Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

My lag putt technique - is this decent? or should I go back?


Note: This thread is 3625 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I've been trying to go out to the course and practice on the practice green with varying conditions the past month or so, and really focus on good putting technique. I've been doing various drills and I believe they are helping me a lot. 

I've read LSW twice now. On the putting section, I'm really trying on short putts (maybe 0-10 ft uphill, 0-20 ft downhill) on palm grip to reduce face turning which seems to be working, putting the ball slightly forward in my stance and the technique of my distance control coming from the length the putter face is from the ball and letting it come down with gravity.

But when it's coming to lag putts 20+ feet, I've noticed that I'm shifting more towards pulling the club back a much shorter distance and "pushing" the club face forward. I seem to be having a lot of success with this method, only for the lag putts though. And it hasn't just been one day and one set of conditions. This has been over several practice sessions under varying conditions. I'm applying a large amount of forward momentum to the club face into the ball in a short distance. When I do this, I'm much more frequently striking the ball well and it's starting the correct roll. When I go back to the pendulum way, I'm having to bring the club head up so high that I lose the angle or impact zone on the face and I'll get hops, sidespin, etc much more often.

If my current way is successful, should I keep doing it? Or would you recommend going back and learning the pendulum way because it will be much more "tried and true?" I think I know the answer... but maybe the technique I've kind of developed myself is already a valid technique that some players use and are successful long-term with it?

Thanks! :) 

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

there are so many different ways to putt that if it works for you keep doing it 

I really believe in a distinct method for lag putting vs short putts 


Posted
1 hour ago, jkelley9 said:

But when it's coming to lag putts 20+ feet, I've noticed that I'm shifting more towards pulling the club back a much shorter distance and "pushing" the club face forward. I seem to be having a lot of success with this method, only for the lag putts though.

When I go back to the pendulum way, I'm having to bring the club head up so high that I lose the angle or impact zone on the face and I'll get hops, sidespin, etc much more often.

I wonder if it is a technique issue with the more pendulum stroke. Are you trying to be too much straight back straight through? The only way to gain clubhead distance in the backswing to compensate for it not going moving on a natural arch is to gain height with the clubhead. 

Idealy you want the backstroke to be as long as the forward stroke. 

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I recommend working on developing a feel for how heavy the putter head feels in the BS for any given distance. The farther back you take the putter head, the heavier it will feel. Try to find the correlation between "weight" and distance.  This concept works very well with the pendulum technique where you do not accelerate through the ball. 

 

  • Upvote 1

Yours in earnest, Jason.
Call me Ernest, or EJ or Ernie.

PSA - "If you find yourself in a hole, STOP DIGGING!"

My Whackin' Sticks: :cleveland: 330cc 2003 Launcher 10.5*  :tmade: RBZ HL 3w  :nickent: 3DX DC 3H, 3DX RC 4H  :callaway: X-22 5-AW  :nike:SV tour 56* SW :mizuno: MP-T11 60* LW :bridgestone: customized TD-03 putter :tmade:Penta TP3   :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.

Seems to be working for you, so I'd stick with it.

In the bag:

Driver Taylormade Burner 9.5. 3W Fusion Vantage 5W Taylormade Burner.

Hybrid: Dunlop Tour Red 18. 4-SW Taylormade RSI 1. Putter Taylormade Ghost TM 880 Tour

64.14 Dunlop HDD Lob Wedge


Posted (edited)

For lag putts I try to die the ball to the hole . I like Dave Stockton's idea about calculating the length of putts into 1/3 . this helps me with figuring out speed.  I tend to pick a spot roughly 1/3 from the hole to aim at and let the ball die to the hole 

the caveat to this method is that it doesn't work for two tier green as well as planar greens . 

Edited by dchoye

Posted

I've been trying the pendulum stroke, but without success on lag putts. It may just take more practice, but I'm having a very difficult time getting the face back down to the correct lie/angle while letting the face come down from the back swing without mishitting. I just finished my best round today (43) using the technique that's been working for me, it helped in almost all lag putts and I even sank an ~18 ft and a ~25 ft putt today. But I also understand that that doesn't make it the best technique for me... since it was only one round. I'm worried I'll lose the feel for my current method and I'll have to transition to a more quantitative method. I'm thinking what I'll do is continue with my current method... but I'll spend half of my putting practice for lag putts on the pendulum method. I think it's just a body technique I need to complete the stroke, rather than the "distance feel." I feel like the method is the BEST way to proceed in golf since it's measurable, just difficult for now.

D: :tmade: R1 Stiff @ 10* 3W: :tmade: AeroBurner TP 15* 2H: :adams: Super 9031 18* 3-SW: :tmade: R9 Stiff P: :titleist: :scotty_cameron: Futura X7M 35"

Ball: Whatever. Something soft. Kirklands Signature are pretty schweeeet at the moment!

Bag: :sunmountain: C130 Cart Bag Push Cart: :sunmountain: Micro Cart Sport

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3625 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Wordle 1,631 3/6* ⬛⬛🟦⬛🟧 ⬛🟧🟧⬛🟧 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧 Awesome, @WillieT! Go get another!
    • Wordle 1,631 2/6* ⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.