Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 6745 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
Often, you hear people describe a course's quality in terms that don't really help the reader understand anything about the course.

So my question is what objective qualities do you look for in a course when deciding how it measures up?

How would you measure each of the following characteristics in rating a course? Rank the importance of each of the following, with 1 being THE most important thing. And feel free to add characteristics. My list is definitely not complete, just food for thought.

Length?
Challenge? If so, is it just about being tough, or are there absolute qualities that create greatness?
Uniqueness of holes? If so, what makes a hole great? Scenery? Fairway contours? Strategically-placed traps/obstacles?
Conditioning?
History?

What are the course features that can ruin an otherwise solid course?

Let me try:

1. Uniqueness of holes. I like holes that make you think at the tee box and play the hole strategically. Aesthetics mean a great deal to me, also, so it also has to simply be attractive and well-tended, and make good use of natural terrain.
2. Conditioning. Includes placing premium on minimizing environmental destruction. Over-fertilized fairways, over-manicured paths between holes, extreme deforestation, etc. is not always good.
3. Challenge. Each hole should test different aspects of your game, not be a cake walk OR a torture session. If the hole is tough, make it easier to putt, if you give me easy access to the green, I expect a difficult pin placement/putting challenge, etc.
4. History
5. Length

Bad course features: too many homes along course, overcrowded/poor ranger effectiveness, tricked up holes that look like they are attempts to startle you or play trick shots instead of solid shots, and I have to admit, too much water.

Heaven is 630 a.m. Saturday morning, 65 crisp degrees headed toward a comfortable 80, first tee (elevated, of course) . . . and not another worry in the world.

Driver: r7 quad/10.5 degree, stiff shaft
3W: Steelhead III, stiff shaft
7W: r5, stiff shaftIrons (2-SW): ISI K/Black dot, stiff shaft,...


Posted
I agree with much of what you say, although on the subject of length I would say that the shorter a course is these days without sacrificing toughness, the better it is. I still think that turning holes into glorified airstrips to counter big hitters is the easy cop-out: defend the course with challenging greens instead, or with mid-fairway bunkers that force the slugger to choose between playing short to take the sand out of the equation or going for the carry.

The key to greatness for me is options: are you given several different ways to play a hole when you stand on the tee?

Posted
I have my own way of grading a course.6 months after I played it can I remember the holes or not.If it was a great course in my mind I can recall allmost every shot on every hole.

In my new FT carry bag
FT-9 Tour nuetral 9.5
FT-15 degree 3 wood
Fussion Hybrids #2&4
Fussion irons with Grapholoy Pro launch Red shafts56&60 Cally X forged wedges with Red shaftsSG9 putterCally I ballBushnell Meadealist range finder


Posted
Conditioning - I can't stand a golf course being in bad condition
Uniqueness of holes
History - I like playing a golf course knowing that when I step on the green, I'm steping on the same green that a legend steped on.
Challenge - Obviously a bit important
Strategically-placed traps/obstacles
Length

In my Essex Stand Bag:
3 Wood: F/Speed - Aldila S Graphite Shaft
Hybrid: Halo 3i 22° - R Graphite Shaft
Wedges: Glass Bead - Lob Wedge - 60°Putter: Tour Collection MX400 (LOVE IT!)Ball: HX-Tour 56 - Pro-V1XHome Courses: Stone Mountain Golf Course (73.5/134)


Posted
  • Good condition
  • Spectacular views
  • Interesting features on the course
  • Well planned holes that are challenging but fair
  • Great off course facilities

Taylormade r7 460
Callaway X 3 Wood
Callaway X 5 Wood
Callaway X 7 Wood
Callaway X Hybrid (24*)TaylorMade r7 Irons (5-PW)Mizuno MP-R Series Wedges (52,58 degrees)Ping G2 Anser Putter


Posted
To me, What makes a golf course is how it is kept. There can be the greatest views on a golf course, or it could be the ugliest, but what would you rather play on. The ugliest golf course that is well kept with the greens nice and solid and no divets, fairsways kept good, or would you want to play on an absolutely BEAUTIFUL course but the greens are torn up, the fair way isn't cut well, and the sand trap is never racked?

Driver: G2
3 Wood: Launcher
Irons: FoundersWedges: Putter: Tru TechBall: The Longest NoodleBag: Grom If you are going to throw a club, it is important to throw it ahead of you, down the fairway, so you don't have to waste energy going back to pick it up. ~Tommy...


Posted
1- Length. Not Overall lenght, but varying length of holes. Nothing worse than a golf course with 14 par fours that are between 390 and 410. Driver-SW gets old real quick.
2- Condition. I don't mind long grass in the fairway or rough sand. I hate, HATE poorly cut cups and hitting off of clay in the fairway.
3- Setting. Agree with the comments about houses and roads, they are a great way to turn an cheap course into an expensive outing.
4- People. I really hate hearing people cheering when they make a 15 putt for double bogey 3 holes over.

I am certainly not a golf snob, I am much less likely to spend $275 to play a TPC course than I am to pay $13 to play twilight at my local muni, but I don't think these things are reserved for the uber expensive course
In the Bag:

-Driver- 905ti 10.5 deg Speeder Shaft
-3W- R7
-Hybrid- G5 22 deg -Irons- X-16 Reduced Offset Created -GW, SW and PutterAnd a Big 'ole Umbrella!

Posted
I kind of have a question to add to these questions...hehe...

ok, the first time i went out, to cullman municipal course in alabama, it was beautiful, no dead grass, perfect greens, everyone was friendly on the course...

then, this past weekend, i went to what was supposed to be one of the nicest courses around; but it sucked... a lot of the tee's consisted of such a hard ground that you couldn't tee up... full of rocks and such... not a single bunker was a bunker anymore; all of them were filled with grass... just looked like a bunch of old, grown up craters...empty beer cans and trash all over the place (especially piled about 10 feet away from each trash can)... and after a while, all of the holes started looking the same, with the exception of 4 or 5...

however, there were several holes that had a near perfect sight from the tee... looking from the top of a mountain to where you can see everything below you... incredible view, and you almost forget about how bad the condition is...

another complaint i have about the last course, is the cart i was on started dying about halfway through the course, and by the time we finished the 18th hole, me and the guy i was with had to push it to the clubhouse...

Posted
I think a great course gives you a good mix of long holes and short holes and it will give you holes that give you various options of how to play them. Risk and Reward if you will. Not even risk reward just sometimes different ways to go about the hole.

For instance a local par 5 is 532, you tee off with a downhill shot, the second shot is uphill. Longer hitters can hit it in 2. Driver however brings a small creek left and a lake right into play. An agressive and great drive is rewarded with a chance to get home in two. But 3 wood is the conservative play making it a 3 shot hole, or a hell of a 2nd shot into the green.

Conditions and service need to be good. As do the practice facilities. I hate uneven tee boxes and tee boxes with spaces of dirt in between grass.

Posted
Condition is a must. Crooked, dried-out tee boxes or patchy fairways and greens will overwhelm ANY other positive. Conversely, give me a nice level tee box, well-kept fairways and true-rolling greens, and I'll probably enjoy myself, no matter what else.

Length must vary! It doesn't have to be super-long, but there's nothing I dislike more than, "oh, look, it's another 410 yard par 4, with a slight dogleg." Give me one that may be drivable, or one where I have to hit 3-wood off the tee.

Par 3's MUST be interesting. Make me struggle to pick a club, wrestle with an elevation change, something, but do it on a hole that I should "feel" like I can birdie if I make the right decisions.

PACE OF PLAY! Put a ranger out there, put people on the clock and clear violators should be skipped ahead when necessary. It is NOT golf to have to wait on a group for every shot from holes 4-18. Being a slow golfer doesn't mean you're a bad golfer, and your greens fee didn't give you stake to the entire course for as long as it takes you.

Nothing in the swing is done at the expense of balance.


Posted
Condition! As a lover of golf, the length of the course doesn't matter to me... you still need to execute the shots. I do not however want to spend my money on a course that isn't kept in great shape, what's the point?

I was lucky to attend the Master's when Phil won and the first thing I noticed about Augusta National is "perfection". Grass that looks better than the carpet in your house, tee boxes that are symmetrically perfect and level, well defined fringes and fairways. Oh my! I'm getting excited thinking about it.

Put a course in that great of shape near me and I'd be happy to play it everyday.
In my staff bag
Driver: 907D2 - 9.5° - X100
3-Wood: PT13 - 13° - X300
Irons: MP-33 - 2i - PW - X300
Wedges: Vokey 54° & 58°Putter: Anser - 33" - (Face weighted)Ball: Pro V1x

Posted
I do not however want to spend my money on a course that isn't kept in great shape, what's the point?

Dude. . . AMEN! I HATE courses that have crappy tee boxes!


Posted
Forcing you to think about each and every shot you play is one hallmark. Deciding on the safe play or the aggressive play...and having an option between the two is definately a hallmark in my eyes. I've become something of a student of Ross and Tillinghast over the last few years, and living in the north-east i have had the opportunity to play some of their courses, and both were masters at that...and didn't need to move a lot of dirt to do it either. After playing Bethpage Black, reflecting on the round with the foursome, we all commented how you needed to be focused and have a game plan on every shot, and if you didn't you paid for it.

Variety in holes in terms of length, in terms of shots they require you to play is a factor as well.

Seeing the task at hand in front of you I think is a hallmark as well...tricked up holes do nothing for me, regardless of the reputation of any modern designer. Huge exception to this are some of the links I have played overseas...Lahinch and Ballybunion...which were built with the land that they had...blind shots and unique approaches over dunes were just a byproduct of the land.

In terms of current architects, I tend to like Coore and Crenshaw. They seem to be minimalists, who put it all out in front of you and force you to think.

WITB:
G-10 10.5* Accra T-50 M3
G-10 17.5* 4W Accra T-50 M3
Burner Rescue 19*
Burner Rescue 22* G-10 5 - PW CG 10 GW 52* 588 DSG RTG SW 56* 588 DSG RTG LW 60*Byron Morgan - 007 Captain Morgan 33" Sound Slot, Sight Dot


  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
The best course are the ones that make you think.

Driver: Pinemeadows Bloc Driver 10
Hybrid: Adams A2 3 and 4 iron stiff
Irons: A2 hybrid irons
Wedges: Golf Smith 56 and 60 Degree
Putter: Pinemeadows bladeBall: Nike Power Distance softBag: Datrek Icon


Posted
In terms of current architects, I tend to like Coore and Crenshaw. They seem to be minimalists, who put it all out in front of you and force you to think.

definitely a fan of C & C--have you played any of Tom Doak's tracks? Very similar schools of thought that you sound like you'd appreciate...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Flickr pics from hacking it up at Pebble, Bandon, Pinehurst, Whistling Straits, the Black, Kiawah & more...


Posted
definitely a fan of C & C--have you played any of Tom Doak's tracks? Very similar schools of thought that you sound like you'd appreciate...

No, havent played any of Doak's yet. Hope to change that in the future though, as you mention he seems to be from the minimalist school as well. With it being in the 40's outside, my mind is already starting to wander to a planned Scottdale trip in March and C&C;'s Talking Stick...

WITB:
G-10 10.5* Accra T-50 M3
G-10 17.5* 4W Accra T-50 M3
Burner Rescue 19*
Burner Rescue 22* G-10 5 - PW CG 10 GW 52* 588 DSG RTG SW 56* 588 DSG RTG LW 60*Byron Morgan - 007 Captain Morgan 33" Sound Slot, Sight Dot


Posted

The staff. They should be courteous and kind but never butt kissing. If they are working on the course I expect them to respect my game it keep the noise to a minimum while I am near. I hate lining up my ball and hearing a weed whacker or lawn mover in my back swing right next to me. I work on a golf course and these are our standards for the "playing" portion of the day so I'm not pulling this out of a hat. We actually have one day where most people do not play and the yard work gets done. I love fairways that feel like greens and tee boxes that level. Too bad I have a dollar budget with a dime income

Driver: 10.5* SuperQuad TP 1st Edition All Black V2 Stiff
5 Wood - 585.h 19* DG S300
Irons: 3-PW S59 Stiff
Wedges: Rac TP 52*, 60* MP-T 56*
Putter(s): Anser 3 TP Black ballGET TO SINGLE DIGITS!Goal: Beat a certain admin that lives in my town


Posted
1. Condition. I've played on courses where you couldn't take a divot. It was a little like trying to take a divot on concrete, wasn't happening.
2. Scenery. My favorite part of golf is the walk in the sun.
3. Variation of difficulty/traps/distance. A couple of extra par 3s are fine if they are unique.
4. The People. Etiquette, etiquette, etiquette.

Note: This thread is 6745 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    Carl's Place
    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • I could see that being the stress of the playing partner. I would be interested to see a deep dive into how he performed.  I do wonder the difference in record of best ball versus alt shot. In alt shot, you basically are taking 50% of his impact and adding in 50% of another golfers impact. So naturally, his total effective strength would be less.  That could be the case.  I think it might be more due to the style of golf they grew up playing. If in the UK, foursomes is more common, then that is an advantage. In the USA, I don't think foursomes or even best ball is common at the high school or collegiate level. It is more match play and stroke play. Maybe the PGA Tour should petition the NCAA to change their formats to include more Alt Shot.   
    • This makes all kinds of sense. Look at an exception on the US side: Justin Thomas and Jordan Spieth are a renowned Ryder and Presidents Cup pairing, and they DO socialize together, are the best of friends in fact. 
    • Tiger has a good singles record, but not a good pairs record. My own personal theory on that is he's hard to play with. If you play with him in either format and lose, it's going to be your fault. "How could you not win playing with the best ever?" kind of thing. That ups the pressure that's already pretty insane and makes you play worse. At the same time, Tiger's a bit of a control freak. He hates not having the wheel and in foursomes play, he has to give that up for half the shots. So he doesn't play very well and his partner doesn't play very well. The Euros are much better (it seems) at giving up that control and playing against him has the effect of reducing the pressure a little because if you lose, well, he's the best ever so it's hardly surprising. All of which shifts the balance a little against Tiger and so his record isn't great.  I also don't think the US captains did a great job partnering him off. Putting him with Phil is maybe one of the worst decisions in team golf history. I think he needed someone who was happy to play second fiddle. Was steady. Kind of person who shoots 68-71 a lot and less 63 or 76 type player. Not sure that was ever going to be an easy thing to do mind you.  As to your other questions, a friend of mine went to a dinner that Padraig Harrington spoke at. What Paddy said is that on the European Tour (as it was then), the players would go and stay at the same place and get together, have dinner, enjoy each other's company and get along. Then in the US, everyone would go to their hotel, order room service and basically barely talk to each other. His theory was that the camaraderie meant much more cohesiveness and people being happy to play for each other and with each other.  County golf matches in the UK tend to be foursomes and singles and a lot of Euro tour players will have been through the county system on their way up. Hard to picture how you can change that. The US is just more individualist and Europe is more inclusive. Just the way that they are.
    • Jim Furyk To Get Tough To Win Ryder Cup Back | Golf Monthly Jim Furyk says he will pick the "toughest" and "grittiest" players he can as he looks to solve the "glaring problem" preventing the USA from winning the Ryder Cup Yea, I am not a fan of the toughness talk. I do think the idea of closers might matter more. Tiger Woods, probably had the most grit of any player in history, has a losing record at the Ryder Cup. He was just not good in team formats.  I do think US needs to fix their team formats. It seems to be a historical problem. Do people over in Europe grow up playing team format golf more often? I don't get why they tend to succeed in that format. I am not sure it is a toughness question. I think toughness matters more in singles matches, where you are on your own island having to win.       
    • Wordle 1,790 6/6 ⬜⬜🟨⬜🟨 ⬜🟨⬜🟨🟩 ⬜🟩⬜🟩🟩 🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜ ⬜🟩🟨⬜⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Whew!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.