Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3744 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hello All,

This is my first post and I sought the site out because I have recently been curious to get others feedback on my question.

I have been playing golf for almost 20 years and have always been considered a decent player. I have always stepped up in shaft stiffness as I got faster swing speeds.

My Dilema: I have always been a poor driver of the ball. That is probably the weakest part of my game. For years I have not been able to be consistent. I am not short off the tee so I am never concerned about distance for me it has always been control. I recently played three straight rounds with my father while visiting him. I did not bring my own clubs so I rented but I used his driver the entire three days. He plays the Cobra Fly Z, Regular Flex, 55grams(senior weight and flex).While playing I had never been so consistent off the tee and did not notice any loss in distance.

My Question: I have an average swing speed of 107mph with my driver. Why do you think that everything I have ever read and believed has always told me that I should be using stiff to x-stiff and heavier grammed shafts? Again, the only reason I am posting is because I have never hit the ball better off the tee and I just want to know everyone else thoughts on "am I going against the norm, and should just believe that stiffer shafts are best for me?"

Thank you in advance for anyone else thoughts and experiences.

dan


Posted

Swinging that softer shaft probably made you concentrate on swinging with good tempo and thus the better driving day.

Rich C.

Driver Titleist 915 D3  9.5*
3 Wood TM RBZ stage 2 tour  14.5*
2 Hybrid Cobra baffler 17*
4Hybrid Adams 23*
Irons Adams CB2's 5-GW
Wedges 54* and 58* Titleist vokey
Putter Scotty Cameron square back 2014
Ball Srixon Zstar optic yellow
bushnell V2 slope edition


  • Moderator
Posted
@drewasem , there isn't a hard rule about shaft weight and flex vs swing speed. There isn't even an industry standard on shaft stiffness. Some faster swingers play better with lighter shafts, some don't. That's why it's important to get fit for your swing.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

My understanding of shaft stiffness is that it has less to do with swing speed and more to do more with transition, tempo, and lag release point. Plus there are no industry standards for stiffness...

http://www.golfwrx.com/44239/wishon-taking-shaft-fitting-from-guessing-to-specifics


Posted

I would forget about stiff, x-stiff, regular, etc. and just go buy a Cobra Fly Z, Regular Flex, 55grams (senior weight and flex) driver. We tend to over think this game too much and listen to all the hype, myself included. I have bought and sold more drivers / shafts than I care to think about. I have a Cobra S3 three wood, regular shaft, that I have used for years and hit very well. I recently thought, why didn't I ever try the S3 driver? So I looked up on E-Bay and found a new Cobra S3 driver, regular flex, for $89.00. Now the S3 is before the Amp Cell, Bio Cell and Fly-Z, has got to be five to six years (maybe more) "out of date." I hit the hell out of it, and straight! When I think of all the money I have wasted on other Cobra, Cleveland, TaylorMade, and Callaway drivers my head hurts. I have sold most of them (for a loss) but still have a few. They will stay in the garage for a long time. I guess I'm saying when you find something that works don't worry about all the BS out there.


Posted
My understanding of shaft stiffness is that it has less to do with swing speed and more to do more with transition, tempo, and lag release point. Plus there are no industry standards for stiffness... [URL=http://www.golfwrx.com/44239/wishon-taking-shaft-fitting-from-guessing-to-specifics]http://www.golfwrx.com/44239/wishon-taking-shaft-fitting-from-guessing-to-specifics[/URL]

The article states that swing speed is a starting point, but the transition dictates the shaft someone should use. There was a reference to 3 golfers with a 100mph SS and yet all three require different shafts.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

In recent years, golf researchers have determined that clubhead speed is only one factor in helping one select proper shaft stiffness.

Your transition move as top is also important. People with a quick transition to downswing would need stiffer shafts than those with a smoother transition. (This factor shows up in the Mizuno shaft optimize r numbers.

When in doubt, get on a launch monitor and see which {Head + Shaft} combo give you the best numbers.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Other factors such as kick point, loft and head shape also come into play. NEVER put yourself in a box when it comes to golf equipment. As others have mentioned, theres not enough standardization to do that. Buy and play what u like and what suits your game above all else. And sounds to me like the cobra might be a good fit.
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3744 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨⬜🟨🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 ⬜🟩🟩🟩⬜ ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6 🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Is it? I bought the Stack radar to replace my PRGR based on what Stack told me! When I am swinging for speed, the PRGR would miss 50%-80% of my backswings due to a higher speed. The stack seldom misses those- at least for me.
    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.