Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Natalie Gulbis being Natalie Gulbis


Note: This thread is 3965 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
She's ok. I think the lifting picture is the best one I've seen so far. It's genuine, she doesn't need the makeup she normally wears. It's a real pic of a healthy and attractive woman.

I totally agree. She's all too frequently done up too much. She has a little natural beauty so let it come out naturally.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
not the best body on the tour either

Well now, you're going to have to back that up with pics and analysis. I'm not arguing with you, I'm just looking for substantive corroboration.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

not the best body on the tour either

Must be a Holly fan... :-D

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

N

I'm not sure why she gets so much criticism. Is it because of her looks or because she makes a living doing something that most of us would like to make a living at but aren't good enough to. By all reports she is one of the hardest working golfers on the LPGA. That can't be it. So I guess it is her looks. That's nice.

cubdog


Your post pretty much nailed it. Class envy. I have followed Nat G, at the LPGA Honda tournament here in Thailand. She is always very receptive to the gallery and seems to genuinely enjoy playing golf. I remember when she first went on tour she was thought to be an airhead but has certainly outgrown that assumption. Many tour players, be it male or female with only a single win do not get the same criticism. Guess it's because they lack the looks.


Posted

Sandra Gal has an amazing natural body and I also think Michelle Wie is stunning

:powerblt: Air force one complete set

:powerblt: TPS Putter

:oakley: Shirts

:footjoy: shoes


Posted

Sandra Gal has an amazing natural body and I also think Michelle Wie is stunning

Agree. Both real lookers. NG looks like a dude.

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Must be a Holly fan...


Ever since Holly Sonders linked up and eventually married that douchebag Erik Kuselias, I lost all respect for her.  He's twice her age. OK, jealously might play a small part, but still...

Robert Spann

:ping: :adidas: :adams: :leupold: :nike: :srixon: :nickent:


Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by liquor box

Sandra Gal has an amazing natural body and I also think Michelle Wie is stunning

Agree. Both real lookers. NG looks like a dude.

I think someone needs glasses.  She may not be the stuff of fashion models, but there is certainly nothing mannish about her.

Rick

"He who has the fastest cart will never have a bad lie."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I think someone needs glasses.  She may not be the stuff of fashion models, but there is certainly nothing mannish about her.

Agreed ... What's weong with you Jason???

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I'm with Jase on this one. The pic posted by the OP is the best I've seen her look. She has very sharp angular facial features.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm with Jase on this one. The pic posted by the OP is the best I've seen her look. She has very sharp angular facial features.

OK, I think I get it.  If you squint a little, pretend like you don't see her big boobs, nice legs, round butt and long blonde hair, and picture her bald and with a penis, I can see how you might think she would look a little like a dude. :-P

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I've always thought Natalie was attractive. I think one of the best things she has going for her is the way she treats fans. Although she's made a good amount of money on the golf course, I'd bet she's made more off (calenders, personal appearances, advertising). I have been frustrated at her golf career on it's own, I thought she should have won more.


Posted
Look, she's not a hag. I just think she overdoes the makeup and the spray tan. All that crap actually makes her less attractive.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Look, she's not a hag. I just think she overdoes the makeup and the spray tan. All that crap actually makes her less attractive.

Yeah, kinda like Holly huh..? :-D

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Yeah, kinda like Holly huh..?  :-D

I'm not sure I've ever looked high enough on Holly to see her face. Does she have a pretty face?

—Adam

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammer 4

Yeah, kinda like Holly huh..?

I'm not sure I've ever looked high enough on Holly to see her face. Does she have a pretty face?

She has a face????

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Actually, the best pic I've seen of Holly was from when she was in college. Fresh faced, no spray tan, minimal makeup.

Colin P.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3965 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.