Jump to content
IGNORED

Ryan Lochte Told a 'Whopper'?


Note: This thread is 3072 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

On 8/27/2016 at 2:44 PM, natureboy said:

I'm certainly glad I don't have to deal with that level of street crime. It's a real problem. Rio / Brazil clearly has some structural issues.

There's probably also a little bit of playing to local opinion in the response from Rio authorities to Lochte.

I have no doubt! Lochte called "shame" to their faces! The authorities don't like that!

It made me laugh when it was announced that Brazil is going to "file charges" against Lochte! Lochte will never set foot in Brazil again, and why would he? It's a third world hell hole!

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
11 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

I have no doubt! Lochte called "shame" to their faces! The authorities don't like that!

It made me laugh when it was announced that Brazil is going to "file charges" against Lochte! Lochte will never set foot in Brazil again, and why would he? It's a third world hell hole!

A bit over the top IMO.

I found his attempt to deflect attention / blame for his bad behavior on Rio's issues kinda sleazy and arrogant. Wasting their time with a fabrication was likely the bigger offense for the authorities. Making points with the public was pure gravy.

If he genuinely thought he was being 'robbed' he should have waited for the authorities to arrive or filed a complaint after he left the scene. He clearly was trying to avoid getting officially sanctioned (a ticket likely) for his behavior and protect his image. Look how that turned out.

If you are for law and order, I don't understand why you're defending this boor/tool? He's over 30 and doesn't qualify for 'youthful indiscretion' anymore.

Even with these real issues, Rio has a lot of attraction as a tourist destination. Not for you or Lochte, fine. Your choice. Before the clean water act, the waters around New York City were pretty nasty. Times Square used to have lots of sketchy characters. Still was a major tourist destination. Rome has a problem with pick-pocketing of tourists too despite ample policing, but no one's calling it a hell-hole. There are probably cities around the world that fit that characterization far better than Rio.

If Brazil bothers (unlikely) to put out an arrest warrant, Lochte might also have to be careful not to travel to a country that has an extradition treaty with Brazil. Maybe not an issue, but extra headache that could have been avoided pretty easily by a more humble response IMO.

Edited by natureboy

Kevin


On 8/29/2016 at 0:23 PM, natureboy said:

A bit over the top IMO.

I found his attempt to deflect attention / blame for his bad behavior on Rio's issues kinda sleazy and arrogant. Wasting their time with a fabrication was likely the bigger offense for the authorities. Making points with the public was pure gravy.

If he genuinely thought he was being 'robbed' he should have waited for the authorities to arrive or filed a complaint after he left the scene. He clearly was trying to avoid getting officially sanctioned (a ticket likely) for his behavior and protect his image. Look how that turned out.

If you are for law and order, I don't understand why you're defending this boor/tool? He's over 30 and doesn't qualify for 'youthful indiscretion' anymore.

Even with these real issues, Rio has a lot of attraction as a tourist destination. Not for you or Lochte, fine. Your choice. Before the clean water act, the waters around New York City were pretty nasty. Times Square used to have lots of sketchy characters. Still was a major tourist destination. Rome has a problem with pick-pocketing of tourists too despite ample policing, but no one's calling it a hell-hole. There are probably cities around the world that fit that characterization far better than Rio.

If Brazil bothers (unlikely) to put out an arrest warrant, Lochte might also have to be careful not to travel to a country that has an extradition treaty with Brazil. Maybe not an issue, but extra headache that could have been avoided pretty easily by a more humble response IMO.

 Please! Spare me!

He had no opportunity to wait for the "authorities" to arrive because they were already there! In the uniformed guise of off duty prison guards! Who had weapons drawn!

As far as fabrications go, maybe Lochte exaggerated some aspects of it, like having a gun pointed at his head. I'll tell you what, you pull a gun on me and point it at my big toe, I'm crapping my pants! It's pretty quick to go from big toe to "center of mass"!

And yes, there are problems all over the place, but they are far worse in certain locations overseas than they are here! When's the last time you were pulled over for a traffic stop, had the cop pull a gun on you, and tell you that if you put a couple hundy in his palm you can drive away without a ticket!

And Rio is a hellhole! The facade is nice, but the interior is rotten to the core!

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

31 minutes ago, Buckeyebowman said:

When's the last time you were pulled over for a traffic stop, had the cop pull a gun on you, and tell you that if you put a couple hundy in his palm you can drive away without a ticket!

True...in the US, you don't really even need any cash:

http://metro.co.uk/2007/05/23/policeman-in-porn-star-trouble-400990/#ixzz1m5tfowIv

- John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

2 hours ago, Buckeyebowman said:

As far as fabrications go, maybe Lochte exaggerated some aspects of it, like having a gun pointed at his head. I'll tell you what, you pull a gun on me and point it at my big toe, I'm crapping my pants! It's pretty quick to go from big toe to "center of mass"!

And Rio is a hellhole! The facade is nice, but the interior is rotten to the core!

I'm very glad that law enforcement in the U.S. tends to be among the most professional in the world.

Lochte also lied about the guards pulling up next to the swimmers while they were in the cab. If they were not officially empowered police or deputies he could have asked the cab driver to call the 'real' police to the scene (and hopefully an interpreter) to clear things up. He decided that $50 was worth not having to go downtown to get booked. Personally, if I thought I was being shaken down, I'd damn well take the time to file a complaint let alone inform my country's embassy.

All I see is an attempt by the security guards to get a lock and sign repaired. Yes $50 was probably more than needed given Rio cost of living, but each guy wasn't asked for a 'donation' only the one responsible and there was no shakedown or personal property taken. It's not clear to me from the testimony that Lochte himself didn't suggest paying for the damages.

Kevin


Note: This thread is 3072 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I cheated and searched the phrase. Good example. 
    • The putting green itself is fine. It's the same green we have here. They just need to learn how to chip "into" the grain instead of just down-grain all the time. You have to hit it solid. The launch monitors and the simulator software are garbage right now. Nobody wants to say anything bad about the LMs because Tiger is a partial owner or something. The software has 3Ws stopping in ten feet on the green, and balls bouncing all of 11 yards after flying 311 in the fairways.
    • Explain this:   Send 3 and 4 pence we're going to a dance.
    • Although fun to watch on a winter night, I don't think the simulation is anywhere near accurate. Watched Kevin Kisner hit a shot onto a green slope that would not roll back. When they got to that spot, they couldn't place a ball there without it rolling down the hill. Had to move to another location. The greens remind me of the pooltable-like surface of a Mini Golf course. Balls just take off and roll away. Chipping from off the green seems tricky on the surface they use. And what's with Tiger spitting during the round? It's an indoor carpet. Don't know why atheletes need to spit outdoors, let alone on an indoor carpet surface. 
    • Maybe this is what you were getting at?  Doing some math. Comparing JumboMax versus Tour Velvet, standard size in both.  I got the force required using the JumboMax grip, to achieve the same rotational acceleration as the Tour Velvet, is about 1.37 more for the JumboMax grip. Interestingly, the Jumbomax grip is about 17% larger than the Tour Velvet, and 17% lighter for the standard size. I just substituted out the radius and mass of the JumboMax as a ratio of the Tour Velvet's mass and radius. This allows me to cancel out the mass and radius and get a ratio for the force. If you need 100 (force units of your choice) to achieve a certain rotational acceleration, you will need 137 (force units of your choice).  There was another thread on the forum about offset, where it basically just delays closure by some stupidly small amount. A lot of fun math there.  Most golfers have to go from about 90 degrees open clubface at A4 to square at A7. So, having a grip that requires more force to close that clubface might not be the best idea pending the golf swing.  A question is, since the clubface is open at A4, and square at A7. Does that mean you want most of the closure to happen from A4 to let say A6, and not A6 to A7, for better consistently (less timing at impact). Just a thought.     
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...