Glad you are talking about golf shafts.


Sorry, I cannot help with the question though.

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I appreciate the shout out. What do you mean it was in the "off topic" section?

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am new here and could be wrong. But I thought the grill room was for non golf topics. Might get better responses in the equipment section.

- Mark

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I am new here and could be wrong. But I thought the grill room was for non golf topics. Might get better responses in the equipment section.

That's correct. (And welcome!!!). Hopefully a mod can move this and op will get the feedback he's hoping for.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
With the proper posture, if the sole of the club lies flat on the ground, it is the proper length. Being 6'2", and 35: WRT, you probably need longer clubs. With the modern longer club lengths, the lie angle of the head is adjusted correspondingly. The main thing is to have the sole of the club to hit the turf in the middle. If the heels drags, the clubs head will shutdown and you'll pull the ball (or hit hooks). When the toe drags, the club face opens and you'll hit it right.

Driver.......Ping K15 9.5* stiff 3 wood.....Ping K15 16* stiff 5 wood.....Ping K15 19* stiff 4 Hybrid...Cleveland Gliderail 23* stiff 5 - PW......Pinhawk SL GW...........Tommy Armour 52* SW...........Tommy Armour 56* LW...........Tommy Armour 60* FW...........Diamond Tour 68* Putter.......Golfsmith Dyna Mite Ball..........Volvik Vista iV Green Bag..........Bennington Quiet Organizer Shoes.... ..Crocs


Posted
With the proper posture, if the sole of the club lies flat on the ground, it is the proper length.

Be careful with your words here. When you say "lies" it sounds a lot like you're talking about something that is at rest, which then could be taken to mean at address. How the sole lies at address has very little correlation to how it contacts the ground at impact, so that really is not a good indicator of whether or not you have the correct lie angle. Taking swings on a lie board would do the trick though. :)

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
... How the sole lies at address has very little correlation to how it contacts the ground at impact, so that really is not a good indicator of whether or not you have the correct lie angle. Taking swings on a lie board would do the trick though. :)

@Golfingdad is on target. You want to hit the clubs on a lie board, or with sole tape, to see where you're making impact.

Callaway has a 38" shaft on most of its 5 irons. For the SLDR irons, 5 iron is only 37.75" - with SLDR, I find I'm consistently making contact on the toe side of the clubface. I'll probably have the SLDRs lengthened slightly at re-grip time.

For length and lie issues, go with the pattern from your live shots.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

G-dad is on target. You want to hit the clubs on a lie board, or with sole tape, to see where you're making impact.

Callaway has a 38" shaft on most of its 5 irons. For the SLDR irons, 5 iron is only 37.75" - with SLDR, I find I'm consistently making contact on the toe side of the clubface. I'll probably have the SLDRs lengthened slightly at re-grip time.

For length and lie issues, go with the pattern from your live shots.

Does the quality of your swing drastically affect where you make impact, or will it be fairly similar even if my technique improves? If I go with the pattern from my live shots, I would probably need an extra 1 1/2 inches and negative offset to fix my regular hook and tendency to hit thin! I guess I just don;t want to buy clubs that mask a problem. Perhaps the answer is just to buy the "recommended" lie/length for a person of my build and stay the course on improvement. Probably splitting hairs here, anyway. When I was 15, I just grabbed the nearest Easton bat that felt good and pounded the ball into the night sky!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Does the quality of your swing drastically affect where you make impact, or will it be fairly similar even if my technique improves? ...

It depends on which impact point.

Clubfitters generally say that the lie angle is fairly consistent for a golfer, and sets in early in swing development.

Years ago, I had a bit of a crouch stance, and would have left misses starting mid-summer when my swing really got going. I got fitted, and the fitter said I needed two degrees flat.

He build me a new set of component irons, 2* flat lie, and it really  straightened out my iron shots. I started hitting dead center on sole tape.

Fast forward to about 2004, and I rebuild my golf swing. Went from a Nicklaus-style super upright, to a more medium tempo swing. In doing so, I started standing more upright.

Suddenly, I was starting to miss to the right. I got fitted, and it turned out in my new stance I was standard lie for Callaway and many other iron models. (For Ping I still test out as 0.75* flat).

As for face impact, both equipment and swing contribute to what you get. When I first played my Callaways, I had trouble hitting half my shots out toward the toe, even through sole impact was good. It turned out I had my weight on my heels, rather than a balanced stance. A few lessons and practice, and I was hitting more toward center face.

Now come the SLDR irons. The SLDR irons are 1/4" shorter than my X20 Tours, and I'm hitting most of my solid shots out toward the toe. I plan to get fitted at reshaft time, and I may have the SLDR shafts extended 1/4".

So, work with a decent fitter. He or she can help get you aligned.

As for masking swing flaws , if your swing is consistent but imperfect, finding helpful clubs could help you hit the ball straighter and more squarely.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4141 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.