Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3673 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
10 hours ago, Ashley said:

Also, I've talked with others about "breakthrough rounds" and these can really accelerate your progress.  Unfortunately, you don't know when it will happen, but it will build your confidence when it does.  For example, the first time I broke 80 I shot a 75.  Going so much lower than I was accustomed to helped me realize that it wasn't a big deal, and then I started shooting in the 70s more often.  You really have to let your great rounds build your confidence...too many golfers make the mistake of dismissing these rounds as flukes.  

This happened to me, I was stuck in my league scores around a 44 at best early this year,  I came so close to breaking it so many times but one day I shot a 39 to beat it, the pressure just fell off.  I started consistently shooting low 40's in league.  Then I stayed there for about a month, shot a 37,  now I don't usually have an issue shooting +2-+4  a round.


Posted

My uncle never played golf until he retired.  He got the golf bug really bad, started playing and practicing all the time and was a single digit handicap inside of 3 years.  He obviously had some natural talent . .plus tons of free time and the ability as well as the desire to play and practice a lot.

It took me around 4 years to break 90.  Then I stopped playing for about 2 years although I kept practicing and took a few lessons.  I'm hoping to play sometime in the next couple weeks . .I have no idea what I'll shoot.  I know my swing is a lot better than it was the last time I played.        


Posted

I'm a complete hack with the lack of talent to back it up. To make matters worse, I've never budgeted for lessons.

1st - First ever round was a 135 on a fairly easy course. By season's end was shooting 110s. (Approx. average 120)

2nd - Busted 100 for the first time in May. Had a handful of other rounds in the 90s (Approx. average 110)

3rd - Busted 90 for the first time (on the area's easiest course.   (Approx. average 102)

4th - First year keeping a handicap. Shot personal low round of 84. Progress slowing. (Appox. average 98).

So progress. Just painfully slow.

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3673 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • As an analyst by nature, I would like to compare the scores under both systems. It is something we can easily do if we have the data. I actually thought the new system was less fair to those whose game was on the decline - like mine! Old: Best 10 of last 20 scores with the .96 multiplier. Course handicap excluded course rating and overall par. New: Best 8/20. Course handicap includes course rating -par. My understanding is Stableford caps scores at Net double bogey like stroke play. If so, handicap should be slower to rise because you are only using 8 versus 10 scores. If I am missing something, I am curious enough to  want to understand what that may be. My home course tees that I play are 72.1/154 now. My best score out here is 82. When my game started to decline, my handicap didn’t budge for 13 rounds because of good scores in my first 8! I know I am an anomaly but my handicap has increased almost 80% in the past few years (with only a few rounds this year). For a few months I knew I was losing every bet because my game was nowhere near my handicap. I suspect I have steamrolled a few nuances but that shouldn’t matter much. When I have modeled this with someone playing the same tees and course, one good round, or return to form, will immediately reduce the handicap by some amount.
    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.