Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
IGNORED

Ball on bed of pine needs, no way to hit w/o it moving


Note: This thread is 3039 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted

Part I: My ball was resting on a bed (6-8 inches deep) of pine needles.  Looked like the groundskeepers just brushed the needles off the cart path so it kind of piled up. My stance would have been on the same bed of pine needles, and there was no way to take a stance without the whole bed of needles moving, including the ball.  I think this just means unplayable, but not sure... whats the ruling?

Part II: I was just playing a solo few holes and not keeping an official score.  So, I just took a stance on the needle nest anyways and the ball did in fact move, and now it was directly over the cart path, albeit about 2 inches off the ground (again, a nest of needles between it and the cart path).  Had my ball originally been there, would I get cart path relief?  I'm good enough where the 2 inches was enough where I had zero concern about my club hitting the concrete path.


  • Administrator
Posted
51 minutes ago, bones75 said:

Part I: My ball was resting on a bed (6-8 inches deep) of pine needles.  Looked like the groundskeepers just brushed the needles off the cart path so it kind of piled up. My stance would have been on the same bed of pine needles, and there was no way to take a stance without the whole bed of needles moving, including the ball.  I think this just means unplayable, but not sure... whats the ruling?

Yeah, you could take the unplayable, because otherwise you'd likely get the penalty for causing the ball to move and would have to replace it. And then you'd still be in the same boat, probably.

51 minutes ago, bones75 said:

Part II: I was just playing a solo few holes and not keeping an official score.  So, I just took a stance on the needle nest anyways and the ball did in fact move, and now it was directly over the cart path, albeit about 2 inches off the ground (again, a nest of needles between it and the cart path).  Had my ball originally been there, would I get cart path relief?  I'm good enough where the 2 inches was enough where I had zero concern about my club hitting the concrete path.

Yeah, as you suspect, your ball isn't in or on the obstruction.

Quote

Interference by an immovable obstruction occurs when a ball lies in or on the obstruction, or when the obstruction interferes with the player's stance or the area of his intended swing.

If you felt that your stance or swing was affected by the cart path, you'd perhaps be entitled to relief (if that belief was reasonable).

But two inches above it, and "zero concern," then no, play it as it lies. Same thing is true if your ball is suspended in a bush above an obstruction, but you're not standing on or going to hit the obstruction with your swing.

  • Like 1
  • Informative 1

Erik J. Barzeski —  I knock a ball. It goes in a gopher hole. 🏌🏼‍♂️
Director of Instruction Golf Evolution • Owner, The Sand Trap .com • AuthorLowest Score Wins
Golf Digest "Best Young Teachers in America" 2016-17 & "Best in State" 2017-20 • WNY Section PGA Teacher of the Year 2019 :edel: :true_linkswear:

Check Out: New Topics | TST Blog | Golf Terms | Instructional Content | Analyzr | LSW | Instructional Droplets

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

If the grounds crew piled the pine needles up with the intent to remove them later it could also be considered ground under repair.... even if it was not marked.  In that case you would be entitled to a free drop. 

  • Thumbs Up 1

:mizuno:  :titleist:  :tmade:

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, todgot said:

If the grounds crew piled the pine needles up with the intent to remove them later it could also be considered ground under repair.... even if it was not marked.  In that case you would be entitled to a free drop. 

I was kind of thinking the same thing. . .

Quote

24/9
Artificially-Surfaced Road or Path
Q.An artificially-surfaced road or path is an obstruction. What constitutes artificial surfacing?
A.A road or path to which any foreign material, e.g., concrete, tar, gravel, wood chips, etc. has been applied is artificially surfaced and thus an obstruction.

But OTOH, if the tree dropped needles as part of the natural process and it somehow piled up like that and natural elements like the wind made it collect, then I would guess either unplayable or play as it lies with some funny and awkward stance. . .

Edited by Lihu

:ping:  :tmade:  :callaway:   :gamegolf:  :titleist:

TM White Smoke Big Fontana; Pro-V1
TM Rac 60 TT WS, MD2 56
Ping i20 irons U-4, CFS300
Callaway XR16 9 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S
Callaway XR16 3W 15 degree Fujikura Speeder 565 S, X2Hot Pro 20 degrees S

"I'm hitting the woods just great, but I'm having a terrible time getting out of them." ~Harry Toscano

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted
On ‎9‎/‎7‎/‎2017 at 6:37 PM, bones75 said:

 Looked like the groundskeepers just brushed the needles off the cart path so it kind of piled up.

The key would be if they planned on removing them later... kind of like leaves.  24/9 would not apply to Part one because it doesn't sound like he was on the cart path... unless his feet were on the path.  But then he could take a drop which might get him out of the pile of pine needles. 

Since this is all just an intellectual exercise because he was playing a round by himself and not keeping score... I would just play the second ball I didn't hit on the cart path. 

:mizuno:  :titleist:  :tmade:

 

 

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

There are many places on a course where you can hit the ball to and it becomes unplayable, without being in a hazard.

If these needles were meant to be removed, you got unlucky. Unless the local rules states anything about being allowed a free drop from such piles, you either gotta try to hit it without it moving, or taking a drop and penalty. Since you can drop within two club lengths, you might end up in a better place with the penalty, than trying to shovel it out of the pines.

Ogio Grom | Callaway X Hot Pro | Callaway X-Utility 3i | Mizuno MX-700 23º | Titleist Vokey SM 52.08, 58.12 | Mizuno MX-700 15º | Titleist 910 D2 9,5º | Scotty Cameron Newport 2 | Titleist Pro V1x and Taylormade Penta | Leupold GX-1

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 3039 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Day 9: 2026.01.11 Hit some balls at the range, concentrating on weight distribution at address, got some on film.
    • Day 468 - 2026-01-11 Loooooong day. Did some work in the patio door (as a mirror) when I got home.
    • I caught a video on this driver; the face tech seems crazy. Looking at the heat map for ball speed, hitting it basically anywhere on the face only loses a few percent ball speed. The surprising and counter intuitive part to me was that for flat faced clubs, ball speed loss is directly proportional to distance loss. For clubs with bulge and roll this is apparently not true. The surprising part of that story being that the max distance potential looks to be a tiny pee sized area for this driver, and I feel in general for drivers. The counter intuitive part being (the myth?) that blade irons have a pee sized sweet spot and missing that tiny spot causes dramatic losses. And that modern drivers, maybe 2017 on, have massive sweet spots and are ultra forgiving. Where in reality, if this heat map data is valid and reliable, it might be a bit of the opposite. This insane tech driver appears to have a pea sized "sweet spot" while Mizuno Pro 241 irons are 28% more forgiving compared to the average of all clubs measured. Not compared to other players irons, compared to all clubs from all categories, players to SGI! The Pro 241 being essentially just a solid chunk of metal with no "tech" at all. Which for me devolves into a whole mess of what is forgiveness really? And in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?  
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜ ⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,667 3/6 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨🟩⬜🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.