Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3503 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a quick question.  I played a fundraising tournament today.  4 person scramble, no minimum number of drives.

The tournament was played as a gross score only.  My wife (36 hcp) and I (12 hcp) played with another husband/wife (24/38 hcp respectively).

I realize the purpose of the tournament was to raise money for the cause.  However, there were cash and goods prizes.

I don't think I'll do this again unless I play with really good players.  It's very, very difficult to even get close to the scores of good golfers.

Has anyone else experienced the feeling of frustration?  We played really well (for our level) and placed 8th in a field of 15 teams.

  • Upvote 1

Mark in Colorado


Posted
17 minutes ago, skywaterbanjo said:

Has anyone else experienced the feeling of frustration?  

Ha ha ha!  Yes, almost every time I play in a scramble. As you said, scrambles are typically for a good cause so at least the money isn't completely lost.  Personally, I avoid playing in scrambles and prefer to just donate some money or sponsor another team.

Brian Kuehn

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

We have scramble tourneys sometimes. There is a window the team handicap has to fit into, a minimum # of drives per player. Some are gross, some net. As a changeup we will play the handicap of the guy whos drive we took. It can make for some tough decisions.

But as you said, this was a fundraiser where you happen to play golf. If it was a poker fundraiser you would have the same range of skill sets, its just not as noticeable.

Edited by Papa Steve 55

Posted
On ‎6‎/‎3‎/‎2016 at 6:50 PM, skywaterbanjo said:

I have a quick question.  I played a fundraising tournament today.  4 person scramble, no minimum number of drives.

The tournament was played as a gross score only.  My wife (36 hcp) and I (12 hcp) played with another husband/wife (24/38 hcp respectively).

I realize the purpose of the tournament was to raise money for the cause.  However, there were cash and goods prizes.

I don't think I'll do this again unless I play with really good players.  It's very, very difficult to even get close to the scores of good golfers.

Has anyone else experienced the feeling of frustration?  We played really well (for our level) and placed 8th in a field of 15 teams.

Most places around here do a gross side and a net side just to be fair to everyone.  It would be tough playing in just a gross side without having at least one low single digit handicap.  At least you know it was for a good cause and you had a fun (hopefully) time out on the course with your wife and got to get to know another couple a little better.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

One of the best outings I played in is a shamble. The way they did the prizes was brilliant. They had a first, tenth and last place prize. This way they let the big guns battle it out. The people who come to enjoy can also get something as well. 

 

  • Upvote 1

Matt Dougherty, P.E.
 fasdfa dfdsaf 

What's in My Bag
Driver; :pxg: 0311 Gen 5,  3-Wood: 
:titleist: 917h3 ,  Hybrid:  :titleist: 915 2-Hybrid,  Irons: Sub 70 TAIII Fordged
Wedges: :edel: (52, 56, 60),  Putter: :edel:,  Ball: :snell: MTB,  Shoe: :true_linkswear:,  Rangfinder: :leupold:
Bag: :ping:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 minute ago, saevel25 said:

One of the best outings I played in is a shamble. The way they did the prizes was brilliant. They had a first, tenth and last place prize. This way they let the big guns battle it out. The people who come to enjoy can also get something as well. 

I have never seen this type of prize structure, but I think its absolutely perfect for a charity event.  

Dave

:callaway: Rogue SubZero Driver

:titleist: 915F 15 Fairway, 816 H1 19 Hybrid, AP2 4 iron to PW, Vokey 52, 56, and 60 wedges, ProV1 balls 
:ping: G5i putter, B60 version
 :ping:Hoofer Bag, complete with Newport Cup logo
:footjoy::true_linkswear:, and Ashworth shoes

the only thing wrong with this car is the nut behind the wheel.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have only played in charity scrambles and they were all gross score.  I honestly do not really care for them and since I get to play less frequently than I would like to, I have taken to sending a donation and then playing real golf somewhere else.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3503 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.