Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3807 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I loved them, they were not as smooth feeling as the G30s were, but the results were longer and more forgiving. they are not terrible feeling by any means. just felt like it took more work to get them into the slot. some may not even feel that however. also they have their own "standard length" as they are about 1/2 inch longer even in the steel. not sure why however. but definitely a good purchase if they swing well for you. great for high handicapper but less offset then G30s as well. and are somewhat shapeable. the 2s seem more so if that's what you are looking for. a solid buy. I would have bought a set if I had the money to spare on them, they are a bit steep for some. then again dollar for dollar if I could squeeze a bit more out I would be going with the XRs or Apex from Callaway as they had the feel of the G30s and the distance at least of the RSi (FOR ME).

try them if you get a chance tho.


  • Moderator
Posted
@billchao is reviewing the RSi 2 irons, they're different but maybe he can share a few thoughts.

I actually have no experience with the RSi 1 irons, but from what I've read about them, the Ping G30s are a good comparison. The G30 irons are very easy to hit and get up in the air, but are also hard to hit lower which is the main reason I'm moving away from them (and other clubs in that category). As for the RSi 2 irons, I think they are excellent clubs. They are very forgiving as shots hit straight off the toe only lose about 10-15 yards or so and are only a little bit more offline. If you're aiming at the center of the green and you toe one or thin one, there's a good chance that you might still hit the green or at the very least have a nGIR. The other thing I really like about them (and the RSi 1s are designed the same way) is that Taylormade designed the set progressively, incorporating more GI elements in the longer irons than the shorter irons. Since most people struggle more with the longer irons, they made them easier to hit and higher launching, but they didn't put as many of those elements into the 9i or PW so they are easier to control and you don't end up hitting them too high.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
I tried both the rsi and callaway xr irons. Both felt similar to me so I went for the xr irons to save some cash as I was upgrading the full set. Love them although the custom fit was an extra inch and a half which I am still getting used to.

Posted

I personally doubt there is a noticeable difference in performance among any of this year's (or the last few years') SGI irons.  That being said, I think the RSi 1s are the best looking of the bunch and I would choose them if I were in the market.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3807 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.