Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3136 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I hit my 1996 WS RM Midsize 7-iron 150 on average, not long but plenty for my age. I'm a mid-handicapper who would like a more forgiving club (plenty of them out there), but all the GI irons I look at also seem to offer higher ball flight (higher launch) and 10-20 more yards (lower lofts) - I don't want either! Does anyone make forgiving irons with "traditional" launch & distances? e.g I like the Titleist AP1 but it's too high/long, and I assume the AP2 isn't much more forgiving than my old Wilsons. I know most people can't imagine why anyone doesn't want more distance, but aside from my driver, I don't care about more distance.

Edited by Midpack
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

The answer to your question is find a shaft that will give you the ball flight you want. You should be able to find something that keeps the ball lower for you.

That said, you're wrong about not wanting higher ball flight and more distance.

  1. Higher ball flight makes it easier to stop the ball on the green. Like I said in another thread you started, the average apex height for PGA Tour players is about 100 feet. High ball flight is a good thing, not a problem.
  2. More distance makes the game easier. I'd much rather have a 9 iron in my hand than a 7 iron. Much easier to hit that 9 iron than the 7 iron.

Edit to add: stop worrying about all this stuff. Clubs are better than they were 20 years ago. If you buy new clubs, you will likely hit the ball straighter and longer, and you seem to think this is a bad thing. It's baffling to me that you would prefer to be worse at golf.

Edited by DeadMan
  • Upvote 1

-- Daniel

In my bag: :callaway: Paradym :callaway: Epic Flash 3.5W (16 degrees)

:callaway: Rogue Pro 3-PW :edel: SMS Wedges - V-Grind (48, 54, 58):edel: Putter

 :aimpoint:

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
45 minutes ago, Midpack said:

I hit my 1996 WS RM Midsize 7-iron 150 on average, not long but plenty for my age. I'm a mid-handicapper who would like a more forgiving club (plenty of them out there), but all the GI irons I look at also seem to offer higher ball flight (higher launch) and 10-20 more yards (lower lofts) - I don't want either! Does anyone make forgiving irons with "traditional" launch & distances? e.g I like the Titleist AP1 but it's too high/long, and I assume the AP2 isn't much more forgiving than my old Wilsons. I know most people can't imagine why anyone doesn't want more distance, but aside from my driver, I don't care about more distance.

First, you can get shafts to affect the ball flight if that's what you want.  Do you really hit your 4-iron too high with an AP1?

Second, AP2s are more forgiving than your 1996 WS RM Midsizes, but not by a whole lot (30 points on the MPF scale).  But they do integrate with the AP1s, so you could get a set of highest iron through, say, 7-iron in AP1 and the rest in AP2 (at the per-iron price, in case that worries you, by the way).

Check out a Titleist fitter or a Titleist Thursday event near you to check these out if that brand is on your mind.

  • Upvote 2

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
1 hour ago, Midpack said:

I hit my 1996 WS RM Midsize 7-iron 150 on average, not long but plenty for my age. I'm a mid-handicapper who would like a more forgiving club (plenty of them out there), but all the GI irons I look at also seem to offer higher ball flight (higher launch) and 10-20 more yards (lower lofts) - I don't want either! Does anyone make forgiving irons with "traditional" launch & distances? e.g I like the Titleist AP1 but it's too high/long, and I assume the AP2 isn't much more forgiving than my old Wilsons. I know most people can't imagine why anyone doesn't want more distance, but aside from my driver, I don't care about more distance.

Basically to create more forgiveness you have to have the weight lower and further away from the face compared to a muscleback or players cavity (which will launch with ball higher).

If you really like the AP1 head I'd look at trying out different shafts, their stock shaft is designed to launch it higher. Other than that a blend of forgiveness and a low/mid launch head would be a Mizuno JPX 900 Tour, Wilson V6 or the TaylorMade 770 irons. You might even like the Hogan Fort Worth irons, can get a set at a great price right now.

  • Upvote 2

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Got it. Not arguing, but to be direct so there's no misunderstanding. 

So if I have the right shafts (honestly I hit very high already, my current iron shafts are supposedly mid weight, mid kick point), I guess height doesn't have to be a problem, I'll just be hitting a 9-iron where I currently use a 7 or 8. And with the added length and the full swing club void inside 150 yards, I'll need four wedges where a PW & SW was all I used to want. 

I'm going to go to a PGA Super Store or Club Champion for a fitting and see what they suggest.

Thanks for your patience all, it's been a shock after a 15 year layoff and seeing how tech has changed (and not) all at once.

Edited by Midpack
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
3 minutes ago, Midpack said:

Got it. Not arguing, but to be direct so there's no misunderstanding. 

So if I have the right shafts (my current irons are supposedly mid weight, mid kick point), I guess height doesn't have to be a problem, I'll just be hitting a 9-iron where I currently use a 7 or 8. And with the added length, I'll need four wedges where a PW & SW was all I used to want. 

Or three wedges, get a GW -- might even come with your set.  And you might not need a 3-iron or 4-iron.  Get 5-P + gap, play a bit, see if you need something between your highest wood and 5-iron.

I've made do without a lob wedge for a while.  I've debated getting one but there are so few times I think I would use it. 

-- Michael | My swing! 

"You think you're Jim Furyk. That's why your phone is never charged." - message from my mother

Driver:  Titleist 915D2.  4-wood:  Titleist 917F2.  Titleist TS2 19 degree hybrid.  Another hybrid in here too.  Irons 5-U, Ping G400.  Wedges negotiable (currently 54 degree Cleveland, 58 degree Titleist) Edel putter. 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I think if you pick up a new set of irons, you will be happy.  The irons I just picked up are the Mizuno JPX 850 Forged.  The lofts on these clubs compared to my Nike Vr Pro Blades are 2-3 degrees less with the Mizunos.  I hit the ball much higher with these clubs though compared to the Nikes, mostly due to the shaft.  I am hitting them much farther, and trust me, its a good problem to have to hit a 9 iron where you used to hit a soft 7.  These are the best irons I think I have ever owned, and I, like you, was hesitant to make the switch, especially with the loft changes, but I am very glad I did now.  I say go for it!!

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

look into the Mizuno HotMetals irons. they are crazy long or the new Callaway Epic or Epic Pro irons are stupid long also

you could even go down the TM M1 or M2 irons are long and forgiving or Even any of the Ping irons will work also

-Good Luck-

That or wait till the718 AP3 releases, I'm sure in august we will be seeing pics of them. and the new TMB 718 irons are more forgiving then the 716 AP2 they are claiming. thats like a MB look with AP1 forgiveness pretty much. 

WITB:
Taylormade M2 - 10.5º 
Taylormade M2 - 3w 15º
Callaway - Apex CF16 9i-3i
Vokey - 46º F Grind
Taylormade MG - 54º, 60º   
Scotty Cameron - Newport M1  - 4.5º
Taylormade - TP5X #7
 


Posted

Being you're in Chicagoland, you might try out Tour Edge irons. TE will be at a demo day this weekend:

-----------------------------------------------------
Demo Day
6/24/2017 
11 AM  to 3 PM ST.      ANDREWS GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB
2241 IL RTE. 59
WEST CHICAGO, IL  60185
(630)231-3160
----------------------------------------

You might try out the CB Pro Tungsten or the EXi irons. The CBs have 4 degree loft increments (4i = 22° ... PW = 46°) and 1/2" shaft increments in the numbered irons. This is about as close to "traditional" you will find, and you can get different shafts to go with it.

On the CBs, the GI head does not launch the ball overly high, so you could still get some lighter weight shafts if you wanted without ballooning the ball.

The EXi has slightly stronger lofts, but has "Traditional shape with less offset for classic playability and performance," as the ad says.

The Tour Edge factory is located in the Chicago suburb of Batavia, and TE clubs have a lifetime guarantee.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3136 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Like others have said, get fitted. Since 2011, I have played some combination of 4W + 7W. I had a Cobra 3H and 4H a couple of years back, and would swap out the 7W for a 3H in cold months (keep out of cold wind, and rough thinner for wayward drives.) The 7W matched up with yardage often with 3H; the current 4H goes almost as long as 7W, but has a lower trajectory. 4H also bumped out 4i in last bag redo; I learned to hit stinger with 4H so that's my driving iron on tight holes with shallow landing area. Again, a side-by-side test will tell you which way to go. If 5W or 3H is meh, keep the 7W. Also, are you looking to replace the 7W with a 5W or 3H, or add a second bridge club (5W or 3H) to your bag?
    • Makes sense and aligns with other literature. Static stretching, especially for longer durations, can impede performance in strength and power activities. I would not want to do like hamstring, quad, and calf stretches then go immediately sprint. To me that sounds like a terrible Idea. I would rather start off walking, then jogging, then running, then ramp up to sprinting.  To me, static stretching isn't even a warmup activity. I like the term warmup; you want to get some exertion going before the activity.      a { text-decoration: none; color: #464feb; } tr th, tr td { border: 1px solid #e6e6e6; } tr th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }
    • Going to Florida for the usual February golf trip, and with our current weather, that date won't get here soon enough. Heading to Augusta GA for the Tuesday Master's practice round, will definitely get some golf in while I'm in the area for a few days. Hope to be able to catch up with @coachjimsc if he's around. Then it's back to Scotland first of July.  Playing 7 new courses, can't wait for that.  Then somewhere after that is the Rhode Island CC Member-Guest and then my normal October golf trip to Myrtle Beach.  
    • It sucks to carry around a lot of water, but ideally it should be way more than we think.  I buy those gallon jugs of water and hang them from my pushcart when I walk. I agree with the electrolytes as well. You don't just sweat out water, but you lose electrolytes as well. 
    • A 2010 study from the Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research compares the effects of different pre-round stretch routines for competitive golfers. Active Dynamic Warm-up: Swing Medicus driver, hit 3 shots each with selected clubs. Passive Static Stretches: Various athletic stretches such as hamstrings, chest stretch and reverse trunk twist. The subjects were collegiate golfers with a HDCP index of 5 or less who engaged regularly in strength and fitness routines. All golfers had two test days: one with active dynamic (AD) warmup, a second with AD followed by static stretches (SS). The results were then compared, within golfers and across golfers. For performance testing after the warmups, golfers hit three driver shots at time 0, 15, 30 and 45 minutes after the warmup. The study shows that static stretch formats produced poorer performance outcomes in the four measures shown in Table 5, which shows Time Zero results. The performance deficits under the PSS protocol decreased over time. Some suggestions on why the passive protocol was tied to lower performance than the active protocol: The passive stretches routine induced excessive range of motion,  basically producing wobbles in the golf swing. Other research indicates that the stretching produced slack in the tendons, lessening the amount of muscle force that could be transferred into the shot. One caveat: The study had good scientific controls and balancing of treatments (test routines). This was, however, an exploratory study and raises as many questions as it answers. Also, although the study was done back in 2010, it is still cited as a primary work in recent reviews. A quick online search did not reveal any follow-ups on the study. For those interested, the study PDF is below. PassiveStretchGOLF.pdf  
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.