Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3150 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted
On November 27, 2016 at 0:40 PM, shanksalot said:

I think the groove rule makes them non conforming, but I am not sure about that. 

Technically, yes. But technically, no. It's a weird situation. When the groove rule was introduced the Eye2's were grandfathered in to remain conforming, due to a 1990 lawsuit filed by PING. In 2010 when the groove rule put was in place... A few pros scoured EBay for old Ping Eye2 wedges with square grooves. The tour in March made them illegal again. 

@Nutsmacker The groove rule only applies to professionals and elite level amateurs as a condition of competition. Furthermore if your Eye 2s were made before 1985 they are legal as PING did not introduce square grooves until 1985.

as far as your topic goes, good luck with the G's. 1 club longer sounds about right because your eye2 7-iron has a loft of 36 degrees I think your G 8-iron is around there. I'm not a PING guy, however I would play eye2's.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have just started playing golf. I have a set of Ping Eye 2 irons 3-SW and Ping Zing driver, 3, 5, and 7 woods. So far I really like them. When I bought them from Play it Again Sports the salesperson told me that they are his most popular iron set. 


Posted
1 hour ago, doctordwayne said:

I have just started playing golf. I have a set of Ping Eye 2 irons 3-SW and Ping Zing driver, 3, 5, and 7 woods. So far I really like them. When I bought them from Play it Again Sports the salesperson told me that they are his most popular iron set. 

Makes sense because Ping Eye2's were the highest selling iron set of the 1980s and maybe ever. They made them from 1982-2001. I believe they are the most re-sold iron set on eBay 35 years after their initial release.

What's in Shane's Bag?     

Ball: 2022 :callaway: Chrome Soft Triple Track Driver: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond 8° MCA Kai’li 70s FW: :callaway:Paradym Triple Diamond  H: :callaway: Apex Pro 21 20°I (3-PW) :callaway: Apex 21 UST Recoil 95 (3), Recoil 110 (4-PW). Wedges: :callaway: Jaws Raw 50°, 54°, 60° UST Recoil 110 Putter: :odyssey: Tri-Hot 5K Triple Wide 35”

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Ping, with those clubs, was really a pioneer in the use of perimeter weighting of irons - right? Neat clubs, for sure.

Custom fit RBZ irons. Taylormade RBZ driver. Some crappy old high-bounce Macgregor wedge and an even older Mizuno 5 wood. Haven't settled on a ball yet - still looking. Decades of football, weightlifting and boxing came together to create the world's worst golfer. I'm slowly correcting that now. 


Posted
On 11/27/2016 at 0:30 PM, gregsandiego said:

It's too bad there is a ban on these - why?
I see a ton of them on ebay.  One "almost new" just sold for $510.

s-l1600.jpg

Not all Eye2s have nonconforming square grooves. In fact, the ones in the picture are Eye2 Plus (+) irons, which are a different version than the Eye2 clubs and they are conforming as part of the agreement between Ping and the USGA.

Just today, I bought a set of the earliest Eye2 irons from 1984, and they have V grooves, not square grooves or U grooves. All of these clubs still hold their own against today's clubs. My set has a PW with a loft of 50.5 degrees. The new Callaway Apex irons have a PW of 45 degrees. Hitting the new clubs longer?  Well, it's no surprise. I'm putting my Eye2s in the bag for a big try. My regular set are Hogan Apex Edge irons from 2001--forged irons with a ton of feel and forgiveness. 

WIMB
TaylorMade Burner driver 10.5* REAX Reg
TaylorMade Burner 3-wood 15* REAX Reg
Mizuno MX-23 4-PW Reg Steel
Mizuno MP Series forged wedges 52, 56, 60
Putter:  Odyssey White Hot Rossie 36" --  Ball: Snell MTB Black


Note: This thread is 3150 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 11: did mirror work for a while. Worked on the same stuff. 
    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.