Jump to content
IGNORED

scramble vs. best ball


lastings
Note: This thread is 2508 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

On 6/22/2017 at 8:56 PM, Buckeyebowman said:

Look, nothing is ever going to be perfect. Just do the best you can matching up the teams. If somebody bitches a bit too much, just ask them if they want the job since you'd be glad to give it to them. Suddenly, your word will be as the word of God!

Lots of people like to bitch. Almost nobody wants to do the work!

Amen to that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites


On 6/22/2017 at 8:00 AM, lastings said:

ok..   got it.  4-man scramble is easiest.   

But, for various reasons we need to go with 2vs2 teams.   (we're pitting defensive pairs against wing pairs..   and there's already a bet in place about which Defensive pair will go the lowest, and a few other reasons..  )    

if it's two man scrambles, The teams that have the 80's golfers are easily going to win.   

not to disregard your opinions, but really what I am trying to figure out is

 

'how many strokes better should a 2-man scramble team be vs. a 2-man bets ball team of equal skill?'   

 

Just play a scramble as others have said But just for fun, it's a probablility math question.

Say you take two players that average 9 over, perhaps that would be about a 7 HI.  They are playing best ball.

If you simplify the assumptions and assume they only hit pars and bogeys and they are evenly distributed for par 3, 4, and 5 holes.  Since they average 9 over, they will bogey 50% of the holes and par the rest.  There are four possibilities for each hole...

1, Player A par Player B par

2. Player A bogey Player B bogey

3. Player A par Player B bogey

4. Player A bogey Player B par.

So, they are going to get a par 75% of the time instead of 50% or the time.  With these overly simplified assumptions, and if I'm getting this right, they will score a (1-.75) * 18 = 4.5 over on average.

To consider the birdie, eagle, double bogey, triple bogey possibilities and that scores won't be evenly distributed for par 3, 4, and 5 holes, that is so complicated that I think one would be best just accumulating a bunch of data to determine the answer.  I think 4.5 for two players with 7 HI's would be close though.

Edited by No Mulligans
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

On 6/22/2017 at 10:00 AM, lastings said:

ok..   got it.  4-man scramble is easiest.   

But, for various reasons we need to go with 2vs2 teams.   (we're pitting defensive pairs against wing pairs..   and there's already a bet in place about which Defensive pair will go the lowest, and a few other reasons..  )    

if it's two man scrambles, The teams that have the 80's golfers are easily going to win.   

not to disregard your opinions, but really what I am trying to figure out is

 

'how many strokes better should a 2-man scramble team be vs. a 2-man bets ball team of equal skill?'   

 

 

 

There's no way to make a 2-person scramble fair with the handicap spreads and unknowns. And I don't think anyone can give you a meaningful answer re: best ball vs scramble - and you'll have to estimate handicaps for everyone playing even so. Since you insist on 2 person teams, and there's probably no way to normalize best ball vs scramble scores - I'd consider using net best ball. You don't need to read the whole article, you'll get the idea after reading the first couple paragraphs.

http://chance.amstat.org/2015/04/best-ball/

Quote

Generally recreational golf is played in foursomes—four golfers playing 18 holes as a group. The most popular betting game among amateur male foursomes is a net best-ball team game, where the foursome is split into two two-player teams, and the lowest score for a team on a hole is the lowest net score of its team members. This net score is termed the team’s net best-ball. For example, let’s suppose that a team has gross scores of 4 and 5 and corresponding net scores of 3 and 5 (the golfer who got the 4 has a handicap stroke so his net score on the hole is 3). Then the team net best-ball is 3, the lower of the two net scores. If we think of a golfer’s net score on a hole as being a random variable, then a team net best-ball is the minimum order statistic of the two net scores. Typically a match is played over 18 holes on the basis of team net best-ball score by hole (i.e., match play). There are many variations of this game, but its essence is a team net best-ball.

Edited by Midpack
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2508 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-15%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope.
  • Popular Now

  • Posts

    • Its simple, YOU are responsible for reporting YOUR score correctly, at every level of golf.  Do you imagine a top pro would really trust anyone else with his score? Without getting too far from the original post, the Rules have been revised every 4 years for decades.  They're continually evaluated, and most changes are in response to changes within the game.  BTW, if wind blows your ball off the green before you've lifted and replaced it, you play from wherever it ends up.  The TV call ins weren't a rule of golf issue, they were a PGA Tour issue, all in an effort to get the call right.  
    • Someone asked what I propose. I think if the bunker is full of rainwater, you get to drop it with no penalty directly in back of the bunker, so you still have a tricky shot of chipping over the bunker. People are talking about local committees and such which we just don’t have at our level. My league and playing partners gave the free drop with no issue. My original purpose of this post was just to understand what the “real” rule is, and I now know. But now I also want to encourage people to see that many long time golf rules are outdated and illogical, and hopefully encourage people to push for change. They made some changes in the last few years, so I’m hopeful the game I love will improve if enough people speak out. A lot to hope for posting in a little forum I know, but you have to start somewhere.
    • You get a penalty stroke because your local committee didn't do their job, they didn't address the specific conditions using the tools available to them within the Rules.  The rulemakers contemplated just this situation, bunkers being so filled with Temporary Water that they're unplayable.  The only way to address it "fairly" is to allow free relief outside the bunker, and they do NOT want to allow that on an everyday basis.  So they write the rules as it is, and allow the Committee to override the normal rule in the rare instance where the bunker really is full.  That's what your "local league" does, they invoke Model Local Rule F-16, which treats flooded bunkers as both GUR and as General Area.  Relief from GUR in the General Area allows relief in the General Area (i.e. outside the re-defined bunker).  Its quite a logical way to approach a relatively rare situation. Separately, consider your concern about temporary Water in the fairway.  I've seen situations in relatively level fairways where the Nearest Point of Complete Relief  from Temporary Water is 30 or 40 yards away, further from the green, even in the rough.   
    • There you go, @yungbuck6. Your hips aren’t really shifted forward and your head tips back. The camera angle isn’t good so what looks like hip slide could actually just be extension towards the ball.
    • But there's more to weight shift than just where you finish. How your weight transfers throughout the swing matters too.  But you're saying you can see it better than a device that can measure it? Got it.  Yeah I'm good here, good luck to whoever tries to coach you. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...