Jump to content
IGNORED

Bogey Golfers Only (Index 16-22) / Breaking 90 Topic


rkim291968
Note: This thread is 1041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissouriHack

Have any of you guys tried too map out your short game? Club+ball position+Swing length ect ect.= the shot distance that you want. If so how did you do it and how did you keep track of it?

As an alternative to this - I think we bogey guys can try too much of this for our own good sometimes.  In my observation, the fancier and more technical folks at this level try to get, the less effective the outcome.  Unless someone is a REALLY consistent chipper, it might be a good idea to go with: 2 clubs, one ball position, one level of face openness, one level of choking down, etc.  Then once you are really good at that - add something.

The two clubs are so you can make two different shots.  One for closer pins with less green and one for when you have more green.  Everything else being the same offers you 2 things.  1) a chance to actually become really reliable with the shot 2) a chance to actually develop an expectation of what the ball will do.

When you add variables of several clubs, each with different ball positions, then each combination of those with different face angles, etc etc etc - the number of variables and outcomes is tremendous.  And none of them matter if you mishit it because you've been varying the ball position.  The small difference in outcomes due to all these variables is small potatoes on the scorecard compared to 1) making great contact time after time and 2) knowing how far the ball is going to fly, check and roll.

I don't believe bogey golfers have poor performance around the greens because they are consistently hitting high quality shots but simply picked the wrong ball position or choked down the wrong length.  In my observation, we perform poorly because we mishit the ball, skull it across the green, fat it into a bunker, etc.  I'd think reducing variables as opposed to adding them would help with decreasing the score-killing mishits.

I feel I'll catch flack for this - but it seems logical to me.


I may be an exception to this.   I focused on short game from the start to compensate for lack of distance.  So, I don't skull, duff around green. Now, I can get balls consistently out from any kind of bunker.   For chipping & pitching, I  have same swing length but use different club for varying length (e.g, 15 yards for LW, 20 for SW, 25 for GW1, 30 for GW2, 35 PW, 40 9i, ..., ).   If needed (too lazy to bring right club from cart), I will use whatever club I had in my hand but I would have less confidence with the ensuing shot.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Replies 2.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

I may be an exception to this.   I focused on short game from the start to compensate for lack of distance.  So, I don't skull, duff around green. Now, I can get balls consistently out from any kind of bunker.   For chipping & pitching, I  have same swing length but use different club for varying length (e.g, 15 yards for LW, 20 for SW, 25 for GW1, 30 for GW2, 35 PW, 40 9i, ..., ).   If needed (too lazy to bring right club from cart), I will use whatever club I had in my hand but I would have less confidence with the ensuing shot.

Actually, it doesn't sound like you are deviating very far from what I had written.  For one - you don't skull or duff.  That is remarkable.  If you are that consistent, then my theory doesn't apply because it is about overcoming inconsistencies common to the bogey golfer.  Once you are that good, then fine tuning with other things becomes appropriate.

However, (and second), from what you list, it doesn't sound like you are varying your ball position, club face, choking, etc.  Not even your swing length.  You have one swing and then just use a different club.  You have still done what was the point of my post - reduced variables so you can 1) gain consistency and 2) know what to expect.  You actually have less variables than I described.  You only have one - the club.

And the result is phenomenal!  Not only are you super-consistent, you can nail your distance to within 5 yards.  You are proving the model.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by rkim291968

I may be an exception to this.   I focused on short game from the start to compensate for lack of distance.  So, I don't skull, duff around green. Now, I can get balls consistently out from any kind of bunker.   For chipping & pitching, I  have same swing length but use different club for varying length (e.g, 15 yards for LW, 20 for SW, 25 for GW1, 30 for GW2, 35 PW, 40 9i, ..., ).   If needed (too lazy to bring right club from cart), I will use whatever club I had in my hand but I would have less confidence with the ensuing shot.

Actually, it doesn't sound like you are deviating very far from what I had written.  For one - you don't skull or duff.  That is remarkable.  If you are that consistent, then my theory doesn't apply because it is about overcoming inconsistencies common to the bogey golfer.  Once you are that good, then fine tuning with other things becomes appropriate.

However, (and second), from what you list, it doesn't sound like you are varying your ball position, club face, choking, etc.  Not even your swing length.  You have one swing and then just use a different club.  You have still done what was the point of my post - reduced variables so you can 1) gain consistency and 2) know what to expect.  You actually have less variables than I described.  You only have one - the club.

And the result is phenomenal!  Not only are you super-consistent, you can nail your distance to within 5 yards.  You are proving the model.


Just about the only time I vary my shot/swing is if my ball is sitting on unusual lie or I need high lob shot to go over something (water, sand, tree).   For unusual lie shots, I don't do very well as it is hard to practice for it.   I practiced lob shots a lot and am fairly good at it (and it helps to be short with short arms when faced with delicate shots - refer to my avatar :-) ),.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Let's start a series of posts with a set of goals that we think we need for each of us to get to single digits or just out of this particular thread. (Then we could start a new one?)

We all have ideas on getting there, we could start sharing them and picking them apart into realistic and attainable goals.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

As an alternative to this - I think we bogey guys can try too much of this for our own good sometimes.  In my observation, the fancier and more technical folks at this level try to get, the less effective the outcome.  Unless someone is a REALLY consistent chipper, it might be a good idea to go with: 2 clubs, one ball position, one level of face openness, one level of choking down, etc.  Then once you are really good at that - add something.   The two clubs are so you can make two different shots.  One for closer pins with less green and one for when you have more green.  Everything else being the same offers you 2 things.  1) a chance to actually become really reliable with the shot 2) a chance to actually develop an expectation of what the ball will do.   When you add variables of several clubs, each with different ball positions, then each combination of those with different face angles, etc etc etc - the number of variables and outcomes is tremendous.  And none of them matter if you mishit it because you've been varying the ball position.  The small difference in outcomes due to all these variables is small potatoes on the scorecard compared to 1) making great contact time after time and 2) knowing how far the ball is going to fly, check and roll. I don't believe bogey golfers have poor performance around the greens because they are consistently hitting high quality shots but simply picked the wrong ball position or choked down the wrong length.  In my observation, we perform poorly because we mishit the ball, skull it across the green, fat it into a bunker, etc.  I'd think reducing variables as opposed to adding them would help with decreasing the score-killing mishits. I feel I'll catch flack for this - but it seems logical to me.

No flack here. I get what you saying and trying to figure out how many combinations there could be lead me to some complicated math. I'm a graphic designer by trade and figuring out how too present very complicated information in an efficient way is kinda my thing. I get what your saying. There is a very definite danger of overwhelming a player at my level with this. But it's cold were I live and I don't watch TV all that much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Let's start a series of posts with a set of goals that we think we need for each of us to get to single digits or just out of this particular thread. (Then we could start a new one?) We all have ideas on getting there, we could start sharing them and picking them apart into realistic and attainable goals.

I would like to be shooting 85's on a regular basis by the end of the year. How about a bogey golfer thread championship? We could post scores, at the end of the year Take the averages and figure it out. The only thing I wouldn't know how to do is adjust the slope rating of different courses to each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


I would like to be shooting 85's on a regular basis by the end of the year.

How about a bogey golfer thread championship?

We could post scores, at the end of the year Take the averages and figure it out. The only thing I wouldn't know how to do is adjust the slope rating of different courses to each other.

You would probably want to use differentials.  That would come the closest to leveling the field for all the different courses and sets of tees etc.  If you don't keep a handicap you can still calculate it yourself.  The formula is on the internet.  There isn't much too it.

Also, if you don't have a handicap - it is kinda cool to have one (even if it is as high as mine!).  It is a very quantifiable way to see how good you are and if you are getting better.  You can also play in tournaments or even get in matches against folks with different skill levels.  And add it to your profile on this site.  It's pretty fun to have one when you need one.  And of course it will calculate your differential the moment you enter your scores.  Since you like the stats and such, you'd dig it the most.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Let's start a series of posts with a set of goals that we think we need for each of us to get to single digits or just out of this particular thread. (Then we could start a new one?)

We all have ideas on getting there, we could start sharing them and picking them apart into realistic and attainable goals.

My goal for 2013 was to start hitting in the 80's as my regular scoring.  I wanted to practice some certain things, but mostly practice more.  It was the first time I joined a course and had availability to hit as many balls as I wanted, play golf without charge, play 5-6 holes if that is all I had time for, etc.  I made a pretty good go of it but I can't say I accomplished it.  I definitely hit in the 80's more, but not as much as I'd like.

For this year, I might have the same goal from a scoring and handicap standpoint, but more than anything I need to fix my swing.  Somewhere between the instruction I got in a certain lesson and what I perceived in that certain lesson caused some serious trouble that I need to fix.  When I saw it on film I was appalled.  I can't believe my handicap didn't go through the roof.  I got a real golf coach a few weeks ago and I'm thrilled.

Step 1: Practice the new move he taught me until it looks great and hope to impress him with my progress

Link to comment
Share on other sites


You would probably want to use differentials.  That would come the closest to leveling the field for all the different courses and sets of tees etc.  If you don't keep a handicap you can still calculate it yourself.  The formula is on the internet.  There isn't much too it. Also, if you don't have a handicap - it is kinda cool to have one (even if it is as high as mine!).  It is a very quantifiable way to see how good you are and if you are getting better.  You can also play in tournaments or even get in matches against folks with different skill levels.  And add it to your profile on this site.  It's pretty fun to have one when you need one.  And of course it will calculate your differential the moment you enter your scores.  Since you like the stats and such, you'd dig it the most.

Yea I know my handicap. http://www.csgnetwork.com/golfhcapcalc.html I used this site before i got my Upro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Moderator

As an alternative to this - I think we bogey guys can try too much of this for our own good sometimes.  In my observation, the fancier and more technical folks at this level try to get, the less effective the outcome.  Unless someone is a REALLY consistent chipper, it might be a good idea to go with: 2 clubs, one ball position, one level of face openness, one level of choking down, etc.  Then once you are really good at that - add something.

The two clubs are so you can make two different shots.  One for closer pins with less green and one for when you have more green.  Everything else being the same offers you 2 things.  1) a chance to actually become really reliable with the shot 2) a chance to actually develop an expectation of what the ball will do.

I get what you're trying to do, keep it simple, which I'm totally all for. My question is, how do you hit different distances? The way I understand the method you're promoting, distance control is determined purely by the length of your swing, which introduces the biggest variable out there.

This is why the Dave Pelz made his system, which I think is what @MissouriHack is getting at. You map out your distances for all your wedges by swing length (1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or by clockface, whatever image works best for you) so that you don't have to "feel" the shot. When you're facing a 35 yard shot, you'll know exactly what combination of club & swing length you need to get there.

Ball position (assuming you're not getting crazy with the placement) is not going to do much to affect distance. All things equal, a ball slightly forward of center and a ball slightly backward of center will result in roughly the same total distance. The forward placed ball will be higher, carry farther, and land softer. The backward placed ball will fly lower, land earlier, and roll more. Conditions and comfort level dictate which shot to use.

I also believe that if a guy is mishitting shots, it's not the ball position, it's the technique (and can also be the wedge setup). A proper pitching technique that utilizes the bounce of the club has a lot of room for error; you can literally hit the ground two inches before the ball and get a good shot off. A lot of people get too steep with the AoA and use the leading edge of the club, which requires precise timing of the bottom of the swing arc to execute.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

[QUOTE name="Meltdwhiskey" url="/t/70872/bogey-golfer-only-thread-handicap-index-from-16-22-what-are-you-going-through-working-on-sob-stories/558#post_945512"]   As an alternative to this - I think we bogey guys can try too much of this for our own good sometimes.  In my observation, the fancier and more technical folks at this level try to get, the less effective the outcome.  Unless someone is a REALLY consistent chipper, it might be a good idea to go with: 2 clubs, one ball position, one level of face openness, one level of choking down, etc.  Then once you are really good at that - add something. The two clubs are so you can make two different shots.  One for closer pins with less green and one for when you have more green.  Everything else being the same offers you 2 things.  1) a chance to actually become really reliable with the shot 2) a chance to actually develop an expectation of what the ball will do. [/QUOTE] I get what you're trying to do, keep it simple, which I'm totally all for. My question is, how do you hit different distances? The way I understand the method you're promoting, distance control is determined purely by the length of your swing, which introduces the biggest variable out there. This is why the Dave Pelz made his system, which I think is what @MissouriHack is getting at. You map out your distances for all your wedges by swing length (1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or by clockface, whatever image works best for you) so that you don't have to "feel" the shot. When you're facing a 35 yard shot, you'll know exactly what combination of club & swing length you need to get there. Ball position (assuming you're not getting crazy with the placement) is not going to do much to affect distance. All things equal, a ball slightly forward of center and a ball slightly backward of center will result in roughly the same total distance. The forward placed ball will be higher, carry farther, and land softer. The backward placed ball will fly lower, land earlier, and roll more. Conditions and comfort level dictate which shot to use. I also believe that if a guy is mishitting shots, it's not the ball position, it's the technique (and can also be the wedge setup). A proper pitching technique that utilizes the bounce of the club has a lot of room for error; you can literally hit the ground two inches before the ball and get a good shot off. A lot of people get too steep with the AoA and use the leading edge of the club, which requires precise timing of the bottom of the swing arc to execute.

I was really speaking more to chipping. I don't really have many thoughts on the longer shots. But with chipping, I feel like I see a lot of guys trying to employ a bunch of techniques and ball positions etc and doing a decent amount of mis hitting. I feel like if they went sqare face, mid stance, and same technique every time, they would mis hit less. I might have misunderstood what was originally meant by short game. When I originally read it, I was thinking of around the greens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

Let's start a series of posts with a set of goals that we think we need for each of us to get to single digits or just out of this particular thread. (Then we could start a new one?)

We all have ideas on getting there, we could start sharing them and picking them apart into realistic and attainable goals.

I would like to be shooting 85's on a regular basis by the end of the year.

How about a bogey golfer thread championship?

We could post scores, at the end of the year Take the averages and figure it out. The only thing I wouldn't know how to do is adjust the slope rating of different courses to each other.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

Let's start a series of posts with a set of goals that we think we need for each of us to get to single digits or just out of this particular thread. (Then we could start a new one?)

We all have ideas on getting there, we could start sharing them and picking them apart into realistic and attainable goals.

My goal for 2013 was to start hitting in the 80's as my regular scoring.  I wanted to practice some certain things, but mostly practice more.  It was the first time I joined a course and had availability to hit as many balls as I wanted, play golf without charge, play 5-6 holes if that is all I had time for, etc.  I made a pretty good go of it but I can't say I accomplished it.  I definitely hit in the 80's more, but not as much as I'd like.

For this year, I might have the same goal from a scoring and handicap standpoint, but more than anything I need to fix my swing.  Somewhere between the instruction I got in a certain lesson and what I perceived in that certain lesson caused some serious trouble that I need to fix.  When I saw it on film I was appalled.  I can't believe my handicap didn't go through the roof.  I got a real golf coach a few weeks ago and I'm thrilled.

Step 1: Practice the new move he taught me until it looks great and hope to impress him with my progress

What I had in mind was writing all the steps we are planning to improve and seeing if there might be other suggestions for improvements.

These are my steps: http://thesandtrap.com/t/71694/what-are-your-2014-golf-goals-official-thread/72#post_943576

Each of has us has some idea of what to do, but I am sure there is always room for improvement.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

What I had in mind was writing all the steps we are planning to improve and seeing if there might be other suggestions for improvements.

These are my steps: http://thesandtrap.com/t/71694/what-are-your-2014-golf-goals-official-thread/72#post_943576

Each of has us has some idea of what to do, but I am sure there is always room for improvement.

If I can master 3 of the 1st 5SKs, I will be out of this thread.   So, for me, it's the year of improving ball striking.  Taking lessons & fitting for clubs will help with the improvement.   To that end, I just made an appointment to fit for driver in two weeks.

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

What I had in mind was writing all the steps we are planning to improve and seeing if there might be other suggestions for improvements.

These are my steps: http://thesandtrap.com/t/71694/what-are-your-2014-golf-goals-official-thread/72#post_943576

Each of has us has some idea of what to do, but I am sure there is always room for improvement.

If I can master 3 of the 1st 5SKs, I will be out of this thread.   So, for me, it's the year of improving ball striking.  Taking lessons & fitting for clubs will help with the improvement.   To that end, I just made an appointment to fit for driver in two weeks.

If you can master the first 3 keys, you would pretty much be a 4 handicap.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/67014/keys-vs-handicap-share-your-data#post_844167

This seems like a little more than a year long project. ;-)

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Originally Posted by Lihu

If you can master the first 3 keys, you would pretty much be a 4 handicap.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/67014/keys-vs-handicap-share-your-data#post_844167

This seems like a little more than a year long project.

Aiming high ... no time to waste (at age 52, my body parts are starting to decay :cry: It's now or never. )

RiCK

(Play it again, Sam)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lihu

If you can master the first 3 keys, you would pretty much be a 4 handicap.

http://thesandtrap.com/t/67014/keys-vs-handicap-share-your-data#post_844167

This seems like a little more than a year long project.

Aiming high ... no time to waste (at age 52, my body parts are starting to decay   It's now or never. )

On the other hand, none of us needs to make a D1 scholarship cut by "next year".

In long (play on short ;-) ), we have plenty of time to enjoy golf.

That's why I created another thread: http://thesandtrap.com/t/72105/how-many-keys-5sk-to-really-start-enjoying-golf#post_941760

We pretty much have the rest of our lives to get to a pretty good level of playing.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Its really hard to say. Not all of us live in southern Cali. So without going out and evaluating where I'm at by playing a couple of rounds its really hard to say. All I know is I was trending down at the end of last season. There's going to be some rust but not much. I will say that if i need help with my swing or any other part of my game this season I'm asking my instructor. No more internet, magazine, youtube guy advise. I'm sticking with the guy in the room and I suggest all of you do the same. If your in this thread and have not taken a lesson yet go. Save your self a lot of frustration. Nothing beats personal instruction. I know you want something more specific than that but I think for now all I can give you is a number. A prediction for your 2014 season Lihu. Things keep going the way they are I think your driving average is going to go up. Fairways play fast when the grass is dead. I hope you guys get some rain soon.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Its really hard to say. Not all of us live in southern Cali. So without going out and evaluating where I'm at by playing a couple of rounds its really hard to say. All I know is I was trending down at the end of last season. There's going to be some rust but not much. I will say that if i need help with my swing or any other part of my game this season I'm asking my instructor. No more internet, magazine, youtube guy advise. I'm sticking with the guy in the room and I suggest all of you do the same. If your in this thread and have not taken a lesson yet go. Save your self a lot of frustration. Nothing beats personal instruction. I know you want something more specific than that but I think for now all I can give you is a number.

A prediction for your 2014 season Lihu. Things keep going the way they are I think your driving average is going to go up. Fairways play fast when the grass is dead. I hope you guys get some rain soon.

We still irrigate here, but I think the drought will affect us pretty soon. You might be right that the fairways will dry up in the summer for super long drives.

I hope you are wrong, though. We need a lot more rain. This goes for all of CA and OR.

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 1041 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • @GolfSwami When you choose to completely ignore the facts and mathematics of Tiger’s dominance over Jack, I find it hard to believe you have no emotional tie to this. SOF HAS to be factored. Hell, you’re so fond of using other sports….SOS is a huge determinant in the NCAA Football playoffs. Gee, why wasn’t UCF the number one team when they went 13-0? That’s crazy right!?😜
    • Best and Greatest are synonyms IMO. Yep. Longevity is a stupid way to determine something like this. If someone took 30 years to amass a certain record, and someone else accomplished the same thing or more in ten years, the second player is better. Golf wasn't nearly as athletic, as taxing, or as well paid, when Jack played. Careers were longer. It's becoming more explosive, with shorter careers. Guys hit more balls now, train harder now, etc. Dude, 14/10 vs. 5/4 is not remotely the same as 18/72 vs. 15/82. It requires context. Jack was playing against club pros. I agree - Tiger blows Jack's record out of the water when you adjust for field strength. 😉  We agree again: Tiger might have won 30 majors. 🤣 Ha ha ha ha ha ha. No, dude. No, it's not "wrong" and the fields were significantly shallower and weaker when Jack played. Pretend Jack amassed his record against ten-year-olds. How impressive would that be? There's context. Jack amassed his record against significantly weaker/shallower competition. This has all been discussed a hundred times. As it would be if he played against ten-year-olds. Compare Tiger's SG in the PGA Championships against only the club pros and let me know how that shakes out. Strokes gained is against the competition at the time. Competition. Jack strongly disagrees with you, and you're casually leaving off the 2000s, too. No, they weren't. Once in a great while they popped up, but no, they weren't. Given all of the conversation that's been had in this topic, this ranks as one of the dumbest posts ever in this topic. If it was made in the first ten pages, cool. But, no. You made it on page 390-something. Try this on for size: every one of Tiger's 82 PGA Tour wins faced stronger/deeper fields than any of Jack's major victories. I also don't really care about top-tens in majors. 15 x > 18 y, where x and y are the respective strength/depth of field. It may be coherent, but so is someone saying 2 + 2 = 7 or someone trying to explain chemtrails. You can understand what they're trying to say, but it can still be a bad, lousy argument. This implies that I do. I do not. I've made the mathematical argument throughout. You're literally counting things with little to no regard for the freaking competition. Guess what: NHL scoring went down when goalies got more pads and learned to take away more parts of the net by learning to go butterfly, etc. The competition changed, and so scoring records aren't the same now as when Wayne Gretzky played most of his hockey. Because the competition is different now. Neither is someone trying to say that 2 + 2 = 7 or that the earth is flat. I can comprehend what they're saying, but they're still a wacko. Dude.
    • Majors are the primary yardstick that most people use.  No one cares about winning some 30 person tour championship or some defunct tournament with 50 people. Those are exhibitions. I use other sports to show that I have a coherent thought process because this debate seems fraught with emotion because of the names. Jack and Tiger are just nouns to me. I have no emotional attachment to either one. The thought process would be no different in evaluating Jeongeun Kim5 or Jeongeun Kim6.   It is not hard to comprehend.  I even gave you a helpful example of Clemson football so that you would understand.  If you can't understand that, life is going to be too much for you.   Charlie Munger Quote: “Without numerical fluency, in the part of life most of us inhibit, you are like a one-legged man in an ass-kicking conte...” “Without numerical fluency, in the part of life most of us inhibit, you are like a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest.” — Charlie Munger quotes from QuoteFancy.com  
    • And that gap between Tiger’s total wins against Jack’s is massive. And aside from your obsession with majors, Tiger’s accomplishments are massive compared to Jack’s. And stop using other sports as an example. This is golf. Have you not looked at the lists of Tiger vs Jack accomplishments and records? It’s comical to look at both of them and derive that Jack is the GOAT. You acknowledge the weak fields Jack played in then turn around and state how amazing his major records are. That makes no sense at all.
    • I didn't disregard it at all. I acknowledged and I am very well aware that the British Open often didn't have the best players (which was still true in the 90s but to a lesser extent), the PGA Championship had a lot of club pros and golf in general was a much less viable profession so the fields were more top heavy. Clemson plays college football in the ACC. The ACC is a much weaker conference than the SEC and Big Ten.  Clemson often had great teams that were discounted because people used the same thinking as you.  Just because the SEC is tougher doesn't imply that every team ore even the top teams are better.  This conversation would be more relevant if Jack only had a slightly better major record. The gap between Jack and Tiger in majors records is massive.  Tiger's 50th place finishes and DNPs aren't magically becoming 2nds in the 60s and 70s.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...