Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3640 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

How do they work compared to golf specific?  

I asked for gift cards to Golf Galaxy this year for Christmas so I could buy a rangefinder.  It turns out my best friend bought me a rangefinder off Amazon.  Problem is it's not golf specific.  Very kind of her to do this for me, but obviously it's not what I had in mind.  And I'm sure she had no idea about golf specific vs non golf specific.  

It's a Nikon 8397 Aculon..   Reviews on Amazon seem very mixed for golf.  Any idea what I can expect?  I'd feel horrible asking her to return it.  


Posted

Hardware is the same but the software is not. A golf rangefinder will pick up small objects like the pin while a hunting type one would filter it out. (Think trying to scope a deer through light foliage) I would opt for a golf specific device.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Golf specific is the way to go all things considered. Then again, for the past 10-12 years I have been using a 1000 yard Bushnell hunting device. It has never let me down as yet. I think I paid $79 for the critter. I also have a GPS gizmo, but rarely ever use it. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, Patch said:

Golf specific is the way to go all things considered. Then again, for the past 10-12 years I have been using a 1000 yard Bushnell hunting device. It has never let me down as yet. I think I paid $79 for the critter. I also have a GPS gizmo, but rarely ever use it. 

It picks up pins okay? Perhaps Bushnell's "pin seeker technology" is mostly marketing.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
2 hours ago, Will82 said:

How do they work compared to golf specific?  

I asked for gift cards to Golf Galaxy this year for Christmas so I could buy a rangefinder.  It turns out my best friend bought me a rangefinder off Amazon.  Problem is it's not golf specific.  Very kind of her to do this for me, but obviously it's not what I had in mind.  And I'm sure she had no idea about golf specific vs non golf specific.  

It's a Nikon 8397 Aculon..   Reviews on Amazon seem very mixed for golf.  Any idea what I can expect?  I'd feel horrible asking her to return it.  

I see the same thing as the review below, but get about 140-170 yards pretty readily. I have a Bushnell Camo style rangefinder used for archery and a cheap Bushnell made for golf.

The hunting one seems to work up to a point, but beyond that it doesn't work as well. It's good to about 140-150 yards or so?

It's really tough to range past 170 yards no matter what you use anyway. One of my playing partners had a $600+ Leupold something or another, and could barely target anything past 170 just like my super cheap Bushnell. He got a flag out to 430 one time with the expensive rangefinder, but it was extremely difficult and I think he hit one of the golfers on the green? My Bushnells had no hope.

Test it and see if you can range to roughly 170 yards?

Here's a review of your rangefinder that seems to indicate similar issues. . .

Quote

Most helpful critical review

16 of 23 people found the following review helpful
3.0 out of 5 stars
just very difficult to lock onto something like a flag stick past 100 yards or so
By Seattle johnon July 6, 2014
Difficult to lock on to an item A challenge for golfers, but would work well for hunting. Very clear optics, just very difficult to lock onto something like a flag stick past 100 yards or so. Does work at a range where the sticks have a wide colored flag. Can pick up the edge of a bunker.

 

 

26 minutes ago, SavvySwede said:

It picks up pins okay? Perhaps Bushnell's "pin seeker technology" is mostly marketing.

I think it's the laser optics. They might have a better or narrower field of view lens (or tighter field of view as you mentioned in an earlier post) on the "pin seeker"? Not sure, even though I've taken a few of them apart and "analyzed" them for work. . .

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_rangefinder

 

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted

I would opt for the golf specific one as well. I would think the Pin seeker technology would be of great benefit, but as stated above...could just be marketing??

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
8 minutes ago, TN94z said:

I would opt for the golf specific one as well. I would think the Pin seeker technology would be of great benefit, but as stated above...could just be marketing??

Thinking about it a bit, it could also be an optimum centering of the laser? They might just "optimize" it for 150 yards to 300 yards.

There's a transmitter (laser) and a "receiver" (PIN Photodiode or GaAs or some faster response technology) and there is an optimum angle between them to "center" the outgoing "laser beam". Maybe the "pin seeker" is centered at the 150 yard and 300 yard ranges?

I'm not convinced it's just marketing hype?

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
9 minutes ago, TN94z said:

I would opt for the golf specific one as well. I would think the Pin seeker technology would be of great benefit, but as stated above...could just be marketing??

I think that tech only works if the course installs prisms in their flag sticks. I've only seen them installed on one course I've played so far, and that one was fairly high end.

  • Upvote 1

Dom's Sticks:

Callaway X-24 10.5° Driver, Callaway Big Bertha 15° wood, Callaway XR 19° hybrid, Callaway X-24 24° hybrid, Callaway X-24 5i-9i, PING Glide PW 47°/12°, Cleveland REG 588 52°/08°, Callaway Mack Daddy PM Grind 56°/13°, 60°/10°, Odyssey Versa Jailbird putter w/SuperStroke Slim 3.0 grip, Callaway Chev Stand Bag, Titleist Pro-V1x ball

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
4 minutes ago, Lihu said:

Thinking about it a bit, it could also be an optimum centering of the laser? They might just "optimize" it for 150 yards to 300 yards.

There's a transmitter (laser) and a "receiver" (PIN Photodiode or GaAs or some faster response technology) and there is an optimum angle between them to "center" the outgoing "laser beam". Maybe the "pin seeker" is centered at the 150 yard and 300 yard ranges?

I'm not convinced it's just marketing hype?

I agree. I honestly don't think it is hype, but haven't really read enough to make that decision.

Bryan A
"Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 minutes ago, dkolo said:

I think that tech only works if the course installs prisms in their flag sticks. I've only seen them installed on one course I've played so far, and that one was fairly high end.

It seems like only expensive private or semi-private courses can afford these. Public courses wear out their flags very quickly.

With the prisms installed I think most of the rangefinders can get close to their rated yardages. Although, there is rarely line of site to the pin from any tee box, so once you rate the yardage limit past 500 yards it's pretty much just a "power output" or "sensitivity" marketing specification or something like that. . .

 

5 minutes ago, TN94z said:

I agree. I honestly don't think it is hype, but haven't really read enough to make that decision.

Yeah, it's probably just a small optimization, and not perfect like anything else in engineering. . .

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
43 minutes ago, SavvySwede said:

It picks up pins okay? Perhaps Bushnell's "pin seeker technology" is mostly marketing.

It does not pick up pins easily. What does best is pick up larger objects like back edges of bunkers, trees, mounds, buildings, posts..etc. Like I posted earlier. Golf specific is the way to go. Mine gives me what I want to know when I do use it. 

In My Bag:
A whole bunch of Tour Edge golf stuff...... :beer:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

I appreciate the replies.  Like I said, i wanted a golf specific rangefinder..  I was going to pick it out.  My best friend surprised me with one and she had no idea there were differences.  She problem read the Amazon reviews (4.5 stars) and saw a few that mentioned golf and thought she was getting me a great gift.

I'm very particular about what I want.  It's why I ask for gift cards.  I understand some people think that takes the thought out of it.  That's not something I'm hung up on though.  I'd rather make sure I'm not wasting my money..  

Edited by Will82

  • Administrator
Posted

http://www.paraide.com/ParAideProducts/GreenArea/Flagsticks/tabid/186/p/pinsite-reflector/Default.aspx

The prism flag toppers are pretty inexpensive, really. The ones built into the flag sticks themselves tend to cost a little more. They do help speed things up a little bit, but are largely unnecessary IME.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, iacas said:

http://www.paraide.com/ParAideProducts/GreenArea/Flagsticks/tabid/186/p/pinsite-reflector/Default.aspx

The prism flag toppers are pretty inexpensive, really. The ones built into the flag sticks themselves tend to cost a little more. They do help speed things up a little bit, but are largely unnecessary IME.

Yep, you only really need the prisms for the older tech range finders that were designed to work with them.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Reflective tape works well.

Prisms fallout often, mostly to guys dropping the flagstick.

That along with the plastic is brittle during cold temps.

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
16 minutes ago, Club Rat said:

Reflective tape works well.

Prisms fallout often, mostly to guys dropping the flagstick.

That along with the plastic is brittle during cold temps.

We have the extra sturdy pins with the prisms built in and they get broken all the time. I watched a guy blade one from 80 yards out and smash a prism. I might suggest they try out the tape or something next year.

:callaway: Big Bertha Alpha 815 DBD  :bridgestone: TD-03 Putter   
:tmade: 300 Tour 3W                 :true_linkswear: Motion Shoes
:titleist: 585H Hybrid                       
:tmade: TP MC irons                 
:ping: Glide 54             
:ping: Glide 58
:cleveland: 588 RTX 62

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Home Depot probably has reflective tape.

Looks like 3M has diamond grade products which may work.

Here's a few ideas.

http://www.reflectivelyyours.com/generic140.html.

   http://shop.vinylguardgolf.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=RK-5000.                     

DO-IT-YOURSELF RANGEFINDER REFLECTIVITY KITS FOR 1/2” FLAGSTICKS

VinylGuard’s High-Performance 360º Distance Measurement System with Laser-Loc® Reflectivity
Add high-intensity, 3M Diamond-Grade, prismatic, reflective tape to ½” flagsticks
Then cover, protect and prevent tape ‘peel off’ and damage with Crystal-Clear VinylGuard

RK-5000 for ½” Flagsticks
Packaging – 1 Kit per Box

The Do-It-Yourself Rangefinder Reflectivity Kit for ½” Flagsticks Contains:
• 10 pre-cut 6” lengths of White or Yellow 3M Diamond-Grade high-intensity, prismatic, reflective tape
• 10 pre-cut lengths of Crystal-Clear VinylGuard shrink-wrap
• Instructions for applying the prismatic tape and VinylGuard shrink-wrap
• Quick and easy to apply - Works with all laser rangefinders

http://www.creativesafetysupply.com/reflect-all-spray/   This spray can be sprayed onto almost any surface and provide high visibility at night and in low-light situations.

 

Johnny Rocket - Let's Rock and Roll and play some golf !!!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Even this retail reflector is less than $10 per pin. That's $280 for my home course to upgrade both courses? Seems cheap enough. . .

https://www.pinreflector.com/Order.aspx

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3640 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.