Jump to content
Note: This thread is 2329 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, billchao said:

Really? I didn't know that. I'm not sure I trust it's accuracy. 

GG barely knows where I am sometimes when I use it.

I agree, it doesn't seem to be super accurate. This is also why I wouldn't trust the wind accuracy. I would guess it's going to be accurate to within a few yards/mph most of the time, good enough for the average golfer. Also probably at least as accurate as a person's best guess most of the time. I can see how it could speed things up a little bit. Still wouldn't say it's worth the cost for me.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
19 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

I agree, it doesn't seem to be super accurate. This is also why I wouldn't trust the wind accuracy. I would guess it's going to be accurate to within a few yards/mph most of the time, good enough for the average golfer. Also probably at least as accurate as a person's best guess most of the time. I can see how it could speed things up a little bit. Still wouldn't say it's worth the cost for me.

https://www.quora.com/Can-the-Galaxy-S6-sense-altitude/answer/Christoph-Marschall?share=af4d61bb&srid=pcYX

I did a quick Google search and the results are not promising. Consumer GPS has an altitude accuracy error of +/- 15 meters? That's less useful than guessing.

Also have to consider that a lot of golf courses are lined with trees, so a horizontal satellite read would actually be of the canopy and not ground level. Then you have to think about different trees being different heights and you might as well not bother with the thing at all.

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

(edited)
12 minutes ago, billchao said:

https://www.quora.com/Can-the-Galaxy-S6-sense-altitude/answer/Christoph-Marschall?share=af4d61bb&srid=pcYX

I did a quick Google search and the results are not promising. Consumer GPS has an altitude accuracy error of +/- 15 meters? That's less useful than guessing.

Also have to consider that a lot of golf courses are lined with trees, so a horizontal satellite read would actually be of the canopy and not ground level. Then you have to think about different trees being different heights and you might as well not bother with the thing at all.

Interesting. Seems strange that they would implement a feature with so much margin for error. I had thought that consumer GPS had improved over the years, since the S6 is several years old, but admittedly I don't keep up on that aspect of phone development either.

Edited by Jeremie Boop

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

  • Moderator
2 minutes ago, Jeremie Boop said:

Interesting. Seems strange that they would implement a feature with so much margin for error. I had through that consumer GPS had improved over the years, since the S6 is several years old, but admittedly I don't keep up on that aspect of phone development either.

The S6 is an older phone, but the science behind how satellites triangulate position should be the same.

Even if your phone has a barometer in it, it is going to tell you the altitude where you are, not some spot 150 yards away. The only way I can think of GG doing that is by using the gyroscope in your phone which seems like a clunky process and you might as well just get a rangefinder with slope technology. 

Bill

“By three methods we may learn wisdom: First, by reflection, which is noblest; Second, by imitation, which is easiest; and third by experience, which is the bitterest.” - Confucius

My Swing Thread

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

21 minutes ago, billchao said:

The S6 is an older phone, but the science behind how satellites triangulate position should be the same.

Even if your phone has a barometer in it, it is going to tell you the altitude where you are, not some spot 150 yards away. The only way I can think of GG doing that is by using the gyroscope in your phone which seems like a clunky process and you might as well just get a rangefinder with slope technology. 

I don't think it's the satellites and triangulation that causes the inaccuracy. According to this article it's more of a gps chip issue.

https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/9/25/16362296/gps-accuracy-improving-one-foot-broadcom

Maybe they are banking on that technology to make the new service worthwhile? Also, I thought google earth was able to give you elevation changes if you select two points on the map? If that's the case, then couldn't the GG app do something similar based on your location and the green? Just spitballing here, as we obviously don't know the technology they are using for calculations.

KICK THE FLIP!!

In the bag:
:srixon: Z355

:callaway: XR16 3 Wood
:tmade: Aeroburner 19* 3 hybrid
:ping: I e1 irons 4-PW
:vokey: SM5 50, 60
:wilsonstaff: Harmonized Sole Grind 56 and Windy City Putter

Awards, Achievements, and Accolades

Note: This thread is 2329 days old. We appreciate that you found this thread instead of starting a new one, but if you plan to post here please make sure it's still relevant. If not, please start a new topic. Thank you!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Want to join this community?

    We'd love to have you!

    Sign Up
  • TST Partners

    TourStriker PlaneMate
    Golfer's Journal
    ShotScope
    The Stack System
    FitForGolf
    FlightScope Mevo
    Direct: Mevo, Mevo+, and Pro Package.

    Coupon Codes (save 10-20%): "IACAS" for Mevo/Stack/FitForGolf, "IACASPLUS" for Mevo+/Pro Package, and "THESANDTRAP" for ShotScope. 15% off TourStriker (no code).
  • Posts

    • 70 today. The number looks good but, the course is a par 67 (5,110 yards, 64.3/115.). While the 70 took quite a few good shots to achieve, I am not counting that as shooting my age.
    • Played our town’s executive course this morning. Everything is closing but for now Huron Hills remains open. #13 is shaped like an upside down backwards L (dogleg left). Only 231 yard par 4. Dogleg has a tree guarding the corner and a sand bunker guards the green for those cutting the dogleg. Tiny green. About 10 years ago or more I would try to cut the dogleg. The hole is so short that even if one tangled with the tree or was bunkered, par was likely and birdie was still on the table. Now in my 70’s, I just hit it straight and try to wedge it close for birdie. Today I screwed up and pulled my drive. I wandered around a bit when my ball was not in the bunker. Finally located it on the approach to the green. Almost chipped in and tapped in the 2 inches for birdie. Best unintentional shot of the week. 😲
    • Wordle 1,255 6/6 ⬜⬜⬜⬜🟨 ⬜⬜🟩⬜⬜ ⬜⬜🟩🟨⬜ 🟨🟩🟩🟨⬜ ⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩   Down to the wire, again.
    • Why wouldn't it have? It's not like you were playing it as a 145yd par 5 and made a 2 or something.  Or not like it was playing 50yds to a temporary green or something either. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Welcome to TST! Signing up is free, and you'll see fewer ads and can talk with fellow golf enthusiasts! By using TST, you agree to our Terms of Use, our Privacy Policy, and our Guidelines.

The popup will be closed in 10 seconds...