Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 4051 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was recently involved in a minor argument (I lost) where I was trying to get Tom Watson installed in the top 5 of all time (well I was aiming for the number 4 spot in truth)

Whereas I could hold my ground on terms of longevity of career and managed to get that point conceded to me, my attempts to have Watson reappraised as a double figure Major winner and regarded as such, kind of failed (as you would expect). Near misses, or losing tournaments he should have won, is what separates the great from the very, very good, and of course the history books make no real concessions for 'bad luck' stories. Luck doesn't come into it at this level etc

Starting with the eight he did win, how many do we think he should have won (how many did he lose from winning positions I guess?) and which ones do you think he should have won, or perhaps more interestingly as this game rolled out, how close did he really get. My opponent did concede on numerous occasions that he did get genuinely very close and should have won, and could easily have 12 or even more which suddenly paints him in a very different light, but........ he didn't ..... and that was where all my floundering and attempts to get history rewritten kind of collapsed

I was also reminded that he enjoyed a little of good fortune as well which I was trying to overlook


Posted

Tommy Watson was one of the truly  great players in pro golf history. No need to rank him any other way than that. However, with 8 majors won, he would be listed at #6 behind  Player, Hogan, Hagen, Woods and Nicklaus. Of course some will knock him because he never won a PGA Championship, while forgetting he won 5 Open Championships.

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

He started getting good when I was first really getting hooked on the game, so I remember watching most every major he was in on TV for a long time, he was one of my favorites to watch. Me and my golf buddies at the time would watch the majors together, a lot of special memories for me.

The one he lost when Larry Nelson drained a 100 footer out of a cold start sticks in my mind, also the one he lost to Seve at St. Andrews. But the one that hasn't scabbed over for me was the one he lost to Cink, if there was ever a horse for a course it was him at Ailsa, plus that course is so unique and special to me that it all kind of ties in. I was really pulling for him, you could sense even from the TV guys that most everybody was. Not to be---

If he hadn't got the yips he prob would have won a bunch more, I guess that turned out to be alcohol related?

But like Bill Parcells said, you are what your record is, no more no less. But his record, pretty darn good!

Steve

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Starting with the eight he did win, how many do we think he should have won (how many did he lose from winning positions I guess?) and which ones do you think he should have won, or perhaps more interestingly as this game rolled out, how close did he really get. My opponent did concede on numerous occasions that he did get genuinely very close and should have won, and could easily have 12 or even more which suddenly paints him in a very different light, but........ he didn't ..... and that was where all my floundering and attempts to get history rewritten kind of collapsed

8, he should have won 8 majors because he did. Tournaments are not stolen from anyone, you either win or you don't. To think that he should have won is BS really. If he should have won than he would have won, but he didn't.

In the end it was his inability to close the deal in those tournaments that cost him. In terms of winning majors, he's an 8 time major winner and that is it.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

This is a very strange thread.

I'm with Matt.

8.

P.S. It's no wonder you lost.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

This is a very strange thread.

I'm with Matt.

8.

P.S. It's no wonder you lost.

I agree as well. Tom is among the greatest golfers of all time but is certainly behind Nicklaus, Woods, Hogan, Player and probably Palmer even though Arnold has one fewer major. I don't consider players that go back as far as Hagen or Jones. It's too hard to make the comparison.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm with the OP. Tiger shoulda won 16, maybe 17 by now.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm with the OP. Tiger shoulda won 16, maybe 17 by now.

Nope, Tiger should have won 14 majors, because that is what he did. Injuries and such are part of the game.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Nope, Tiger should have won 14 majors, because that is what he did. Injuries and such are part of the game.

There is no shoulda, coulda, woulda period. If there was - well Jack came in second place a boatload of times. I agree, Tiger is at 14 cuz it is what it is.


Posted
Nope, Tiger should have won 14 majors, because that is what he did. Injuries and such are part of the game.

[quote name="Mulligan Jeff" url="/t/77870/tom-watson-majors#post_1070990"] There is no shoulda, coulda, woulda period. If there was - well Jack came in second place a boatload of times. I agree, Tiger is at 14 cuz it is what it is.[/quote] Tiger shoulda won the YE Yang PGA because of spike marks, and he shoulda won that Master's because of flagstick. Shoulda coulda woulda applies to Tiger.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Tiger shoulda won the YE Yang PGA because of spike marks, and he shoulda won that Master's because of flagstick. Shoulda coulda woulda applies to Tiger.

Nope, flagsticks are part of the course. He's not the first one to have done that. Also spike marks are part of the course. All golfers have to deal with it. Your examples prove nothing other than yoU think Tiger should get preferential treatment.

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Tiger shoulda won the YE Yang PGA because of spike marks, and he shoulda won that Master's because of flagstick.

Shoulda coulda woulda applies to Tiger.


Strange logic. Shouda, coulda,woulda applies only to Tiger? How is this rational?

cubdog

Ross (aka cubdog)


Posted

Umm... @colin007 is being tongue in cheek. Duh. :doh:

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Umm... @colin007 is being tongue in cheek. Duh.:doh:

Tongue in cheek, maybe, but when someone is discussing Woods logic is often absent. cubdog

Ross (aka cubdog)


Posted

Tongue in cheek, maybe, but when someone is discussing Woods logic is often absent.

cubdog

Uhh...yup...and apparently that applies to both sides of the divide. ;-)

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Tongue in cheek, maybe, but when someone is discussing Woods logic is often absent. cubdog

It's only logical if it supports my side of the argument.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
It's only logical if it supports my side of the argument.

I hear you.

Ross (aka cubdog)


  • Administrator
Posted

It's only logical if it supports my side of the argument.

:)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 4051 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.