Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Nick Faldo On Overtinkering and Why Young Players Are Excelling


Note: This thread is 3670 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

Do you agree with Faldo on why young players are ready to win early in their careers? 

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2015/11/18/faldo-on-overtinkering-why-young-players-are-excelling.html

Quote

In a lengthy chat reported by Reuters' Tony Jimenez (who dutifully plugged the six-time major winner's six new wines), Faldo sounds horrified by Spieth's off-season plan to gain yardage. But it's his take on the role of technology via things likeTrackman and the application of biomechanics that may explain why we are seeing so many complete, ready-for-prime-time players under 25:

"Now you have what I call the appliance of science. You have machines to tell your swing path, club-face angle, ball flights after one shot -- that's fantastic.

"I wish I would have had that rather than hit a million balls and then go, 'Oh, I wonder how this feels?," added Faldo with a giggle.

Europe's 2008 Ryder Cup captain also said golfers were much more powerful nowadays.

"The physical side has been taken to a new level. They've really done a good job in dispelling the thought that it's an old man's sport," said Faldo.

"These guys now are unbelievably strong. We have more than a dozen doctors travelling on tour with degrees in biomechanics ... they know exactly how to build a golfer and that's fantastic.

"This is all factual information, it's not a guess. It's been around for years now and kids at 15 get this knowledge for five years and bang, that's why they can come out at 20 and be impressive golfers."

 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
20 minutes ago, mvmac said:

Do you agree with Faldo on why young players are ready to win early in their careers? 

http://www.geoffshackelford.com/homepage/2015/11/18/faldo-on-overtinkering-why-young-players-are-excelling.html

 

Faldo makes very good points. The proper fitness and better instruction methods are definitely showing up with these young players. 

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
Quote

"These guys now are unbelievably strong. We have more than a dozen doctors travelling on tour with degrees in biomechanics ... they know exactly how to build a golfer and that's fantastic.

Just an example of some of the new guys: Justin Thomas, Emiliano Grillo, Matthew Fitzpatrick - these guys don't shout out unbelievably strong, in the traditional sense to me. Maybe they have whatever it is that makes a body prime for golf. Explosiveness, flexibility.

Quote

"Kids who used to be surfing dudes are now talking golf, that's the important thing," said Faldo. "I've been travelling the world and everybody's now talking golf.

https://sports.yahoo.com/news/golf-dont-over-tinker-faldos-message-spieth-080001338--golf.html

I think it's more a combo of bigger athletic pool being drawn from (I didn't know like, surfing, was like, a huge pool, like, to draw from, dude) , better teaching technique, better "farm" system, better fitness. The strong thing is important, but not commensurate to the degree he's implying.

Over tinker. Sounds like an oxymoron to me. Wouldn't overhaul be a better word?

 

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
Quote

Luke Donald, Paula Creamer, the list goes on and on for short/medium hitters that really regressed by trying to get longer. Agree with Faldo from that standpoint.

This reminds me of a piece I read on Annika Sorenstam who spent the early 2000s working solely on her distance and increased 20 yards from 2000-2003.  In her case that work went hand in hand with a resurgence to her career and may have helped elevate her from merely top female golfer to GOAT.  A decent counter example I think to the above comment to the article.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think it's a combo of technology and the pool becoming bigger than ever since most of these kids that are coming up now became golfers during the Tiger Woods era when the game exploded..

Christian

:tmade::titleist:  :leupold:  :aimpoint: :gamegolf:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
2 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Over tinker. Sounds like an oxymoron to me. Wouldn't overhaul be a better word?

I actually think tinker is a good word for it. Spieth is going to "rebuild" his swing, he's "tinkering" with adding more length to his game.

1 hour ago, allenc said:

This reminds me of a piece I read on Annika Sorenstam who spent the early 2000s working solely on her distance and increased 20 yards from 2000-2003.  In her case that work went hand in hand with a resurgence to her career and may have helped elevate her from merely top female golfer to GOAT.  A decent counter example I think to the above comment to the article.

It's more and more of a bomber's game and we all know how important length is to scoring. If you're a guy like Donald and you're playing with the younger guys that are hitting it 30-40 yards past you, you're going to take notice and consider a few things. I also don't think seeking length was Donald's downfall, even when he was #1 in the world he "got away" with a lot of bad driving, short and crooked. Long term it's not something you can hide from.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

Curious as to what percentage of juniors who had Division I aspirations vs all juniors in 2010 were regularly using radar like Trackman and Flightscope versus today.

20% (2010) vs 75% (today) - D I

10% (2010) vs 50% (today) - All

Just a guess, probably totally off.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
9 minutes ago, nevets88 said:

Curious as to what percentage of juniors who had Division I aspirations vs all juniors in 2010 were regularly using radar like Trackman and Flightscope versus today.

20% (2010) vs 75% (today) - D I

10% (2010) vs 50% (today) - All

Just a guess, probably totally off.

I think the number would have been very small in 2010, wasn't even that popular on tour then. 

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 minute ago, mvmac said:

I think the number would have been very small in 2010, wasn't even that popular on tour then. 

Ah, what do you think it is currently?

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Just an example of some of the new guys: Justin Thomas, Emiliano Grillo, Matthew Fitzpatrick - these guys don't shout out unbelievably strong, in the traditional sense to me. Maybe they have whatever it is that makes a body prime for golf. Explosiveness, flexibility.

https://sports.yahoo.com/news/golf-dont-over-tinker-faldos-message-spieth-080001338--golf.html

I think it's more a combo of bigger athletic pool being drawn from (I didn't know like, surfing, was like, a huge pool, like, to draw from, dude) , better teaching technique, better "farm" system, better fitness. The strong thing is important, but not commensurate to the degree he's implying.

Over tinker. Sounds like an oxymoron to me. Wouldn't overhaul be a better word?

 

Having seen Fitzpatrick at the British Masters a few weeks ago, its obvious he has spent a lot of time in the gym since his amateur days. His shoulders and upper back had got noticeably more bulked up, nowhere near a body builder but bigger and more defined than he was before.


  • Administrator
Posted
7 hours ago, allenc said:

This reminds me of a piece I read on Annika Sorenstam who spent the early 2000s working solely on her distance and increased 20 yards from 2000-2003.  In her case that work went hand in hand with a resurgence to her career and may have helped elevate her from merely top female golfer to GOAT.  A decent counter example I think to the above comment to the article.

Interesting. I have another theory, but perhaps in the end, it's really the combination of both, particularly given what we know about how distance is important: during the same time frame, she worked quite a bit with Tiger Woods. He taught her a lot of short game shots, and probably also juiced up her competitive drive a bit, too.

Distance is more important in a lot of ways than the short game, though, so… I give more credence to your theory than the one I am now ditching. :-)

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think that Faldo makes a lot of good points. The fact that all of this information is readily available makes it easier to figure out what is going on and to make the necessary adjustments.

Tristan Hilton

My Equipment: 
Titleist TSR2 Driver (Fujikura Pro 2.0 TS; 10.5°) · PXG 0211 FWs (Diamana S+ 60; 15° and 21°) · PXG 0211 Hybrid (MMT 80; 22°) · Edel SMS Irons (SteelFiber i95; 5-GW) · Edel SMS Pro Wedges (SteelFiber i110; 56°, 60°) · Edel Classic Blade Putter (32") · Maxfli Tour Ball · Pinned Prism Rangefinder · SuperStroke Grips · Flightscope Mevo · TRUE Linkswear Shoes · Vessel Player V Pro 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
7 hours ago, nevets88 said:

Ah, what do you think it is currently?

Not sure but I'd guess it's much lower than it is on tour. I'm pretty sure a lot of the top colleges have radars but not sure if they use it on a regular basis.

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3670 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.