Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 3087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

I recently bought a used (but near mint) Mizuno S5 (50 degree). It apparently has a mystery shaft. There is no sticker on it. The seller had originally said it was a TT DG S300. It's clearly not as it has a satin/brushed finish and is smooth. I've since inquired and he said he got it from a friend. Long story short, I guess I'll just reshaft it. 

But what shaft? I play regular flex in all of my other clubs. I tend to play this wedge loft as full or 3/4 shots and occasionally chips on longer ones. 

Should I reshaft this in regular with a heavier weight like DG R300 (iron shafts are 85g)? Or should I do S200 or S300? Those seem to be the standard of wedges. 


Posted

Most wedges you buy say "Wedge Flex," which is usually S200 or S300. That's what I'd do. 

I'm curious what the satin one is though. Maybe a KBS C-Taper?

In my bag:

Driver: Titleist TSi3 | 15º 3-Wood: Ping G410 | 17º 2-Hybrid: Ping G410 | 19º 3-Iron: TaylorMade GAPR Lo |4-PW Irons: Nike VR Pro Combo | 54º SW, 60º LW: Titleist Vokey SM8 | Putter: Odyssey Toulon Las Vegas H7

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I initially thought a C-Taper, but I can't be sure. Not 100% of the flex either. Doing the old bend with my hands test, I suppose it feels similar to the S200 in my Vokey. Not sure how to assess the accuracy of my test. 

 

If I for sure knew what shaft it was and the accurate flex, I'd probably just keep it for now. 


Posted
7 hours ago, atomheartmother said:

Should I reshaft this in regular with a heavier weight like DG R300 (iron shafts are 85g)? Or should I do S200 or S300? Those seem to be the standard of wedges. 

It depends on what feels best for you. I got to talk to the Vokey wedge marketing director back in 2016, and asked him about shafts for wedges. He said Bob Vokey recommends having the same shafts in your wedges as your irons, and soft-stepping at least the SW and LW so you get a lighter touch around the greens.

If you go with a little heavier shaft, I would suggest the DG SL (superlight) R300. This comes in at about 104 grams.

In an earlier bag set-up, I had Callaway X20 Tours w/ ProjectX 5.0 shafts (115 grams), and CG14 wedges with S300 120-gram "wedge-flex" shafts.

When I reshafted the X20 Tours with NS Pro 8950 R.flex (97 grams), the following season I had trouble with partial wedge shots. On full wedges I did OK, but was having problems with partials - either leaving them short or airmailing them.

So, I reshafted the CG14s with KBS Tour R.flex (110 grams), and regained control on partial wedges.

Supposed lesson from all this: The weight difference between 97 gram R.flex iron shafts and 120-gram S.flex wedge shafts was just too much. By closing the gap on weight and flex, i regained control of partial wedges. 

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
Posted
7 hours ago, atomheartmother said:

Should I reshaft this in regular with a heavier weight like DG R300 (iron shafts are 85g)? Or should I do S200 or S300? Those seem to be the standard of wedges. 

I generally go with this way of thinking

 

7 hours ago, jamo said:

I'm curious what the satin one is though. Maybe a KBS C-Taper?

Probably is.

  • Upvote 1

Mike McLoughlin

Check out my friends on Evolvr!
Follow The Sand Trap on Twitter!  and on Facebook
Golf Terminology -  Analyzr  -  My FacebookTwitter and Instagram 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
1 hour ago, WUTiger said:

It depends on what feels best for you. I got to talk to the Vokey wedge marketing director back in 2016, and asked him about shafts for wedges. He said Bob Vokey recommends having the same shafts in your wedges as your irons, and soft-stepping at least the SW and LW so you get a lighter touch around the greens.

If you go with a little heavier shaft, I would suggest the DG SL (superlight) R300. This comes in at about 104 grams.

In an earlier bag set-up, I had Callaway X20 Tours w/ ProjectX 5.0 shafts (115 grams), and CG14 wedges with S300 120-gram "wedge-flex" shafts.

When I reshafted the X20 Tours with NS Pro 8950 R.flex (97 grams), the following season I had trouble with partial wedge shots. On full wedges I did OK, but was having problems with partials - either leaving them short or airmailing them.

So, I reshafted the CG14s with KBS Tour R.flex (110 grams), and regained control on partial wedges.

Supposed lesson from all this: The weight difference between 97 gram R.flex iron shafts and 120-gram S.flex wedge shafts was just too much. By closing the gap on weight and flex, i regained control of partial wedges. 

This was my thought as well. Any way of telling if there'd be much of a difference in swing weight between DG vs DG SL (both R300 and same grip)?


Posted

I have Nippon Modus 105 shafts in my irons.  My fitter took the KBS 125 grams wedge shafts out of my PM Grind Callaway wedges and replaced them with the Nippon Modus 105 wedge shafts.

I love them.  There was too much weight difference and now it is seamless.  I hit a lot of full or near full shots with wedges and I noticed a distance loss with the heavier shafts.  Now all is good, feel is great, distance is back.  Definitely a smart move.

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

So, if my irons have 85g shafts (TM proprietary shafts in the Speedblades), which shaft for the wedge? Would the XP95 or 105 be a good fit for a wedge?

Edited by atomheartmother

Posted
15 hours ago, atomheartmother said:

Any way of telling if there'd be much of a difference in swing weight between DG vs DG SL (both R300 and same grip)?

Yes, change in shaft weight would influence swingweight.

DG R300 = 127 grams / DG SL R300 = 104 grams... SL weighs 23 grams less.

  • For every 9 gram decrease in shaft weight, your swingweight goes down 1 point. So, you would have swingweight about 2.5 points lower.
  • You could recapture the swingweight if the clubsmith tip-weighted the shafts with 5 grams. (+2 gram increase in headweight increases swingweight 1 point.)
  • You could also recapture the swingweight if you went with a grip that was 12 grams lighter than your current one. (minus-5 gram change in grip weight increases swingweight +1 point)
7 hours ago, Typhoon92 said:

My fitter took the KBS 125 grams wedge shafts out of my PM Grind Callaway wedges and replaced them with the Nippon Modus 105 wedge shafts.

I love them.  There was too much weight difference and now it is seamless.

Typhoon had the same weight diffential problem which I had mentioned earlier in this thread.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
5 hours ago, atomheartmother said:

So, if my irons have 85g shafts (TM proprietary shafts in the Speedblades), which shaft for the wedge? Would the XP95 or 105 be a good fit for a wedge?

First of all, the XP shafts are a replacement for the Dynalite shafts, which for years were the high-launch cousin of the Dynamic Golds.

The XP95 R300 weighs 93 grams in taper tip and 98 grams in parallel tip. 

To get closer to 85 grams, consider the NS Pro Zelos 8, a new shaft from Nippon. The Z-8 R-flex weighs 84 grams in both taper and parallel tips. (It is a high-launch shaft).

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
4 hours ago, WUTiger said:

Yes, change in shaft weight would influence swingweight.

DG R300 = 127 grams / DG SL R300 = 104 grams... SL weighs 23 grams less.

  • For every 9 gram decrease in shaft weight, your swingweight goes down 1 point. So, you would have swingweight about 2.5 points lower.
  • You could recapture the swingweight if the clubsmith tip-weighted the shafts with 5 grams. (+2 gram increase in headweight increases swingweight 1 point.)
  • You could also recapture the swingweight if you went with a grip that was 12 grams lighter than your current one. (minus-5 gram change in grip weight increases swingweight +1 point)

Typhoon had the same weight diffential problem which I had mentioned earlier in this thread.

Is there anyway to estimate what the swingweight might be with the SL shaft? With a stiff Wedge Flex shaft (DG S200) and a MC+4 grip, the stock swing weight is D4. What would it be with the SL regular shaft (with a Tour Velvet grip if they matters)?


Posted (edited)

Calculations below are estimates. The clubsmith can give a more precise reading by weighing components on a swingweight machine.

1 hour ago, atomheartmother said:

Is there anyway to estimate what the swingweight might be with the SL shaft? With a stiff Wedge Flex shaft (DG S200) and a MC+4 grip, the stock swing weight is D4. What would it be with the SL regular shaft (with a Tour Velvet grip if they matters)?

5 hours ago, WUTiger said:

DG R300 = 127 grams / DG SL R300 = 104 grams... SL weighs 23 grams less.

  • For every 9 gram decrease in shaft weight, your swingweight goes down 1 point. So, you would have swingweight about 2.5 points lower.

 D4 - 2.5 Swingweights = D1.5 with DG SL.

(MC grip only weight = 0.5 grams more than TourVs - so, no difference)

Note: The DG SL weighs 23 grams less than regular Dynamic Gold, BUT the DG SL weighs 19 grams more than your stock iron shafts. So, you would still be facing a weight differential even with DG SL. ... Reconsider the Zelos 8 shaft...

Edited by WUTiger
Added advisory to weigh components.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
44 minutes ago, WUTiger said:

Calculations below are estimates. The clubsmith can give a more precise reading by weighing components on a swingweight machine.

 D4 - 2.5 Swingweights = D1.5 with DG SL.

(MC grip only weight = 0.5 grams more than TourVs - so, no difference)

Note: The DG SL weighs 23 grams less than regular Dynamic Gold, BUT the DG SL weighs 19 grams more than your stock iron shafts. So, you would still be facing a weight differential even with DG SL. ... Reconsider the Zelos 8 shaft...

Is it that simple? The irons are rated at a swing weight of 2.5 despite having lighter shafts. How is that? The grips are the same on both clubs. So, will swinging the wedge feel lighter versus the irons despite having heavier shafts and presumably a heavier head?


Posted
1 hour ago, atomheartmother said:

The irons are rated at a swing weight of 2.5 despite having lighter shafts. How is that?

If you go to a shaft (DG SL) that is 23 grams lighter than stock wedge shaft, the swingweight will decrease from D4 to D1.5. You could recapture the D4 swingweight by either tip-weighting shaft, or going with a lighter grip.

Or, you could leave the swingweight at D1.5 - that is the stock swingweight for your Speedblade irons.

A clubsmith can help you do the specific calculations for whatever shaft/grip combo you end up with.

If you like the Speedblade irons, any chance you could swap out the Miz S5 for a Speedblade AW? Just a thought, a lot less hassle than reshafting Mizuno wedge to fit with TMs.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
7 hours ago, WUTiger said:

If you go to a shaft (DG SL) that is 23 grams lighter than stock wedge shaft, the swingweight will decrease from D4 to D1.5. You could recapture the D4 swingweight by either tip-weighting shaft, or going with a lighter grip.

Or, you could leave the swingweight at D1.5 - that is the stock swingweight for your Speedblade irons.

A clubsmith can help you do the specific calculations for whatever shaft/grip combo you end up with.

If you like the Speedblade irons, any chance you could swap out the Miz S5 for a Speedblade AW? Just a thought, a lot less hassle than reshafting Mizuno wedge to fit with TMs.

Thanks. 

Stock swingweight for the Speedblade irons is 2.5 according to the spec sheet, which I've found odd considering the super light shafts. Will swinging the Mizuno feel lighter than the Speedblades with the SL shaft. I'd like to avoid this. If anything, I'd prefer it to feel the same or a tad heavier.

So given this info, wouldn't those Zelos shafts you mentioned make the Mizuno like a D0 weight if they're 20 grams lighter than even the SL?


Posted (edited)

If you went with the Zelos shaft, you could recapture swingweight by using either a TM Burner Superfast replacement grip (25 grams), or a Golf Pride Tour 25 (also 25 grams). NOTE: both are pricey, about $10 each. (1 SwWt point for 5 grams = +5 SwWt points)
Lightening the grip increases the swingweight - it's a balance thing.

Also: DG S300 = 127 grams / Zelos 8 = 84 grams. So... Z8 would be 43 grams lighter, or about 5 swingweight points lighter.

So... {Zelos = - 5} + {Light grips = +5} = Zero... the shaft change and the grip change cancel each other out. So reshaft/regrip, and go win the club championship!

Edited by WUTiger
Clarification on grip weight dynamics.

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

U might want to have a fitter do this for u.  It's a lot of weight change etc...  I had my fitter do mine so he could properly weight everything...he's a professional, for me to do it right , forget it!  Plus the time involved...

  • Upvote 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
18 minutes ago, Typhoon92 said:

U might want to have a fitter do this for u. It's a lot of weight change etc

Definitely!

Focus, connect and follow through!

  • Completed KBS Education Seminar (online, 2015)
  • GolfWorks Clubmaking AcademyFitting, Assembly & Repair School (2012)

Driver:  :touredge: EXS 10.5°, weights neutral   ||  FWs:  :callaway: Rogue 4W + 7W
Hybrid:  :callaway: Big Bertha OS 4H at 22°  ||  Irons:  :callaway: Mavrik MAX 5i-PW
Wedges:  :callaway: MD3: 48°, 54°... MD4: 58° ||  Putter:image.png.b6c3447dddf0df25e482bf21abf775ae.pngInertial NM SL-583F, 34"  
Ball:  image.png.f0ca9194546a61407ba38502672e5ecf.png QStar Tour - Divide  ||  Bag: :sunmountain: Three 5 stand bag

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3087 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • My next golf trip will probably be a short one, but I’m really looking forward to it. I’m thinking of staying relatively close, picking a spot with a few solid courses and making a long weekend out of it. For me, the best golf trips are about good courses, relaxed vibes, and time away with friends.
    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.