Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3542 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

For chip shots keep your arm straight. Just turn you shoulders. Make you chips with the same swing as a putting stroke. Then you will be more consistent. 


Posted
On ‎4‎/‎25‎/‎2016 at 9:40 AM, paininthenuts said:

I have only been playing 8 months, and whilst certain aspects of my game have improved, my short play is dreadful. My lobbing is so bad, I don't even attempt it now, so I tend to pitch and run using my 8 iron. Sometimes I smash the ball in the face, and it shoots off of the back of the green, and other times I make some useless attempt, only to find it has gone 6 feet. I am going to have a lesson when I get back from my holiday, but until then can I have some tips to ponder over whilst laying by the pool.  Thanks

The best tip I can give a beginner is don't listen to everyone's tips. There are many many different ways to play shots around the green, and often times the tip is the "only" or "best way to do it. What that means is its the best way that method works for that particular player(s).

The best advice I can give is get lessons. Have a teaching professional show the difference between a pitch shot, lob shot and chip shot. Have him teach you how to read lies and what shots work for what lies. Have him teach you how to adjust for uphill, downhill and sidehill lies. Most importantly, have him teach you how to properly use the bounce of your wedge so that the club glides along the ground and does not dig into the turf. Good luck!!!

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Why all the arguing about head down, or not head down?  I don't keep my head down.  But I can believe it might actually help someone who has problems making solid contact on chip shots or short wedge shots.  It'd be worth a try anyway, in that situation.  And it doesn't seem like keeping your head down would be likely to cause an injury on a short greenside shot.  I mean, it's not like 9wood is advising to keep your head down up in the tee box or a full swing approach shot.   Anyway, carry on.  :-P

 


Posted (edited)

Here is my two cents.  I chip with my feet very close together.  Try to not get my legs or hips involved in the chip.  Maintain the same height with your shoulders(don't dip or bend your legs).  I try not to open and close the club face.  Straight back and through(Steve Stricker).  I must concentrate to keep my grip pressure light and make sure to see the club contact the ball.  This is my explanation of what works for me.  My goal is to try and get the ball on the green with a reasonable putt for par and to avoid duffs that lead to a double bogie.  I am almost 66 years old, so my expectations are not as high as those of a younger man.  By eliminating lots of timing movements during chips, I have become more consistent and have lowered scores.  Stricker is a good guy to emulate as he doesn't play much, but has maintained his level of quality play.  

 

One quick edit for clarification.  Keeping ones head down really equates to seeing the club head hit the ball and accelerating through the swing with the proper tempo or swing speed.  Don't get quick.

Edited by Lastpick

Posted
1 hour ago, Lastpick said:

Stricker is a good guy to emulate as he doesn't play much, but has maintained his level of quality play.  

Interesting thought. Is Stricker's technique generally considered simple and flub-proof, such that he can play less than others yet still maintain high quality? I know he has the reputation of taking it easy and picking only the tournaments he wants to play as he slips quietly into retirement mode, but still shows off a good game when he plays (for the most part).

For players that play infrequently, is there a style that could be better for them, but for a player that plays more frequently, they could potentially move "up" to a more advanced, more accurate technique that pays off only if they spend the time with it?  

Just something I hadn't thought about before, and thought I'd highlight your comment as it struck me as interesting to consider.

My Swing


Driver: :ping: G30, Irons: :tmade: Burner 2.0, Putter: :cleveland:, Balls: :snell:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
12 minutes ago, RandallT said:

For players that play infrequently, is there a style that could be better for them, but for a player that plays more frequently, they could potentially move "up" to a more advanced, more accurate technique that pays off only if they spend the time with it?  

Just something I hadn't thought about before, and thought I'd highlight your comment as it struck me as interesting to consider.

To me, the pitching technique that you recommended in Post #3 of thread is one of the more fool-proof short-game shots available.  I say that because when using the bounce, perfect contact isn't required to make an acceptable shot.  The chipping technique (see post 4) does ask you to make a more precise contact, but the mechanics are much simpler when using a variation of the putting stroke.  Its when you start taking more risks and/or longer swings, like you would with a full-swing flop, that having more time to practice becomes essential. 

  • Upvote 2

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There are a lot of different ways to get the ball to go 20 yards. Every club in the bag can make the ball go that far. Everyone has a favorite way, the quickie pitching video is a great one.  I think its one of the easiest ways to utilize bounce and limit my misses. I play with a guy quite regularly that insists on flopping the ball, and i honestly feel that if he started pitching with the bounce of the club he would lower his scores by 5 strokes a round easily.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On 4/26/2016 at 6:17 PM, 9wood said:

I don't know if any of you have ever tried this. I never have seen anyone do this nor did I ever hear of this being done. I wouldn't be surprised if it already has been done by others, it's just that no one taught me this, and I didn't see any video about it. I learned it without any ones help by simply messing around. Anyways, I was experimenting today with my short chip shots. I was using a 9 iron and I bent over my ball until the the butt of the shaft of my 9 iron was pushing into my belly just above my belt buckle. This acted like a fulcrum for my short back swing to about the 8 O'clock position and swing to the 4 O'clock position. I noticed this method produced some really accurate results on short chip shots.

Paul Runyan actually advocated that as a cure for chipping yips, but anchoring now against the rules per other posts.

Kevin


Posted

But as far as tips, the best advice that i don't use is take your medicine.  Where i play most of greens are elevated and pretty small, with a pretty decent amount of slope to them, i tend to always leave myself shortsided with no green to work with. So instead of pitching on and the ball running out a bit leaving me a pretty long putt, I usually get cute and either blade a flop shot across, or a bump and run that has about 30% chance of being short, great or long.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

One other item of major importance for me to be successful in the short game is hand position.  The hands need to be ahead of the club at impact.  This may have been addressed earlier by someone, but I didn't read every post on this thread.

Edited by Lastpick

Posted

For me, within 10-15 yards of the putting surface, I keep my feet closer together, open stance, and open the club face.

If the grass is deep, I'll often use a hybrid to get through the grass

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3542 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.