Jump to content
IGNORED

10-Year Comparison: Majors & Players Using OWGR SoF Rating


Note: This thread is 2389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

(edited)

Inspired by posts within the 2018 Players Championship topic on the issue of PGA Championship-VS-Players Championship for Strongest Field, I decided to do some research. I went directly to the Official World Golf Ranking site, and then to the Events Page. Once on "Events" , I chose the filter "ALL", then (individually) the last 10 years (2017 back to 2008). Finally, I toggled "SoF" (Strength of Field) until the ranking order showed the strongest rated event at the top, followed by 2nd strongest, then 3rd strongest, etc.

I then went year-by-year (2017, 2016, 2015, etc down to 2008) obtaining the "SoF' ratings for the "Big Five" events -- Masters, US Open, Open Championship, PGA Championship and Players Championship. Once I had that info, I was able to easily compute ten-year averages for each of the five events. The results are presented in the attached image below.

Although based on OWGR data, this may not be the definitive word on what constitutes the "strongest event". You can draw your own conclusions and express them at leisure.

Incidentally, the OWGR site has given the 2018 Players an SoF rating of 871. Unless otherwise, that's a record high for this particular event. The 2018 Masters had an SoF rating of 794.

SoF-BigFive-TenYearComparison.jpg

Edited by Frank-0-Sport
  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Informative 1

Interesting - there are different ways you can look at this. 

Masters has more of an elite field, but less depth I assume would lead to lower SoF rating. 

Another way of looking at it is the strength of the average winner. Over the last 5 years The Open has produced the lowest average ranking (8.2) for the winner , which I think shows that it requires an elite player to win it. That said, it also occasionally produces strange winners, or at least unlikely players in the top 5, but I think there's always a chance of that with a links because there's a little bit more scope for luck. 

 

 


Does this adjust for field size? Because what I'm seeing looks like a total. I'm just curious, I've no idea.

"Witty golf quote."


19 hours ago, Aguirre said:

Does this adjust for field size? Because what I'm seeing looks like a total. I'm just curious, I've no idea.

Could not answer that, as I do not understand all of the aspects of the OWGR system. I can tell you about my decision to use the "SoF" (Strength of Field) stat to do my event comparisons. One of the qualifications for The WGC Bridgestone Invitational is winners of International Federation of Tours events since the previous Bridgestone event. provided that such events have a minimum field strength rating of 115. Unless otherwise, I believe that the "SoF" stat is used for that process. So I adopted "SoF" for my research results here.


Note: This thread is 2389 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Going to a Friendsgiving tomorrow and I am bringing a no-bake cheesecake. I make the crust too big, but I think it turned out good. The filling is really good. 
    • Sure, but how was your alignment? 🙂 Day 53 - 2024-11-22 Mirror work after getting back home. Wife is a superstar for her career/job/whatever.
    • I would say your back nine is the second nine you play that day. It's part of what makes getting some of those holes tougher. Or, if 18 holes are played pretty often, out of A, B, and C, and you often play A and C, A is the front and C is the back, regardless of the order you play them in. That way not birdieing C #7 isn't overcome by birdieing the easier A #7 on a day you played it C-A instead of A-C. But, at the end of the day, nobody really cares except yourself.
    • Day 128: played 9. Nice little even 9, with 2 birdies and 2 bogeys. 
    • @DeadMan, I think your approach makes sense. As @dennyjones said, consistency is the key.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...