Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3566 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, saevel25 said:

I don't keep driver shafts between drivers. Why should I? If I buy a new driver I rather get fit for that driver and have a shaft that matches the profile of that driver. In the end, putting an older golf shaft in a newer driver might just not work well. 

This is a good point. While I tested the drivers head to head with the same shaft to isolate the performance of the clubhead, I also got fit into a different shaft for my new driver that performed even better than the old shaft/new driver combo. 

The new clubhead performed better in terms of launch angle and ball speed, which meant that I could benefit even more from a lower spinning shaft. Hence the reason I switched to a different shaft, as well as a club. Different characteristics of a clubhead will require different shafts to pair with them. For example, the very low spinning SLDR head would be best paired with a shaft that provides a higher launch without negating the low spin effects of the clubhead.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Pretzel said:

This is a good point. While I tested the drivers head to head with the same shaft to isolate the performance of the clubhead, I also got fit into a different shaft for my new driver that performed even better than the old shaft/new driver combo. 

The new clubhead performed better in terms of launch angle and ball speed, which meant that I could benefit even more from a lower spinning shaft. Hence the reason I switched to a different shaft, as well as a club. Different characteristics of a clubhead will require different shafts to pair with them. For example, the very low spinning SLDR head would be best paired with a shaft that provides a higher launch without negating the low spin effects of the clubhead.

That's interesting cause I know a lot of experienced golfers who swear by a specific shaft and no matter what driver head they buy they have their favorite shaft installed on it.  

I would think with all the adjustments available on driver heads today you could make any head work with a shaft you know works for your swing.  

Joe Paradiso

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
28 minutes ago, newtogolf said:

That's interesting cause I know a lot of experienced golfers who swear by a specific shaft and no matter what driver head they buy they have their favorite shaft installed on it.  

I would think with all the adjustments available on driver heads today you could make any head work with a shaft you know works for your swing.  

You can, but you can also find a shaft that works better in many cases. Previously I had a shaft that generated more spin, because I found that the G10 head launched lower than the G30 head. When I had a higher launch to begin with, I was able to optimize my launch conditions with a shaft that is lower spinning. I couldn't do that previously because the launch was too low to benefit from lower spin numbers.

I don't really swear by any specific shaft, but I do have a preference for low torque shafts. My previous driver has a shaft (Proforce V2 Tour x-flex with a torque of 1.8, my current shaft (BiMatrix x-flex) is a 2.0. That's just a personal thing though, it's not based on performance, just how the shaft feels to me. I also haven't purchased any of the super expensive Tour AD shafts or the like, since to me the feel doesn't justify the cost (especially on a college-oriented budget).

The best numbers I've ever gotten from a shaft were from a Blueboard with a Titleist head, but for some reason that clubhead had lower ballspeeds for me. I like the feel of that shaft too, but it's too expensive for me.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I personally think a lot of it is hype. I play with a Cobra S3 (which came before to Fly-Z; Amp Cell and probably a number of other "upgrades" but I still hit the S3 as far and as straight as all the guys I play with. Again, the old saying "its the Indian not the arrow." But I, like a lot of other people love new candy. I've tried many new drives over the years, but I always go back to the S3, I guess I'm just use to it.


Note: This thread is 3566 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 27 (7 Dec 25) - Got in a few swings with 9i and hard foam balls in backyard.  Setup weight fwd (rebuilt left foot really lets me feel the weight in a slightly painful way) - kept the backswing to around 9 o’clock focusing on contact and resulting divot pattern.  Like how the hard foam balls come off the face (almost like real balls in sound).  A good abbreviated session as I only able to hit about a dozen balls in the fading light. 
    • Day 117 12-7 A bit of chipping practice today. Full swing- hit some real balls to see where Im at. 
    • Not the part I was replying to: Handicaps did not go down much (like 0.14 on average IIRC?) when we went from 10/20*0.96 to 8/20. And a good chunk of that was from the +s.
    • I think he meant in the UK. The old system was completely different from the new one. 10/20 x 0.96 vs 8/20 would really only impact very low handicaps I think. The 0.96 serves to increase differentials for plus differentials, where 8/20 vs 10/20 works to lower differentials for all. I don't know many plus golfers who would be upset that their index got lower. A lot of really good players don't even really keep their handicaps up-to-date. They're much more interested in their WAGR rankings which get them entries to certain events.
    • Day 433 - 2025-12-07 Got some work in after Junior Elite before a night of sports (and the return of my wife!). Backswing work. Similar to what a lot of my juniors are doing.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.