-
Topics Being Discussed Right Now on The Sand Trap
-
- 96 replies
- 16,401 views
-
- 931 replies
- 54,097 views
-
- 203 replies
- 22,644 views
-
- 150 replies
- 10,897 views
-
- 47 replies
- 4,131 views
-
-
2019 TST Partners
-
Posts
-
My golf was an evolution the past 3 years but today I feel like I made a revolution. I finally managed to change my transition from shallow to steep to steep to shallow. What lead the change was the backswing that I was working on last winter with my friend (the future pro 🙂 ) and the takeaway that we changed last month - I used to go to a cupped immediately and now I keep a bowed wrist throughout the backswing (or I at least try to). And for the past week I was thinking about how to lead the downswing more with my hips to get them being open on impact, making room and thereby preventing the early extension. While I still didn’t change that part of the swing the thought helped me get to a change where I go to the top of the swing with my hands and then they start “backward” while I start the downswing with my lower body. The result is that my ball flight immediately changed from a fade/slice pattern to a constant draw/hook. I feel like this will really help with my scoring as well as I will be able to better game plan @iacas -
-
By pganapathy · Posted
That may be true, but the average amateur is unlikely to be better than 45% from a 140 yards. And the pro can probably hit the same club or at worst one iron longer from the 200 yards in. Most amateurs are hitting like an 8 iron or so from 140 and the pro can probably manage with a 7 iron from 200. The pro is definitely better with a 7 iron than an amateur with an 8 iron. The reason the pro is better from 140 than 200 is probably because they are hitting a PW rather than say a 7 iron -
By dennyjones · Posted
You see this in other sports. Anybody can coach great talent but it takes a good coach to get the best out of each and every player. -
I may be a bit unfair to these coaches so I’ll admit that up front. But what I tend to believe is that many of these coaches that ‘got their name in the lights’ really lucked into it for the most part. They’ve taught hundreds of people before and nobody knew who they were. Now that definitely doesn’t define their level of quality. Not at all. But when a coach happens to score a player who is super talented and has the ‘it’ factor I can’t help believe that player was going to make waves regardless of his coach. Hank Haney got the majority of his notoriety from coaching Tiger. So did Sean Foley as did McCormick from Spieth. From the years of being on this thread I firmly believe Erik is every bit as good and better (Hank Haney) than these guys. I will agree that McCormick is a good coach as I’ve been told this by respectable people who are in the know. I just don’t think he’s anything so special that Spieth needs to remain with him. At least not now. He needs renovation, not tweaking. I’d never heard of him before Spieth came to the stage and now he’s on commercials and pumps out dvd’s as an all time best instructor. I think the talent of these golfers played a much bigger role in their success than the coaching they received from these guys. Just my opinion.
-
-
TST Blog Entries
-
Blog Entries
-
-
Today's Birthdays
-
-
