Jump to content
Check out the Spin Axis Podcast! ×
Note: This thread is 2755 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Hi everyone,

 

First time poster, long time lurker here.

I am currently gaming Ping I25 in CFS stiff shafts, and I seem to be hitting a high ball. I am a little flippy, but I have been taking lessons to take my game to hopefully single digit from the 14-15 I play at right now.

I am thinking these irons are too high of launch for me and i am losing distance from them.

I hit my 7 iron around 150 but it is a high ball flight and I would like to be able to get some more distance out of my irons.

I did hit some Srixon Z565 and I liked how they felt when I hit them in the bay at Golftown, but they seemed to launch high as well.

Is there a shaft that can help with this high flight that anyone could recommend? I know I have a bit of a swing flaw, but I have tamed it somewhat, and the flight is still high.

Any advise would be appreciated.

 

Thanks, and I look forward to adding my minisscle golf knowledge to this illustrious forum.

Edited by Ohthehumanity

  • Moderator
Posted
12 hours ago, Ohthehumanity said:

Hi everyone,

 

First time poster, long time lurker here.

I am currently gaming Ping I25 in CFS stiff shafts, and I seem to be hitting a high ball. I am a little flippy, but I have been taking lessons to take my game to hopefully single digit from the 14-15 I play at right now.

I am thinking these irons are too high of launch for me and i am losing distance from them.

I hit my 7 iron around 150 but it is a high ball flight and I would like to be able to get some more distance out of my irons.

I did hit some Srixon Z565 and I liked how they felt when I hit them in the bay at Golftown, but they seemed to launch high as well.

Is there a shaft that can help with this high flight that anyone could recommend? I know I have a bit of a swing flaw, but I have tamed it somewhat, and the flight is still high.

Any advise would be appreciated.

 

Thanks, and I look forward to adding my minisscle golf knowledge to this illustrious forum.

The i25 are mid launch irons. It may be your swing and not the clubs. That being said, hitting a nice high 7 iron 150 would be an advantage to hold greens. Have you got any Trackman numbers? That would help. It will tell you launch angle and spin. 

Also, if you are working to reduce flipping, the ball launch angle will reduce and your may get more distance that way. Keeping the i25 will also help you to see if you are improving. They are good irons.

Scott

Titleist, Edel, Scotty Cameron Putter, Snell - AimPoint - Evolvr - MirrorVision

My Swing Thread

boogielicious - Adjective describing the perfect surf wave

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

Like Boogielicious said, great irons...and just about everything else he said is spot on.  I flip a little and as a result my ballflight and launch angle are higher but it's pretty much " drop and stop"...so that's nice.

Since u are taking lessons, talk to your pro about it.  He will probably agree about flipping and work on that.

I have a set of i25 irons and a set of ie-1 irons and my launch, spin and distance are the same so I know it's not the clubs.  Don't change irons...you'd be wasting you money.  Put the cash toward the lessons.

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted (edited)

Thanks for the info guys.

I haven't been on Trackman yet but I am going to go for a complete bag fitting at Modern Golf here in Vancouver in the fall(I'm a an equipment ho) because my irons are off the rack and have not been fitted, and I am interested in seeing what is out there that can help improve my game equipment wise along with my practice, plus I will get the Trackman #s for my current set.

I do agree that the irons are not the problem, but I would like to see what is out there to be able to squeeze as much distance and accuracy as I can out of my equipment, and then let the rest be up to me.

 

Question....Are you guys using the Ping I25 irons with the CFS shafts, or do you play something else? I play the CFS stiff shafts in mine.

 

 

Edited by Ohthehumanity

  • Moderator
Posted

I agree with the others, but I'll just add this: how do you know you're hitting the ball too high? When I started really improving my ballstriking, I started hitting my irons what I thought was really high, but I've since learned they're right where they should be based on launch monitor data.

If you're losing distance it might be from too much spin (ballooning) rather than hitting the ball too high. That's likely a technique issue.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I have the cfs stiff in mine and the Nippon modus 3 105 stiff in my Ie-1 irons.  Both about the same performance.

As for height...all you clubs, no matter if it's a PW or a driver, peak height should be 29-31 yards.

  • Like 1
Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Posted

I hit a high ball and have tried various "low launching " shafts and it doesn't change my ball flight. My ball flight is mostly due to the steep swing I have. Just learn to hit lower shots with ball placement and swing. 

  • Like 1

"My ball is on top of a rock in the hazard, do I get some sort of relief?"

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2755 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    PlayBetter
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • Nah, man. People have been testing clubs like this for decades at this point. Even 35 years. @M2R, are you AskGolfNut? If you're not, you seem to have fully bought into the cult or something. So many links to so many videos… Here's an issue, too: - A drop of 0.06 is a drop with a 90 MPH 7I having a ball speed of 117 and dropping it to 111.6, which is going to be nearly 15 yards, which is far more than what a "3% distance loss" indicates (and is even more than a 4.6% distance loss). - You're okay using a percentage with small numbers and saying "they're close" and "1.3 to 1.24 is only 4.6%," but then you excuse the massive 53% difference that going from 3% to 4.6% represents. That's a hell of an error! - That guy in the Elite video is swinging his 7I at 70 MPH. C'mon. My 5' tall daughter swings hers faster than that.
    • Yea but that is sort of my quandary, I sometimes see posts where people causally say this club is more forgiving, a little more forgiving, less forgiving, ad nauseum. But what the heck are they really quantifying? The proclamation of something as fact is not authoritative, even less so as I don't know what the basis for that statement is. For my entire golfing experience, I thought of forgiveness as how much distance front to back is lost hitting the face in non-optimal locations. Anything right or left is on me and delivery issues. But I also have to clarify that my experience is only with irons, I never got to the point of having any confidence or consistency with anything longer. I feel that is rather the point, as much as possible, to quantify the losses by trying to eliminate all the variables except the one you want to investigate. Or, I feel like we agree. Compared to the variables introduced by a golfer's delivery and the variables introduced by lie conditions, the losses from missing the optimal strike location might be so small as to almost be noise over a larger area than a pea.  In which case it seems that your objection is that the 0-3% area is being depicted as too large. Which I will address below. For statements that is absurd and true 100% sweet spot is tiny for all clubs. You will need to provide some objective data to back that up and also define what true 100% sweet spot is. If you mean the area where there are 0 losses, then yes. While true, I do not feel like a not practical or useful definition for what I would like to know. For strikes on irons away from the optimal location "in measurable and quantifiable results how many yards, or feet, does that translate into?"   In my opinion it ok to be dubious but I feel like we need people attempting this sort of data driven investigation. Even if they are wrong in some things at least they are moving the discussion forward. And he has been changing the maps and the way data is interpreted along the way. So, he admits to some of the ideas he started with as being wrong. It is not like we all have not been in that situation 😄 And in any case to proceed forward I feel will require supporting or refuting data. To which as I stated above, I do not have any experience in drivers so I cannot comment on that. But I would like to comment on irons as far as these heat maps. In a video by Elite Performance Golf Studios - The TRUTH About Forgiveness! Game Improvement vs Blade vs Players Distance SLOW SWING SPEED! and going back to ~12:50 will show the reference data for the Pro 241. I can use that to check AskGolfNut's heat map for the Pro 241: a 16mm heel, 5mm low produced a loss of efficiency from 1.3 down to 1.24 or ~4.6%. Looking at AskGolfNut's heatmap it predicts a loss of 3%. Is that good or bad? I do not know but given the possible variations I am going to say it is ok. That location is very close to where the head map goes to 4%, these are very small numbers, and rounding could be playing some part. But for sure I am going to say it is not absurd. Looking at one data point is absurd, but I am not going to spend time on more because IME people who are interested will do their own research and those not interested cannot be persuaded by any amount of data. However, the overall conclusion that I got from that video was that between the three clubs there is a difference in distance forgiveness, but it is not very much. Without some robot testing or something similar the human element in the testing makes it difficult to say is it 1 yard, or 2, or 3?  
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟨🟩⬜⬜ ⬜🟨⬜⬜🟨 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
    • Wordle 1,668 3/6 🟨🟩🟨🟨⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩 Should have got it in two, but I have music on my brain.
    • Wordle 1,668 2/6* 🟨🟨🟩⬛⬛ 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.