Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

USGA and R&A's 2016 distance report published


Note: This thread is 3254 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator
Posted

There are dozens of charts and tables to mull over. I  thought launch angle would have increased over the years, but it stayed pretty much the same. Looks like average driving distance is about the same too.

Quote

Key facts noted in the paper include:

  • Between 2003 and the end of the 2016 season, average driving distance on five of the seven tours has increased by approximately 1.2%, around 0.2 yards per year.
  • For the same time period, average driving distance on the other two tours studied decreased by approximately 1.5%.
  • Looking at all of the players who are ranked for distance on the PGA TOUR and PGA European Tour, the amount by which players are “long” or “short” has not changed – for instance, since 2003 the 10 shortest players in that group are about 6% shorter than average, while the 10 longest players in the group are about 7% longer than average. The statistics are not skewed toward either longer or shorter players.
  • The average launch conditions on the PGA TOUR – clubhead speed, launch angle, ball speed and ball backspin – have been relatively stable since 2007. The 90th-percentile clubhead speed coupled with the average launch angle and spin rate are very close to the conditions that The R&A and the USGA, golf’s governing bodies, use to test golf balls under the Overall Distance Standard.

http://www.randa.org/News/2017/02/Research-on-Driving-Distance-in-Golf-Published

Screen Shot 2017-02-15 at 11.42.32 AM.pngScreen Shot 2017-02-15 at 11.41.43 AM.png

 

  • Upvote 1

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

Yup. Pretty much what I thought it'd say.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If that trend continues; I'll have to move back one set of tee markers 80 years from now...to preserve the integrity of the game.

In der bag:
Cleveland Hi-Bore driver, Maltby 5 wood, Maltby hybrid, Maltby irons and wedges (23 to 50) Vokey 59/07, Cleveland Niblick (LH-42), and a Maltby mallet putter.                                                                                                                                                 "When the going gets tough...it's tough to get going."

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
18 hours ago, Piz said:

If that trend continues; I'll have to move back one set of tee markers 80 years from now...to preserve the integrity of the game.

:dance:

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
21 hours ago, iacas said:

Yup. Pretty much what I thought it'd say.

With all the talk about angle of attack, how come launch angle has stayed the same? I thought it would go up a little? Its actually gone down a little.

Steve

Kill slow play. Allow walking. Reduce ineffective golf instruction. Use environmentally friendly course maintenance.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted
2 hours ago, nevets88 said:

With all the talk about angle of attack, how come launch angle has stayed the same? I thought it would go up a little? Its actually gone down a little.

I don't know. Honestly I'm not entirely sure where their data comes from… ShotLink has data on this type of stuff, too.

I was speaking only to the distance numbers, the top-level stuff, when I said it was about what I suspected.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I'm looking at the whole report right now, and the distance jump from 1993 to 2003 is 25 yards. This is page 3 of the report. So basically, this study concludes that since multi-layer balls and better club technology were introduced, driving distance has been pretty steady.

Isn't that entirely meaningless for people who think we should roll back the ball? That chart on page 3 shows that the distance increases for PGA Tour players were before the years this study looked at.

I do note that the chart for amateurs from 1996-on shows only negligible distance increases. That's a pretty big contrast from the jump the professional tours took around the same time.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Administrator
Posted

More than the ball changed between 1993-2003. Plus pros could always have played a "distance ball" back then if they wanted to.

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
19 minutes ago, iacas said:

More than the ball changed between 1993-2003. Plus pros could always have played a "distance ball" back then if they wanted to.

Right. The chart has notations for what was introduced. Broadly, club innovations took place from 1992-2000, and ball innovations from 2000-2003. Distance went up 10-15 yards from 1992-2000, and then another ~10 yards from 2000-2003.

People generally talk about the ball as opposed to clubs, but this study really doesn't prove that distance isn't a problem. That's the point I was trying to make.

For reference, here is that chart:2016DistanceReport.jpg

 

For what it's worth, I'm conflicted about the distance issue. On one hand, more distance is probably bad for the golf industry, given that you need longer courses, which are more expensive (more land, more maintenance). On the other hand, you can have my multi-layer tour ball and oversized driver when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3254 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.