Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3187 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

So I have been playing for a short time, 19 years old now. I had always played once in a while but got addicted in 2014. Goal was to break 90 at the end of the summer, and i did. Following year got a membership and played all the time, goal was to break 80, and i did pretty early, finished the summer around a 7-8 handicap, (didnt keep an index at the time). Kept all my scores from 2016 and signed up for Golf Association of Ontario to play in tournaments this year. Had to input my scores and i am now a 2.6 handicap. When i mean addicted to golf i mean addicted, constantly playing, hitting the range properly to work on things, and always hitting fake balls in my basement and doing something golf related. Although never broke par or shot par yet on 18 holes, but a consistent 73-76 player on 6700-7000 yard course. I am a short golfer, only 5'5. I am wondering if it is necessary for me to get my clubs retro-fitted? I have cobra flyz plus irons, taylor m2 woods. I feel most comfortable w the 9iron length. I feel like my stance over the ball is just where it needs to be to hit a perfect golf shot if that means anything. Thanks, would love to know your guys thoughts:)


Posted

If you are serious about improving your scores and playing the best golf you can, getting fitted will allow you to see the best results. That's the bottom line. It's expensive and time consuming but it's the best way to go about it. 


Posted

I believe you'll find the consensus here to be; get fitted regardless of your ability.    

From the land of perpetual cloudiness.   I'm Denny

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
6 minutes ago, dennyjones said:

I believe you'll find the consensus here to be; get fitted regardless of your ability.    

I don't join in with that consensus.  My uneducated position is that clubs are fitted to be the best they can be for your swing.  If you have bad form, then fitted clubs will reinforce your bad form.  Do not compensate for a poor or inconsistent swing; build a good and consistent swing, THEN get clubs fitted.

12 hours ago, jshanks26 said:

 Goal was to break 90 at the end of the summer, and i did. 

Ok, yeah, go get fitted.


Posted
12 minutes ago, MRR said:

I don't join in with that consensus.  My uneducated position is that clubs are fitted to be the best they can be for your swing.  If you have bad form, then fitted clubs will reinforce your bad form.  Do not compensate for a poor or inconsistent swing; build a good and consistent swing, THEN get clubs fitted.

 

I don't really agree with that.   I got fitted, and it was really all about my height, arm length, swing speed, etc, which are things that are not really going to change much.   It didn't have much to do with [swing] form, except for the measurement of how the club soles itself when striking the ground, and in my case, the adjustment was only 1 degree.   So, "improving my form" isn't going to result in my fitted clubs becoming un-fitted. 

I would say, if you are not average physically, say you are over 6 foot 2 or under 5 foot 6, absolutely get fitted BEFORE you start working on your game, because if you work up a good swing and then get fitted, the fitted clubs will be so far from average, you might well have to adjust your swing to fit the clubs.   Not the other way around as you suggest. 

And besides, a lot of club-fitting places like Golftec will fit you for free if you buy the clubs from them, and they sell the clubs at the standard price.  So it doesn't have to cost you anything much to get fitted. 

 

 

11 hours ago, mistermuhl said:

If you are serious about improving your scores and playing the best golf you can, getting fitted will allow you to see the best results. That's the bottom line. It's expensive and time consuming but it's the best way to go about it. 

It's not expensive at all.  The fitting service I went to (Golftec) will fit you for free if you buy the clubs through them, and they sell the clubs at standard list price.  I got fitted for a set of Ping Irons, and they cost exactly the same as off the rack at any golf store I checked on the internet.  

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Marty2019 said:

I don't really agree with that.   I got fitted, and it was really all about my height, arm length, swing speed, etc, which are things that are not really going to change much.   It didn't have much to do with [swing] form, except for the measurement of how the club soles itself when striking the ground, and in my case, the adjustment was only 1 degree.   So, "improving my form" isn't going to result in my fitted clubs becoming un-fitted. 

I would say, if you are not average physically, say you are over 6 foot 2 or under 5 foot 6, absolutely get fitted BEFORE you start working on your game, because if you work up a good swing and then get fitted, the fitted clubs will be so far from average, you might well have to adjust your swing to fit the clubs.   Not the other way around as you suggest. 

And besides, a lot of club-fitting places like Golftec will fit you for free if you buy the clubs from them, and they sell the clubs at the standard price.  So it doesn't have to cost you anything much to get fitted. 

 

 

The problem with that (and I'm not exactly disagreeing), is that required length is related to lie angle, is related to upper-body lean, etc.  Changes in one can effect one/some/all of the others.  But, there are certainly a few customizations that can be made based purley on height, arm length, and physical ability.  For instance, my 6'0" frame and 6'4" wingspan precluded me from learning with my father's shortened clubs.

 

I suppose I can retract my earlier statement to be "speak with a club fitter and have that person decide if it's time to be fitted".  Just keep in mind that you are really asking that person if he/she wants money.


Posted
54 minutes ago, MRR said:

The problem with that (and I'm not exactly disagreeing), is that required length is related to lie angle, is related to upper-body lean, etc.  Changes in one can effect one/some/all of the others.  But, there are certainly a few customizations that can be made based purley on height, arm length, and physical ability.  For instance, my 6'0" frame and 6'4" wingspan precluded me from learning with my father's shortened clubs.

 

I suppose I can retract my earlier statement to be "speak with a club fitter and have that person decide if it's time to be fitted".  Just keep in mind that you are really asking that person if he/she wants money.

The standard answer you would get would be:

"I think you should have a few lessons first.  We offer lessons here.   Can I sign you up for a few lessons?"  

That's basically what I got with Golftec, but I didn't mind, because it made sense for them to get to know my swing and my capabilities first, plus, I could always use a few lessons.  But yes, they are certainly in the money-making business, and they do try to sell you some lessons. 

I understand what you were saying and I guess it's a chicken-and-egg sort of question.   If I get fitted when I have a bad swing, then will I need to get re-fitted when I get a good swing? Conversely, if I learn a good swing with clubs that do not fit me, then when I get fitted clubs, will I have to re-adjust my swing?   

In my case, the fitting wasn't really very far from off-the-rack, because I'm a very average person: 5 foot 8, 150 pounds, hit my driver about 220 to 240.   I have a pretty slow swing tempo but not slow enough to get those whippy, senior shafts.   All that is really very average, so it probably wasn't even necessary for me to get fitted.  I probably would have been fine with a set of game-improvement irons, and regular flex graphite shafts.  I did take 5 lessons from Golftec before they fitted me, so my instructor did have a pretty good idea of my swing and my capabilities.  

What I liked most about getting fitted, other than the pleasure of getting a new set of irons, was that I knew once and for all that any difficulties I was having did not originate in my equipment.   So I had some peace of mind on that subject. 

As for the original poster who originated this thread, I think pretty strongly that anyone who is 5'-5", and a 2.6 handicap, should definitely get fitted.  That combination of non-standard stature and probably a really good swing to me is the ideal case for getting fitted. 

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
15 hours ago, jshanks26 said:

I am a short golfer, only 5'5. I am wondering if it is necessary for me to get my clubs retro-fitted? I have cobra flyz plus irons, taylor m2 woods. I feel most comfortable w the 9iron length. I feel like my stance over the ball is just where it needs to be to hit a perfect golf shot if that means anything. Thanks, would love to know your guys thoughts:)

I would suggest you get your clubs fit to you ASAP.  You have obviously come a long way in a short time and have made a lot of progress, which is awesome, but to get to the next level a club and ball fitting is important.  You are at a point where it's going to be harder and harder to shave strokes off your handicap. Having equipment dialed in to your swing will give you the best chance to continue to improve.

Good luck and keep playing well.

  • Upvote 1

Bridgestone j40 445 w/ Graphite Design AD DJ-7
Callaway Steelhead Plus 3 wood w/ RCH Pro Series 3.2
Adams Idea Pro hybrids (3 & 4) w/ Aldila VS Proto 
Bridgestone j33 CB (5-PW) w/ original Rifle 5.5
Bridgestone West Coast 52*, j40 satin 56* & 60* w/ DG S-300
Odyssey White Hot XG #9
Bridgestone B330-RX

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Going from breaking 90 to a 2.6 hcp in less than 3 years is pretty impressive.  You are obviously doing something right.

I think it would be beneficial to get fit, but I'd tread lightly before making any drastic changes.  And if your 9 iron feels the best, you should have numbers verifying that your performance is best with that club.  It really is all about the numbers, especially at 2.6.

John

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3187 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • I'm not sure you're calculating the number of strokes you would need to give correctly. The way I figure it, a 6.9 index golfer playing from tees that are rated 70.8/126 would have a course handicap of 6. A 20-index golfer playing from tees that are rated 64/106 would have a course handicap of 11. Therefore, based on the example above, assuming this is the same golf course and these index & slope numbers are based on the different tees, you should only have to give 5 strokes (or one stroke on the five most difficult holes if match play) not 6. Regardless, I get your point...the average golfer has no understanding of how the system works and trying to explain it to people, who haven't bothered to read the documentation provided by either the USGA or the R&A, is hopeless. In any case, I think the WHS as it currently is, does the best job possible of leveling the playing field and I think most golfers (obviously, based on the back & forth on this thread, not all golfers) at least comprehend that.   
    • Day 115 12-5 Skills work tonight. Mostly just trying to be more aware of the shaft and where it's at. Hit foam golf balls. 
    • Day 25 (5 Dec 25) - total rain day, worked on tempo and distance control.  
    • Yes it's true in a large sample like a tournament a bunch of 20 handicaps shouldn't get 13 strokes more than you. One of them will have a day and win. But two on one, the 7 handicap is going to cover those 13 strokes the vast majority of the time. 20 handicaps are shit players. With super high variance and a very asymmetrical distribution of scores. Yes they shoot 85 every once in a while. But they shoot 110 way more often. A 7 handicap's equivalent is shooting 74 every once in a while but... 86 way more often?
    • Hi Jack.  Welcome to The Sand Trap forum.   We're glad you've joined.   There is plenty of information here.   Enjoy!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.